Understanding 6th-century barbarian social organization & migration through paleogenomics


Credit: Soprintendenza Archeologia, Belle Arti e Paesaggio per la Città Metropolitana di Torino

Applying a comprehensive analysis of genetic, historical, and archeological factors in two 6th-century barbarian cemeteries, researchers have gleaned new insights into a key era known as the Migration Period that laid the foundation for modern European society. Spanning the 4th to 8th centuries, this epoch followed the decline of the Western Roman Empire and was a time of major socioeconomic and cultural transformation in Europe. However, despite more than a century of scholarly work by historians and archaeologists, much about the period still remains unknown or is hotly debated, as reliable written accounts are lacking.

A paper, published today in Nature Communications, seeks to shed new light on how these communities were formed, how people lived, and how they interacted with the local populations they supposedly came to dominate. The international team of geneticists, historians, and archaeologists led by Professor Patrick Geary of the Institute for Advanced Study and Professor Krishna Veeramah of Stony Brook University in the U.S., Professor Johannes Krause of the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany, and Professor David Caramelli of the University of Florence in Italy, have for the first time sequenced the genomes of entire ancient cemeteries–one in Hungary and one in Italy.

This research provides the clearest picture yet of the lives and population movements of communities associated with the Longobards, a barbarian people that ruled most of Italy for more than two hundred years after invading from the Roman Province of Pannonia (modern-day Hungary) in 568 C.E. The team's data from the Hungarian cemetery, Szólád, almost doubles the number of ancient genomes obtained from a single ancient site to date. This in-depth genomic characterization allowed the team to examine the relationship between the genetic background of the community and the archaeological material left behind.

Professor Patrick Geary, of the Institute for Advanced Study, a senior author of the paper said, "Prior to this study, we would not have expected to observe such a strong relationship between genetic background and material culture. This appears to suggest that these particular communities contained a mix of individuals with different genetic backgrounds, that they were aware of these differences, and that it likely influenced their social identity."

A somewhat surprising result was that in both cemeteries, individuals buried with elaborate grave goods, like swords and shields for the men and beaded necklaces and broaches for the women, tended to have a genetic ancestry associated with modern northern and central Europeans today, while grave goods in individuals with more southern European-looking genomes were much less abundant. The individuals with abundant grave goods also tended to consume more protein rich diets.

"What we have presented in this study is a unique cross-discipline framework for the future," added Geary, "uniting experts from different disciplines to reinterpret and reconcile historical, genomic, isotopic, and archaeological evidence to enhance our knowledge of the past, compile new information on how populations move, how culture is transmitted, how to better understand identity, and new ways of understanding the complexity, heterogeneity, and malleability of Europe's population in the past and the present."

The approach also allowed researchers for the first time to reconstruct comprehensive genealogies of the people who were buried in these cemeteries, finding that family relations spanning multiple generations were likely key to establishing these communities. "It looks like both these cemeteries organized themselves around one or two large groups of biologically related kin, with the vast majority of these individuals being men" said Veeramah. "In addition, these related individuals tended to share the northern/central genetic ancestry associated with rich grave goods."

The team concluded that it was unusual to see this genetic ancestry type in Hungary and certainly in Italy in the 6th century. "Though we really need more data, our current results are consistent with the idea of barbarians migrating from north of Danube and east of the Rhine, which would suggest we are observing the invasions previously described by the Romans," said Veeramah. "It is also likely that social organization was based around large high-status male biological kinship groups, and these were key to establishing communities following the migration into Italy."

Veeramah, Caramelli, Krause, and Geary stressed that these results represented mere snapshots of the period and that more work in other cemeteries in other regions is vital for truly understanding this period. "It could be that we look at some new cemeteries 50 km away or that are 100 years older or younger and find very different patterns of social organization. People are complicated now, and they almost certainly were during the Migration Period," said Geary. "There are thousands of medieval cemeteries out there for us to look at. This is hopefully just the beginning of our work."


The international team of 24 scholars joining Geary, Caramelli, Krause, and Veeramah in producing this paper include Carlos Eduardo G. Amorim and Dean Bobo of Stony Brook University; Stefania Vai, Alessandra Modi, and Martina Lari of Università degli Studi di Firenze; Cosimo Posth of the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History and University of Tübingen; István Koncz of Eötvös Loránd University; Susanne Hakenbeck of the University of Cambridge; Maria Cristina La Rocca of Università degli Studi di Padova; Balázs Mende of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences; Tivadar Vida of Eötvös Loránd University and the Hungarian Academy of Sciences; Walter Pohl of Österreichische Akadamie der Wissenschaften; Luisella Pejrani Baricco, Elena Bedini, and Caterina Giostra of Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Paolo Francalacci of Università degli Studi di Sassari; Daniel Winger of Universität Rostock; Uta von Freeden of Deutsches Archäologisches Institut; and Silvia Ghirotto and Guido Barbujani of Università degli Studi di Ferrara.

The idea of creating such an interdisciplinary team originated eight years ago in the course of a faculty seminar at the University of California, Los Angeles, supported by a grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation to transform research in the humanities. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation, the Anneliese Maier Research Award of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, the Max Planck Society, the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research, the Swedish Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, the Gerard B. Lambert Foundation, and the Italian Ministry for University and Research Department of Excellence Program. Additional funding was provided by the Director's Office of the Institute for Advanced Study.

The full paper Understanding 6th-Century Barbarian Social Organization and Migration through Paleogenomics is available at http://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-06024-4 on Nature Communications.

About the Institute

The Institute for Advanced Study is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. The Institute exists to encourage and support curiosity-driven research in the sciences and humanities–the original, often speculative thinking that produces advances in knowledge that change the way we understand the world. Work at the Institute takes place in four Schools: Historical Studies, Mathematics, Natural Sciences, and Social Science. It provides for the mentoring of scholars by a permanent Faculty, and it ensures the freedom to undertake research that will make significant contributions in any of the broad range of fields in the sciences and humanities studied at the Institute.

The Institute, founded in 1930, is a private, independent academic institution located in Princeton, New Jersey. Its more than 8,000 former Members have held positions of intellectual and scientific leadership throughout the academic world. Thirty-three Nobel Laureates and 42 out of 60 Fields Medalists, as well as many winners of the Wolf and MacArthur prizes, have been affiliated with the Institute.

About Stony Brook

Since its founding in 1957, Stony Brook University has grown to become a flagship as one of only four University Center campuses in the State University of New York (SUNY) system with more than 26,000 students and 2,600 faculty members, and 18 NCAA Division I athletic programs. Faculty have earned numerous prestigious awards, including the Nobel Prize, Pulitzer Prize, Indianapolis Prize for animal conservation, Abel Prize and the inaugural Breakthrough Prize in Mathematics. The University offers students an elite education with an outstanding return on investment: U.S. News & World Report ranks Stony Brook among the top 50 public universities in the nation. Its membership in the Association of American Universities (AAU) places Stony Brook among the top 62 research institutions in North America. As part of the management team of Brookhaven National Laboratory, the University joins a prestigious group of universities that have a role in running federal R&D labs. The state, country and world demand ambitious ideas, imaginative solutions and exceptional leadership to forge a better future for all. The students, alumni, researchers and faculty of Stony Brook University are prepared to meet this challenge.

Media Contact

Lee Sandberg
[email protected]

Greg Filiano
[email protected]
(631) 444-9343

Related Journal Article