In an era defined by accelerating climate change and expanding human influence on natural ecosystems, unraveling the complex interplay between environmental drivers and biodiversity has never been more critical. A groundbreaking study by Huang, Reich, Wang, and colleagues, published in Nature Communications in 2025, delves deeply into how the simultaneous enrichment of nitrogen and atmospheric carbon dioxide influences biodiversity’s role in ecosystem functioning. Their findings challenge some prevailing assumptions about the benefits of biodiversity under changing global conditions and open new avenues for understanding ecosystem responses under multiple, interacting nutrient and climatic pressures.
For decades, ecologists have recognized biodiversity as a cornerstone of ecosystem resilience and productivity. Diverse plant communities are often more productive, efficient, and stable than monocultures—a phenomenon largely attributed to two well-established mechanisms known as complementarity and selection effects. Complementarity refers to the way different species utilize resources and niches in a way that enhances community-level functioning, while selection effects emphasize the dominance of particularly productive or influential species within a mixture. These mechanisms have been fundamental in explaining why species-rich ecosystems often outperform species-poor ones under natural conditions.
Yet, global changes such as increasing nitrogen deposition and rising CO₂ concentrations complicate this picture. Nitrogen enrichment—a result of fertilizer runoff, fossil fuel combustion, and industrial processes—has been linked to biodiversity loss and altered species interactions. Meanwhile, elevated CO₂ levels, stemming from anthropogenic emissions, affect plant physiology and global carbon cycling. What happens when these two widely pervasive forces act together? Huang et al.’s study responds to this crucial question by deploying sophisticated factorial experiments that simulate simultaneous nitrogen and CO₂ enrichment in grassland communities.
The research centers on partitioning the effects contributing to biodiversity’s influence by disentangling complementarity and selection processes under different environmental treatments. By doing so, the authors unveil how nutrient enrichment and increased carbon availability do not merely add their effects linearly but interact in complex, often counterintuitive ways. The key revelation is that nitrogen and CO₂ enrichment, when combined, reduce the positive impact biodiversity typically has through both complementarity and selection. This finding disrupts the assumption that biodiversity’s enhancement of ecosystem functionality remains robust under future environmental conditions.
What makes this study particularly compelling is the integration of rigorous statistical decomposition and cutting-edge experimental designs. Huang and colleagues cultivated replicated grassland plots with varying levels of species richness, subjecting them to controlled nitrogen and CO₂ treatments both individually and in combination. By closely monitoring biomass production—a proxy for ecosystem productivity—they could trace changes in the underlying mechanisms that facilitate biodiversity’s positive roles. This methodological approach marks a significant advance in ecosystem ecology, bridging observational studies with manipulative experiments to unravel cause-and-effect relationships.
Detailed analysis revealed that nitrogen enrichment alone tends to suppress species diversity by favoring fast-growing, nitrogen-loving species, thus reducing the niche complementarity benefits. Elevated CO₂, by altering photosynthetic rates and water use efficiency, can shift species interactions and competitive balances. When combined, the synergy leads to an overall decline in the magnitude of biodiversity’s influence on ecosystem productivity. Complementarity effects were notably diminished, suggesting that mutualistic or facilitative interactions among plant species weaken, weakening niche partitioning under these environmental regimes.
Selection effects, often dominated by a few highly productive species that thrive under resource-rich scenarios, also became less pronounced with combined enrichment. The dominance of particular species no longer translated to proportionally higher community biomass, hinting at physiological or ecological thresholds being exceeded. These insights point toward fundamental shifts in community assembly rules under anthropogenic environmental changes, where the expected benefits of maintaining or enhancing biodiversity might be compromised.
This research carries profound implications for conservation and ecosystem management amid global change. Many ecosystem services, including carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling, and soil stabilization, hinge on robust biodiversity-driven processes. If nitrogen and CO₂ pollution blunt these effects, ecosystems worldwide could become more vulnerable to disturbances such as droughts, pest outbreaks, and further climatic shifts. The study underscores the need to consider multiple interacting global change drivers simultaneously, rather than in isolation, to accurately predict future ecosystem trajectories.
Moreover, the findings illuminate the potential limitations of current biodiversity conservation strategies that may overlook the modifying influence of global change on ecological mechanisms. Traditional approaches emphasizing species richness alone might insufficiently safeguard ecosystem functionality if key interactions deteriorate under altered nutrient and atmospheric conditions. This calls for integrative management frameworks that incorporate nutrient cycle interventions and carbon management alongside biodiversity preservation.
The authors also highlight the importance of scaling these experimental insights to broader ecosystems and longer timeframes. While grasslands provide valuable model systems, applying similar experimental paradigms to forests, wetlands, and agroecosystems could paint a more comprehensive picture of global biodiversity-function dynamics. Furthermore, exploring how these interactions evolve over multiple growing seasons, including potential feedbacks and acclimation responses, remains an essential frontier for future research.
At the heart of this study lies a nuanced understanding of ecological complexity in the Anthropocene. Ecosystems no longer respond to singular changes but face a suite of converging pressures that reshape fundamental biotic relationships. The revelation that nitrogen and CO₂ enrichment can jointly decrease biodiversity’s positive effects on complementarity and selection underscores the fragile balance within natural communities. It also points to the urgency of mitigating nutrient pollution and controlling carbon emissions to preserve the intricate processes that sustain life-supporting ecosystems.
Intriguingly, this work also opens discussions about evolutionary responses and species adaptation under simultaneous environmental changes. Will certain species evolve traits that allow them to maintain or restore complementarity and selection effects, or will community structures fundamentally change to favor novel assemblages? Answering these questions will require interdisciplinary efforts linking ecology, evolutionary biology, and environmental science.
The detailed factorial experimental approach pioneered by Huang et al. sets a new bar for mechanistic understanding of biodiversity-environment interactions. Their quantitative decomposition techniques can be applied broadly to dissect multifactorial effects in varied ecological contexts. By refining the conceptual framework around complementarity and selection, this research reinvigorates key ecological theories while grounding them firmly within the realities of rapid global change.
In sum, Huang and colleagues illuminate a sobering but necessary perspective: the ecosystem benefits derived from biodiversity are susceptible to complex environmental modulations that can erode their strength. Recognizing and integrating these multidimensional dynamics into conservation policies and sustainability frameworks is paramount. As we continue to grapple with the twin challenges of nitrogen pollution and climate change, this study serves as a clarion call to deepen our ecological understanding and rethink strategies aimed at safeguarding ecosystem resilience for generations to come.
Subject of Research:
The study investigates how simultaneous nitrogen and CO₂ enrichment affects biodiversity’s impact on ecosystem functioning, specifically evaluating effects on complementarity and selection mechanisms in plant communities.
Article Title:
Nitrogen and CO₂ enrichment interact to decrease biodiversity impact on complementarity and selection effects
Article References:
Huang, M., Reich, P.B., Wang, S. et al. Nitrogen and CO₂ enrichment interact to decrease biodiversity impact on complementarity and selection effects. Nat Commun 16, 7445 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62691-0
Image Credits:
AI Generated