The researchers designed the study to capture three distinct dimensions of cyber hygiene. Participants completed survey instruments measuring their awareness of cybersecurity practices, their actual protective behaviours, and their factual knowledge about online threats. News veracity judgement was operationalized in a separate way: rather than relying on self-reported skill, the team asked participants to evaluate six curated news items, recording their assessments of whether each item was truthful. This design allowed the investigators to compare a person’s cyber hygiene profile directly against their real performance on a news evaluation task, rather than against their own opinion of how discerning they were.

The central finding was a null result. Cyber hygiene awareness, behaviour, and knowledge did not consistently predict how accurately participants judged the veracity of the news items. The analysis did surface some statistically significant associations between individual cyber hygiene knowledge items and specific news stimuli, but these effects were scattered. They did not hold across the full set of news items and did not indicate a stable overall relationship between cyber hygiene and veracity judgement. In practical terms, knowing a great deal about cybersecurity did not translate into a general ability to distinguish true news from false news in this sample.

One pattern did emerge clearly from the data: gender differences. Women displayed greater distrust and scepticism toward news content than men did. The authors are careful to note what this finding does and does not mean. Greater scepticism is an attitude, not a skill, and it does not imply increased accuracy in news veracity judgement. A participant who doubts everything is not necessarily better at identifying which specific items are false. The gender effect therefore concerns the psychological posture people take toward news rather than their performance on the evaluation task itself.

The authors argue that reporting null results has genuine scientific value. The assumption that cyber hygiene enhances veracity judgement carries implications for mental health, decision-making, and social trust, yet it had rarely been tested directly. By failing to confirm it empirically, the study helps clarify theoretical assumptions and can guide educational and organizational strategies: programs that teach cybersecurity practices should not assume that these lessons automatically build resistance to misinformation. The work also received formal recognition in the field, having been accepted for publication in the journal’s Digital Public Health section after submission in August 2026.

The study’s limitations frame the next steps. As an exploratory investigation with a single sample and a fixed set of six news items, it cannot rule out that cyber hygiene matters under different conditions, for different populations, or in interaction with other variables. The authors recommend that future research examine gender effects more thoroughly and explore how cyber hygiene interacts with psychosocial factors such as trust, anxiety, and social context. Until such studies are done, the intuitive idea that careful digital habits produce careful news readers remains just that—an intuition awaiting evidence.

Subject of Research: Null relationship between cyber hygiene and news veracity judgement

Article Title: Investigation of relation between cyber hygiene and news veracity judgements

Article References: Baraković, S., Pezo, N., & Baraković Husić, J. (2026). Investigation of relation between cyber hygiene and news veracity judgements. Frontiers in Public Health, 14, Article 1962217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1962217

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1962217

Keywords: Investigation, relation, between, cyber, hygiene, news, veracity, judgements, scientific research