In recent years, a disturbing new phenomenon has emerged within the landscape of environmental activism and political extremism: eco-paramilitarism. This term denotes a faction of far-right militantly oriented environmentalists whose ideological roots are entrenched in exclusionary, often ethnonationalist ideas. Unlike traditional environmental groups grounded in conservation or ecological science, eco-paramilitarists couple ecological concerns with militant tactics reminiscent of state security forces. Their rise signals not only a radical redefinition of ecological activism but a potent fusion of old and new extremist frameworks, raising urgent questions about the direction of environmental politics in the twenty-first century.
The genealogy of eco-paramilitarism can be traced to far-right ideological traditions like the völkisch movement, which foregrounds ethnic identity and purity as central to the protection of the land and community. This lineage informs both the motivation and methodology of eco-paramilitary actors, who adopt militaristic structures and strategic doctrines historically associated with authoritarian regimes or paramilitary forces. Their framing of ecological preservation is deeply entwined with a nativist agenda, often scapegoating marginalized groups and advocating exclusionary policies under the guise of environmental stewardship.
One of the more insidious aspects of eco-paramilitarism is how these groups mimic the operational tactics of conventional military and law enforcement agencies. Through adopting paramilitary training, hierarchical command systems, and confronting political dissidents with physical intimidation, eco-paramilitarists blur the lines between partisan activism and organized armed enforcement. This mimetic behavior is not coincidental but rather a strategic adaptation leveraging historical patterns of state violence against perceived enemies, thereby normalizing a climate of fear and repression around social and environmental activism.
Central to understanding the proliferation of eco-paramilitarism is the escalating entanglement between far-right extremists and military institutions. Reports indicate increasing recruitment overlaps and ideological convergences as some military personnel and veterans bring their expertise into these fringe movements. The militarization of environmental dissent thus reflects a broader trend in which state-sanctioned violence serves as a template and sometimes direct support system for unauthorized militant groups. This symbiosis poses a significant challenge to democratic accountability and civil liberties.
Online ecosystems play a crucial role in the radicalization and dissemination strategies of eco-paramilitarists. Platforms that host far-right content, such as forums associated with the manosphere and incel communities, act as incubators for ideologies combining misogyny, ethnonationalism, and apocalyptic environmental narratives. Influencers who promulgate “trad-wife” ideals — glorifying traditional gender roles within a nationalist framework — often subtly advance ideologies aligned with eco-paramilitary objectives. These digital spaces serve as recruiting grounds where younger, impressionable men are exposed to a toxic blend of environmental concern and far-right radicalism, which then morphs into active militancy.
Figures like Andrew Tate, with their brash articulation of masculinity and societal control, exemplify how modern far-right influencers leverage social media algorithms to normalize extremist views. Their content does not explicitly advocate violence but frequently lays ideological groundwork for accepting authoritarian and exclusionary frameworks as solutions to ecological and social crises. Similarly, lifestyle content such as that from Ballerina Farm injects traditionalism into environmental narratives, promoting a sanitized version of militant ideology cloaked in pastoral nostalgia. Together, these cultural vectors create a feedback loop of radicalization, where ideological seeds planted in online communities grow into committed paramilitary activism offline.
What distinguishes eco-paramilitarists from earlier waves of environmental extremism is their hybrid modus operandi. They combine traditional violent tactics — including sabotage, intimidation, and armed confrontation — with efforts to infiltrate and co-opt institutional power. This dual approach facilitates not only direct action but also policy influence, capturing municipal or state-level positions to steer environmental governance through far-right lenses. Such strategic multiplicity complicates efforts to counteract these groups, as their influence permeates both grassroots and official spheres.
The ethical ramifications of this new breed of eco-paramilitarism are profound and multifaceted. The normalization of militarized responses to environmental and social conflict risks entrenched cycles of violence and repression. Civil liberties are imperiled as paramilitary tactics become more commonplace, threatening freedoms of expression, assembly, and dissent. Democracies face mounting pressure to balance security concerns with rights protections amid proliferating extremist violence framed as eco-defense. Moreover, the framing of ecological degradation as a justification for violent exclusion risks exacerbating social divisions at a moment when unified climate action is critical.
This militarization trend is intricately connected to broader global political shifts, notably the rise of populism and nationalist movements worldwide. As climate change intensifies, competition over resources and political power escalates, creating fertile ground for militant factions to legitimize violent tactics as necessary for survival and sovereignty. Consequently, eco-paramilitarism does not exist in isolation but is part of an alarming global pattern where environmental upheaval intersects with extremist nationalism and militarization, destabilizing social orders.
Research into eco-paramilitarism also underscores a dangerous trajectory in the online amplification of extremist content through algorithm-driven platforms. The viral nature of polarizing and radical ideologies magnifies their reach and potency, transforming online subcultures into real-world militias with access to weaponry and institutional leverage. Platform design choices and content moderation policies thus come under scrutiny, as they inadvertently enable the recruitment and coordination of paramilitary actors under the guise of legitimate environmental advocacy or lifestyle promotion.
The paper emphasizes that the rise of eco-paramilitarism should not be viewed solely as a fringe phenomenon but as an emergent security and ethical concern demanding immediate scholarly and policy-oriented attention. Its existence reflects lasting tensions at the intersection of ecology, identity politics, and state violence, necessitating interdisciplinary approaches that understand how militarized far-right environmentalism reshapes contemporary activism and governance landscapes. Without confronting these dynamics, efforts to tackle climate change and social inequality risk cooptation by militant agendas that undermine democratic resilience.
In conclusion, eco-paramilitarism represents an alarming evolution in environmental protest movements, one that combines far-right militaristic strategies, online radicalization, and strategic infiltration of political institutions. The phenomenon illuminates how ecological anxieties can be weaponized within extremist frameworks to justify violence and exclusion, echoing past horrors while forging new threats. As climate crises exacerbate socio-political fragilities, understanding and addressing eco-paramilitarism is crucial to safeguarding democratic principles and fostering truly inclusive environmental stewardship. The challenge ahead is not only to counteract these militias but to rethink how environmental activism and governance can withstand manipulative ideological currents.
Confronting eco-paramilitarism requires comprehensive responses, including robust legal frameworks regulating paramilitary activity, enhanced monitoring of online radicalization pathways, and proactive engagement with at-risk communities, particularly young men vulnerable to far-right recruitment. It necessitates collaboration across sectors—academics, law enforcement, policymakers, and civil society—to devise strategies that de-escalate conflict while protecting civil liberties. Transparency around military linkages and state complicity is paramount to disrupting the feedback loop that empowers eco-paramilitary growth. Ultimately, this multifaceted approach is essential to prevent the militarization of ecological and social dissent from becoming a normalized feature of our political landscape.
The phenomenon also challenges environmental movements to self-reflect on inclusivity and ideological direction. By exposing how far-right extremism exploits genuine environmental concerns, mainstream environmentalism can develop more resilient narratives that reject exclusionary, violent impulses. Reclaiming ecological discourse from militant factions entails fostering pluralistic, justice-oriented activism that centers marginalized voices and promotes sustainable futures without divisive identity politics. Only through such a principled reorientation can the corrosive allure of eco-paramilitarism be diminished.
As the planetary crisis escalates, the intertwining of extreme environmentalism with militarization and far-right ideologies crystallizes as a pressing global issue. The rise of eco-paramilitarism is a stark warning that climate change is not merely an environmental emergency but also a sociopolitical tinderbox. Addressing this interlinked crisis demands foresight, ethical clarity, and concerted mobilization against violent extremism posing as ecological guardianship. The imperative to sustain democratic governance, social cohesion, and ecological flourishing hinges on recognizing and countering these emerging militant currents.
—
Subject of Research: The emergence and development of eco-paramilitarism as a far-right militarized ecological movement in the United States, including its ideological foundations, online radicalization pathways, linkages with military institutions, and ethical implications concerning civil liberties and environmental conflict.
Article Title: The rise of eco-paramilitarism in the United States.
Article References:
Lash, S. The rise of eco-paramilitarism in the United States.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun 12, 1271 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05684-0
Image Credits: AI Generated
