<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>trap states &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/trap-states/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 02:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Hotter Chemistry, Brighter Traps: Growth Temperature Steers Copper-Rich Defects in Quantum Dots</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hotter-chemistry-brighter-traps-growth-temperature-steers-copper-rich-defects-in-quantum-dots/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katie Riggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 02:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chalcopyrite phase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colloidal nanocrystals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper indium sulfide quantum dots for solar energy applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper-rich defect formation in CuInS2 quantum dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper-rich off-stoichiometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CuInS2 quantum dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defect physics in heavy-metal-free quantum emitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defect-mediated photoluminescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downshifting films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy-metal-free emitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of stoichiometry control on quantum dot light emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of synthesis temperature on quantum dot properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luminescent solar concentrators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoluminescence Quantum Yield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantum dot growth temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of deep-level defects in quantum dot luminescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetic strategies for defect engineering in nanocr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature-dependent defect emission in semiconductor nanocrystals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time-resolved photoluminescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trap states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuning optical properties of quantum dots via growth parameters]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=214139</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study shows that growth temperature tunes copper-rich off-stoichiometry and deep trap-state emission in colloidal CuInS2 quantum dots, establishing synthesis-structure-photophysics correlations for heavy-metal-free downshifting emitters.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quantum dots have spent two decades in the spotlight as tiny semiconductor crystals whose colors can be dialed in simply by changing their size. Yet a new study of copper indium sulfide, one of the most promising heavy-metal-free emitters, shows that another dial matters just as much as size: the temperature at which the crystals grow. Researchers report that varying the growth temperature of colloidal CuInS2 quantum dots from 180 to 280 degrees Celsius systematically changes how copper-rich the crystals become, and that this off-stoichiometry in turn governs the deep-level defect emission that makes these materials attractive for solar windows, luminescent solar concentrators, and downshifting films. The work, published in the Journal of Nanoparticle Research, offers one of the more direct links yet between a simple synthetic knob and the defect physics that controls light emission in this class of nanocrystals.</p>
<p>CuInS2 belongs to the I-III-VI family of compound semiconductors and has long been prized as a less toxic alternative to cadmium- and lead-based quantum dots. Unlike conventional binary nanocrystals, where emission typically comes from band-edge recombination, CuInS2 quantum dots glow through a broad, strongly Stokes-shifted emission that arises when charge carriers recombine at deep trap states associated with intrinsic defects such as copper vacancies, copper interstitials, and related point defects. That defect-mediated glow is a feature rather than a bug: the broad emission spectrum is exactly what designers of luminescent solar concentrators want, because it allows a film to absorb sunlight across a wide range and re-emit it toward photovoltaic cells at the edges. But engineering those defects deliberately requires knowing precisely how synthesis conditions shape them.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Stefan C. Ghany and Richard A. Taylor of the University of the West Indies with collaborators at Brookhaven National Laboratory and North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, synthesized their quantum dots from copper(II) hexafluoroacetylacetonate hydrate and indium(III) diethyldithiocarbamate precursors. Beyond temperature, they varied reaction time from 10 to 60 minutes and adjusted the ratio of 1-dodecanethiol to oleic acid, two ligands that play very different roles in the reaction vessel. The resulting nanocrystals ranged from 1.4 to 7.0 nanometers in size and adopted quasi-spherical and triangular morphologies, giving the team a rich library of samples to compare across structural, compositional, and optical measurements.</p>
<p>A central structural finding concerns crystal phase. Powder X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy together showed that decreasing the oleic acid content pushed the nanocrystals from a predominantly wurtzite-like structure toward the chalcopyrite phase, the thermodynamically stable form of CuInS2. The wurtzite and chalcopyrite structures are close cousins on the energy landscape, and which one forms depends delicately on the balance of precursor reactivity, ligand coordination, and thermal energy available during nucleation and growth. Ligands that bind more strongly to particular crystal facets can stabilize metastable phases, so shifting the ligand mixture effectively re-tunes the surface energetics of the growing particles. For device engineers, phase quality matters because structural disorder introduces additional electronic states that can either enhance or quench emission.</p>
<p>The compositional story is where the temperature knob reveals its power. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed that growth temperature modulates particle size, morphology, and off-stoichiometric composition in a coupled way. The nanocrystals were generally copper-rich, indium-poor, and sulfur-rich, a composition the authors describe with the general formula Cu(1±x)In(1-y)S(2+z). This is a notable contrast with much of the existing literature, which has focused heavily on copper-poor CuInS2 quantum dots. Copper-rich off-stoichiometry implies an abundance of copper-related defect chemistry, including possible interstitial copper and copper sulfide-like surface domains, and the study demonstrates that the degree of this richness tracks directly with the growth conditions chosen in the flask.</p>
<p>Optically, the dots absorbed with tunable bandgaps between 2.06 and 2.32 electronvolts and emitted broadly across the visible and near-infrared, with emission peaks spanning 653 to 756 nanometers. The breadth and red-shift of the emission relative to the absorption edge are the classic signatures of trap-assisted recombination, in which an excited electron falls into a deep trap state before recombining radiatively with a hole. The researchers attribute the emission to a combination of intrinsic defects and surface-derived states, meaning that both the internal defect chemistry set by off-stoichiometry and the surface chemistry set by ligands contribute to the final optical output. In other words, the color and width of the glow encode a memory of how the crystal was built.</p>
<p>Time-resolved photoluminescence measurements added a kinetic dimension to the picture. The emission decayed with multiple characteristic time constants: a fast component of 1.1 to 1.7 nanoseconds, an intermediate component of 3.9 to 5.1 nanoseconds, and a slow component stretching from 9.2 to 26.9 nanoseconds. Multi-exponential decays of this kind indicate that several distinct recombination pathways operate in parallel, each associated with a different population of trap states or surface environments. Crucially, the relative weights and lifetimes of these components varied with growth conditions, confirming that changing the synthesis recipe does not merely shift the emission color but reshapes the entire landscape of electronic states through which excited carriers relax.</p>
<p>Photoluminescence quantum yields, the fraction of absorbed photons re-emitted as light, ranged from 5.30 to 8.43 percent across the sample library. While modest compared with the best core-shell architectures, these values correlated systematically with the growth-dependent copper-rich composition, the Cu-plus-to-In-3-plus surface ratio measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and particle morphology. That correlation is the practical payoff of the study: it suggests that a synthesis team aiming for brighter downshifting films can rationally tune growth temperature and ligand ratios to land in the most favorable corner of composition space, rather than relying on trial and error. It also provides a diagnostic principle, since surface copper speciation emerges as a useful proxy for emission quality.</p>
<p>The broader significance lies in how the study reframes defects in nanomaterials. For years, defect engineering was treated as a problem to be minimized, particularly in photovoltaics where traps kill efficiency. But in emitter materials designed for spectral conversion, defects are the working medium, and controlling their density and character is the central synthetic challenge. By establishing clear synthesis-structure-photophysics correlations for the copper-rich side of the CuInS2 composition map, the work complements the extensive literature on copper-deficient dots and gives the field a more complete, two-sided picture of how off-stoichiometry shapes emission. The authors also note that their approach connects to a growing body of work on doped and alloyed CuInS2 derivatives, including manganese-doped and gallium-doped variants, where similar defect physics governs performance.</p>
<p>For applications, the implications are concrete. Luminescent solar concentrators and quantum-dot solar windows depend on emitters that absorb broadly, emit efficiently, and remain stable in polymer matrices, and heavy-metal-free CuInS2 dots are among the leading candidates to meet those requirements without the toxicity concerns of cadmium or lead. The new results indicate that the recipe sheet for making them should list growth temperature as a first-order variable alongside precursor ratios and reaction time, because it quietly sets the copper content that in turn sets the trap landscape and the emission. As the field pushes toward higher quantum yields and scalable synthesis, studies that map such parameter space with structural, compositional, and time-resolved optical rigor provide the kind of groundwork on which practical, defect-engineered photonic materials can be built.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Growth-temperature control of copper-rich off-stoichiometry and defect-mediated photoluminescence in colloidal CuInS2 quantum dots</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Growth temperature modulates copper-rich off-stoichiometry and defect-mediated emission in colloidal CuInS2 quantum dots</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Growth temperature modulates copper-rich off-stoichiometry and defect-mediated emission in colloidal CuInS2 quantum dots. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-026-06773-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-026-06773-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-026-06773-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11051-026-06773-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> CuInS2 quantum dots, copper-rich off-stoichiometry, defect-mediated photoluminescence, growth temperature, trap states, photoluminescence quantum yield, colloidal nanocrystals, chalcopyrite phase, luminescent solar concentrators, downshifting films, time-resolved photoluminescence, heavy-metal-free emitters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">214139</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bulky Molecules Keep Rival Defect-Fighters From Cancelling Each Other Out in Perovskite Solar Cells</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/bulky-molecules-keep-rival-defect-fighters-from-cancelling-each-other-out-in-perovskite-solar-cells/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 09:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced photovoltaic research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atomic-scale defect chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charge carrier trapping in solar cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical engineering of perovskite surfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defect neutralization in perovskites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defect Passivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defect passivation strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defect-related efficiency loss in solar cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-performance perovskite solar cell fabrication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving stability of perovskite solar cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis acids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis acids and bases in photovoltaic materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis bases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-radiative recombination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perovskite solar cell efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perovskite Solar Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photovoltaics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point defects in perovskite materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power conversion efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steric hindrance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trap states]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=210073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chemists have engineered bulky Lewis acid and base pairs that evade mutual quenching to passivate both defect types in perovskite solar cells, pushing certified efficiency to 25.8 percent.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perovskite solar cells have spent a decade shattering efficiency records, but their Achilles heel has always been chemistry at the atomic scale. Tiny charged imperfections, known as point defects, litter the surface of the light-absorbing crystal. These defects act as traps that snatch up the energetic charge carriers the cell is trying to harvest, bleeding away efficiency and accelerating the material&#8217;s notorious tendency to degrade. Now a team of chemists and photovoltaic researchers at Northwestern University, working with collaborators in South Korea, has reported a deceptively simple fix for a long-standing paradox in how those defects are neutralized, and the result is a device that reaches a power conversion efficiency of 27.4 percent, with a certified steady-state value of 25.8 percent.</p>
<p>The paradox centers on two classic tools of the synthetic chemist: Lewis acids and Lewis bases. A Lewis base is a molecule that donates an electron pair, and it naturally seeks out positively charged, or cationic, defects on the perovskite surface. A Lewis acid, which accepts an electron pair, does the complementary job on negatively charged, or anionic, defects. In principle, adding both to a solar cell should heal both classes of defect at once. In practice, the strategy has repeatedly failed for the most fundamental of reasons: acids and bases react with each other. When mixed, they form stable adducts, quenching one another&#8217;s reactivity before either molecule ever reaches the defect it was designed to neutralize. The result is a passivation cocktail that neutralizes itself.</p>
<p>The new study, published in Nature Chemistry on 23 September 2026 and led by Donghoon Shin and Shuta Kitade under the supervision of Bin Chen and Edward H. Sargent, with Chad A. Mirkin and Mercouri G. Kanatzidis among the senior co-authors, sidesteps this self-defeating chemistry by making the two passivators chemically orthogonal. Orthogonality here means that each molecule reacts with its intended target on the perovskite surface but essentially ignores its partner in the solution. The key insight is geometric rather than electronic: the researchers exploited steric hindrance, the physical bulk of molecular groups, to keep the acid and base from getting close enough to share electrons.</p>
<p>The molecular design hinges on a family of bulky sp3-phosphine Lewis bases. Phosphines, compounds built around a trivalent phosphorus atom, are workhorse Lewis bases in coordination chemistry. By decorating the phosphorus center with bulky substituents arranged in tetrahedral, sp3-hybridized geometry, the team created bases whose lone electron pair is shielded by a thicket of atoms. When paired with fluorinated aromatic Lewis acids, these sterically congested phosphines simply cannot achieve the orbital overlap needed to form a conventional acid-base adduct. The fluorinated aromatic acids, for their part, are relatively weak and geometrically restrained acceptors, so the mutual attraction that normally dooms mixed acid-base formulations is suppressed at its source.</p>
<p>Crucially, the strategy works because of an asymmetry in accessibility. The defect sites on the perovskite surface, such as undercoordinated lead ions and halide vacancies, protrude from the crystal lattice and are more sterically exposed than the crowded acid-base pair is to itself. In other words, each passivator can still reach its target defect even though the two passivators cannot reach each other. The researchers describe this as a sterically gated arrangement, in which molecular bulk acts as a selective filter: small, exposed defect sites pass through the gate, while the bulky acid-base encounter does not. Spectroscopic measurements, including nuclear magnetic resonance and infrared techniques, along with defect-profiling methods such as drive-level capacitance profiling, support the picture that the two additives suppress trap states additively rather than destructively.</p>
<p>The photophysical consequences are exactly what defect passivation should deliver. Photoluminescence quantum yield measurements, which track how many absorbed photons are re-emitted rather than lost as heat, improve markedly when the orthogonal pair is applied, indicating that fewer photoexcited carriers are falling into trap states. Time-resolved photoluminescence shows longer carrier lifetimes, and transient absorption spectroscopy corroborates the reduction in non-radiative recombination pathways. Density functional theory calculations, performed with the VASP and ORCA packages, provide a molecular-level account of the binding energies involved, showing that each passivator binds effectively to its intended ionic defect while the acid-base interaction between the two molecules remains weak.</p>
<p>Translated into devices, the dual-passivation strategy produced impressive numbers. Solar cells fabricated with the sterically gated acid-base pair achieved power conversion efficiencies up to 27.4 percent, with an independently certified steady-state efficiency of 25.8 percent, placing the devices among the leading perovskite cells reported to date. Beyond raw efficiency, the team reported gains in operational stability, an equally important metric for a technology hoping to displace silicon in commercial panels. Because the passivation suppresses the charged surface defects that also serve as nucleation points for ion migration and chemical degradation, the molecular repair kit addresses both efficiency loss and instability with a single intervention.</p>
<p>The work also showcases an unusually broad collaboration across chemistry subdisciplines. Mirkin&#8217;s group contributed high-throughput spray-based screening methods for rapidly evaluating candidate passivators, developed with Jaewon Lee, while Kanatzidis brought deep expertise in halide perovskite materials chemistry. The team&#8217;s computational and spectroscopic characterization spanned X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry, and microscopy performed at Northwestern&#8217;s shared facilities. The underlying datasets have been deposited openly on Zenodo, and the authors have filed an invention disclosure with Northwestern University covering the molecular mutual passivation strategy, signaling interest in translating the chemistry toward commercial fabrication.</p>
<p>For the perovskite field, the significance of the result may lie less in the headline efficiency number than in the design principle behind it. Researchers have long known that single-function passivators leave half the defect population untouched, and that simply mixing acids and bases fails. The demonstration that steric gating can decouple two mutually reactive passivators gives the community a generalizable rule for building multi-component surface treatments: choose partners whose mutual reaction geometry is blocked but whose targets remain accessible. As perovskite technology pushes toward the detailed-balance efficiency limit set by Shockley and Queisser in 1961, every remaining percentage point must be wrested from non-radiative losses at surfaces and grain boundaries. Orthogonal, sterically engineered passivation offers a rational route to squeeze out those losses, and it suggests that the next generation of record-breaking cells may be designed as much by molecular architects thinking about shape and crowding as by device engineers optimizing layer thicknesses.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Orthogonal Lewis acid-base defect passivation in perovskite solar cells</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Sterically gated Lewis acid and base pairs enable orthogonal defect passivation in perovskite solar cells</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Sterically gated Lewis acid and base pairs enable orthogonal defect passivation in perovskite solar cells. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-026-02261-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-026-02261-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-026-02261-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41557-026-02261-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> perovskite solar cells, Lewis acids, Lewis bases, defect passivation, steric hindrance, phosphines, power conversion efficiency, non-radiative recombination, surface chemistry, Nature Chemistry, photovoltaics, trap states</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">210073</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
