<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>use of LC-MS/MS in pesticide detection &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/use-of-lc-ms-ms-in-pesticide-detection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 23:02:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Bee Pollen Reveals Hidden Pesticide Peaks Across Latvian Farmland</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/bee-pollen-reveals-hidden-pesticide-peaks-across-latvian-farmland/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 23:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural landscapes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bee foraging behavior and pesticide exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioindicators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cypermethrin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecotoxicology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of pesticide timing on bee health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental health monitoring with bees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[episodic pesticide spikes in apiaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungicides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glyphosate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glyphosate and its breakdown products in pollen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honey bees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of crop flowering on pesticide levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvian farmland pesticide exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-residue pesticide analysis in bee pollen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pesticide contamination in honey bee pollen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticide residues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticide risk assessment in agricultural landscapes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollen Hazard Quotient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollinator health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal variation in pesticide residues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use of LC-MS/MS in pesticide detection]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=211054</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A two-year Latvian study of pollen from six apiaries found pesticide exposure in honey bees to be episodic and seasonally driven, with toxicity rather than landscape composition determining risk.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honey bees have long been hailed as flying sentinels of environmental health, but a new two-year study from Latvia shows just how sharply their chemical exposures can swing from week to week. Researchers at the Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies analysed pollen trapped from six commercial apiaries spread across the country during the 2024 and 2025 flowering seasons, screening the samples for an extraordinary scope of 793 pesticide active substances and related compounds. What they found was not a steady background hum of contamination but a landscape of episodic, site-specific spikes, driven less by how much farmland surrounded a hive than by the precise timing of crop flowering, pesticide applications, and the foraging decisions of the bees themselves.</p>
<p>The team installed pollen traps at two marked hives per apiary, pooling material into composite two-week samples across seven sampling periods each season, from early May to mid-August in 2025 and mid-May to late August in 2024. Samples were frozen at minus 18 degrees Celsius until analysis, and accredited laboratories in Berlin used validated multi-residue methods based on liquid and gas chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, with dedicated LC-MS/MS screening for the highly polar herbicide glyphosate and its breakdown product AMPA. Botanical composition was reconstructed under light microscopy, with more than 500 pollen grains identified per sample, allowing the researchers to link each residue detection to the plants the bees had actually visited.</p>
<p>In total, 15 active substances were detected in 2024 and 19 in 2025. Fungicides dominated the detection profile in both years, accounting for 51 percent of detections in 2024 and 54 percent in 2025, followed by herbicides and, trailing behind, insecticides. The most frequently recorded compounds included boscalid and azoxystrobin among the fungicides, glyphosate and clopyralid among the herbicides, and the neonicotinoid-class insecticide acetamiprid. Maximum concentrations were striking: glyphosate reached 840 micrograms per kilogram in 2024 and 327 in 2025, boscalid peaked at 610 micrograms per kilogram in 2024, and the herbicide fluazifop-P-butyl hit 660 and 1800 micrograms per kilogram across the two years, far exceeding the European Union recommended maximum residue level of 50 micrograms per kilogram for bee products.</p>
<p>The fluazifop-P-butyl findings stand out as among the most consequential for beekeepers and regulators. This grass-specific herbicide is not typically considered a bee-toxicity headline grabber, yet its concentrations in Latvian pollen exceeded most values reported elsewhere in Europe, though they remained below the extreme 6831 micrograms per kilogram documented in southern Germany by earlier researchers. Acetamiprid tells a different regulatory story. The European Union&#8217;s acceptable concentration in bee products was 50 micrograms per kilogram in 2024 but rose to 300 micrograms per kilogram in 2025, and individual Latvian samples exceeded the limits applicable at the time of sampling in both years, with maxima of 350 and 200 micrograms per kilogram respectively.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most unexpected detection was terbutryn, a herbicide banned for agricultural use in the EU, found once in 2025 exclusively at the urban-influenced Jelgava apiary. Because it appeared in no earlier sampling year, the researchers rule out current farming as the source. Terbutryn is known to leach from biocide-treated facade coatings and paints, and it is used for aquatic algae control; a wastewater treatment plant within the foraging radius of the Jelgava hives may represent a plausible contamination pathway. The finding is a reminder that pollinator pesticide exposure is not confined to fields, and that urban infrastructure can quietly contribute to the chemical loads carried back to the hive.</p>
<p>Seasonal patterns proved decisive. Residue concentrations and risk values rose mainly between mid-May and early July, coinciding with the flowering of oilseed rape and legumes and the associated pesticide applications. In 2024, the highest total residue load occurred in the second sampling period, when pollen from the crucifer family dominated the samples and bees were foraging intensively on winter oilseed rape. Elevated levels followed in early June, tied to legume crops such as field beans and peas, and again in late July when flowering weeds of the goosefoot family provided a late-summer pollen source. In 2025, detections were spread more evenly across the season, with peaks in late May and early June linked to crucifers and rose-family bloom such as apple, plum and pear, and renewed elevations in late July associated with summer oilseed rape.</p>
<p>To translate chemical concentrations into biological risk, the team applied the Pollen Hazard Quotient, a screening metric that divides the detected concentration in pollen by the acute oral or contact LD50 for honey bees, assuming a maximum daily intake of up to 9.5 milligrams of bee bread per nurse bee. Values below 50 are considered low risk, between 50 and 500 moderate, and above 500 high. Median PHQ values stayed safely under 50 in every sampling period of both years, indicating generally low colony-level toxicological pressure. But individual samples told a sharper story: several 2025 samples crossed the threshold, and one sample from Vecauce parish in the fifth period of 2025 reached a staggering PHQ of 1173.91, driven almost entirely by cypermethrin, a pyrethroid insecticide whose very low contact LD50 means even a moderate concentration translates into a high hazard score.</p>
<p>That cypermethrin result crystallises a central lesson of the study: toxicity, not abundance, determines risk. Frequently detected fungicides and herbicides contributed little to cumulative PHQ because their LD50 values are comparatively high, while compounds such as acetamiprid, flupyradifurone and cypermethrin punched far above their concentration weight. The researchers caution that PHQ is a screening tool with real limitations. It rests on acute endpoints only, ignoring chronic exposure, sublethal effects and the potential interactions within the pesticide mixtures that bees inevitably encounter simultaneously. Real-world exposure risk may therefore be underestimated, particularly when colonies face repeated pulses throughout a brood-rearing season.</p>
<p>What the study did not find may matter just as much. The team hypothesised that apiaries surrounded by more agricultural land, more nectar-producing crops, or crops under higher pesticide-use intensity would show higher cumulative PHQ values. Graphical comparisons across the six sites and two years found no consistent pattern. Platone parish, with the highest proportion of agricultural land, did not post the highest risk values, while some sites with little farmland still recorded measurable exposure. High proportions of crucifer, legume or rose pollen did not reliably track the mapped crop areas around each apiary, suggesting that bees forage selectively, that systemic pesticides move residues away from treated fields, and that broad landscape categories are simply too coarse to capture field-level application timing. Exposure, the authors conclude, is shaped by temporal dynamics, local management and bee behaviour rather than landscape composition alone.</p>
<p>The study builds on earlier Latvian work published in 2024 and offers the Baltic region some of its first long-term pollen monitoring data, filling a gap where oilseed rape covers 145,100 hectares and legume areas have grown 84 percent since 2020. For beekeepers, the practical message is that danger is concentrated in identifiable windows, chiefly mid-May through early July, when crop flowering and spraying overlap with intensive foraging and brood rearing. For regulators and researchers, the findings argue for monitoring designs that capture short-term exposure peaks and application timing rather than averaging the season into invisibility. Honey bee-collected pollen, the authors note, proved a suitable and temporally resolved tool for exactly this purpose, identifying precisely when and where agricultural environments turn most hazardous for their most industrious visitors.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Pesticide residues and seasonal exposure risk in honey bee-collected pollen across Latvian agricultural landscapes</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Pesticide exposure risks and seasonal variation in honey bee-collected pollen across agricultural landscapes in Latvia</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Pesticide exposure risks and seasonal variation in honey bee-collected pollen across agricultural landscapes in Latvia. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38238-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38238-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38238-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11356-026-38238-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> honey bees, pesticide residues, pollen, pollinator health, glyphosate, cypermethrin, Pollen Hazard Quotient, agricultural landscapes, fungicides, Latvia, ecotoxicology, bioindicators</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">211054</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
