New Path-Based Model for Multi-Modal Argumentation

Researchers Qiuping Zhong and Shiyang Yu have proposed a path-based analytical model for multi-modal argumentation, marking an important step toward a systematic model for analyzing and evaluating arguments. Published as an open-access article in the journal Humanities and Social Sciences Communications on October 30, 2026, the paper addresses a recognized gap in argumentation theory. The manuscript has been shared as an early access article to provide faster access to peer-reviewed, accepted research. It carries a permanent digital object identifier and remains citable, though it is subject to further edits and will be replaced automatically by the final Version of Record with all legal disclaimers applying.

The authors explain that traditional argumentation theory has primarily centered on logical reasoning, often overlooking other modes that also contribute to argumentative practice. In response to these historical limitations, Michael Gilbert’s multi-modal argumentation theory represented an important advancement by integrating these neglected modes into argumentation analysis. Although Gilbert’s perspective accordingly attracted substantial attention within argumentation studies, a systematic model for the analysis and evaluation of multi-modal argumentation has nevertheless remained underdeveloped across the field.

To address this ongoing gap, Zhong and Yu introduce their analytical framework by clarifying the primary objective of argumentative engagement. In their account, they take the goal of argumentation to be the resolution of disagreement through the presentation of arguments. Under this approach, the premises of an argument are specifically intended to justify a conclusion that expresses the arguer’s standpoint.

The model operationalizes this justificatory process by establishing clear conceptual definitions for modes and paths within arguments. The authors treat a mode as a way through which information is expressed. To capture the justificatory connection between premises and the conclusion, they employ the notion of a path. By integrating these elements into a unified structure, the path-based model provides researchers with a foundation for tracing how diverse expressive resources support argumentative standpoints, taking an important step toward the systematic analysis and evaluation of multi-modal argumentation.

Subject of Research: A path-based analytical model for multi-modal argumentation theory

Article Title: An analytical model for multi-modal argumentation

Article References: Zhong, Q., & Yu, S. (2026). An analytical model for multi-modal argumentation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-09447-3

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-026-09447-3

Keywords: argumentation theory, multi-modal argumentation, path-based model, logical reasoning, Michael Gilbert, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, argument analysis, justificatory connection, analytical, model, multi-modal, argumentation