In an era dominated by digital connectivity, the nuanced interplay between emotional expression and social media addiction has garnered increasing scholarly attention. A groundbreaking study by DE Lițan titled “Emoji or real emotions? The effect of digitalization on the quality of life through social media addiction – a multigroup SEM analysis, moderated by positive and negative affect,” recently published in BMC Psychology, ventures boldly into this intricate territory. The research meticulously dissects how digitalization, particularly habitual social media use, influences individuals’ emotional lives and overall quality of life, employing sophisticated statistical models to unravel these complex relationships.
The ubiquity of digital communication platforms has transformed how emotions are conveyed and experienced. The traditional face-to-face emotional exchange has gradually given way to symbolic communication, where emojis often substitute for genuine emotional expression. Lițan’s study delves into whether this shift towards emoji-based interaction fosters authentic emotional connections or cultivates superficial emotional experiences that might adversely affect well-being. This examination is crucial as it frames emotional expression within the digital context, posing critical questions about the integrity of online emotional communication.
Employing a multigroup Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) framework, the research transcends simple correlational analyses to examine latent constructs representing social media addiction, emotional affect, and quality of life. This analytic approach allows for the simultaneous examination of these variables’ direct and indirect relationships while accounting for moderation effects, specifically the roles of positive and negative affect. The study’s methodological rigor provides a holistic understanding of how emotional dispositions condition the impacts of social media dependence on life satisfaction.
The findings highlight a dual dynamic: social media addiction tends to exert a deleterious effect on quality of life, but this relationship is nuanced by the emotional state of users. Individuals characterized by higher positive affect—those who generally experience more positive emotions—exhibit a different susceptibility to social media’s adverse consequences compared to those with predominant negative affect. This moderation suggests emotional frame colors how digital immersion translates into life satisfaction or dissatisfaction, pointing to affective resilience as a protective factor.
Intriguingly, the study reveals that for users dominated by negative affect, the compulsive use of social media exacerbates feelings of dissatisfaction and emotional fatigue. This subgroup’s quality of life deteriorates more markedly compared to positive-affect counterparts, who demonstrate a somewhat buffered experience. Such differential effects underscore the importance of individual affective profiles in psychological outcomes related to technology use, suggesting personalized interventions might be necessary for digital well-being.
The role of emojis as emotional signifiers emerges as a poignant theme. While emojis can bridge communicative gaps and enrich digital discourse by conveying nuanced emotional cues, their potential to displace ‘real’ emotions raises alarms. The study suggests that overreliance on emojis could cultivate emotional ambiguity or superficiality, impairing genuine empathic exchange and fostering a detachment that undermines emotional authenticity within social networks.
Lițan’s analysis also underscores the reciprocal nature of social media use and emotional states. Social media addiction does not merely result from pre-existing emotional dispositions; it actively shapes them. Prolonged and compulsive engagement with digital platforms can reinforce negative affective states by fostering social comparison, envy, and anxiety, creating a self-perpetuating cycle that erodes emotional and psychological well-being.
The implications extend beyond individual experience to societal levels. As digitalization deepens, the collective quality of life might be imperiled by widespread emotional disconnection disguised as virtual connectivity. The results prompt urgent reflections on how digital culture designs and promotes emotional exchange, challenging technologists and policymakers to foster platforms that enhance authentic emotional engagement rather than superficial affect display.
Moreover, the study aligns with growing literature on digital mental health risks, validating concerns about the psychological costs of unmoderated social media use. However, it advances these dialogues by incorporating affective moderation, thereby refining our understanding of who is most vulnerable and why. These insights carry practical significance for mental health practitioners devising tailored preventive strategies and therapeutic interventions addressing social media-related distress.
The research also provides a methodological contribution by showcasing the potency of multigroup SEM in disentangling complex psychosocial phenomena. Its capacity to parse nuanced interactions among latent variables under differential affective states offers a template for future examinations in digital psychology and behavioral sciences. Researchers now have a robust model to explore how context-specific factors modulate technology’s impact on human well-being.
In conclusion, DE Lițan’s investigation into the interplay between emoji use, emotional authenticity, and social media addiction presents a pivotal inquiry amid contemporary digital transformations. Its nuanced analysis offers compelling evidence that digitalization’s influence on quality of life is intricately mediated by emotional affect, with social media addiction acting as a critical conduit. This research invites broader interdisciplinary collaborations aimed at mitigating digital-related psychosocial challenges and promoting healthier emotional landscapes in an increasingly virtual world.
The findings compel us to reconsider our digital communication norms and emotional literacy in the age of screen-mediated interactions. Understanding when emojis represent genuine emotional resonance or merely mask emptiness will be vital in crafting healthier digital societies. As digital natives navigate this complex emotional terrain, insights from this study provide hope that technological progress and emotional well-being need not be mutually exclusive but can coexist with thoughtful design and awareness.
Ultimately, this study opens new avenues for exploring how emotional expression and digital media use intertwine in shaping subjective well-being. It pushes boundaries by situating emotional affect as a pivotal modulator in the digital addiction-quality of life nexus, underscoring the need for comprehensive approaches to digital mental health that account for individual affective variability. Lițan’s work is a clarion call for nuanced emotions research in our increasingly digitized world.
Subject of Research: The impact of digitalization and social media addiction on quality of life, focusing on the moderation effects of positive and negative emotional affect.
Article Title: Emoji or real emotions? The effect of digitalization on the quality of life through social media addiction – a multigroup SEM analysis, moderated by positive and negative affect.
Article References:
Lițan, DE. Emoji or real emotions? The effect of digitalization on the quality of life through social media addiction – a multigroup SEM analysis, moderated by positive and negative affect. BMC Psychol 13, 1197 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03508-z
Image Credits: AI Generated
