<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tofogliflozin &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/tofogliflozin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:14:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Diabetes Drug Face-Off: New Japanese Trial Tests Whether a Popular SGLT2 Inhibitor Eats Away at Muscle</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/diabetes-drug-face-off-new-japanese-trial-tests-whether-a-popular-sglt2-inhibitor-eats-away-at-muscle/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical trial protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors and sulfonylureas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diabetes drug safety in older adults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes medication muscle loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diabetes therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glimepiride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of tofogliflozin on skeletal muscle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese clinical trial on diabetes drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muscle preservation in type 2 diabetes treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmacology of SGLT2 inhibitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential muscle erosion from diabetes medications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[randomized trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarcopenia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGLT2 inhibitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGLT2 inhibitor effects in lean diabetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skeletal muscle mass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIGHTEN clinical trial on diabetes drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tofogliflozin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type 2 diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight loss and muscle mass in diabetes management]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=206231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A Japanese randomized trial will compare the SGLT2 inhibitor tofogliflozin with glimepiride to determine whether popular diabetes drugs erode skeletal muscle in lean, older patients with type 2 diabetes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A large share of Japanese patients living with type 2 diabetes are older adults who are not obese, a population that has been largely invisible in the international evidence base for one of the fastest-growing classes of diabetes drugs. Now, a team of researchers led by Yasutaka Takeda and Naoki Kumashiro of Kanazawa Medical University has launched a randomized clinical trial designed to answer a question that has been quietly worrying diabetologists for years: do sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, celebrated for protecting the heart and kidneys, quietly erode skeletal muscle in lean patients? The study, known as TIGHTEN, compares the SGLT2 inhibitor tofogliflozin against the older sulfonylurea glimepiride, and its protocol has just been published in the journal Diabetes Therapy.</p>
<p>The concern is rooted in the pharmacology of the drug class itself. SGLT2 inhibitors lower blood glucose by blocking glucose reabsorption in the kidney, flushing roughly 60 to 80 grams of glucose into the urine each day. That caloric loss drives weight reduction, which is often marketed as a benefit, particularly for patients with obesity. But evidence drawn mainly from trials in heavier patients suggests the lost weight may include not only fat but also skeletal muscle, raising the specter of sarcopenia, the age-related loss of muscle mass and strength that predisposes older adults to frailty, falls, disability, and death. In a country where most people with type 2 diabetes do not meet the Japanese threshold for obesity, the question is not academic.</p>
<p>Previous data have been ambiguous. The EMPA-ELDERLY trial, which tested empagliflozin in Japanese adults aged 65 and older, found that the drug improved glycemic control and promoted weight loss without compromising muscle mass or strength. Yet that trial enrolled participants with a mean body mass index of 25.6 kilograms per square meter, a figure that qualifies as obese under Japanese criteria. In other words, even the most reassuring study to date was conducted in a population that does not resemble the lean, older Japanese patient most likely to receive these drugs in everyday practice. The TIGHTEN investigators argue that this gap leaves clinicians prescribing in a zone of genuine uncertainty.</p>
<p>The trial itself is deliberately straightforward. It is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group comparative study conducted at three sites in Ishikawa Prefecture: Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, Asanogawa General Hospital, and Kanazawa Nakade Clinic. Participants are adults with type 2 diabetes whose body mass index is below 25 kilograms per square meter, the Japanese cutoff for obesity, and whose glycated hemoglobin sits between 7.0 and just under 10.0 percent. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 30 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meters are excluded, consistent with the safety labeling of both drugs. After informed consent, participants are centrally randomized in a one-to-one ratio using the minimization method, balanced for sex and for age below or above 70 years.</p>
<p>One arm receives 20 milligrams of tofogliflozin orally once daily for 24 weeks. The other starts glimepiride at 0.5 to 1 milligram per day, with dose adjustments between 0.5 and 4 milligrams permitted at the treating physician&#8217;s discretion to reach glycemic targets while avoiding hypoglycemia. All participants follow a diet calibrated to their target body weight and maintain daily physical activity in line with Japan Diabetes Society guidelines. Changes to other antidiabetic medications are not permitted in principle during the study, ensuring that any differences in body composition can be attributed to the assigned treatment rather than to shifting polypharmacy.</p>
<p>The primary endpoint is the change in the ratio of total skeletal muscle mass to total body weight from baseline to 24 weeks. That choice is more subtle than it looks. Because body weight is the denominator, the ratio can rise simply because weight falls, even if absolute muscle mass declines. The investigators have anticipated this trap and pre-registered a battery of secondary measures to guard against a misleading result: percentage change in the muscle-to-weight ratio, the skeletal muscle mass index calculated by dividing appendicular lean mass by height squared, absolute total lean body mass, appendicular lean mass, total and relative fat mass, and dietary intake measured with the Brief-type Self-administered Diet History Questionnaire. If the ratio climbs while absolute lean mass or the muscle index falls, the increase will be interpreted as denominator-driven rather than as evidence of muscle preservation.</p>
<p>All body composition measurements will be performed with a single dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry system at Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, a design decision meant to eliminate the inter-scanner variability that can plague multicenter imaging studies. Blood counts, glycemic parameters, a full biochemical panel, urinary albumin excretion, blood pressure, and body weight round out the observation schedule. An independent data center and data and safety monitoring board manage the trial&#8217;s data and monitor its conduct, and adverse events, including exacerbations of preexisting conditions, are systematically captured and reported.</p>
<p>The sample size is modest but justified. Drawing on a prior trial of dapagliflozin versus glibenclamide that reported changes in the muscle-to-weight ratio of 0.012 versus 0.001, the investigators assumed a between-group difference of 0.011 with a standard deviation of 0.011. With a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and 90 percent power, 23 participants per group suffice; adding a 15 percent dropout allowance brings the target to 56 participants. Recruitment ran from April 2024 to June 2025, and complete findings are expected in 2027. No interim analysis is planned; the primary endpoint will be analyzed with analysis of covariance adjusting for treatment group, sex, age category, and the baseline muscle-to-weight ratio, with per-protocol analyses as sensitivity checks.</p>
<p>The open-label design, the restriction to Japanese patients, and the 24-week horizon all limit how far the results can travel, and the authors acknowledge each of these constraints. Still, the trial will be the first randomized study to test the effects of an SGLT2 inhibitor on DXA-measured skeletal muscle mass in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not obese, and it sets no lower limit on body mass index, meaning it will capture even very lean participants with BMI values below 20. For millions of older, lean patients with type 2 diabetes worldwide, and for the physicians weighing cardiorenal protection against the hidden cost of frailty, the answer cannot come soon enough.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor tofogliflozin versus glimepiride on skeletal muscle mass in patients with type 2 diabetes without obesity</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Study Protocol for the TIGHTEN Study Comparing the Effects of Tofogliflozin and Glimepiride on Skeletal Muscle Mass in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes without Obesity: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel Group Trial in Japan</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Takeda, Y., Ozawa, T., Ikoma, M., Shimada, K., Saito, R., Nakagawa, A., Sawamura, T., &amp; Kumashiro, N. (2026). Study Protocol for the TIGHTEN Study Comparing the Effects of Tofogliflozin and Glimepiride on Skeletal Muscle Mass in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes without Obesity: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel Group Trial in Japan. <em>Diabetes Therapy</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-026-01920-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-026-01920-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-026-01920-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s13300-026-01920-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> SGLT2 inhibitor, tofogliflozin, glimepiride, type 2 diabetes, sarcopenia, skeletal muscle mass, randomized trial, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Japan, Diabetes Therapy, clinical trial protocol, body composition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">206231</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tofogliflozin vs. Metformin: Impact on Diabetic Kidney Disease</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/tofogliflozin-vs-metformin-impact-on-diabetic-kidney-disease/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry Hayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 14:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood sugar control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diabetes management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diabetic kidney disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end-stage renal disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glycosuria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metformin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osmotic diuresis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renal protective effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGLT2 inhibitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tofogliflozin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRUTH-DKD trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/tofogliflozin-vs-metformin-impact-on-diabetic-kidney-disease/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a significant advancement in the management of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), researchers have initiated the TRUTH-DKD trial, which aims to evaluate the efficacy of Tofogliflozin compared to Metformin in reducing urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratios. This innovative study emerges during a time when the global prevalence of diabetes has surged, leading to an increasing incidence of [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a significant advancement in the management of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), researchers have initiated the TRUTH-DKD trial, which aims to evaluate the efficacy of Tofogliflozin compared to Metformin in reducing urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratios. This innovative study emerges during a time when the global prevalence of diabetes has surged, leading to an increasing incidence of kidney complications. Understanding the interplay between diabetes and kidney function is essential, given that diabetic kidney disease is one of the leading causes of end-stage renal disease worldwide.</p>
<p>Tofogliflozin, a member of the SGLT2 inhibitor class of medications, has garnered attention for its potential renal protective effects. These advantages stem from its unique mechanism of action, which involves the prevention of glucose reabsorption in the kidneys, thus promoting glycosuria and subsequently leading to osmotic diuresis. This process not only aids in blood sugar control but also has been shown to reduce hyperfiltration in diabetic patients, a key factor in the progression of kidney damage.</p>
<p>The TRUTH-DKD trial is particularly noteworthy, as it is one of the first large-scale, randomized studies to directly compare Tofogliflozin with Metformin, a longstanding cornerstone in the pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes. While Metformin primarily works by decreasing hepatic glucose output and enhancing insulin sensitivity, its efficacy in preventing kidney disease progression has been less pronounced compared to the emerging data on SGLT2 inhibitors. This trial is poised to clarify the renal advantages of Tofogliflozin and could potentially reshape therapeutic strategies for individuals suffering from both diabetes and kidney impairments.</p>
<p>A primary endpoint of the study is the alteration in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, which serves as a crucial biomarker for kidney function and disease progression. Elevated levels of albumin in the urine are indicative of glomerular damage, and reducing these levels is vital in mitigating long-term renal complications. The trial’s design includes carefully defined inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure that the findings are representative of the broader diabetic population, thereby enhancing the applicability of the results.</p>
<p>Moreover, the researchers are committed to investigating not only the effectiveness of Tofogliflozin in comparison to Metformin but also the safety profiles associated with each medication. The trial intends to monitor adverse events meticulously, providing comprehensive insights into the tolerability of both drugs in a diabetic population at risk for kidney disease. This focus on safety is paramount, particularly given the increasing emphasis on personalized medicine and understanding individual response to treatment.</p>
<p>Another critical aspect of the TRUTH-DKD trial is its commitment to addressing racial and ethnic disparities in diabetic kidney disease management. Historically, certain populations have been underrepresented in clinical trials, leading to gaps in understanding how different demographics respond to therapies. By aiming for a diverse participant pool, the TRUTH-DKD study aims to provide more generalized findings applicable to a range of patients across various backgrounds.</p>
<p>As the study unfolds, it leverages a robust methodology that encompasses patient-centered outcomes. Researchers will not only look at clinical markers but will also consider factors that impact the quality of life for individuals living with diabetes. This holistic approach ensures that the trial results will inform clinical practice guidelines beyond mere efficacy, reinforcing the importance of quality of life as a critical endpoint in treatment evaluation.</p>
<p>The significance of this trial extends beyond immediate therapeutic outcomes; it represents a crucial step in understanding the long-term implications of medication choices in diabetic patients. When managing diabetes, healthcare providers must consider not only glucose control but also the preservation of kidney function, which is often intertwined with cardiovascular health as well. Therefore, findings from this trial could have far-reaching effects on comprehensive diabetes management.</p>
<p>In recent years, the exploration of diabetes treatments has highlighted the importance of addressing comorbid conditions prevalent among diabetic patients. Given the intertwining nature of diabetes and chronic kidney disease, the TRUTH-DKD trial aligns with the growing recognition that multi-faceted approaches addressing various health issues concurrently can yield better patient outcomes. This perspective of integrated care is becoming increasingly vital in chronic disease management.</p>
<p>As discussions around health equity evolve, the outcomes of this trial will ideally advocate for updated clinical practice standards that prioritize access to effective treatment options like Tofogliflozin for individuals at high risk for kidney disease. The potential benefits include not only improved clinical outcomes but also a decrease in healthcare costs associated with advanced disease management and treatment.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the TRUTH-DKD trial’s findings have the potential to establish new benchmarks in diabetic kidney disease treatment. Should Tofogliflozin demonstrate superior efficacy compared to Metformin in reducing urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratios, clinical guidelines may shift, recommending SGLT2 inhibitors as preferred first-line therapies for patients with diabetes and kidney concerns. This could lead to broader adoption of SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical settings.</p>
<p>As the world continues to face a diabetes epidemic, trials like TRUTH-DKD are essential. They pave the way for innovative solutions, informed practice, and hopefully a brighter prognosis for individuals struggling with the dual challenges of diabetes and kidney disease. By advancing our understanding of these interconnected health issues, researchers can help ensure that the management of diabetes not only focuses on glucose control but also prioritizes kidney health and the overall well-being of patients.</p>
<p>The impact of such studies cannot be understated as they contribute to the evolving landscape of diabetes management. As physicians await the trial’s outcome, there’s growing optimism surrounding the potential therapeutic shifts that could arise from proof of Tofogliflozin’s benefits over Metformin. The future of diabetes care may ultimately hinge upon the effective integration of new treatments backed by comprehensive clinical evidence.</p>
<p>As the TRUTH-DKD trial progresses, it represents a significant stride in diabetes care, addressing the urgent need for effective, long-term management strategies for diabetic kidney disease. The collaboration among researchers, healthcare providers, and patients is crucial to translating this research into actionable clinical practice, ensuring that the voices of individuals facing diabetes-related challenges are heard and valued in the quest for better healthcare solutions.</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Effect of Tofogliflozin on Urinary Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio in Diabetic Kidney Disease</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>: Effect of Tofogliflozin on Urinary Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio vs. Metformin in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Rationale and Study Protocol of the TRUTH-DKD Trial</p>
<p><strong>Article References</strong>:</p>
<p class="c-bibliographic-information__citation">Kimura, K., Takagi, Y., Harada, M. <i>et al.</i> Effect of Tofogliflozin on Urinary Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio vs. Metformin in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Rationale and Study Protocol of the TRUTH-DKD Trial. <i>Diabetes Ther</i>  (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-025-01822-8</p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>: AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI</strong>: <span class="c-bibliographic-information__value">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-025-01822-8</span></p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Diabetic Kidney Disease, Tofogliflozin, Metformin, Urinary Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio, TRUTH-DKD Trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">107454</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
