<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Xanthomonas campestris &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/xanthomonas-campestris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 02:24:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Plant Hormone Turns a Bacterial Pathogen&#8217;s Own Language Against It</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/plant-hormone-turns-a-bacterial-pathogens-own-language-against-it/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristina Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 02:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auxin-induced bacterial communication breakdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial quorum sensing disruption by plant hormones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial virulence factor regulation by plant hormones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black rot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-kingdom communication between plants and bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cytoplasmic pH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSF signaling pathway in bacterial pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efflux pumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of plant hormones on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indole-3-acetic acid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indole-3-acetic acid role in plant immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant hormone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant hormone manipulation in bacterial pathogen communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-bacterial molecular dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-pathogen interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[positive feedback loop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quorum sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of RpfF and RpfC/RpfG in bacterial signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RpfB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tryptophan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xanthomonas campestris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xanthomonas campestris virulence regulation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=233110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research shows that the plant hormone indole-3-acetic acid triggers the degradation of the quorum sensing signal DSF in Xanthomonas campestris through a self-reinforcing biosynthetic loop, revealing a hidden chemical dialogue between crops and pathogen.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the black rot bacterium Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) invades cabbage and its cruciferous relatives, the plant responds by accumulating indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), the most abundant natural auxin. For decades, plant biologists have treated this hormone mainly as a growth regulator and, in the context of disease, as a tool that pathogens exploit to suppress host immunity. A new study published in Stress Biology flips part of that picture on its head. Researchers report that IAA, whether supplied from outside the cell or manufactured inside it, triggers the destruction of the very signal Xcc uses to coordinate its attack, revealing a previously unrecognized molecular dialogue in which a host hormone actively dismantles bacterial communication.</p>
<p>The signal in question is the diffusible signaling factor, or DSF, chemically identified as cis-11-methyl-dodecenoic acid. DSF is the linchpin of quorum sensing in Xcc, the process by which bacterial populations gauge their density and synchronize the production of virulence factors, biofilms, and stress defenses. The molecule is synthesized by the enzyme RpfF through the fatty acid elongation cycle, sensed by the RpfC/RpfG two-component system, and funneled into the global regulator Clp. At late stages of growth, a fatty acyl-CoA ligase called RpfB activates the fatty acid beta-oxidation pathway to degrade DSF, effectively switching the conversation off. Because quorum sensing underpins nearly every aggressive behavior of the pathogen, any manipulation of DSF levels has profound consequences for disease.</p>
<p>To test whether IAA interferes with this system, the team, led by Si-Nan Li and Kai Song of Shanghai Jiao Tong University together with colleagues, grew the wild-type strain XC1 in Xylem-Sucrose medium, a formulation designed to mimic the nutrient environment inside plant xylem. Adding IAA at concentrations of 1 to 100 micromolar left bacterial growth untouched but slashed DSF levels dramatically. At 36 hours post-inoculation, DSF concentrations fell to 11.9, 9.2, and 1.4 percent of control levels at the three doses respectively. The effect held in a mutant that overproduces DSF, confirming that the hormone does not merely slow signal synthesis but actively accelerates its turnover.</p>
<p>Genetic dissection pinpointed RpfB as the indispensable executioner. In a strain lacking rpfB, 100 micromolar IAA failed to reduce DSF at all, while restoring a single chromosomal copy of the gene rescued the hormone&#8217;s effect. Intriguingly, IAA did not boost rpfB transcription, nor did it stimulate purified RpfB enzyme activity in vitro. The hormone was instead working through the cell&#8217;s physiology, and the next clue came from an unexpected quarter: pH.</p>
<p>Left alone in XYS medium, Xcc acidifies its surroundings, with culture pH dropping from 6.75 to 4.40 over 36 hours, and its cytoplasmic pH declining in parallel. IAA reversed this acidification in a dose-dependent manner. At 100 micromolar, the hormone significantly raised both culture and cytoplasmic pH by 24 hours, an effect sustained through 36 hours. This matters because prior work from the same group had shown that elevated cytoplasmic pH enhances RpfB-dependent DSF degradation. IAA, in other words, was not touching the degradation machinery directly; it was remodeling the intracellular environment so that the machinery works faster.</p>
<p>Transcriptome sequencing revealed how the hormone achieves this remodeling, identifying four IAA-regulated gene clusters. The hormone upregulated the atpABCDEFGH operon, encoding the F0F1 ATP synthase, by 2.6- to 5.2-fold. This bifunctional enzyme can run in reverse under acidic stress, hydrolyzing ATP to pump protons out of the cell and defend cytoplasmic pH. IAA also strongly induced hepABCD, an RND-family efflux pump shown previously to generate a proton motive force that raises cytoplasmic pH and stimulates RpfB activity. Digital PCR confirmed the RNA-seq patterns for representative genes, with hepB rising as much as 9.23-fold and atpB 4.96-fold at the highest IAA dose.</p>
<p>The most striking discovery, however, was a self-reinforcing biosynthetic loop. IAA induced the tryptophan synthase gene cluster trpB-A by 21- to 45-fold, driving production of L-tryptophan, the direct precursor of IAA in Xcc. Strains engineered to overexpress trpB-A accumulated more intracellular tryptophan and more IAA, and showed significantly reduced DSF levels, while deleting trpB in a DSF-overproducing background caused DSF to balloon to roughly 672 percent of control. The regulatory logic was completed by TrpI, a transcriptional activator adjacent to the operon: deletion of trpI abolished IAA&#8217;s induction of trpB-A, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays confirmed that TrpI binds the trpB promoter specifically. Yet adding IAA directly to the binding reaction changed nothing, meaning TrpI is essential but is not itself the IAA sensor, and the true receptor remains unidentified.</p>
<p>A fourth cluster added a second, pH-independent route to the same endpoint. IAA repressed iaepABCDE, an RND-family efflux pump the authors named the IAA-associated efflux pump, to as little as 0.06-fold of control levels. Deleting the cluster cut DSF levels by about 62 percent without altering culture or cytoplasmic pH, and the effect vanished in an rpfB mutant, showing that iaepABCDE normally suppresses RpfB-dependent turnover through a mechanism that does not involve proton pumping. Its substrate is still unknown, leaving a tantalizing gap in the pathway.</p>
<p>Critically, the laboratory findings translate to real infection. Using gusA reporter strains, the team detected promoter activity of all four IAA-regulated clusters, trpB-A, atpABCDEFGH, hepRABCD, and iaepABCDE, inside cabbage leaves five days after inoculation, confirming that the pathway operates during actual disease. The authors propose a dual-role model: Xcc exploits IAA to enhance its own virulence traits such as exopolysaccharide production and reactive oxygen species degradation, while the plant simultaneously deploys the hormone to erode quorum sensing and push the pathogen toward a quieter, more persistent lifestyle. The work also revealed synergy between IAA and the defense signal salicylic acid, hinting that multiple hormonal signals co-modulate bacterial behavior in planta. Because the study relied on a defined medium that simplifies the complex host environment, the authors caution that spatiotemporal IAA gradients, immune responses, and microbiome interactions still need validation in living plants, ideally using IAA-homeostasis mutants and real-time DSF reporters. Even so, the identification of a hormone-triggered feedback loop that amplifies its own precursor while dismantling bacterial communication opens a genuinely new front in the arms race between crops and one of their most devastating pathogens, and it suggests that auxin signaling could one day be manipulated to blunt quorum-sensing-dependent diseases across the roughly 400 plant species that Xanthomonas attacks.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> IAA-induced, RpfB-dependent turnover of the DSF quorum sensing signal in the phytopathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> The phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid induces quorum sensing signal DSF turnover via a positive feedback biosynthetic loop in the phytopathogen Xanthomonas campestris</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Li, S.-N., Zhang, M.-L., Cui, Y., Li, L., Thawai, C., Jiang, L., Tian, D.-L., Gu, Y.-C., He, Y.-W., Zhou, L., &amp; Song, K. (2026). The phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid induces quorum sensing signal DSF turnover via a positive feedback biosynthetic loop in the phytopathogen Xanthomonas campestris. <em>Stress Biology, 6</em>(1), Article 22. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-026-00298-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-026-00298-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-026-00298-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44154-026-00298-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Xanthomonas campestris, indole-3-acetic acid, quorum sensing, DSF, RpfB, tryptophan, cytoplasmic pH, efflux pumps, plant hormone, black rot, plant-pathogen interaction, positive feedback loop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">233110</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Viruses Armed With Calcium Shield Crops From Fire Blight and Black Rot</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/viruses-armed-with-calcium-shield-crops-from-fire-blight-and-black-rot/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addressing antibiotic resistance in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternatives to chemical pesticides in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteriophage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteriophage stability on plant surfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biocontrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biocontrol of fire blight and black rot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biopesticide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black rot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcium carbonate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combating copper resistance in plant pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development of field-ready phage sprays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly crop disease management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erwinia amylovora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire blight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial biotechnology in plant disease control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phage stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phage survival under sunlight and storage conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phage-based biocontrol for crop diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant pathology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reducing pesticide environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UV photoprotection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses targeting plant pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xanthomonas campestris]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=195231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have designed a bacteriophage-based biocontrol product with room-temperature stability and calcium carbonate photoprotection that sustains viral activity on pear and cabbage surfaces against the fire blight and black rot pathogens.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bacteriophages, the viruses that hunt and kill bacteria, are edging closer to becoming practical weapons against two of the world&#8217;s most damaging crop diseases. In a new study published in Microbial Biotechnology, researchers report the systematic design of a phage-based biocontrol product that targets the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora and the black rot pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris, two bacteria ranked among the ten most significant plant pathogens worldwide. The work tackles the gap that has long kept laboratory phage successes from translating into field-ready sprays: survival of the viruses on plant surfaces under real sunlight, and stability during storage long enough for commercial distribution.</p>
<p>The case for alternatives to conventional treatments is pressing. Chemical pesticides, although effective and easy to manufacture, contaminate soil, leach toxic compounds into groundwater and disrupt beneficial microbial communities that naturally suppress pathogens. Copper compounds, a mainstay of orchard sprays, accumulate in the environment, and copper resistance in target bacteria has steadily eroded their value. Antibiotics have fared little better: the global rise of antibiotic resistance and risks to human health have limited agricultural use, and resistance development in phytopathogens undermines long-term efficacy. Concerns extend to pollinators as well, since pesticide exposure and habitat contamination threaten the honeybees on which fruit, nut and oilseed yields depend. Within the European Union, most conventional pesticides and antibiotics are progressively being banned, leaving farmers in urgent need of new tools.</p>
<p>Phages offer an attractive answer because of their exquisite host specificity. They infect and lyse their target bacteria without touching beneficial microorganisms, plants, animals or humans, so applications are not expected to disturb plant or soil microbiota. They also replicate only when sufficient susceptible hosts are present, naturally declining once pathogen populations fall. The team behind the new work built on three virulent phages previously isolated from urban wastewater: ɸEF1 and ɸEF2, which attack E. amylovora, and ɸXF1, which attacks X. campestris. Genomic analysis confirmed that all three follow a strictly lytic cycle, producing transparent plaques and complete host lysis in liquid culture within five to eight hours.</p>
<p>The first task was optimizing infection dynamics. Testing multiplicities of infection (MOI) ranging from 0.01 to 10, the researchers found that higher MOIs offered no significant improvement in pathogen reduction. A MOI of 1 was selected because it produced greater reductions in bacterial density than 0.1 for all three phages. From a manufacturing perspective this matters enormously: low MOIs allow a single concentrated phage stock to be diluted into large-volume formulations, whereas MOIs of 100 or 1000 would require titers of 10^10 to 10^11 plaque-forming units per milliliter, inflating production complexity and cost. Host density also influenced performance, with better bacterial reductions at 10^6 colony-forming units per milliliter than at 10^7. Under the optimized conditions, ɸXF1 delivered the strongest lysis, a 5.5 log10 reduction in host density within four hours, while ɸEF1 and ɸEF2 achieved reductions of 3.5 and 3.8 log10 respectively, with their combined use potentially acting synergistically.</p>
<p>Shelf life was the next hurdle. The phages were stored at 4°C, 20°C and 37°C for six months and enumerated at regular intervals. Both ɸEF1 and ɸEF2 remained stable for the full 180 days at 4°C, with losses close to or below 1 log10 unit, and performed acceptably at 20°C with roughly 2 log10 reductions. At 37°C, however, both declined sharply, falling 8 log10 units by day 150. Phage ɸXF1 was somewhat more fragile, losing about 2 log10 units at 4°C and 3 log10 at 20°C over six months, and becoming undetectable within 28 days at 37°C. Notably, the study is among the first to demonstrate long-term stability of phage formulations at room temperature, a finding with substantial logistical value because it could eliminate the need for costly cold chains or freeze-drying, both of which complicate distribution and can reduce infectious particle counts.</p>
<p>Acidity proved a hard limit. All three phages were inactivated within a single day at pH 3, whereas at neutral and alkaline pH stability rose markedly. ɸEF2 was the sturdiest, losing less than about 1 log10 unit at both pH 7 and pH 9 over six months, while ɸEF1 declined by 1.2 log10 units and ɸXF1 dropped 2.0 log10 at pH 7 and 3.8 log10 at pH 9. These results directly inform formulation choices, since any carrier solution must avoid acidic conditions that would rapidly destroy infectivity before the product even reaches the crop.</p>
<p>The decisive challenge, however, was sunlight. Ultraviolet radiation induces DNA lesions that block phage replication and transcription, and daylight inactivation is widely regarded as the primary obstacle to phage biocontrol in the field. The researchers therefore screened three photoprotective agents already used in agriculture: aminic acid, an acidic protein hydrolysate; Amino 22%, a commercial amino acid-based biostimulant; and Vegepron Sun, a calcium carbonate (CaCO3) foliar fertilizer that forms a reflective film on fruit and leaves. Suspensions were exposed outdoors to full natural sunlight for six hours, with solar irradiance peaking above 700 watts per square meter around midday. Aminic acid failed outright: even after neutralization, phages declined within two hours and became undetectable by four, performing worse than unprotected controls. In contrast, 24 percent CaCO3 kept average reductions to just 0.73 log10 units after six hours, with AA22 providing intermediate protection.</p>
<p>Controlled irradiation under a germicidal 253.7-nanometer UV lamp confirmed the hierarchy. Unprotected phages fell below detection within one hour, but both photoprotectants extended recoverable infectivity to eight hours, and CaCO3 consistently outperformed AA22. With 24 percent CaCO3, all three phages lost only 1.2 to 1.4 log10 units after eight hours of irradiation, compared with 2 to 2.5 log10 at the 12 percent concentration, establishing that the higher formulation offered superior and more consistent shielding. The team then moved to real crop surfaces, inoculating detached pear fruits and cabbage leaves and exposing them to sunlight. Because phage recovery from plant tissue is notoriously inefficient, the group first optimized extraction, finding that homogenization in a 10 percent beef extract solution with a Stomacher blender recovered roughly 76.7 percent of inoculated phages, versus a mere 0.79 percent with phage buffer. On the plants, 24 percent CaCO3 again proved decisive: after six hours of sun exposure, ɸEF1 titers on pears averaged 1.8 log10 units higher with the additive than without, ɸEF2 gained 2.5 log10 units, and ɸXF1 on cabbage leaves showed gains of up to 1.9 log10 units at early time points, while the unprotected suspension dropped below detection within four hours.</p>
<p>The authors argue that these results, combined with the regulatory status of the additives, clear a practical path to commercialization. Because CaCO3 and AA22 are already approved agricultural biostimulants, incorporating them into phage products should face fewer regulatory barriers than novel excipients. Recommended deployment would favor evening spraying to maximize the protective window, with reapplication every five to seven days during high-risk periods or after heavy rainfall, all compatible with Integrated Pest Management frameworks. Only a handful of commercial phage products currently exist for plant disease, including Erwiphage PLUS against fire blight and Biolyse against Xanthomonas in Europe, and Ecofire and AgriPhage elsewhere. By demonstrating room-temperature shelf stability, defined infection parameters and sunlight-protected persistence on crops, the study provides concrete formulation guidance for expanding that market, in line with European Green Deal goals for residue-free food. The researchers caution that greenhouse experiments and multi-season field trials remain necessary to validate efficacy across diverse climates, but the blueprint for a viable phage biopesticide now looks considerably more complete.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Design of a bacteriophage-based biocontrol product against the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora and the black rot pathogen Xanthomonas campestris</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Design of a Bacteriophage‐Based Product for Biocontrol of Fire Blight and Black Rot</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Vique, G., Blanco‐Picazo, P., Trenchs, A., Ramos‐Barbero, M. D., Isern, M., Quirós, P., Atares, S., Salaet, I., Sala‐Comorera, L., Rodríguez‐Rubio, L., &amp; Muniesa, M. (2026). Design of a Bacteriophage‐Based Product for Biocontrol of Fire Blight and Black Rot. <em>Microbial Biotechnology, 19</em>(9), Article e70436. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.70436" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.70436</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.70436" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1111/1751-7915.70436</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> bacteriophage, biocontrol, fire blight, black rot, Erwinia amylovora, Xanthomonas campestris, calcium carbonate, UV photoprotection, plant pathology, biopesticide, phage stability, sustainable agriculture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">195231</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
