<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>warm basal thermal regimes &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/warm-basal-thermal-regimes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 11:48:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>What Controls Global Glacial Erosion Rates?</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/what-controls-global-glacial-erosion-rates/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SCIENMAG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 11:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bedrock erosion dating techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary glacial erosion measurements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital elevation models in glaciology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glacial erosion rates synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glacier velocity and thickness estimation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaciological variables assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holocene glacial erosion data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-year average erosion analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proglacial sediment analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randolph Glacier Inventory data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment discharge measurement methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warm basal thermal regimes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/what-controls-global-glacial-erosion-rates/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The text you have provided is a detailed methodological description about the synthesis of glacial erosion rates from multiple published studies prior to January 2021. Here&#8217;s a concise summary and key points from the described methodology and data processing: Summary of Synthesis of Glacial Erosion Rates and Related Data: 1. Data Collection and Scope: Glacial [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The text you have provided is a detailed methodological description about the synthesis of glacial erosion rates from multiple published studies prior to January 2021. Here&#8217;s a concise summary and key points from the described methodology and data processing:</p>
<hr />
<h3>Summary of Synthesis of Glacial Erosion Rates and Related Data:</h3>
<p><strong>1. Data Collection and Scope:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>
Glacial erosion rates were synthesized from published data primarily measuring the removal of material from glacier beds (164 contemporary rates + 17 Holocene rates).
</li>
<li>
Only data from <strong>topographically constrained extant glaciers and ice caps</strong> with dominantly warm basal thermal regimes were included.
</li>
<li>
Measurements come from four methods:</p>
<ul>
<li>Sediment discharge from meltwater streams.</li>
<li>Bulk sediment in proglacial areas.</li>
<li>Bedrock erosion via terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide dating.</li>
<li>Instrumental measurements from extant glaciers.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
Multiple measurements from the same glacier were included to reflect the range of observed erosion rates.
</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<p><strong>2. Glaciological Variables:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Variables like ice mass length, area, median elevation, surface slope, glacier termination type, form, surge behaviour were sourced primarily from the Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI25).</li>
<li>Missing variables were supplemented by digital elevation models (SRTM and ASTER GDEM).</li>
<li>Surface and sliding velocities and ice thicknesses were included where available, preferring multi-year averages temporally matching erosion measurements.</li>
<li>Where velocity/ice thickness not available from original sources, they were estimated from published velocity datasets or ice thickness models.</li>
<li>Sliding velocity (U_sliding) was estimated from surface speed (U_surface) and local surface slope (β) using a constrained ratio and linear interpolation.</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<p><strong>3. Geological Variables:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Glacier bed lithology was extracted from the Global Lithological Map (GLiM) using glacier centroids.</li>
<li>Lithologies categorized into:
<ul>
<li>Crystalline (igneous and metamorphic)  </li>
<li>Sedimentary (carbonates, sandstones, shales)  </li>
<li>Volcanics (volcanics, basalts)  </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Seismicity approximated using PGA (Peak Ground Acceleration) from the Global Seismic Hazard Assessment dataset, filling gaps for polar regions where needed.</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<p><strong>4. Climatic Variables:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Mean Annual Air Temperature (MAAT) and Mean Annual Precipitation (MAP) were extracted from the CHELSA climate dataset for modern erosion rates and from PaleoClim for Holocene rates, using glacier centroids.</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<p><strong>5. Dataset and Analysis Limitations:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Methods differ in the processes they capture, potentially biasing erosion rates (e.g., instrumental measurements focus on abrasion only).</li>
<li>Bulk sediment and sediment discharge methods might underestimate or misattribute erosion due to sediment storage effects or partial sediment load measurement.</li>
<li>Timescale dependence is mitigated by focusing on short-term (~350 years or less) erosion rates; no significant correlation between rate and timespan was observed.</li>
<li>Temporal mismatches between velocity and erosion rate measurements remain a limitation, though methods to mitigate this were employed.</li>
<li>Velocity data were selected preferentially to match erosion measurement periods, with sensitivity analyses confirming this approach improved model performance.</li>
<li>Surge-type glaciers were underrepresented (&lt;15% of data), which may limit extrapolation for those glacier types.</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<h3>Additional Notes:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Velocity estimation: sliding velocity is a proportion of surface speed scaled by slope β constrained between 0.001 and 0.1, interpolated linearly.</li>
<li>Velocity variability and surge behaviour introduce further complexities.</li>
<li>Data synthesis incorporated multiple data quality and spatial resolution sources to achieve as comprehensive and consistent a dataset as possible.</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<h3>Application of This Dataset:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Enables near-global estimation of glacial erosion rates.</li>
<li>Can be used to investigate relationships between glacial erosion and glaciological, geological, climatic, and seismic variables.</li>
<li>Provides a basis for &#8220;velocity–erosion&#8221; rules and erosion scaling models relevant to Earth surface processes, landscape evolution, and glaciology.</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<p>If you have any specific questions regarding this synthesis, such as the methods for velocity estimation, geological categorizations, or limitations on data interpretation, please let me know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">63725</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
