Herpes zoster vaccination is unique in that it targets a virus that remains latent in the body and reactivates later in life, primarily affecting older adults and immunocompromised individuals. The clinical burden of shingles includes severe neuropathic pain, known as postherpetic neuralgia, which can severely diminish patients’ quality of life. Therefore, understanding vaccination dynamics in densely populated urban areas where healthcare resources are relatively accessible holds valuable lessons for public health strategies.

This study adopts a qualitative methodology, emphasizing the lived experiences and perceptual frameworks of urban residents in China. By delving into individual narratives, the research unveils the complex interplay of cultural beliefs, knowledge gaps, health literacy, and systemic barriers that collectively shape vaccine decision-making. The approach contrasts with quantitative surveys by allowing a richer, more nuanced understanding of the psychological and social dimensions influencing health behaviors.

One of the pivotal findings centers on the role of informational accessibility and trust. Interviewees expressed ambivalence and sometimes skepticism towards vaccine safety and efficacy. Despite endorsement by healthcare professionals, misinformation and anecdotal adverse event reports amplify hesitations. This distrust is compounded by inconsistent messaging across media platforms and a perceived lack of tailored communication by health authorities, underscoring the critical need for targeted educational campaigns that resonate with urban populations.

Moreover, the study highlights logistical challenges as a significant barrier. While urban centers in China boast advanced medical infrastructure, issues such as inconvenient clinic hours, costs associated with vaccination, and bureaucratic hurdles dampen the motivation to pursue vaccination. These practical impediments emphasize that beyond awareness, structural facilitators must be optimized to translate intention into action.

Sociocultural dynamics also emerged as influential components. The cultural context in China, where traditional medicine and health practices hold sway, sometimes engenders conflicting attitudes towards Western preventative interventions like vaccines. For some participants, these traditional perspectives foster skepticism or preference for alternative remedies. The intersection of cultural belief systems with modern healthcare paradigms creates a delicate environment in which public health messaging must be carefully crafted to avoid alienation.

The study further exposes the role of perceived susceptibility and severity in vaccination intent. Individuals who considered themselves at high risk for complications or who had personal or familial experiences with herpes zoster were more inclined to seek vaccination. This psychological appraisal of risk informs the adoption of preventive behaviors, pointing to the potential effectiveness of personalized risk communication strategies to bolster vaccine uptake.

Notably, social influences and norms play a catalytic role. The endorsement or discouragement from family members, peers, and community leaders significantly sways individual decisions. The communal fabric and collective decision-making models prominent in Chinese society render social networks as vital channels for disseminating pro-vaccination attitudes. Leveraging these networks could, therefore, amplify positive health behaviors on a population scale.

A key facilitator identified involves trust in healthcare providers. Positive patient-provider relationships and recommendations from trusted medical professionals significantly enhance vaccination intentions. Such findings advocate for empowering healthcare workers with comprehensive information and communication skills to effectively counsel patients about herpes zoster vaccination benefits and address concerns.

Additionally, the study addresses the impact of policy and insurance coverage on vaccination intentions. Participants cited cost as a deterrent, highlighting the imperative for public health policies that subsidize or otherwise reduce the financial burden associated with immunization. In contexts where vaccination is not fully covered, disparities in uptake are more pronounced, potentially exacerbating health inequities.

In exploring the psychological constructs underlying vaccine hesitancy, the study also incidentally acknowledges the global parallels. Vaccine hesitancy is a multifaceted phenomenon influenced by trust, knowledge, and socio-environmental factors worldwide. The insights drawn from urban China contribute to the broader discourse on how tailored approaches, respecting cultural, societal, and infrastructural variations, can shape successful immunization campaigns globally.

Furthermore, this research underscores the importance of dynamic and adaptable public health strategies. The urban landscape in China is rapidly evolving, characterized by shifting demographics, economic factors, and health system reforms. Public health initiatives must therefore be nimble, incorporating ongoing feedback from urban residents to remain relevant and effective in mitigating vaccine-preventable diseases such as herpes zoster.

The implications of the study extend beyond vaccination intentions to inform health communication, service delivery design, and policy formulation. By elucidating the barriers and facilitators from the perspective of the target population, policymakers and healthcare providers gain actionable intelligence to tailor interventions. The incorporation of community voices into program development invariably promotes more sustainable health outcomes.

In summary, the qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators for herpes zoster vaccination in Chinese urban populations adds a critical dimension to the understanding of vaccine uptake dynamics. The interplay of trust, culture, accessibility, and social influence elucidated by this study offers a roadmap for enhancing immunization strategies in similar demographic contexts worldwide. As the global community grapples with vaccine hesitancy, these findings signal the enduring need for context-sensitive, person-centered approaches to public health promotion.

The comprehensive nature of this study highlights the potential for future research to expand upon these findings, exploring intervention efficacy or comparing rural versus urban perspectives. As the burden of herpes zoster represents a growing public health challenge with aging populations, optimized vaccination programs supported by insights such as these could yield significant benefits in morbidity reduction and healthcare resource optimization.

Ultimately, this research embodies the critical nexus of behavioral science, epidemiology, and health policy, reinforcing that tackling vaccine hesitancy requires an integrated, multidisciplinary effort. The nuanced understanding gained from the voices of urban Chinese residents offers a valuable template that can inspire similar qualitative inquiries elsewhere, advancing the global mission of enhancing vaccine coverage and protecting vulnerable populations from preventable diseases.

Subject of Research: Barriers and facilitators influencing herpes zoster vaccination intentions among urban residents in China.

Article Title: The barriers and facilitators of herpes zoster vaccination intentions of urban residents in China: a qualitative study.

Article References:
Yuan, B., Long, C., Wang, M. et al. The barriers and facilitators of herpes zoster vaccination intentions of urban residents in China: a qualitative study. glob health res policy 10, 19 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-025-00413-1

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-025-00413-1

This groundbreaking research, spearheaded by a team of two lead authors, Waterlander and Luna Pinzon, alongside collaborator Dijkstra, harnesses the power of group model building techniques to understand and combat the factors contributing to obesity in urban settings. By engaging a diverse group of stakeholders—including public health officials, community leaders, and even individuals affected by obesity—the team aimed to create a holistic view of the problem and generate actionable solutions tailored to local needs.

At its core, the study employs system dynamics—a methodologies widely utilized in public health to simulate and analyze the complex interactions among various elements influencing health outcomes. This multidisciplinary approach offers a more dynamic understanding of how different factors, including policy, environment, and behavior, interplay in the obesity landscape. Unlike traditional statistical methods that often rely on static data, system dynamics allows researchers to model the evolving nature of these relationships over time, providing invaluable insights into the repercussions of potential interventions.

The researchers began by facilitating a series of workshops, during which participants collectively built a model that illustrated the conditions fostering obesity within their communities. This model not only illuminated existing challenges but also sparked discussions on possible interventions. Participants identified key leverage points—such as food accessibility, local marketing strategies for unhealthy foods, and opportunities for physical activity—which were crucial in devising an effective obesity prevention strategy.

One of the most compelling aspects of the study is its commitment to local context. Recognizing that obesity does not manifest uniformly across different demographics, the authors used a participatory approach to surface unique community insights. This tailored model encouraged stakeholders to take ownership of the problem and embrace wide-ranging perspectives. Through this inclusive strategy, the research team was able to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, ensuring that the proposed interventions were grounded in real-world experiences and realities.

As the workshops progressed, the models developed were rigorously tested against existing public health data. These simulations helped to forecast the potential impacts of various interventions, offering a glimpse of how they might reshape the local obesity landscape over the years. Participants were thus able to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different strategies and assess which actions would ultimately produce the most significant benefits for their communities.

The results from the Amsterdam study revealed some encouraging trends. Over the projected modeling period, the diverse interventions illustrated potential shifts in dietary habits, increased physical activity levels, and ultimately, reductions in obesity rates among various population segments. The collaborative nature of the project allowed for rapid iteration and adjustment of strategies based on simulated outcomes, ultimately leading to more informed decision-making.

Moreover, the findings underscore the importance of ongoing engagement from all stakeholders in the solution process. By fostering strong collaboration among local organizations, government bodies, and community members, the research highlights how collective action can streamline resource allocation and support initiatives aimed at optimizing health outcomes. In a world where public health challenges are ever-increasing, collaborative models become essential frameworks for sustainable change.

In addition to creating a durable framework for intervention, the study also serves as a call to action for replicating similar group model-building exercises in other cities. Each locality carries its unique set of challenges and resources, creating an immense opportunity for tailoring interventions that meet specific community needs. As evidenced by the positive reception and participation in Amsterdam, this approach can foster enthusiasm and optimism, transforming a significant public health issue into a collaborative project that nurtures community spirit.

An impactful innovation was also the incorporation of technology into the modeling process. As participants generated ideas collaboratively, the input was fed directly into digital platforms that allowed for visual representation of the concepts, tipping points, and potential outcomes. This visualization helped demystify complex interactions for all participants and enhanced their ability to engage in meaningful dialogue over various topics related to obesity and health.

Furthermore, the researchers took care to align their findings with existing public health policies, ensuring that their proposed interventions are not only innovative but also feasible. By aligning with existing frameworks, this approach affords policymakers the flexibility to adapt and incorporate evidence-based solutions into existing legislative agendas. New policies could prioritize healthy food options, promote urban planning that accounts for physical activity, and effectively regulate advertising strategies targeting vulnerable populations.

The ongoing journey toward obesity prevention is a multi-faceted one – it requires a commitment not just from healthcare providers but also from policymakers and community stakeholders. As such, the meaningful outcomes of this Amsterdam study provide a strong foundation for encouraging other cities to adopt similar models of collaboration and system thinking. If communities across the globe can embrace this integrative mindset, we may finally possess the tools necessary for combatting the tidal wave of obesity that threatens the well-being of millions.

The implications of this study extend far beyond Amsterdam. Advocates and public health experts are hopeful that these findings will resonate internationally and inspire a wave of innovative obesity prevention strategies that prioritize community engagement and systematic analysis of health determinants. The promise of a healthier future lies not only in understanding the complexity of obesity but also in uniting stakeholders in diverse settings to collectively unravel new pathways for intervention.

As public health officials continue to navigate the complexities of obesity prevention, studies stemming from novel methodologies such as these will prove invaluable. By applying system dynamics methods, the Amsterdam research exemplifies how collaborative model-building can lead to tailored and effective multi-strategy interventions. It shines a light on the potential for community-driven solutions to yield meaningful changes in health outcomes.

In conclusion, the findings from this pioneering research not only underscore the complexities surrounding obesity prevention but also validate the necessity for collective action. Integrating stakeholder perspectives through a system dynamics approach showcases the promising potential of collaborative health interventions grounded in local realities. By celebrating and building on these initiatives, communities worldwide can take significant strides towards curbing the obesity epidemic and creating healthier environments for all.

Subject of Research: Obesity prevention through system dynamics methods.

Article Title: Applying system dynamics methods for local obesity prevention: results from a group model building study in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Article References: Waterlander, W., Luna Pinzon, A., Dijkstra, C. et al. Applying system dynamics methods for local obesity prevention: results from a group model building study in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Health Res Policy Sys 23, 131 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01398-6

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12961-025-01398-6

Keywords: Obesity prevention, system dynamics, public health, community engagement, group model building.

The study was conducted by Heredia-Pi et al., who embarked on in-depth fieldwork to explore the nuances of diabetes care experiences from a gender perspective. Ethnography, a qualitative research approach rooted in immersive observation and narrative analysis, enabled the researchers to capture the subjective realities of individuals living with type 2 diabetes. By staying embedded within these communities across rural and urban settings, they sought to unravel how gendered experiences shape health behaviors, coping mechanisms, and the social stigmas associated with chronic illness in markedly different environments.

Mexico, with its striking socio-economic gradients and rapid urbanization trends, presents an ideal setting to investigate how place and gender converge in chronic illness experiences. Rural zones often bear the hallmarks of limited healthcare infrastructure, poverty, and stronger adherence to traditional gender roles, whereas urban areas exhibit more complex health systems and evolving social norms. This dichotomy provided a fertile ground for the researchers to examine disparities in disease management and highlight systemic inequities that may exacerbate complications for either men or women with type 2 diabetes.

One of the pivotal findings from the study reveals that women living with type 2 diabetes in rural communities frequently encounter a unique set of challenges shaped by entrenched gender roles. These women often shoulder the bulk of domestic responsibilities, including caregiving, cooking, and household labor, which complicates their ability to prioritize their own health. The expectation to maintain family welfare sometimes leads to neglecting their dietary and medication regimens, thereby worsening clinical outcomes. Furthermore, access to education about diabetes self-management is often limited, entrenching knowledge gaps that deepen health disparities.

Conversely, men in rural settings face a different set of difficulties rooted in societal expectations about masculinity. The cultural imperative to appear strong and capable often deters men from openly acknowledging their illness or seeking timely medical intervention. Fear of stigma and appearing vulnerable can contribute to poorer disease control and higher rates of diabetes-related complications. These insights underscore how gender norms function as invisible barriers to effective health management, perpetuating cycles of neglect and adverse outcomes.

In contrast, the urban landscape paints a somewhat different picture, albeit with persistent gendered disparities. Urban women with type 2 diabetes generally have somewhat improved access to healthcare resources, nutrition information, and diabetes education programs. However, they continue to confront challenges balancing work, family, and self-care, as modern professional roles add new layers of responsibility and stress. The commercialized food environment in cities also introduces additional hurdles, with calorie-dense, nutrient-poor options widely available and aggressively marketed, complicating adherence to diabetes-appropriate diets.

Urban men, meanwhile, may benefit from more progressive attitudes toward health but still wrestle with entrenched ideas of masculinity that discourage vulnerability. Workplace cultures and social networks often reinforce notions of invulnerability, leading to underutilization of health services even when facilities are accessible. This phenomenon emphasizes that expanding healthcare availability alone is insufficient without addressing deep-seated gender ideologies influencing health behaviors.

Integral to the study’s methodology was the nuanced analysis of how participants negotiate their diabetes within the cultural fabric of familial relationships. Women, often regarded as the emotional and nutritional anchors of families, experience not only physical but psychosocial stress by balancing diabetes management against expectations to provide care for others. Men’s experiences are marked by social isolation around their illness, as openly discussing health concerns clashes with prevailing norms of stoicism. These dynamics demonstrate how gender deeply molds not only bodily experiences of diabetes but also the social texture within which those experiences unfold.

Of particular note is how the intersection of gender with socioeconomic status compounds these disparities. Rural women with lower income levels face compounded vulnerabilities due to limited healthcare access, low literacy, and economic dependence, restricting disease management options and amplifying risk. In urban settings, economic inequality intersects with gender to influence food security and healthcare affordability, reinforcing patterns of health inequity. These intersections highlight the critical need for intersectional frameworks in diabetes care policies that recognize how multiple axes of identity impact disease experience and outcomes.

The study also draws attention to systemic deficiencies in Mexico’s health infrastructure concerning gender-sensitive care. Current diabetes interventions frequently employ generic, one-size-fits-all strategies, overlooking the socio-cultural realities shaping men’s and women’s lives differently. The authors argue for tailored health education programs and support systems that explicitly incorporate gender considerations—addressing, for instance, the caregiving burdens faced by women or the stigmatization fears of men—to enhance adherence and wellbeing.

An innovative dimension of this research is its use of ethnography to amplify voices often marginalized in public health narratives. By focusing on the lived, everyday realities of individuals, the study transcends statistical analyses to reveal the human stories behind diabetes statistics. This approach brings critical empathy to the discourse, emphasizing that effective interventions require understanding patients within their unique gendered contexts rather than abstract clinical categories.

The findings bear profound implications for global diabetes strategies, especially in middle-income countries experiencing rapid social transformation. Mexico’s example illustrates the urgent need to integrate gender as a central axis in chronic disease management frameworks. Policies that ignore gendered experiences risk overlooking crucial determinants of health behaviors and outcomes, thus perpetuating avoidable disparities and inefficiencies.

Moreover, the research resonates with broader theoretical discourses on health equity, suggesting that gender operates as both a social determinant and a mediator of healthcare access and quality. This dual role mandates interdisciplinary collaborations involving healthcare providers, social scientists, and community leaders to design and implement culturally attuned, gender-aware diabetes programs.

Given the global surge of type 2 diabetes cases and the rising burden on health systems, translating such nuanced ethnographic insights into practice is not merely advisable but imperative. Innovations such as community-based peer support groups differentiated by gender, targeted health literacy campaigns, and flexible care models that accommodate caregiving demands promise to bridge the gap between policy and patients’ lived realities.

In summary, Heredia-Pi and colleagues’ ethnographic exploration offers a compelling, richly textured portrait of how gender shapes the daily reality of living with type 2 diabetes in Mexico’s contrasting rural and urban environments. The study’s robust findings invite policymakers, clinicians, and researchers to rethink standard approaches, foreground gender as a core variable, and champion equity-informed innovations in chronic disease management that honor diversity and complexity.

As healthcare continues to evolve in the 21st century, such gender-sensitive insights advance the promise of truly personalized medicine—not just at the molecular or genetic level but at the intersection of culture, identity, and lived experience. Addressing the gendered dimensions of diabetes holds promise not only for enhancing patient outcomes but also for fostering inclusive health systems that reflect the multifaceted realities of all individuals living with chronic illness.

Subject of Research: Gendered experience of people living with type 2 diabetes in rural and urban Mexico

Article Title: Gendered experience of people living with type 2 diabetes in rural and urban Mexico: an ethnographic study

Article References:
Heredia-Pi, I.B., Orozco-Núñez, E., Guerrero-López, C.M. et al. Gendered experience of people living with type 2 diabetes in rural and urban Mexico: an ethnographic study. Int J Equity Health 24, 157 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02523-1

Image Credits: AI Generated

Herpes zoster is caused by the reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus, which remains dormant in nerve tissues following primary infection, usually in childhood as chickenpox. The reemergence of this virus in older adults results in painful, debilitating rashes and potentially severe complications such as postherpetic neuralgia. Vaccination against herpes zoster has proven highly effective in reducing both the incidence and severity of the disease. However, vaccine coverage rates remain suboptimal across many urban centers in China, prompting researchers to explore the underlying reasons through qualitative methodologies that capture lived experiences, perceptions, and decision-making processes.

The study employs semi-structured interviews and focus groups with urban residents across diverse demographic backgrounds to unpack their cognitive and emotional responses to the herpes zoster vaccine. This qualitative approach is invaluable because it transcends quantitative statistics to reveal nuanced factors like trust in healthcare providers, cultural beliefs regarding aging and illness, and the influence of peer networks. These subjective elements often dictate whether individuals feel motivated or hesitant to accept vaccination, shaping the trajectory of public health uptake beyond mere availability or policy mandates.

One prominent barrier identified is the widespread lack of awareness and knowledge about herpes zoster as a preventable condition and the existence of an effective vaccine. Many participants held misconceptions about the nature of shingles, conflating it with other dermatological conditions or perceiving it as an inevitable part of aging that cannot be mitigated. This gap in understanding fosters a sense of fatalism and diminishes perceived urgency, effectively dampening vaccination intentions. Public health campaigns must therefore prioritize clear, evidence-based education to dismantle misinformation and highlight the benefits of early vaccination.

Compounding the knowledge deficit are concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy, commonly fueled by skepticism toward new vaccine technologies and perceived governmental transparency. Urban residents expressed fears about potential side effects or unknown long-term consequences, which were sometimes amplified by circulating rumors on social media platforms or anecdotal accounts from acquaintances. This phenomenon aligns with global patterns of vaccine hesitancy where confidence in health authorities and vaccine science is critical for acceptance. Strengthening communication channels and transparency about vaccine development processes could mitigate these fears and enhance trust.

Healthcare system factors also play a pivotal role. The logistics surrounding vaccine access — including clinic availability, appointment scheduling, and direct costs — were frequently cited as inconvenient or burdensome. Urban lifestyles characterized by busy work schedules and crowded health facilities create a structural barrier that discourages timely vaccination. Moreover, the fragmentation between primary care and specialty services leads to inconsistent physician recommendations, which is a crucial determinant of patient compliance. Integrating vaccination services within routine healthcare visits could streamline uptake and align with patient behaviors.

Interestingly, cultural perceptions about illness and aging influenced responses to the herpes zoster vaccine. In some urban Chinese contexts, conditions associated with older age are normalized rather than medicalized, meaning that symptoms like pain or rash may be tolerated as part of natural decline rather than signs warranting prevention. This cultural framing reduces motivation for preemptive action and shifts attention toward treatment rather than prevention. Tailoring public health messaging to resonate with these cultural narratives, while gently reframing preventive health as a means to preserve vitality, could enhance receptivity.

Conversely, factors that facilitate vaccination intentions emerged as equally instructive. Trusted endorsements from healthcare providers significantly boosted confidence, illustrating the importance of clinician-patient relationships in shaping health behaviors. When physicians proactively discussed herpes zoster risks and vaccine benefits, patients reported feeling more empowered and reassured in their decision-making. Training healthcare professionals to initiate these conversations and address concerns comprehensively is essential in closing the intention-to-action gap.

Moreover, personal or vicarious experiences with herpes zoster markedly heightened perceived susceptibility, prompting stronger vaccination intentions. Witnessing the suffering of family members or friends due to shingles created emotionally salient reminders of the disease’s seriousness, motivating preventive action. This finding underscores the psychological mechanism of perceived risk as a driver of health behavior and suggests that testimonials and storytelling could serve as powerful public health tools.

Community-level social norms also influenced vaccine uptake. In urban environments where proactive health behaviors were socially valued and discussed openly, individuals felt a sense of collective responsibility and were more inclined to vaccinate. Conversely, social circles harboring skepticism or indifference toward vaccination perpetuated hesitancy. This social contagion effect highlights the role of peer influence and communal attitudes in public health interventions.

Digital media environment presented a double-edged sword. On one hand, official health information disseminated via online platforms expanded reach and accessibility of credible vaccine knowledge. On the other, misinformation proliferated rapidly, complicating efforts to establish consensus on vaccine safety and necessity. Technological literacy and critical appraisal skills become paramount in enabling individuals to navigate this informational landscape effectively. Public health authorities may need to collaborate with tech companies to monitor and counteract false narratives about herpes zoster vaccination.

Socioeconomic factors intercepted vaccine intentions as well. Cost considerations were a tangible impediment for some urban residents, despite the economic benefits of preventing herpes zoster-associated complications. Out-of-pocket expenses for the vaccine or related medical visits deterred lower-income individuals from prioritizing immunization. Policy interventions aimed at subsidizing or incorporating herpes zoster vaccination into public insurance schemes might stimulate equitable access and uptake.

The timing of vaccine introduction and public familiarity is another determinant. As the herpes zoster vaccine is relatively new in China compared to other routine vaccines, initial uncertainty and lack of historical precedent contribute to hesitancy. Over time, as vaccination becomes normalized and visibly endorsed by community leaders and influencers, uptake may improve. Early adopters and pilot programs could serve as catalysts to shift social norms toward acceptance.

This study reinforces the complexity of vaccine hesitancy as a dynamic and context-dependent phenomenon that demands tailored, multifocal strategies rather than one-size-fits-all solutions. The qualitative lens applied by Yuan and colleagues captures the lived realities of urban residents negotiating layers of information, trust, culture, and system constraints. Their findings invite policymakers, healthcare providers, and communicators to co-create interventions attuned to local identities and practical challenges.

In addressing herpes zoster vaccination in urban China, these insights come at a critical juncture when aging populations expand and the global health community intensifies focus on vaccine-preventable diseases beyond childhood immunization schedules. By integrating qualitative evidence into design and implementation, public health initiatives stand to improve their resonance, efficacy, and ultimately, the health trajectories of millions at risk for herpes zoster and its complications.

The research also serves as an exemplar for examining vaccination intentions amid other emerging adult immunizations, illustrating transferable lessons across contexts and diseases. From reinforcing provider-patient communication, enhancing educational outreach, ensuring equitable access, to counteracting misinformation, these multifaceted approaches could yield substantial public health dividends. The interplay of scientific knowledge, cultural sensitivity, and empathetic engagement featured in this study epitomizes the future of effective vaccination campaigns in complex urban settings.

As urban centers grapple with the dual challenges of infectious diseases and demographic shifts, advancing understanding of barriers and facilitators to vaccination moves from academic inquiry to urgent public health imperative. The comprehensive qualitative framework developed here offers a blueprint for researchers and practitioners aiming to close the gap between vaccine availability and acceptance, transforming preventive medicine from theoretical promise into everyday reality.

Subject of Research: Barriers and facilitators influencing herpes zoster vaccination intentions among urban residents in China.

Article Title: The barriers and facilitators of herpes zoster vaccination intentions of urban residents in China: a qualitative study.

Article References:
Yuan, B., Long, C., Wang, M. et al. The barriers and facilitators of herpes zoster vaccination intentions of urban residents in China: a qualitative study. Global Health Research and Policy 10, 19 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-025-00413-1

Image Credits: AI Generated