<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>triple-negative breast cancer imaging &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/triple-negative-breast-cancer-imaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 13:08:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>New Nectin-4-Targeted PET Scan Outperforms FDG in Aggressive Breast Cancer</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-nectin-4-targeted-pet-scan-outperforms-fdg-in-aggressive-breast-cancer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathaniel Bowman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 13:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[[68Ga]Ga-FZ-NR-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements in breast cancer imaging techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antibody-drug conjugates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early detection and staging of metastasis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDG PET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDG PET/CT in breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gallium-68 radioligand in cancer detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improved imaging for aggressive breast tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular imaging in oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nectin-4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nectin-4 as cancer biomarker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nectin-4 targeted PET scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PET/CT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prognosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiotracer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[receptor-specific PET imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survival prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeted radiotracers in cancer diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triple-negative breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triple-negative breast cancer imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumor heterogeneity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumor surface molecular signature]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=194715</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new gallium-68 tracer targeting Nectin-4 detected more lesions and predicted survival better than FDG PET/CT in patients with recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Triple-negative breast cancer remains one of the most feared diagnoses in oncology. Lacking the estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors that make other breast cancers vulnerable to targeted drugs, it tends to relapse early, spread aggressively, and resist conventional chemotherapy. For patients whose disease has returned or metastasized, clinicians have long relied on FDG PET/CT, a scan that lights up tumors based on their glucose appetite. But glucose metabolism is a blunt instrument: inflamed tissue, healing wounds, and infections can all glow on an FDG scan, and some metabolically quiet tumors escape detection entirely. A new study published in the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging suggests that a fundamentally different imaging strategy, one that reads a molecular signature on the tumor cell surface rather than the cell&#8217;s metabolic activity, could change how these patients are scanned, staged, and ultimately selected for treatment.</p>
<p>The tracer at the center of the research is called [68Ga]Ga-FZ-NR-1, a gallium-68-labeled radioligand designed to bind specifically to Nectin-4, a cell adhesion molecule that has emerged as one of the most compelling targets in modern oncology. Nectin-4 sits on the surface of cells and is largely silenced in healthy adult tissue, but it is overexpressed in a wide range of malignancies, including triple-negative breast cancer, where it has been linked to proliferation, metastasis, and poor prognosis. Its clinical importance has been underscored by the success of enfortumab vedotin, a Nectin-4-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved for urothelial carcinoma, and by a growing pipeline of next-generation Nectin-4-targeted agents now being tested across solid tumors. If a tracer could map where Nectin-4 is expressed throughout a patient&#8217;s body, physicians would gain a non-invasive window into which tumors might respond to these drugs.</p>
<p>That is precisely what a team at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center set out to test. In a clinical translational study, the researchers enrolled 40 patients with recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, each of whom underwent both [68Ga]Ga-FZ-NR-1 PET/CT and conventional FDG PET/CT within a single week. This head-to-head design allowed a direct comparison of the two tracers on the same patients, same lesions, and same time points, eliminating many of the confounders that plague cross-study comparisons. Diagnostic performance was assessed against a reference standard and compared statistically using the McNemar test, while survival outcomes were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier methods to determine whether imaging features could predict how long patients remained free of progression or alive.</p>
<p>The first striking finding concerned heterogeneity. When the researchers examined Nectin-4 expression across all lesions within a single patient, they found remarkable spatial variability: the median inter-lesion fold difference in uptake was 3.10, and the median coefficient of variation reached 31.70 percent. In practical terms, one metastatic deposit in a patient might light up intensely on the Nectin-4 scan while another lesion in the same body barely registered. This kind of whole-body mapping of molecular heterogeneity is something a single biopsy can never provide, and it carries real therapeutic consequences. Antibody-drug conjugates depend on target expression at every disease site; a tumor clone that has downregulated Nectin-4 could survive treatment and seed relapse, even when the primary lesion shows abundant target. The scan essentially renders this invisible biology visible.</p>
<p>On raw signal intensity, FDG still held an advantage. The study found that FDG achieved higher maximum standardized uptake values, or SUVmax, reflecting the intense glucose consumption typical of aggressive cancers. But raw uptake is not the whole story, because a tracer is only as useful as its contrast between tumor and surrounding tissue. Here the new agent excelled: [68Ga]Ga-FZ-NR-1 delivered a significantly higher tumor-to-background ratio across a variety of metastatic sites. Because Nectin-4 is minimally expressed in normal adult tissues, the tracer paints tumors in sharp relief against a quiet background, whereas FDG competes with the physiological glucose uptake of the brain, heart, bowel, and inflamed tissue. High contrast translates directly into clinical confidence, allowing radiologists to distinguish true lesions from ambiguous uptake with far less uncertainty.</p>
<p>The diagnostic numbers bore this out decisively. [68Ga]Ga-FZ-NR-1 PET/CT detected more lesions overall than FDG PET/CT and achieved a sensitivity of 98.13 percent compared with 93.46 percent for FDG, meaning it missed fewer true tumor deposits. The gap in specificity was even more dramatic: 68.63 percent for the Nectin-4 tracer versus just 27.45 percent for FDG. In other words, when the Nectin-4 scan showed uptake, it was far more likely to represent genuine malignancy rather than a benign mimic. For patients with recurrent disease, where scar tissue from prior surgery and radiation can confound interpretation, that difference in specificity could spare patients from unnecessary biopsies, inappropriate treatment changes, and the psychological toll of false alarms.</p>
<p>Beyond diagnosis, the study delivered something arguably more valuable: prognostic power. The researchers measured volumetric and heterogeneity parameters from the baseline Nectin-4 scans, including metabolic tumor volume at a 40 percent threshold (MTV40) and a heterogeneity index (HI). Patients with a high baseline mean MTV40 on the Nectin-4 scan had significantly shorter progression-free survival, with a P value of 0.009, while a high heterogeneity index predicted significantly shorter overall survival, with a P value of 0.008. These associations suggest that the sheer burden of Nectin-4-expressing disease and the unevenness of its expression are not merely visual curiosities but quantitative signals of aggressive biology. A single pretreatment scan could therefore help stratify patients into risk groups before a single dose of therapy is given.</p>
<p>The implications extend naturally into the era of Nectin-4-targeted therapeutics. Companion diagnostics have become essential as antibody-drug conjugates multiply, because these expensive and sometimes toxic drugs work best in patients whose tumors actually express the target. Immunohistochemistry on a biopsy sample offers only a local, single-site answer, and studies in urothelial carcinoma have shown that Nectin-4 expression can decrease during metastatic spread, contributing to resistance against enfortumab vedotin. A whole-body PET tracer like [68Ga]Ga-FZ-NR-1 offers a complementary, dynamic view: it can confirm target expression across every known lesion, quantify heterogeneity, and potentially identify patients most likely to benefit from Nectin-4-directed treatment. The authors describe their findings as hypothesis-generating, an appropriately cautious framing, but the direction of travel is clear.</p>
<p>Several caveats temper the enthusiasm. The study involved 40 patients at a single institution, and the survival analyses, while statistically significant, require validation in larger, multicenter cohorts before they can guide clinical decision-making. The comparison also reflects the specific tracer and imaging protocols used, and questions remain about optimal timing, dosimetry, and how Nectin-4 PET findings should be integrated with existing staging tools. Cost and availability of gallium-68 radiopharmaceutical production will also shape adoption, although generator-based production and the growing network of radiopharmacies are steadily lowering those barriers. None of these caveats, however, diminishes the central achievement of the study: demonstrating, in a rigorous head-to-head comparison, that a molecularly targeted tracer can outperform the workhorse of oncologic imaging in one of the hardest cancers to image and treat.</p>
<p>For patients with recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, the study offers a glimpse of a more precise future. Instead of asking simply whether a tumor is metabolically active, clinicians could soon ask whether it expresses the specific molecule their next drug is designed to attack, and how uniformly that expression is distributed across the entire disease burden. The Fudan team&#8217;s work positions [68Ga]Ga-FZ-NR-1 as both a diagnostic upgrade and a prognostic instrument, a dual role that mirrors the theranostic philosophy transforming nuclear medicine. As Nectin-4-targeted antibody-drug conjugates advance through clinical trials in breast cancer and beyond, the ability to see the target before committing to therapy could become as routine as receptor testing is today. This study is an early but persuasive step toward that goal, and it signals that the next generation of cancer imaging will speak the molecular language of the tumor itself.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Nectin-4-targeted [68Ga]Ga-FZ-NR-1 PET/CT imaging for diagnosis and prognosis in recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Prognostic value and diagnostic performance of nectin-4-targeted [68Ga]Ga-FZ-NR-1 PET/CT versus [18F]FDG in recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Li, Y., Sun, Y., Sun, L., Wang, D., Pan, X., Xu, X., &amp; Song, S. (2026). Prognostic value and diagnostic performance of nectin-4-targeted [68Ga]Ga-FZ-NR-1 PET/CT versus [18F]FDG in recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. <em>European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-08177-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-08177-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-08177-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00259-026-08177-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Nectin-4, triple-negative breast cancer, PET/CT, [68Ga]Ga-FZ-NR-1, FDG PET, molecular imaging, antibody-drug conjugates, tumor heterogeneity, prognosis, radiotracer, nuclear medicine, survival prediction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">194715</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ahead-of-Print Highlights from The Journal of Nuclear Medicine – April 18, 2025</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ahead-of-print-highlights-from-the-journal-of-nuclear-medicine-april-18-2025/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced imaging agents for tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comprehensive visualization of tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnostic imaging breakthroughs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heterogeneity in cancer types]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular imaging technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurology diagnostic developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novel radiotracers for cancer detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear medicine advancements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalized patient care in oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PET scanning innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precision medicine in oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triple-negative breast cancer imaging]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/ahead-of-print-highlights-from-the-journal-of-nuclear-medicine-april-18-2025/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Reston, VA (April 18, 2025)—In a series of breakthrough developments, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine (JNM) has unveiled pioneering research that promises to revolutionize diagnostic imaging and precision medicine in oncology and neurology. These newly published studies leverage cutting-edge molecular imaging technologies to enhance the detection, differentiation, and prognosis of complex diseases, representing significant strides [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reston, VA (April 18, 2025)—In a series of breakthrough developments, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine (JNM) has unveiled pioneering research that promises to revolutionize diagnostic imaging and precision medicine in oncology and neurology. These newly published studies leverage cutting-edge molecular imaging technologies to enhance the detection, differentiation, and prognosis of complex diseases, representing significant strides toward more personalized and effective patient care. The insights elucidated across multiple investigations showcase the transformative potential of positron emission tomography (PET) combined with novel radiotracers and advanced scanning systems, redefining the capabilities of nuclear medicine in clinical practice.</p>
<p>One of the most compelling advances reported involves the creation of an innovative imaging agent specifically engineered to target triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a notoriously heterogeneous and aggressive subtype characterized by the absence of estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors. This novel agent binds to a shared protein expressed across various TNBC phenotypes, enabling comprehensive visualization of this elusive tumor type. Preclinical models utilizing PET/CT scanning demonstrated the agent’s capacity to accurately highlight tumors with diverse molecular profiles, offering unprecedented precision in detecting and characterizing TNBC lesions. Such improvements are critical given the difficulty in diagnosing and treating TNBC, which lacks targeted therapies and is often associated with poor patient outcomes.</p>
<p>In the realm of neurodegenerative disease, a cutting-edge brain imaging technique utilizing the radiotracer ^18F-florzolotau showed promising results for differentiating atypical parkinsonian syndromes, including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD). Both disorders often present with overlapping clinical features, complicating diagnosis and delaying appropriate intervention. The study demonstrated that specific visual patterns identifiable on ^18F-florzolotau PET scans allowed clinicians to more effectively distinguish these disorders from other neurodegenerative conditions in real-world settings. This advancement not only enhances diagnostic accuracy but also underscores the growing role of tau-targeted PET imaging in clarifying complex neuropathologies.</p>
<p>Another noteworthy contribution centers on the prognostic capabilities of early PET imaging following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy in patients with aggressive lymphoma. While CAR T therapy represents a groundbreaking therapeutic approach, durable remissions are not achieved uniformly. By analyzing PET scans one and three months post-treatment, researchers identified correlations between residual tumor metabolic activity, lesion size, and patient outcomes. These findings suggest that early PET imaging can serve as a robust biomarker to stratify patients at risk of relapse, supporting timely clinical decision-making and potentially guiding modifications to therapeutic regimens. The integration of dynamic PET metrics into the post-CAR T monitoring paradigm could significantly influence personalized management strategies in hematologic malignancies.</p>
<p>In addition to biological innovations, advancements in PET/CT scanner technology were explored through a comparative assessment of traditional scanners versus long–axial-field-of-view (LAFOV) systems. The study highlights that LAFOV scanners, characterized by extended detection coverage, yield higher patient throughput while reducing operator time and radiation exposure per scan. Importantly, these scanners demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness globally, particularly in resource-limited settings, due to their efficiency and reduced consumable needs. This technological leap is poised to democratize access to high-quality molecular imaging, enabling broader implementation across diverse healthcare infrastructures, from large academic hospitals to smaller regional clinics.</p>
<p>These breakthroughs collectively illustrate an evolving landscape where molecular imaging transcends traditional boundaries, facilitating earlier and more precise disease characterization. The ability of novel radiotracers to target specific molecular pathways not only improves detection sensitivity but also opens new avenues for theranostics—integrating diagnostic imaging and targeted treatment. In oncology, this translates to optimizing therapy selection and monitoring therapeutic response at an individual level, maximizing benefit while minimizing unnecessary interventions. In neurology, molecular imaging’s refined specificity aids in unraveling complex pathologies, fostering earlier diagnosis and better tailored management plans.</p>
<p>The underpinning technologies leverage positron emission tomography’s extraordinary sensitivity to trace radiolabeled molecules in vivo. PET imaging, coupled with computed tomography (CT), provides high-resolution anatomical and functional data, offering a comprehensive picture of biological processes. Enhanced by new radiotracers such as ^18F-florzolotau and the TNBC-targeting agent, PET can now illuminate pathological changes at the molecular level far earlier than conventional imaging. This capability is particularly vital in diseases with heterogeneous and dynamic pathophysiology—such as TNBC and atypical parkinsonism—where clinical manifestations may be nonspecific and traditional imaging falls short.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the economic and operational benefits demonstrated by LAFOV PET/CT systems address long-standing challenges in nuclear medicine accessibility. Reduced radiation dose requirements align with safety imperatives, while high throughput caters to increasing demand without proportionally escalating costs or manpower. Such systems offer promising adaptability for global healthcare systems striving to balance technological sophistication with cost constraints.</p>
<p>As these studies illustrate, precision imaging tools wield immense promise for reshaping clinical workflows. For patients with aggressive cancers or complex neurodegenerative diseases, timely and accurate diagnosis is often the determinant between effective intervention and disease progression. The integration of advanced imaging biomarkers into routine practice represents a paradigm shift, emphasizing a personalized approach where therapy and follow-up decisions are informed by detailed, real-time molecular insights.</p>
<p>The Journal of Nuclear Medicine thus continues to be an essential conduit for disseminating novel findings that push the envelope in molecular imaging and theranostics. Researchers and clinicians alike are provided with critical knowledge and technological advancements to propel the field forward. With millions of practitioners accessing JNM annually, the impact of these innovations is global, fostering an international community dedicated to elevating patient care through science-driven precision medicine.</p>
<p>For further details and continuous updates on these pioneering studies, the JNM website and affiliated social media channels offer comprehensive resources. Researchers and the broader medical community are encouraged to engage with the content to stay abreast of emerging trends and applications in nuclear medicine.</p>
<p>Subject of Research: Molecular imaging advancements in oncology and neurology focusing on novel PET radiotracers, improved diagnostic accuracy for triple-negative breast cancer and atypical parkinsonism, PET-based prognostication post-CAR T therapy in lymphoma, and cost-effectiveness of advanced PET/CT scanners.</p>
<p>Article Title: Cutting-Edge PET Imaging Advances Promise Precision Diagnostics in Cancer and Neurodegenerative Diseases</p>
<p>News Publication Date: April 17, 2025</p>
<p>Web References:<br />
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268859<br />
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268956<br />
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.269670<br />
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.269203</p>
<p>Keywords: Molecular imaging, Positron emission tomography, Triple-negative breast cancer, ^18F-florzolotau, Progressive supranuclear palsy, Corticobasal degeneration, CAR T therapy, Lymphoma prognosis, Long–axial-field-of-view PET, Theranostics, Neurodegenerative diseases, PET/CT scanner technology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">37818</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
