US interstate highways need overhaul, says new report

US interstate highways need overhaul; system requires significant commitment for federal and state coordination and funding, says new report

WASHINGTON – The future of the U.S. Interstate Highway System is threatened by a persistent and growing backlog of structural and operational deficiencies and by various looming challenges, such as the progress of automated vehicles, developments in electric vehicles, and vulnerabilities due to climate change. Unless a commitment is made to remedy the system’s deficiencies and prepare for these oncoming challenges, there is a real risk that the nation’s interstates will become increasingly unreliable and congested, far more costly to maintain, less safe, incompatible with evolving technology, and vulnerable to the effects of extreme weather, says a new congressionally mandated report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The report calls for a 20-year “blueprint for action,” which includes creating an “Interstate Highway System Renewal and Modernization Program,” increasing the federal fuel tax to help pay for it, and allowing tolls and per-mile-charges on more interstate routes.

“The interstates have long been the backbone of our country’s transportation system, but most of them have exceeded their design lives and in many places are worn and overused,” said Norman Augustine, former chairman and CEO of Lockheed Martin Corp. and chair of the committee that wrote the report. “These aging interstates are highly congested oftentimes and in need of reconstruction. Furthermore, technological advances are offering new opportunities, but they may also undermine a principal source of income for the interstates, namely the tax on fuel. We recommend a course of action that is aggressive and ambitious, but by no means novel. Essentially, we need a reinvigoration of the federal and state partnership that produced the Interstate Highway System in the first place.”

The Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways was authorized in 1956 and designed to provide safe and efficient transportation across states. The highways serve as both urban commuter and inter-urban travel corridors, integrate the country’s freight system by connecting to major ports and rail hubs, and are critical to the logistics of national defense. Constituting about 1 percent of public road mileage, the interstates carry about one-fourth of the nation’s vehicle miles traveled, including about one-half of the miles traveled by heavy trucks. Moreover, per vehicle mile traveled, interstate highways are the safest roads in the country. Because of their heavy use, however, they still account for more than 5,000 traffic deaths per year. Nevertheless, today they suffer from severe congestion, mainly in urban areas, and in many cases are in need of costly reconstruction.

Looming Challenges

The committee identified a series of challenges – both long-standing and emerging ones – that confront the future of the interstates. These include rebuilding the system’s pavements, bridges, and other aging assets before they become unserviceable and less safe; adding more traffic capacity and demand management capabilities, especially on congested urban segments; ensuring the system’s coverage keeps pace with changes in the location of the country’s population and economic growth; improving safety as traffic volumes increase; adapting to changing vehicle technologies; adopting new user-based funding mechanisms that will generate the needed reinvestment revenues; and incorporating changing climate conditions into planning and design. For example, more than one-third of interstate bridges have been in service for more than 50 years and will require repair and renewal investments that will add significantly to the major outlays required for rebuilding the system’s original pavement foundation. In addition, large metropolitan areas are expected to continue to account for most of the country’s population growth, yet their interstates have little room to expand locally and are likely to require innovative solutions to accommodate growing travel demand.

The committee noted that advances in technology – ranging from more efficient and faster construction methods and more durable materials to electronic tolling and increasingly connected and automated vehicles – could make the rebuilding of the Interstate Highway System and the allocation of its capacity more manageable, while also furthering the continual goal of increasing the system’s capacity and level of safety.

An Investment Imperative

The report’s proposed major upgrade of the Interstate Highway System would require the federal and state governments to coordinate and focus their efforts on a goal similar to the one that motivated the system’s development under the original Interstate Highway System Construction Program. Therefore, the committee recommended that Congress legislate the Interstate Highway System Renewal and Modernization Program (RAMP) to reinforce a partnership where the federal government would provide leadership, vision, and the bulk of the funding, and the states would prioritize and execute projects in their traditional role as owners, builders, and maintainers of the system.

Recent combined state and federal capital spending on the interstates has been approximately $25 billion annually. To renew and modernize these highways over the next 20 years, $45 billion to $70 billion will be required annually, depending on uncertainties, such as the rate of growth of vehicle miles traveled. The committee noted, however, that these estimates may be low, because they do not include funding required to reconfigure and reconstruct many of the interstates’ 15,000 interchanges or make the system more resilient to the effects of climate change.

To raise the additional new revenue needed for system upgrades, the committee recommended increasing the federal fuel tax in the near term and allowing tolls or per-mile charges on interstate users. Lifting the ban on tolling that applies to most general purpose interstate lanes would provide states and metropolitan areas with more options for raising revenue for their share of RAMP investments and for managing the traffic demand on and operations of interstate segments that offer limited opportunity for physical expansion.

Additional Recommendations

Congress should direct the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to establish criteria for “rightsizing” the interstates – which would extend the system’s length and scope of coverage and remediate disruptions caused by highway segments that are viewed as intrusive to local communities. These criteria should be developed in consultation with states, local communities, highway users, and the general public and take into account the needs of growing regions and cities for improved access to the transportation network, as well as the interests of jurisdictions that have been harmed by interstate segments that divide or isolate neighborhoods.

In addition, Congress should direct U.S. DOT and FHWA – working with states, industry, and independent technical experts – to start planning for the transition to more automated and connected vehicle operations, the committee said. This effort should entail the needed research and updates to Interstate Highway System requirements and standards to ensure that basic intelligent transportation system instrumentation is adopted on a consistent and systemwide basis, and that uniformity and other attributes of pavement markings, interchange design, and the like are capable of facilitating eventual interstate use by connected and automated vehicles.

###

The study was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Transportation. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are private, nonprofit institutions that provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions related to science, technology and medicine. They operate under an 1863 congressional charter to the National Academy of Sciences, signed by President Lincoln. For more information, visit http://national-academies.org. A committee roster follows.

Contact:

Jennifer Walsh, Director of Media Relations

Andrew Robinson, Media Relations Assistant

Office of News and Public Information

202-334-2138; e-mail [email protected]

Additional Resources (Live at 11 a.m. EST on Dec. 6):

Full Report

Video

Website with Report Highlights at interstate.trb.org

Social Media:

Follow us on Twitter: @theNASEM and @NASEMTRB

Follow us on Instagram: @the NASEM

Follow us on Facebook: @National Academies

Copies of Renewing the National Commitment to the Interstate Highway System: A Foundation for the Future are available from the National Academies Press on the Internet at http://www.nap.edu or by calling 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242. Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and Public Information (contacts listed above).

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCES, ENGINEERING, AND MEDICINE

Transportation Research Board

Committee for a Study of the Future Interstate Highway System

Norman R. Augustine1,2 (chair)

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (retired)

Lockheed Martin Corp.

Bethesda, Md.

Victoria A. Arroyo

Founding Executive Director

Georgetown Climate Center, and

Assistant Dean of Centers and Institutes

Georgetown University Law Center

Washington, D.C.

Moshe Ben-Akiva

Edmund K. Turner Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and

Director

Intelligent Transportation Systems Lab

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Boston

Ann Drake

Chairman and Former Chief Executive Officer

DSC Logistics

Des Plains, Ill.

Genevieve Giuliano

Professor and Margaret and John Ferraro Chair in Effective Local Government

Sol Price School of Public Policy, and

Director

METRANS

University of Southern California

Los Angeles

Steve Heminger

Executive Director

Metropolitan Transportation Commission

Oakland, Calif.

Chris T. Hendrickson2
Hamerschlag University Professor of Engineering Emeritus, and

Director

Traffic 21 Institute

Carnegie Mellon University

Pittsburgh

Keith L. Killough

Director of Transportation Analysis

Multimodal Planning Division

Arizona Department of Transportation

Phoenix

Adrian K. Lund

Consultant

HITCH42 LLC

Arlington, Va.

Joan McDonald

Principal

JMM Strategic Solutions

Mahopac, N.Y.

Norman Y. Mineta

President and Chief Executive Officer

Mineta & Associates LLC

Edgewater, Md.

Kirk T. Steudle

Senior Vice President

Econolite

Anaheim, Calif.

Michael S. Townes

Consultant

Michael S. Townes, LLC

Las Vegas

C. Michael Walton2
Professor of Civil Engineering and Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering

University of Texas

Austin

STAFF

Monica A. Starnes

Staff Officer

1Member, National Academy of Sciences

2Member, National Academy of Engineering

Media Contact
Jennifer Walsh
[email protected]
202-334-2138
http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=25334

Comments