<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>vesicle biogenesis &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/vesicle-biogenesis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 12:43:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Tiny Vesicles Reveal How Toxoplasma gondii Quietly Rewires Its Host</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/tiny-vesicles-reveal-how-toxoplasma-gondii-quietly-rewires-its-host/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristina Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 12:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biomarkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVs as communication tools in pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exosomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extracellular vesicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extracellular vesicles in parasitic infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[host-parasite interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunomodulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intracellular parasite survival tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microRNAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular conversation in parasitic infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasite secretion mechanisms beyond rhoptries and micronemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasite-host molecular communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proteomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of EVs in Toxoplasma infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[significance of extracellular vesicles in infectious diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subtle host immune modulation by parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxoplasma gondii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxoplasma gondii host manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxoplasma gondii persistence in hosts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxoplasma immune evasion strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxoplasmosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccine platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vesicle biogenesis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=253913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review argues that extracellular vesicles released by Toxoplasma gondii and infected host cells act as strategic molecular messengers that prime infection, modulate immunity, and may reprogram neural tissue.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The single-celled parasite Toxoplasma gondii infects an estimated fraction of the global population measured in the billions, yet most of its carriers never know they harbor it. The organism survives for decades inside its host by engaging in an extraordinarily subtle molecular conversation, one that allows it to persist without triggering the full fury of the immune system. For years, researchers focused on the parasite&#8217;s canonical secretion apparatus, the apical organelles known as rhoptries, micronemes, and dense granules, which discharge proteins directly into host cells during and after invasion. A new review published in Parasites &amp; Vectors argues that this picture, while accurate, is incomplete. A team led by Erick Fonseca Balbino and Izadora Volpato Rossi of the State University of Londrina, working with colleagues at Brazilian institutions including the Federal University of Uberlândia, the Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, and the Carlos Chagas Institute of Fiocruz, makes the case that extracellular vesicles, or EVs, deserve recognition as a central pillar of the parasite&#8217;s communication strategy rather than an afterthought of infection.</p>
<p>Extracellular vesicles are membrane-bound particles released by virtually all known cells, from bacteria to human neurons. They range from small exosomes, roughly 30 to 150 nanometers in diameter and born inside multivesicular bodies, to larger microvesicles that bud directly from the plasma membrane. Far from being cellular debris, these particles act as couriers: they carry proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids between cells, and their cargo can reprogram the recipient&#8217;s behavior. In the context of T. gondii, the review frames EVs as an extension of the parasite&#8217;s secretory arsenal, a parallel channel of communication that operates alongside, and sometimes in concert with, the classical apical secretion systems that parasitologists have studied for decades.</p>
<p>The technical foundations of this field rest on a growing toolkit for isolating and characterizing vesicles. The review catalogs the methods that have defined the state of the art: ultracentrifugation and size-exclusion chromatography for separation, nanoparticle tracking analysis and dynamic light scattering for sizing vesicle populations, transmission and scanning electron microscopy for direct visualization, and Western blotting, mass spectrometry, and immunocytochemistry for identifying the proteins that vesicles carry. Lipid composition is probed with techniques such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, revealing envelopes enriched in phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, sphingomyelins, ceramides, and triacylglycerols. Each method carries its own biases and limitations, and the authors emphasize that careful, standardized characterization is essential if the field is to distinguish genuine biological signaling from artifacts of preparation.</p>
<p>Biogenesis is where the story becomes mechanistically rich. Parasite-derived vesicles appear to draw on conserved eukaryotic machinery, including the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport, the ESCRT apparatus, and SNARE-mediated membrane fusion, pathways that T. gondii shares with its hosts despite being separated by more than a billion years of evolution. Multivesicular bodies within the parasite can package cargo into intraluminal vesicles that are released when these compartments fuse with the parasite&#8217;s surface. The result is a population of vesicles whose membrane composition and internal cargo reflect the physiology of the cell that made them, whether that cell is the parasite itself or the host cell it has commandeered. This dual origin is one of the review&#8217;s central conceptual points: the vesicles circulating in the blood or tissues of an infected animal are a mixture, some born of the parasite and some of the infected host, and both populations carry messages.</p>
<p>The cargo of T. gondii-associated vesicles reads like an inventory of the parasite&#8217;s most important virulence tools. Proteomic analyses have detected proteins associated with invasion and intracellular survival, including members of the rhoptry protein, rhoptry neck protein, microneme protein, dense granule protein, and surface antigen families, the very molecules the parasite uses to attach to, penetrate, and remodel host cells. Alongside these proteins travel regulatory microRNAs, small RNA molecules capable of silencing host genes, and bioactive lipids that can themselves trigger signaling cascades. The packaging of such a diverse molecular repertoire into a single nanoscale delivery vehicle positions EVs, in the authors&#8217; framing, as multilayered effectors, capable of acting simultaneously on protein receptors, gene expression, and membrane biochemistry in the cells they encounter.</p>
<p>Functionally, the review organizes the evidence around three themes: infection priming, immune modulation, and neural reprogramming. Infection priming refers to the observation that vesicles released by the parasite or by infected cells can prepare host tissues for invasion, altering the local environment before the parasite itself arrives. Immune modulation is the better-documented phenomenon: vesicle cargo can shift the balance of inflammatory signaling, dampening the Th1-type responses that would otherwise clear the parasite and encouraging states of immune tolerance that permit long-term persistence. Because T. gondii establishes lifelong infection precisely by walking this immunological tightrope, vesicle-mediated modulation offers a compelling explanation for how the parasite sustains its delicate equilibrium with the host immune system over decades.</p>
<p>The neural dimension is perhaps the most provocative. T. gondii is unusual among parasites in its ability to form tissue cysts in the brain, and behavioral changes in infected rodents, including a curious loss of aversion to cat odor, have fascinated researchers for years. The review highlights evidence that vesicles can influence neural cells, carrying microRNAs and other regulatory molecules capable of reshaping gene expression in neurons and glia. The authors are careful to frame this as an emerging area: the mechanistic chain from vesicle uptake to altered neural circuitry remains incompletely mapped, and the field has not yet demonstrated a complete causal pathway from a specific vesicle cargo to a specific behavioral change. Even so, the possibility that a parasite can package gene-regulatory messages into vesicles that cross into neural tissue opens a research agenda with implications far beyond toxoplasmosis.</p>
<p>What elevates the review beyond a catalog of mechanisms is its translational argument. The same vesicles that mediate immune evasion could serve as diagnostic biomarkers: because their cargo reflects the presence and activity of the parasite, detecting parasite-associated vesicles or their molecular signatures in patient samples, through methods such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, could offer a window into infection status that conventional serology cannot provide. As vaccine platforms, vesicles present a natural display of parasite antigens in a membrane context that mimics infection, potentially stimulating immunity without requiring live organisms. And as therapeutic delivery vehicles, they offer a biocompatible nanoscale capsule that could, in principle, be engineered to carry drugs or immunomodulatory molecules across biological barriers that defeat conventional formulations, including the blood-brain barrier that shields the parasite&#8217;s chronic cysts from most treatments.</p>
<p>The authors also confront the field&#8217;s growing pains honestly. EV research across all of biology suffers from reproducibility challenges: isolation methods yield heterogeneous populations, quantification is inconsistent between laboratories, and distinguishing parasite-derived vesicles from host-derived ones in infected samples is technically demanding. The review&#8217;s emphasis on standardized characterization, combining orthogonal techniques such as electron microscopy, nanoparticle tracking, and proteomic validation, reflects a maturing discipline recognizing that its boldest claims will only survive if its methods do. The mixture of vesicle origins in infected hosts means that attributing a biological effect to the parasite, rather than to the host&#8217;s own response, requires careful experimental design, often involving purified parasite cultures and comparison with vesicles from uninfected host cells.</p>
<p>Taken together, the review makes a persuasive case for a conceptual shift. Extracellular vesicles in T. gondii are not metabolic exhaust, not incidental shedding from a busy cell, but strategic molecular messengers that operate at the interface between parasite and host, shaping infection from its earliest moments to its lifelong persistence. The work, published open access under a Creative Commons license with support from Brazil&#8217;s CAPES system, synthesizes mechanistic biology with translational ambition, and it arrives at a moment when vesicle biology is exploding across medicine, from cancer to neurodegeneration. For a parasite that infects such a vast share of humanity, understanding how it whispers to its host, through packets far too small to see, may prove as important as understanding how it invades. The conversation between Toxoplasma and its host, it turns out, has been conducted partly in a language scientists are only now learning to read.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Extracellular vesicle-mediated host–parasite communication in Toxoplasma gondii infection</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Extracellular vesicles in Toxoplasma gondii: molecular messengers at the host–parasite interface</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Balbino, E. F., Buso, L. S., de Oliveira, M. M., de Souza Martins, M. A. F., Bovolin, M. F., de Freitas Barbosa, B., Oliveira Gomes, A., Ramirez, M. I., Costa, I. N., &amp; Rossi, I. V. (2026). Extracellular vesicles in Toxoplasma gondii: molecular messengers at the host–parasite interface. <em>Parasites &amp;amp; Vectors</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07622-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07622-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07622-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s13071-026-07622-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Toxoplasma gondii, extracellular vesicles, exosomes, host–parasite interaction, immunomodulation, microRNAs, vesicle biogenesis, proteomics, biomarkers, vaccine platforms, drug delivery, toxoplasmosis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">253913</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plant Cell Cultures Emerge as Controllable Factories for Extracellular Vesicles</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/plant-cell-cultures-emerge-as-controllable-factories-for-extracellular-vesicles/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controllable plant cell factories for therapeutic nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-kingdom signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESCRT pathway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extracellular vesicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in vitro plant cell vesicle production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intercellular communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lab-grown plant cells for]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocarriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant cell culture as nanoparticle delivery systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant cell culture extracellular vesicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant cell cultures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant cell wall constraints on vesicle secretion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant defense proteins in extracellular vesicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant extracellular vesicle communication mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant lipid and RNA cargo in vesicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant vesicles for intercellular signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-derived exosomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-derived nanovesicles for biomedicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential applications of plant extracellular vesicles in medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNA cargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vesicle biogenesis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=209069</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review argues that in vitro plant cell cultures could become controllable, scalable platforms for producing and engineering extracellular vesicles with defined therapeutic cargo.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For decades, extracellular vesicles were viewed as a signature of animal biology—tiny membrane-bound packages that cells release to shuttle proteins, lipids, and genetic material to their neighbors. Plants, it was long assumed, were too constrained by their rigid cell walls to participate meaningfully in this form of nanoscale communication. That assumption has now collapsed. A comprehensive review published in Plant Cell Reports argues that extracellular vesicles released by plant cells, particularly those grown in vitro, represent one of the most promising yet underexplored frontiers at the intersection of plant biology and biomedicine, and that laboratory cell cultures may hold the key to turning these natural nanoparticles into reliable therapeutic tools.</p>
<p>The review, led by Francesca Cristiana Piritore and Maria Teresa Valenti of the University of Verona together with colleagues in Portugal, synthesizes a rapidly expanding body of evidence showing that plant cells actively secrete extracellular vesicles enriched in defense proteins, structural lipids, and regulatory RNAs. These vesicles, typically ranging from 30 to 300 nanometers in diameter, are now recognized as genuine mediators of intercellular communication rather than byproducts of cell wall remodeling. Crucially, vesicle release has been documented not only in intact plant tissues but also in callus and suspension cell cultures maintained in the laboratory, demonstrating that vesicle secretion is an intrinsic cellular process rather than one dependent on organized tissue architecture.</p>
<p>The functional repertoire of plant extracellular vesicles is striking. Early landmark work showed that sunflower vesicles, loaded with defense proteins and cell-wall-modifying enzymes, can bind to and kill cells of the fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, causing morphological defects, growth retardation, and death in treated spores. More recent studies in Arabidopsis revealed that vesicles released during systemic acquired resistance are packed with immune signaling components and pattern-recognition molecules; recipient plant cells take up these vesicles and mount stronger defenses, reducing the virulence of bacterial and fungal pathogens in both infection assays and neutralization tests. Perhaps most remarkably, plant vesicles carry small interfering RNAs and microRNAs capable of silencing genes in interacting pathogens—direct evidence of cross-kingdom gene regulation mediated by vesicle traffic.</p>
<p>The molecular machinery behind this RNA trafficking is beginning to come into focus. Researchers identified several RNA-binding proteins in Arabidopsis that are secreted via exosome-like vesicles, including argonaute 1, RNA helicases RH11 and RH37, and the annexins ANN1 and ANN2. The helicases selectively associate with vesicle-enriched small RNAs, while the annexins bind them non-specifically; mutants lacking these proteins show reduced small RNA secretion, indicating that they are essential for loading or stabilizing RNA cargo within vesicles. This selectivity suggests a highly evolved mechanism by which plants can directly interfere with gene expression in their antagonists—a capability with obvious biotechnological appeal, though the authors caution that the relationship between cargo selection and specific vesicle biogenesis pathways remains poorly defined.</p>
<p>This is precisely where in vitro plant cell cultures enter the picture. The review highlights that callus and suspension cultures offer something whole plants cannot: a controlled, homogeneous, and potentially scalable environment for studying how vesicles are made, what they carry, and how their cargo can be modulated. Work on Arabidopsis cell cultures showed that vesicle biogenesis depends on the ESCRT trafficking pathway and on the physiological state of the cells, while studies of tobacco demonstrated that vesicles can be reproducibly generated and purified from calli and suspension cultures with morphological features comparable to those derived from whole tissues—although their composition differs, reflecting distinct cellular origins.</p>
<p>The practical advantages of culture-based production are considerable. Plant cell cultures can be maintained in simple, animal-component-free media without serum, reducing upstream costs, ethical concerns, and the risk of contamination by mammalian pathogens. They provide renewable biomass and are compatible with contained bioreactor production, including gentler airlift and temporary immersion systems that permit non-destructive collection of vesicles from the surrounding medium. Because vesicles can be harvested directly from conditioned culture media rather than from disrupted tissue, cultures also reduce interference from intracellular contents released during homogenization—a distinction the authors argue is critical for reproducibility. They draw a sharp line between bona fide extracellular vesicles secreted by living cells and the heterogeneous nanovesicle preparations generated by grinding or blending plant material, which contain membrane fragments, organelle-derived particles, and soluble contaminants that can confound both characterization and functional studies.</p>
<p>Isolation and purification remain the field&#8217;s most stubborn obstacles. Plant extracts are rich in pigments, phenolics, starch, polysaccharides, and secondary metabolites that coprecipitate with vesicles and interfere with downstream analysis. Differential ultracentrifugation remains the workhorse method, but high centrifugation forces co-sediment protein aggregates, prompting many laboratories to combine it with size-exclusion chromatography or density-gradient ultracentrifugation, which exploits the characteristic buoyant density of plant vesicles. Polymer-based precipitation offers a low-cost, scalable alternative at the price of contaminant carryover, while newer technologies—tangential flow filtration for pharmaceutical-grade scalability, the EXODUS system using oscillating membrane vibration, hydrophobic interaction chromatography on polymer fiber phases, and label-free microfluidic and acoustofluidic platforms—promise higher purity and throughput, though most still require validation on plant-derived material.</p>
<p>Characterization suffers from an equally fundamental gap: the absence of universal plant vesicle markers. Mammalian extracellular vesicle research relies on well-established markers such as CD9, CD63, and CD81, but no plant equivalents have been validated. Candidate proteins including TETRASPANIN8, PEN3, HSP70, HSP90, and PATL1 are frequently detected, yet their abundance varies with species, tissue, physiological state, and vesicle subpopulation, and antibodies raised against mammalian markers cannot be assumed to recognize plant homologs specifically. The review calls for plant-specific characterization guidelines combining multiple positive markers with negative markers for intracellular contaminants, aligned with the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles&#8217; MISEV framework, alongside standardized reporting of cell-line origin, culture age, subculture number, and growth-regulator regime to guard against somaclonal variation during prolonged propagation.</p>
<p>On the translational side, the momentum is unmistakable. Plant-derived vesicles have shown antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity, immune modulation, inhibition of tumor cell growth, and promotion of tissue repair in mammalian experimental systems. Cannabis-derived vesicles enriched in cannabidiol reduced the viability of hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines, with activity tracking CBD content across chemotypes. Strawberry and citrus vesicles carrying vitamin C and microRNAs protected human mesenchymal stromal cells from oxidative stress, with encapsulation enhancing the stability and bioavailability of the antioxidant cargo. Engineering strategies are advancing rapidly: LED irradiation exploits the intrinsic photosensitizing properties of vesicles to transiently increase membrane permeability, achieving roughly 80 percent loading efficiency under optimized conditions; electroporation loaded RNA into high-yield vesicles from poplar callus cultures, which were then internalized by Botrytis cinerea hyphae; and genetically modified tobacco plants produced vesicles selectively enriched with artificial microRNAs that induced sequence-specific gene silencing in recipient cells—the first proof of concept that plant vesicles can be programmed for targeted RNA delivery.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to temper enthusiasm with rigor. Most biomedical evidence comes from in vitro systems or acute animal models, with little known about biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, immune interactions, and long-term safety following systemic administration. Functional studies must exclude contributions from co-isolated free metabolites, and dose-response relationships, uptake mechanisms, and off-target effects remain largely unexplored. Yet the convergence of plant cell biology, vesicle research, and biotechnology that this review charts suggests a coherent path forward: controlled cultures as model systems for understanding vesicle-mediated communication, and as production platforms for biologically defined vesicles whose cargo, purity, and function can finally be specified, standardized, and translated.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Extracellular vesicles released by in vitro plant cell cultures and their role in vesicle-mediated communication and biomedical applications</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Extracellular vesicles released by in vitro plant cell cultures: emerging systems for vesicle-mediated communication and biomedical translation</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Extracellular vesicles released by in vitro plant cell cultures: emerging systems for vesicle-mediated communication and biomedical translation. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-026-03983-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-026-03983-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-026-03983-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00299-026-03983-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> extracellular vesicles, plant cell cultures, plant-derived exosomes, intercellular communication, drug delivery, RNA cargo, vesicle biogenesis, plant immunity, nanocarriers, biotechnology, ESCRT pathway, cross-kingdom signaling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">209069</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
