<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>value co-creation &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/value-co-creation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 04:58:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Virtual Fitting Rooms That Sell: Study Reveals Which AR Features Actually Drive Fashion Shoppers to Buy</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/virtual-fitting-rooms-that-sell-study-reveals-which-ar-features-actually-drive-fashion-shoppers-to-buy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 04:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AR feature impact on purchasing behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AR shopping experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AR usability attributes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AR-driven sales in apparel industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[augmented reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Augmented reality fashion retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral intention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer engagement in fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital try-on solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emerging market fashion technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emerging markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion retail innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immersive shopping experiences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalized fashion AR applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchase intention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service-dominant logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural equation modelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telepresence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value co-creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual fitting room technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=272819</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study of 216 Pakistani fashion consumers finds that personalisation, creative engagement, connectedness, and immersion in augmented reality shopping experiences drive value co-creation and purchase intention, while visual polish and telepresence do not.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Augmented reality has quietly become one of the most talked-about tools in fashion retail, promising shoppers the ability to try on clothing, experiment with styles, and visualise products without ever stepping into a fitting room. Yet for all the industry enthusiasm, a fundamental question has remained surprisingly difficult to answer: which specific features of an AR experience actually make customers feel they are creating value alongside a brand, and does that feeling translate into real purchasing behaviour? A new study from researchers at NUST Business School in Islamabad, published in the journal Discover Sustainability, offers one of the first attribute-level answers from an emerging market, and its findings cut against some common assumptions about what makes AR shopping experiences work.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Sana Imran with colleagues Farasat Ali Shah Bukhari, Fizza Khalid, Muhammad Saqib Iqbal, and Hassan Waqar Raja, focused on Pakistan&#8217;s fashion retail sector, a rapidly digitising market where clothing brands have begun deploying AR applications to engage consumers. Rather than treating augmented reality as a single undifferentiated technology, the researchers broke the AR experience down into six distinct attributes: immersion, aesthetic appeal, creative thinking, telepresence, connectedness, and commercial personalisation. Each of these captures a different psychological dimension of what happens when a shopper interacts with a virtual try-on tool, from the sensation of being absorbed in the experience to the feeling that a brand genuinely understands one&#8217;s personal style.</p>
<p>The theoretical backbone of the study is value co-creation, a concept drawn from service-dominant logic in marketing theory. In this framework, customers are no longer passive recipients of products and services but active collaborators who contribute to the brand experience itself. When a shopper uses an AR feature to experiment with outfits, provide implicit feedback through their choices, or engage with brand content, they are arguably co-creating value with the company. The researchers hypothesised that specific AR attributes would strengthen this sense of co-creation, which would in turn boost behavioural intentions such as continued app use and recommendation, and ultimately drive purchase intention. This three-stage chain, from AR attribute to value co-creation to behavioural intention to purchase, formed the model they set out to test.</p>
<p>To gather evidence, the team surveyed 216 consumers who had used AR features from a Pakistani clothing brand within the previous six months, a screening criterion designed to ensure that every respondent was drawing on genuine first-hand experience rather than speculation. The survey instrument measured each construct with adapted items; for example, immersion was assessed through statements about feeling completely absorbed and losing track of time, while commercial personalisation was captured through statements about product suggestions being tailored to individual preferences. The data were then analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling, a statistical technique widely used in business research because it can estimate complex networks of relationships between latent psychological constructs that cannot be observed directly.</p>
<p>The results delivered a clear split among the six AR attributes. Four of them, commercial personalisation, connectedness, creative thinking, and immersion, were positively associated with value co-creation, meaning that shoppers who experienced personalised suggestions, emotional connection with the brand, opportunities for creative experimentation, and deep absorption reported a stronger sense of partnership with the brand. Strikingly, however, two attributes failed to reach statistical significance: aesthetic appeal and telepresence. In other words, a visually polished interface and the sensation of being virtually present with the product did not, on their own, make shoppers feel they were co-creating value. For an industry that has invested heavily in graphical fidelity and realistic rendering, this is a provocative result.</p>
<p>The downstream chain of the model held together as predicted. Value co-creation was positively associated with behavioural intention, encompassing intentions to reuse AR features, recommend the experience to others, and engage more deeply with the brand. Behavioural intention, in turn, was positively associated with purchase intention, including the likelihood of buying products tried on virtually and confidence in purchasing after an AR experience. The researchers also examined indirect effects and found that commercial personalisation, creative thinking, and immersion were associated with purchase intention through the theoretically proposed sequence involving value co-creation and behavioural intention. This suggests that these three attributes work on purchasing behaviour not directly but by first making customers feel like collaborators in the brand experience, which then builds engagement that culminates in buying.</p>
<p>The practical implications for fashion retailers, particularly in emerging markets, are substantial. If personalisation, creative engagement, relational connection, and immersion are the attributes that matter, then AR development priorities may need to shift. A beautifully rendered but generic virtual mirror may impress shoppers without changing their behaviour, whereas a simpler tool that recommends styles matched to individual preferences, encourages playful experimentation with combinations, and reinforces brand values could deliver measurable commercial returns. The finding on connectedness is especially interesting for markets like Pakistan, where brand communities and social identity around clothing are strong; AR experiences that make shoppers feel part of a larger community or cause appear to deepen the co-creation dynamic that ultimately drives sales.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to flag important limitations, and these deserve equal attention. The study used a cross-sectional design, capturing attitudes at a single point in time, which means it identifies statistical associations rather than definitive causal relationships. It remains possible, for instance, that shoppers already inclined to buy also rate AR features more favourably, rather than the features causing the purchase intent. Additionally, the authors note that discriminant validity was not demonstrated for all construct pairs, a statistical caveat indicating that some of the measured constructs may overlap conceptually more than the model assumes. The sample of 216 consumers, while adequate for the modelling technique used, is modest, and the findings are explicitly described as preliminary attribute-level evidence rather than settled conclusions.</p>
<p>There are also broader contextual questions the study opens but does not resolve. Pakistan&#8217;s fashion retail sector differs from Western markets in cultural norms, technology infrastructure, and consumer expectations, and it is an open question whether the same attribute hierarchy would emerge in Europe, North America, or East Asia. The screening window of six months of AR use means the sample reflects relatively recent adopters, who may respond differently from the general shopping population. Future research with longitudinal designs, larger and more diverse samples, and perhaps experimental manipulation of individual AR attributes would be needed to confirm which features cause value co-creation and to test whether the aesthetic appeal and telepresence null results hold up under different conditions.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the study marks a meaningful step forward in understanding how augmented reality actually functions as a marketing instrument rather than a novelty. By decomposing the AR experience into testable psychological attributes and tracing a pathway from those attributes through value co-creation and behavioural intention to purchase, the researchers have given both scholars and practitioners a framework for evaluating AR investments with more precision than blanket enthusiasm allows. For fashion brands in emerging markets contemplating their next digital initiative, the message is nuanced: the technology&#8217;s commercial power appears to lie not in how realistic or beautiful the virtual experience looks, but in how personally relevant, creatively engaging, relationally meaningful, and immersive it feels to the shopper who uses it.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The association between augmented reality experience attributes and value co-creation in fashion retail</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Augmented reality attributes and value co-creation in Pakistan&#x27;s fashion retail sector</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Imran, S., Bukhari, F. A. S., Khalid, F., Iqbal, M. S., &amp; Raja, H. W. (2026). Augmented reality attributes and value co-creation in Pakistan&#x27;s fashion retail sector. <em>Discover Sustainability</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04683-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04683-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04683-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s43621-026-04683-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> augmented reality, value co-creation, fashion retail, consumer behavior, Pakistan, emerging markets, behavioral intention, purchase intention, structural equation modelling, service-dominant logic, telepresence, personalisation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">272819</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a Floating Papuan Village Turned Sago and Lake Life Into Inclusive Tourism</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/how-a-floating-papuan-village-turned-sago-and-lake-life-into-inclusive-tourism/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courtney Benton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 01:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenges of inclusive tourism in indigenous settings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community empowerment through tourism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community-based tourism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community-controlled tourism innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultural sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danau Sentani cultural tourism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair tourism practices in floating villages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floating village sustainable tourism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusive development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusive development in Papua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous knowledge in tourism development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous tourism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lake life and sago forest conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lake Sentani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participatory governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of community authorization in tourism sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transformative social innovation in indigenous communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[translation of local knowledge into economic value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value co-creation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=239834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research from Kampung Yoboi, Papua, shows how Indigenous sago and lake-based knowledge becomes tourism value, and why inclusive development still depends on community-controlled governance.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the waters of Danau Sentani in Papua, Indonesia, roughly ninety percent of the buildings in Kampung Yoboi stand above the lake itself. Wooden bridges connect painted floating houses, boats replace roads, and sago forests fringe the shoreline. What might look like a picturesque curiosity is, according to new research, something far more analytically interesting: a living case study in how Indigenous knowledge becomes tourism value, and why that transformation does not automatically deliver fair, inclusive development. A team led by Ferdinand Risamasu of Cenderawasih University spent June and July 2025 in the village, interviewing twenty-four informants and observing daily life to trace the pathway from local knowledge to social innovation to inclusion.</p>
<p>The study, published in Discover Global Society, rests on a deliberately conditional argument. Local knowledge, the authors contend, does not inherently become tourism value; a tourism activity is not inherently a social innovation; and social innovation does not necessarily produce inclusive development. Each step requires something extra. Knowledge must be translated with community authorization, translation must reorganize relationships and capabilities to count as innovation, and innovation must be institutionalized under community control before its benefits can be called inclusive. In Kampung Yoboi, the researchers found strong evidence for the first two steps and only partial evidence for the third.</p>
<p>The raw material is distinctive. Sago, the starchy staple of Papuan communities, functions simultaneously as food, livelihood, ecological system, cultural identity, and intergenerational knowledge. In Kampung Yoboi it has been reinterpreted as a tourism experience through guided sago-forest tracking, traditional food preparation, storytelling, and the sago grub festival. A tourism manager told the researchers that sago is not merely food but the community&#8217;s identity, a medium through which visitors can learn about the culture, environment, and way of life around Lake Sentani. The floating settlement itself, with its colorful docks and painted houses, has been reframed as the destination rather than a backdrop to separately constructed attractions.</p>
<p>Methodologically, the study is an interpretive qualitative case study. The team used purposive, criterion-based sampling to assemble informants across seven categories: one community leader, four members of the Tourism Awareness Group known as Pokdarwis, one tourism manager, five residents involved in tourism, four local knowledge holders, five visitors, and four village-level institutional actors. Semi-structured interviews lasting forty-five to sixty minutes were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed, and analyzed thematically in NVivo 12, combining deductive codes drawn from social innovation theory with inductive codes that surfaced unanticipated issues such as dependence on individuals and damaged facilities. Triangulation across participant groups, field observations, and documentary sources strengthened the analysis, and an audit trail preserved interpretive decisions.</p>
<p>The findings show that tourism value in Kampung Yoboi is co-created rather than manufactured. A community leader explained that the village becomes attractive because what visitors see comes from local life itself, from the lake, the houses on water, and the way people live with sago and nature. Ordinary infrastructure doubles as tourism infrastructure: bridges are both daily pathways and visitor routes, and household practices such as craft production and food preparation become small-scale income opportunities. This supports value co-creation theory, in which tourism value emerges from interactions among residents, knowledge holders, visitors, and the material environment rather than from managers alone.</p>
<p>Yet the translation process remains fragile. Much of the community&#8217;s knowledge about sago, customs, and lake life is transmitted orally and resides with individual elders. One local knowledge holder noted that many stories still need to be written down and introduced more clearly to visitors and younger generations. Without community-controlled documentation, the researchers warn, tourism development could fragment or erode the very knowledge it celebrates. The study treats documentation not as a technical fix but as a political question: who decides what is recorded, who is authorized to share it, and how customary authority is preserved when cultural content circulates to outsiders.</p>
<p>The social innovation dimension emerges through what the authors call relational recombination. Elders contribute cultural interpretation; households supply food, crafts, and hospitality; Pokdarwis members and the tourism manager coordinate activities; visitors provide feedback and recognition; and village institutions shape legitimacy and resources. Training sessions and community forums allow residents to discuss visitor suggestions and improve management skills. A Pokdarwis member described how villagers support tourism in different ways, some making crafts, some preparing food, and others beautifying the village. Innovation here is not technological novelty but the reorganization of roles, relationships, and collective capabilities in response to locally defined needs.</p>
<p>However, the researchers draw a sharp line between emergent and institutionalized innovation. Kampung Yoboi&#8217;s creativity is relationally rich but institutionally weak. Roles and responsibilities have not been fully formalized, tourism is not consistently integrated into village planning and budgeting, and activities depend on a small group of motivated individuals. A tourism manager observed that the ideas already exist but must be managed collectively so tourism does not depend on a few people and instead becomes a shared responsibility of the whole village. Youth involvement in digital promotion and oral history documentation is promising but remains peripheral to formal decision-making.</p>
<p>Inclusion, the study&#8217;s most demanding criterion, is emerging but incomplete. Recognitional inclusion is the strongest dimension: tourism visibly affirms sago culture, floating settlement identity, and lake-based livelihoods, and the village&#8217;s national recognition, including a place among the top fifty villages in the 2021 Anugerah Desa Wisata Indonesia and finalist status in the 2025 Wonderful Indonesia Award, has reinforced community pride. Economic opportunities exist through food, crafts, and hospitality, but they remain small-scale and unevenly accessible. Procedural and distributive inclusion lag behind, because evidence on who controls priorities, who receives the largest benefits, and how women, youth, and less-connected households participate is limited. Visibility of Indigenous culture, the authors stress, is not the same as inclusion when communities lack authority over representation and development priorities.</p>
<p>Material constraints compound the governance gap. Limited village funding restricts the maintenance of bridges, toilets, sanitation systems, and public spaces, and poor sanitation threatens both visitor comfort and the environmental quality of Lake Sentani. Human resource limitations affect guiding, interpretation, digital promotion, and safety management, while existing training is too occasional to build a continuous capacity system. These constraints reinforce one another: weak institutional recognition limits funding, inadequate facilities reduce visitor satisfaction, limited skills weaken service quality, and reliance on a few individuals threatens continuity. The central problem, the researchers conclude, is not a shortage of creativity but the absence of stable governance, financing, maintenance, and capacity-building arrangements.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s theoretical contribution is a conditional pathway with clear policy implications. Local knowledge contributes to inclusive community-based tourism through community-authorized translation, relational recombination, and community-controlled institutionalization. The authors recommend integrating tourism into village planning and accountable budgeting, treating bridges, sanitation, and public facilities as shared community and visitor infrastructure, establishing representative coordination among village governments, customary leaders, Pokdarwis, knowledge holders, households, women, and youth, and making benefit distribution transparent. Institutionalization, they caution, should not mean imposing external bureaucratic models that displace Indigenous institutions, but rather formalizing rules and roles while the community retains cultural authority.</p>
<p>The limitations are acknowledged candidly. A single-case, interpretive design with twenty-four informants cannot establish statistical representativeness or causal effects, demographic data were too incomplete for subgroup analysis, and the absence of longitudinal data prevents assessment of whether current initiatives endure. Visitor statistics are also patchy; available records indicate roughly 1,852 visitors during 2021 to 2022, but comprehensive seasonal series do not exist. Future research, the team suggests, should compare Indigenous lake-based tourism cases, track governance and benefit distribution over time, and test whether the proposed pathway holds under different customary, ecological, and institutional conditions.</p>
<p>For a village of floating houses on a Papuan lake, the stakes extend well beyond tourism. Kampung Yoboi demonstrates that communities can convert inherited ecological knowledge into experiences that visitors genuinely value, and that this conversion can strengthen identity, pride, and learning. But the research also delivers a caution to policymakers and destination marketers everywhere: participation is not empowerment, visibility is not inclusion, and creativity without institutional foundations risks evaporating when its few champions step away. The pathway from knowledge to inclusive development, the study shows, must be built deliberately, governed locally, and maintained continuously, one bridge, one budget, and one documented story at a time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Local knowledge and social innovation in inclusive community-based tourism in an Indigenous lake settlement in Papua, Indonesia</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Local knowledge and social innovation for inclusive community based tourism in Kampung Yoboi, Papua, Indonesia</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Risamasu, F., Srem, A. I. A., Wabe, T. G., Manaqib, I. W., Amandaria, R., Azkar, R., Darma, R., &amp; Ardiansyah, M. F. P. (2026). Local knowledge and social innovation for inclusive community based tourism in Kampung Yoboi, Papua, Indonesia. <em>Discover Global Society, 4</em>(1), Article 265. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-026-00627-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-026-00627-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-026-00627-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44282-026-00627-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> community-based tourism, Indigenous tourism, social innovation, local knowledge, sago, Lake Sentani, Papua, inclusive development, value co-creation, participatory governance, cultural sustainability, Indonesia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">239834</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
