Age-specific time-spent patterns among residents living near gold mine tailings storage facilities in the West Rand, South Africa

In the mining towns scattered across South Africa’s West Rand, a quiet but consequential question sits at the intersection of environmental health and everyday life: how much time do residents actually spend near the vast dumps of crushed rock and fine sand left behind by more than a century of gold mining? A new study published in the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology addresses this question directly, documenting age-specific time-spent patterns among people living close to gold mine tailings storage facilities. The work fills a gap that exposure scientists have long identified in one of the world’s most intensively mined landscapes, where millions of people dwell within sight, and often within walking distance, of enormous engineered mounds of mine waste that have become a permanent feature of the region’s geography and daily experience.

Tailings storage facilities, known in the industry as TSFs, are the embankments and impoundments built to contain the fine-grained residue that remains after gold ore is crushed and processed. On the Witwatersrand, the gold-bearing basin that underlies much of Gauteng Province, these facilities rise as pale, treeless hills that dominate the horizon of townships and informal settlements. Under dry Highveld conditions, particularly during the windy winter months, fine dust can be lifted from tailings surfaces and carried into nearby communities. Residents may inhale respirable dust containing crystalline silica and, in some cases, low concentrations of uranium and other metals associated with gold-bearing ore. Assessing the health risks of such exposure requires not only measurements of dust concentration but also a clear picture of how long, and in what settings, people are actually exposed to whatever the wind carries off the dumps.

That second ingredient is precisely what time-activity data provide, and it is precisely what has been missing for the communities of the West Rand. Exposure assessment in environmental epidemiology depends fundamentally on the product of concentration and duration: a person who spends twelve hours a day outdoors near a dust source faces a very different exposure profile from someone who works in an office across town and sleeps behind closed windows. Yet regulatory models and risk assessments in South Africa, as in many countries, have often relied on generic assumptions imported from international guidelines, typically European or North American time budgets that assume substantial time indoors, in sealed buildings, with mechanical ventilation. Such assumptions map poorly onto communities where many homes are informal structures, where cooking and socializing happen outdoors, where unemployment keeps large numbers of people at home all day, and where children play on unpaved ground close to the tailings themselves.

The research team set out to replace those assumptions with locally observed data. Their study focused on residential communities situated in proximity to tailings storage facilities along the West Rand, the western arm of the Witwatersrand gold field that runs through municipalities such as Merafong and the areas around Randfontein and Westonaria. Participants across a range of age groups were asked to document and recall how they spent their time across a representative day, capturing the categories of activity that exposure scientists use to partition daily life: time indoors at home, time indoors elsewhere such as school or work, time outdoors near the residence, time spent further afield, and time in transit. By collecting this information separately for children of different ages, working-age adults, and older residents, the study was able to construct age-stratified time budgets rather than a single community average.

The age-stratified approach matters because exposure risk is not distributed evenly across a lifetime. Infants and young children breathe more air per unit of body weight than adults, their respiratory tracts are still developing, and their behaviors, crawling on floors, playing in dust, hand-to-mouth contact, can amplify contact with contaminated soil and particulates. School-age children spend large portions of the day in classrooms that may or may not offer protection from outdoor dust, and many walk routes to and from school that pass close to tailings footprints. Adults of working age may be away from the residential exposure zone for much of the day, or, where unemployment is high, may remain in it continuously. Elderly residents, particularly those with pre-existing respiratory or cardiovascular conditions, are among the most vulnerable to particulate pollution yet may spend nearly all of their time within a few hundred meters of home. Without age-specific data, a risk model that averages across these very different patterns will underestimate exposure for some groups and overestimate it for others.

While the detailed numerical results reside in the full publication, the study’s contribution can be understood at two levels. At the level of raw evidence, it provides measured, locally grounded estimates of the hours per day that West Rand residents of different ages spend in locations and microenvironments relevant to tailings-derived dust exposure. At the level of method, it demonstrates a practical protocol for gathering such data in resource-constrained, high-exposure settings, where survey-based recall and structured questionnaires are often the only feasible instruments. Studies of this kind commonly reveal that total time outdoors near the home is substantially higher than default values assumed in international exposure models, particularly for children and for adults who are not formally employed, and that time in enclosed, mechanically ventilated environments is correspondingly lower. The West Rand findings are significant precisely because they anchor risk calculations in the actual rhythms of life in mining-adjacent communities rather than in borrowed assumptions.

The broader context makes the work urgent. The Witwatersrand has produced gold since 1886, and the region’s legacy tailings footprint extends across hundreds of square kilometers, much of it now surrounded or penetrated by residential development that expanded during and after apartheid-era planning, when Black communities were frequently located on marginal land close to mine dumps. Re-mining operations, in which companies reprocess old tailings to extract residual gold, add a contemporary layer of activity: trucks, conveyors, and processing plants that can re-suspend dust from deposits that had partially stabilized. Community organizations and environmental justice groups on the West Rand have for years raised concerns about respiratory illness, silicosis-like symptoms, and the long shadow of mining waste, while regulatory attention to residential proximity has grown through frameworks such as South Africa’s National Environmental Management Act and guidelines addressing buffer distances around tailings facilities. Sound policy in this contested space depends on defensible exposure estimates, and defensible exposure estimates depend on exactly the kind of time-activity data this study supplies.

The findings also speak to an international audience of exposure scientists, because time-activity patterns are among the most context-dependent variables in all of environmental health research. A time budget measured in a North American suburb, with its sealed houses, air conditioning, and car commutes, is simply a different object from one measured in a settlement of informal dwellings where daily life unfolds outdoors. Researchers in the exposure sciences have increasingly recognized that microenvironment models, which calculate total exposure as the sum of concentrations multiplied by time spent in each distinct setting, are only as good as the time-location inputs they receive. Studies from low- and middle-income countries remain underrepresented in this literature relative to the size of the populations potentially affected, which makes locally generated datasets from places like the West Rand valuable well beyond their immediate geography. They offer reference points for other mining-affected regions of southern Africa, and for the wider Global South, where tailings facilities and residential communities frequently coexist.

For residents themselves, the practical significance lies in what follows from measurement. Age-specific time budgets can inform where and when dust-control interventions will deliver the greatest benefit: rehabilitating tailings surfaces with vegetation or covers, adjusting re-mining activities during high-wind seasons, considering buffer zones in land-use planning, and targeting school and household-level measures, such as improved ventilation practices and dust-suppression around play areas, toward the groups whose daily routines place them most directly in the exposure pathway. Public health authorities can use the same data to refine health risk assessments and to prioritize environmental monitoring locations. Community advocates gain a documented, quantified account of how mining infrastructure shapes the daily lives of those living in its shadow, evidence that can carry weight in consultations, licensing processes, and debates over land use.

The study also underscores a deceptively simple point that recurs throughout exposure science: people are not passive receptors of pollution, and the dose they receive reflects the texture of their days. Understanding that texture, hour by hour and age group by age group, is an unglamorous but essential foundation for protecting public health in landscapes shaped by extraction. For the communities of the West Rand, where gold mine waste has been a neighbor for generations, having their actual patterns of movement and activity captured in the peer-reviewed literature represents a step toward risk assessments that see them as they are. It is a reminder that the path from a mine dump to a person’s lungs runs not only through the air, but through the ordinary details of where people live, work, learn, and play, and that measuring those details is where credible environmental health protection begins.

As gold mining continues its long retreat across the Witwatersrand, the waste it leaves behind will outlast the industry itself, and the populations living alongside that waste will continue to grow. Research that documents, with precision, how those populations inhabit their environment converts a legacy of neglect into an evidence base for action. The age-specific time-spent patterns reported for the West Rand provide a template for how such evidence can be gathered and a foundation on which dust management, urban planning, and public health interventions can now be built, in South Africa and in every other region where communities and mine tailings share the same ground.

Subject of Research: Age-specific time-spent patterns among residents living near gold mine tailings storage facilities in the West Rand, South Africa

Article Title: Age-specific time-spent patterns among residents living near gold mine tailings storage facilities in the West Rand, South Africa

Article References: Kalumbi, L. R., Masekameni, M. D., Utembe, W., & Brouwer, D. (2026). Age-specific time-spent patterns among residents living near gold mine tailings storage facilities in the West Rand, South Africa. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-026-00972-6

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1038/s41370-026-00972-6

Keywords: Age-specific, time-spent, patterns, residents, living, near, gold, mine, tailings, storage, facilities, West