In a groundbreaking study emerging from Saudi Arabia’s healthcare sector, researchers have unveiled compelling empirical evidence highlighting the profound interplay between ethical leadership, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), and organizational excellence. These findings not only enhance the existing body of leadership literature but also underscore how ethical leadership emanates beyond mere compliance, driving discretionary behaviors among employees that ultimately lead to superior organizational outcomes. The novelty of this research lies in its illumination of the partial mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior, suggesting that while such voluntary employee conduct is crucial, it cannot solely account for the mechanism through which ethical leadership catalyzes organizational success.
Ethical leadership, characterized by a leader’s adherence to a strong moral code and a steadfast commitment to fairness, emerges as a critical determinant of organizational excellence. This study corroborates prior assertions by eminent scholars such as Brown et al. (2005) and Kalshoven et al. (2011), situating ethical leadership as a strategic driver that molds both employee conduct and the broader organizational climate. Through fostering a shared vision imbued with integrity, justice, and elevated expectations, ethical leaders cultivate an environment where excellence is not only aspired to but systematically realized. Such environments motivate individuals toward collective organizational goals, mitigating conflicts and enhancing cooperation which is pivotal in complex healthcare settings.
The dynamics between ethical leadership and organizational citizenship behavior represent a cornerstone of the researchers’ inquiry. Rooted in Social Exchange Theory, the study elucidates how fair, transparent, and morally grounded leadership engenders trust and a reciprocal sense of obligation among employees. This psychological exchange prompts staff members to voluntarily exceed their formal role requirements—displays of altruism and conscientiousness that are vital to organizational health but often underappreciated in formal evaluations. The findings resonate with seminal works by Podsakoff et al. (2009) and Neubert and Roberts (2013), reinforcing the premise that the ethical tone at the top decisively shapes a workforce willing to contribute discretionary effort toward organizational goals.
A nuanced aspect of the study lies in its identification of the partial mediating effect of organizational citizenship behavior on the link between ethical leadership and organizational excellence. While OCB certainly transmits some of the impact of ethical leadership, its role is incomplete, suggesting other latent psychological and structural factors operate concurrently or independently. This partial mediation aligns with prior research, such as that of Ishak and Williams (2020), which hinted at the complex web of causality bridging leadership styles and performance outcomes. Recognizing this complexity invites a broader and more integrative approach to dissecting leadership effectiveness, one that transcends singular behavioral explanations.
Expanding on potential mediators, the authors propose alternative psychological constructs that might influence the ethical leadership-excellence relationship. Job satisfaction, for instance, has been shown in related studies to enhance motivation and reduce turnover, serving as a mechanism through which leaders’ ethical conduct translates into tangible performance gains. Similarly, empowerment, which involves granting employees autonomy and authority, offers a parallel pathway by bolstering feelings of ownership and initiative. Commitment, encompassing emotional attachment to the organization, further fortifies this conceptual framework, collectively underscoring a constellation of intertwined factors influencing organizational outcomes in healthcare settings.
The study’s contextual focus on Saudi Arabian healthcare institutions offers intriguing insights into how cultural and systemic nuances might interact with leadership phenomena. In non-Western environments, where organizational dynamics differ markedly from Western counterparts, factors such as organizational culture and leadership empathy emerge as potential moderators strengthening or attenuating ethical leadership’s efficacy. This recognition emphasizes the necessity for future research to adopt culturally sensitive lenses, exploring how deeply rooted social and organizational frameworks mediate the outcomes of leadership initiatives in global healthcare ecosystems.
Leadership ethics is increasingly recognized as a linchpin for sustainable organizational performance, particularly in healthcare, where the stakes encompass patient safety, care quality, and ethical service delivery. The study reinforces that ethical leadership is far more than an aspirational virtue—it functions as a strategic intervention that shapes the micro-level behaviors of employees and macro-level organizational processes. Leaders who model fairness, transparency, and integrity become pivotal architects of organizational culture, embedding values that precipitate excellence in service provision and employee engagement.
Moreover, the study’s methodology, encompassing robust empirical analysis within healthcare institutions, strengthens the reliability of its conclusions. By situating the investigation within real-world organizational settings grappling with multifaceted operational challenges, the research bridges the gap between theory and praxis. It reflects a mature trend in leadership studies that prioritizes empirical validation, reinforcing trust in the causal relationships identified while emphasizing practical relevance for healthcare administrators aiming to foster high performance.
A distinguishing contribution of this work is its focus on the ‘partial mediation’ phenomenon, which challenges simplistic cause-effect assumptions in organizational behavior research. The partial mediation acknowledges that ethical leadership’s impact is multi-faceted and operates through an intricate network of direct and indirect influences. This insight invites practitioners and scholars alike to appreciate the multilayered mechanisms by which leadership translates into measurable excellence—signaling caution against attributing performance outcomes to any singular variable.
Importantly, the research underscores the role of integrity and employee-centeredness as critical dimensions of ethical leadership that catalyze organizational citizenship behaviors. Integrity serves as a touchstone value, inspiring trust and consistency, while a focus on employee needs fosters supportive relationships vital for voluntary, prosocial behaviors. These elements form a behavioral scaffold underpinning cooperation, dedication, and normative commitment within healthcare settings, where ethical dilemmas and pressures abound.
The study also gestures toward future avenues of investigation centered on leadership empathy and organizational culture as moderators. Empathy in leadership—understanding and valuing employee perspectives—can amplify the positive effects of ethical leadership by humanizing managerial action and nurturing relational trust. Likewise, organizational culture functions as a contextual filter through which leadership behaviors are interpreted and enacted, influencing the sustainability and breadth of organizational citizenship behaviors.
By placing the mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior under a microscope, the study contributes to nuanced leadership discourse tailored for healthcare, an arena where voluntary employee initiative can dramatically enhance efficiency, safety, and patient satisfaction. Understanding that OCB is only part of the puzzle enables healthcare leaders to devise multi-pronged strategies that combine ethical leadership with well-calibrated structural and cultural interventions to optimize organizational outcomes.
In conclusion, this study makes a vital contribution to both scholarship and practice by elaborating on the mechanisms through which ethical leadership fosters organizational excellence in healthcare. Its Saudi Arabian context provides valuable cultural insights pertinent to global health systems confronting ethical and operational challenges. By explicating the partial mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior, the research sets the stage for a more sophisticated understanding of leadership impact—one that integrates psychological, cultural, and structural dimensions to inform evidence-based leadership development and organizational transformation.
As healthcare organizations worldwide seek to elevate their performance amidst increasing demand and complexity, insights from this research offer a timely reminder: ethical leadership transcends moral obligation to become a strategic catalyst of excellence. Developing leaders who embody justice, integrity, and employee respect is not merely a compliance exercise but a fundamental business imperative with profound implications for health outcomes, staff morale, and institutional sustainability. This study provides a robust framework for navigating that imperative with empirical clarity and cultural sensitivity.
Subject of Research: Ethical leadership, organizational citizenship behavior, and organizational excellence in healthcare.
Article Title: Ethical leadership and organizational excellence: the mediating role of citizenship behavior in healthcare.
Article References:
Saeed Almanbahi, F., Awad, A., Ghonim, A. et al. Ethical leadership and organizational excellence: the mediating role of citizenship behavior in healthcare. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 12, 1392 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05743-6
Image Credits: AI Generated
