<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UniProt &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/uniprot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 13:56:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>AI-guided enzyme search yields two new cellulases and an eightfold secretion boost in Bacillus subtilis</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ai-guided-enzyme-search-yields-two-new-cellulases-and-an-eightfold-secretion-boost-in-bacillus-subtilis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake Davidson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 13:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bacillus subtilis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bacillus subtilis enzyme secretion enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuel enzyme development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnological applications of newly discovered cellulases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carboxymethylcellulose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CatPred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cellulase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational nominations for enzyme identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning in enzyme prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enzyme discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enzyme discovery using AI-guided screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental validation of cellulases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extracellular enzyme production optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GH5 endoglucanase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GH5 endoglucanases for lignocellulose deconstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lignocellulose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutagenesis of novel cellulases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protein Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recombinant expression of cellulases in E. coli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretory production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequence-diversity-guided enzyme screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signal peptide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UniProt]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=337575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study links database-guided discovery of two uncharacterised GH5 endoglucanases with two rounds of mutagenesis and an approximately eightfold increase in extracellular AQSP_CL production in Bacillus subtilis, while showing that CatPred activity predictions did not correlate with experimental CMC measurements.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researchers have linked the discovery of two previously uncharacterised GH5 endoglucanases to experimental assessment of computational nominations, lead-enzyme development and extracellular production in Bacillus subtilis, according to a study published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts. Cellulases of glycoside hydrolase family 5 are central to lignocellulose deconstruction, but identifying additional GH5 enzymes remains slow. Deep-learning predictors have proliferated in recent years, yet few studies carry their predictions through experimental validation and testing in a production host. The new work addresses that gap by taking sequence-diversity-guided candidates all the way to measurable enzyme activity, mutagenesis and secretory recovery.</p>
<p>The team began with 25,148 initial UniProt entries, which they clustered and filtered using CatPred-based selection combined with homology searches seeded by EglS, a known GH5 endoglucanase, supplemented by two comparative screening routes. This produced a 23-gene panel for experimental testing. Twenty-two candidates were expressed in Escherichia coli and assayed on carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), with EglS retained as a separate control. Two enzymes, AQSP_CL and MACA_CL, for which the authors found no prior biochemical characterisation, were purified alongside EglS and the thermophilic benchmark Cel5A, making them genuinely new entries in the GH5 catalogue.</p>
<p>Characterisation of the purified enzymes showed that both new candidates have short-assay temperature optima of 70 °C. AQSP_CL was most active at pH 5.0 and gave an apparent mass-based CMC kinetic-efficiency estimate of 0.201 U·mL·mg⁻¹, close to the 0.231 U·mL·mg⁻¹ measured for EglS. The thermophilic benchmark Cel5A remained the more thermostable enzyme of the set. These apparent efficiency values are based on CMC rather than purified substrates, a distinction the authors preserve when reporting enzyme properties.</p>
<p>The computational predictions met a mixed reception in the experimental data. CatPred predictions of activity on cellotetraose showed no detected correlation with lysate CMC activity across the eight assayed candidates with reconciled identities, with a Spearman correlation of ρ = 0.10 and p = 0.82, a cautionary result for anyone relying on substrate-level model outputs without wet-lab confirmation. Ensemble docking offered partial discrimination: AQSP_CL had the highest fraction of poses meeting the operational distance criterion, at 52.0% compared with 28.7–39.0% for the other enzymes, although the differences were not resolved at the conformer level and Vina scores did not distinguish the enzymes.</p>
<p>Protein engineering proceeded in two rounds of mutagenesis. In first-round screening, the M65Q variant had the highest measured lysate activity among the tested single substitutions, at 1.61-fold wild type. A few-shot learning model trained on the first-round data then nominated the second-round library, but the additive predictions did not generalise to combinations, underscoring the difficulty of extrapolating from single substitutions to multi-mutant combinations with limited training data.</p>
<p>The final stage moved production into Bacillus subtilis. Screening of signal peptides identified SP3 as the best performer, increasing the extracellular activity of parental AQSP_CL approximately eightfold over the signal-peptide-free construct. The authors are explicit about scope: the CMC and flask-scale measurements establish enzyme properties and extracellular recovery, and AQSP_CL provides a new scaffold for further biomass-deconstruction research, but biomass-conversion performance remains to be evaluated on real lignocellulosic substrates.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Discovery, engineering, and secretory production of GH5 endoglucanase enzymes for lignocellulose deconstruction</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Sequence-diversity-guided discovery, model-guided mutagenesis, and secretory production of GH5 endoglucanases in Bacillus subtilis</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Jeong, S.-J., Yoo, M., Seo, H.-D., Song, N.-E., Cho, C.-W., Hong, H.-D., Rhee, Y. K., &amp; Choi, J. W. (2026). Sequence-diversity-guided discovery, model-guided mutagenesis, and secretory production of GH5 endoglucanases in Bacillus subtilis. <em>Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02838-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02838-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02838-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s13068-026-02838-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> GH5 endoglucanase, cellulase, lignocellulose, Bacillus subtilis, CatPred, machine learning, enzyme discovery, signal peptide, protein engineering, carboxymethylcellulose, secretory production, UniProt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">337575</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
