<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>uterine electromyography &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/uterine-electromyography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 21:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>AI Listens to the Womb: Deep Learning Model Predicts Preterm Birth from Uterine Electrical Signals</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ai-listens-to-the-womb-deep-learning-model-predicts-preterm-birth-from-uterine-electrical-signals/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake Davidson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 21:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements in maternal-fetal medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI in obstetrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class imbalance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuous wavelet transform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convolutional neural network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning in biomedical signal processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning models for pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early detection of preterm delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrohysterogram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrohysterogram (EHG) monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focal loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neural network-based pregnancy monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noninvasive monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noninvasive preterm labor detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalized pregnancy risk scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictive medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy risk assessment tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preterm birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preterm birth prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signal Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uterine electrical signal analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uterine electromyography]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=212491</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new deep learning model called CWT-AuxNet converts wavelet-based time-frequency representations of uterine electrical recordings into individualized preterm birth risk scores, achieving an AUC of 0.932 at the patient level.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, an estimated 15 million babies around the world are born preterm, and complications of prematurity remain a leading cause of death among newborns. For clinicians, the central challenge has always been anticipation: identifying, weeks in advance, which pregnancies will end too soon. Now a team of researchers in China has unveiled a deep learning system that reads the electrical chatter of the pregnant uterus and converts it into a personalized risk score, achieving strikingly high accuracy in distinguishing women who will deliver early from those who will carry to term. The study, published in Medical &amp; Biological Engineering &amp; Computing, describes a model called CWT-AuxNet, which reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, or AUC, of 0.932 at the level of individual patients, a figure that places it among the strongest noninvasive preterm birth predictors reported to date.</p>
<p>The signal at the heart of the work is the electrohysterogram, or EHG, a recording of the electrical activity that coordinates contractions of the uterine muscle. Electrodes placed on the abdominal wall pick up these faint potentials noninvasively, much as an electrocardiogram captures the heart&#8217;s rhythm. Researchers have known for decades that the EHG changes character as pregnancy progresses: as labor approaches, the electrical bursts that sweep across the uterus shift toward lower frequencies and become more synchronized, a physiological signature of the muscle preparing for coordinated contractions. What has been harder is turning that knowledge into a reliable clinical test, because EHG recordings are long, noisy, subtly different between patients, and, crucially, scarce. Datasets of labeled recordings from women who later delivered preterm are small, which has made it difficult to train the data-hungry deep neural networks that have transformed other areas of medicine.</p>
<p>That scarcity and complexity, the authors argue, is precisely why most previous efforts relied on conventional machine learning pipelines, in which experts hand-craft features from the signal, such as entropy measures, frequency-band power ratios, or nonlinear descriptors, and then feed them to a classifier. Such approaches work, but they inherit the biases and blind spots of the features humans choose to extract. Deep learning, by contrast, can in principle discover discriminative patterns directly from raw data. The new study tackles the obstacles that have kept end-to-end deep learning out of the EHG field with a three-part strategy: a wavelet-based representation of the signal, an auxiliary feature that injects established physiological knowledge, and a training objective engineered to cope with severe class imbalance.</p>
<p>The first ingredient is the continuous wavelet transform, or CWT, a mathematical technique that decomposes a signal into a family of wavelets stretched and shifted across different scales. Unlike the Fourier transform, which tells you which frequencies are present in a recording but discards when they occurred, the wavelet transform preserves both time and frequency information simultaneously. Applied to an EHG recording, the CWT produces a two-dimensional image, a scalogram, in which the horizontal axis is time, the vertical axis is frequency, and brightness encodes the local energy of the signal. This transformation is a natural fit for uterine electrical activity, whose relevant patterns, such as the gradual downward shift of contraction-related frequencies, unfold over time. It also converts a one-dimensional signal into an image-like input, allowing the researchers to exploit the full power of convolutional neural networks, the same architecture that revolutionized image recognition.</p>
<p>On top of this time-frequency representation, the team added what they call an auxiliary feature: the peak amplitude, or PA, of the normalized power spectrum in the low-frequency band. This measure, highlighted in recent work as an effective standalone predictor of premature birth, captures how strongly the EHG energy is concentrated at the frequencies associated with preterm labor. By feeding this engineered feature into the network alongside the learned wavelet representations, CWT-AuxNet blends data-driven pattern discovery with domain knowledge accumulated over years of EHG research. The architecture itself is multibranch and convolutional, meaning parallel streams of filters process different aspects of the input before their outputs are merged, enabling the model to extract fine-grained features at the level of short signal windows rather than forcing a single judgment on an entire recording.</p>
<p>The third innovation addresses a problem that has quietly inflated results across the EHG literature: imbalance. Preterm deliveries are, fortunately, the minority outcome, so datasets contain far more term recordings than preterm ones. Naively trained classifiers tend to default to predicting the majority class, and oversampling techniques such as SMOTE, which synthesize artificial minority examples, have been shown in critical reanalyses to produce overly optimistic performance estimates. Instead of resampling the data, CWT-AuxNet uses a cost-sensitive loss function built on focal loss, a technique originally developed for dense object detection in computer vision. Focal loss down-weights the contribution of easy, well-classified examples and concentrates the gradient signal on hard, ambiguous ones, while class-specific weighting compensates for the rarity of preterm cases. The result is a network that learns to care about the minority class without fabricating synthetic data.</p>
<p>Because the model produces predictions for individual windows of the EHG recording rather than a single verdict per patient, the researchers designed a two-tier decision strategy. At the window level, the network assigns a risk score to each short segment of signal, capturing fine-grained fluctuations in uterine electrical behavior. At inference time, these window-level outputs are aggregated into a user-level decision through a dedicated strategy, yielding one individualized assessment of preterm risk per patient. This hierarchical design mirrors how a clinician might reason: noticing suspicious moments in a long monitoring session and then weighing them together to form an overall judgment. It also makes the system more robust, since a single noisy segment cannot dominate the final decision.</p>
<p>The performance numbers tell a compelling story. CWT-AuxNet achieved an AUC of 0.741 at the window level, indicating strong discrimination even when judging brief, isolated segments of signal where information is inherently limited. When window-level predictions were aggregated to the user level, performance climbed to an AUC of 0.932, meaning the model ranked individual patients&#8217; preterm risk with high reliability. In head-to-head comparisons, the model consistently outperformed both traditional machine learning baselines built on hand-crafted features and earlier deep learning approaches. The authors also employed gradient-based visualization techniques, in the spirit of Grad-CAM, to probe which regions of the time-frequency representations drove the network&#8217;s decisions, offering a degree of interpretability that is essential for any technology hoping to enter prenatal care.</p>
<p>The implications reach beyond a single benchmark. Preterm birth prediction has long been dominated by clinical measures with limited predictive power when applied early: cervical length measured by ultrasound and fetal fibronectin testing, for example, show modest predictive value in threatened preterm labor. An EHG-based approach offers something different, a continuous, noninvasive window into the physiological maturation of the uterus itself, potentially usable in routine prenatal visits with standard surface electrodes. The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and the research team, led by co-first authors Xinliang Wen and Shengnan Zhuan with corresponding authors Lai Jiang and Xu Zhang, spans the University of Science and Technology of China, Bengbu Medical University, and the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, combining expertise in microelectronics, life sciences, and obstetrics.</p>
<p>Challenges remain before CWT-AuxNet or any successor reaches the delivery ward. EHG datasets are still small and drawn largely from a limited number of recording centers, and the field has been burned before by methods that excelled on a single benchmark but failed to generalize. External validation on independent, multi-center cohorts, prospective clinical studies, and careful attention to calibration of risk scores will all be necessary. Yet the study marks a meaningful shift in how the problem is framed: rather than asking humans to define what distinguishes a preterm EHG recording, the wavelet-driven network learns those distinctions itself, guided by physiological priors and trained with an objective that respects the reality of imbalanced clinical data. If that approach holds up in the clinic, the faint electrical whispers of the uterus could become one of obstetrics&#8217; most valuable early warning systems, giving mothers and doctors the most precious resource of all, time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Deep learning prediction of preterm birth from electrohysterogram signals</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> A deep learning method for preterm birth prediction using wavelet representations and auxiliary features from electrohysterogram</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wen, X., Zhuan, S., Gao, X., Jiang, L., &amp; Zhang, X. (2026). A deep learning method for preterm birth prediction using wavelet representations and auxiliary features from electrohysterogram. <em>Medical &amp;amp; Biological Engineering &amp;amp; Computing</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-026-03602-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-026-03602-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-026-03602-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11517-026-03602-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> preterm birth, electrohysterogram, deep learning, continuous wavelet transform, convolutional neural network, focal loss, class imbalance, uterine electromyography, predictive medicine, signal processing, noninvasive monitoring, machine learning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">212491</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI Reads the Electrical Rhythm of Labor to Estimate Cervical Dilation Without Invasive Exams</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ai-reads-the-electrical-rhythm-of-labor-to-estimate-cervical-dilation-without-invasive-exams/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 19:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomedical engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cervical dilation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cervical dilation measurement techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dystocia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical activity of uterus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrohysterography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaussian process regression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare innovation in obstetrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive vs non-invasive labor exams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor dystocia detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor progress monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning in obstetrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maternal comfort during childbirth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-invasive cervical dilation estimation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-invasive monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obstetrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy monitoring technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensor-based labor assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uterine electrical signals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uterine electromyography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaginal examination]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=197696</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A machine-learning proof-of-concept study shows that abdominal electrohysterography combined with maternal data can moderately estimate cervical dilation during model development, though generalization to unseen recordings remains limited.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For generations, the progress of childbirth has been tracked in a strikingly low-tech way: a clinician&#8217;s gloved fingers, inserted repeatedly into the vagina, estimating how far the cervix has opened. Now a team of researchers in Mexico has tested whether a machine-learning model, fed only with the electrical chatter of the laboring uterus and a handful of routine maternal details, could replace some of those examinations with a non-invasive reading. Their proof-of-concept study, published in the Annals of Biomedical Engineering, offers a tantalizing glimpse of sensor-driven obstetrics while delivering an honest verdict: the approach is feasible, but it is not yet ready for the delivery room.</p>
<p>The motivation is more than convenience. Repeated vaginal examinations remain the standard method for assessing labor progress, yet they are uncomfortable, carry an infection risk, and vary from one examiner to the next. Qualitative work has found that many women associate the procedure with pain, fear, and embarrassment, and a regional study in Latin America reported that nearly one in three women underwent five or more examinations during labor, a frequency considered excessive by current guidelines. Meanwhile, dystocia, a failure of the normal mechanisms of cervical dilation or fetal descent, drives an estimated 60 to 80 percent of cesarean sections performed for labor arrest. An objective, continuous, and painless way to gauge dilation could therefore reshape how clinicians detect abnormal labor before mother or baby is in danger.</p>
<p>The researchers turned to electrohysterography, or EHG, a technique that records the electrical activity of the uterine muscle through electrodes placed on the abdominal surface, much as a cardiogram listens to the heart. Between 2017 and 2019, the team assembled 72 ten-minute EHG recordings from women in low-risk term or moderate preterm labor at two Mexican hospitals: the Maternal and Childhood Research Center in Mexico City and the Mónica Pretelini-Sáenz Maternal-Perinatal Hospital in Toluca. Signals were captured with a Monica AN24 trans-abdominal monitor at 900 Hz using disposable electrodes, then exported through a single bipolar channel down-sampled to 20 Hz and band-limited to 0.2 to 1 Hz. Each participant contributed one recording, paired with a cervical dilation value documented by digital vaginal examination shortly beforehand.</p>
<p>The engineering challenge lay in translating raw electrical traces into numbers a regression model could digest. The team split each recording into three frequency bands and computed seven linear and nonlinear metrics in each: root-mean-square amplitude, the area under the rectified envelope, zero-crossing rate, mean and median frequencies, sample entropy, and bubble entropy. These 21 base metrics were calculated across nine overlapping 120-second windows within each recording, and eight temporal descriptors, including mean, slope, maximum, standard deviation, steepest positive and negative changes, total variation, and accumulated area, were then derived to capture how each metric evolved over the ten minutes. Combined with counts of low- and high-intensity contractions, maternal age, and gestational age, the pipeline produced a 172-feature vector per recording. Five recordings with sparsely represented dilation values outside the 4 to 8 cm range were excluded, leaving 67 records: 50 for model development and 17 held back for internal testing.</p>
<p>Model development followed a deliberately sequential blueprint. Four feature-ranking algorithms, minimum redundancy maximum relevance, the F-test, neighborhood component analysis, and regression-tree importance, were compared, and a composite ranking identified the five strongest candidates. Twenty-eight regression algorithms available in MATLAB&#8217;s Regression Learner app were then benchmarked with fivefold cross-validation. Their baseline errors clustered tightly between 1.324 and 1.331 cm, with coefficients of determination near zero or negative, indicating that the top-ranked features alone explained little of the variability in dilation. The team retained the squared-exponential Gaussian process regression model, or SE-GPR, for further optimization because it produces a smooth, continuous, nonlinear fit and can explicitly account for observation uncertainty, an important consideration when the reference values come from manual exams reported mostly in whole centimeters.</p>
<p>Because simple sequential feature selection proved insufficient, the researchers unleashed a genetic algorithm on the 172-dimensional search space, an optimization strategy inspired by evolution in which candidate feature subsets are encoded as binary chromosomes, scored by a composite fitness function balancing prediction error, correlation, and feature count, and iteratively refined through selection, crossover, and mutation. After 98 generations, the algorithm converged on a lean subset of five EHG-derived temporal features: the maximum difference in mean frequency from band one, the maximum median frequency and zero-crossing statistics from band two, the steepest negative change in zero-crossing rate from band two, and the accumulated area of the lower-frequency envelope from band three. Notably, none of the clinical variables survived the selection, suggesting the electrical signal itself carried the most informative, if fragile, relationship to dilation.</p>
<p>The optimized model&#8217;s performance told a two-part story. Within the development set, fivefold cross-validation yielded a root-mean-square error of 0.97 cm, a Pearson correlation of 0.67, and an R-squared of 0.45, a respectable showing for a continuous centimeter-scale prediction. But when the finalized model faced the 17 recordings it had never seen, performance collapsed: the error rose to 1.45 cm, the correlation fell to 0.23, and the R-squared turned negative at minus 0.31, meaning the model did worse than simply guessing the average dilation. The authors are candid about this gap. The small held-out sample inflates uncertainty, and the quantized, one-centimeter resolution of the clinical reference values amplifies the effect of small prediction deviations. Still, the negative R-squared signals that the moderate association observed during development did not generalize to unseen recordings.</p>
<p>Several physiological threads nonetheless emerge from the selected features. The chosen predictors describe the magnitude and temporal variation of the EHG spectrum, changes in signal oscillation within the 0.34 to 1 Hz fast-wave band, and the accumulated magnitude of the lower-frequency component. These align with prior observations that uterine electrical activity becomes more organized as labor advances, with entropy falling and burst frequencies rising from roughly 0.41 Hz below 3 cm dilation to about 0.52 Hz at 6 cm or more. The authors caution, however, that because the features were mined from a small, high-dimensional dataset, they should be treated as hypotheses rather than confirmed biomarkers of cervical dilation.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s limitations are clearly drawn. The analysis rests on 67 recordings from just two Mexican hospitals, covers only the 4 to 8 cm dilation range, relies on a single bipolar EHG lead, and assigns one dilation value per ten-minute recording rather than tracking continuous change. Dystocia was never labeled or modeled, so no screening performance can be claimed, and the model produces one estimate per recording, not a second-by-second readout. Yet the strengths are equally real: an openly shared dataset on Zenodo, a systematic model-selection pipeline, rigorous separation of development and test data at the recording level, and a refusal to overstate the results. The authors call for larger prospective multicenter cohorts spanning the full dilation spectrum, multichannel EHG arrays, combinations with ultrasound elastography, and explainable-AI methods to clarify each predictor&#8217;s contribution.</p>
<p>If those validation efforts succeed, the payoff could be substantial: a wearable, electrode-based adjunct that flags abnormal labor progression early, prompts timely clinical reassessment, and reduces the number of invasive examinations women endure, lowering infection risk and discomfort in the process. For now, the message of this exploratory study is measured. The electrical signature of the laboring uterus does appear to carry information about cervical dilation, and modern machine learning can begin to decode it, but the road from proof of concept to clinical tool runs through many more patients, hospitals, and hours of data.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Non-invasive machine-learning estimation of cervical dilation during labor from electrohysterography and maternal clinical data</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Exploratory Non-invasive Estimation of Cervical Dilation from Electrohysterography and Maternal Data: A Machine-Learning Proof-of-Concept Study</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Portillo-Rodríguez, O., Escalante-Gaytán, J., Sandoval-González, O. O., Soria, P. R., Mendieta-Zerón, H., Echeverría, J. C., Peña-Castillo, M. Á., Abarca-Castro, E. A., &amp; Reyes-Lagos, J. J. (2026). Exploratory Non-invasive Estimation of Cervical Dilation from Electrohysterography and Maternal Data: A Machine-Learning Proof-of-Concept Study. <em>Annals of Biomedical Engineering</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-026-04349-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-026-04349-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-026-04349-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10439-026-04349-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> electrohysterography, cervical dilation, machine learning, labor monitoring, obstetrics, dystocia, Gaussian process regression, genetic algorithm, uterine electromyography, non-invasive monitoring, vaginal examination, biomedical engineering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">197696</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
