<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thiamethoxam &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/thiamethoxam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 23:47:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Soil Bacteria From Mango Orchards Devour Persistent Neonicotinoid Pesticide</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/soil-bacteria-from-mango-orchards-devour-persistent-neonicotinoid-pesticide/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 23:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodegradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological methods for pesticide soil detoxification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioremediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioremediation research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[degradation kinetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental risks of systemic insecticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of neonicotinoids on pollinators and ecological health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mango orchard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial bioremediation of thiamethoxam residues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neonicotinoid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticide residues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PGPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudomonas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudomonas bacteria in agricultural soil cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of rhizospheric microorganisms in pesticide degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soil bacteria degradation of neonicotinoid pesticides in mango orchards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil enzymes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbiome adaptation to chemical exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable pest management strategies in mango cultivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thiamethoxam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFLC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=224370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in India have isolated two Pseudomonas strains from mango orchard soil that degrade up to 99 percent of the persistent neonicotinoid thiamethoxam, offering a sustainable biological route to restoring contaminated agricultural soils.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep in the rhizospheric soil of a mango orchard at India&#8217;s ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture in Lucknow, researchers have found an unexpected ally in the fight against one of modern agriculture&#8217;s most stubborn chemical residues. Two strains of Pseudomonas bacteria, isolated from soil repeatedly exposed to the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam, can break down the compound with remarkable efficiency, using it as their sole carbon source. The discovery, published in BMC Environmental Science, offers a biologically grounded path toward cleaning up contaminated orchard soils without the cost and collateral damage of chemical or physical remediation.</p>
<p>Thiamethoxam is a second-generation neonicotinoid that has become a mainstay of pest control in mango cultivation. As a systemic insecticide, it is absorbed by the plant and transported through its vascular system, reaching leaves, stems, flowers, and roots, so that any insect feeding on the plant encounters the chemical. Its molecular target is the insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: by binding to these receptors, thiamethoxam overstimulates the pest&#8217;s nervous system, causing paralysis and death. That mechanism makes it devastatingly effective against sap-sucking insects such as aphids, whiteflies, and leafhoppers, but it also underlies the compound&#8217;s well-documented hazards to beneficial pollinators, including bees, whose receptors are similarly sensitive.</p>
<p>The environmental profile of thiamethoxam compounds the concern. The molecule is highly water soluble, leaches readily, adsorbs poorly to soil particles, and persists with a long environmental half-life, particularly in dry, sandy, low-organic-matter soils and at lower temperatures. It is classified as a class III hazard compound by the World Health Organization and considered moderately hazardous to humans by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. Reported human health effects include acute kidney injury through direct tubular toxicity, potentially mediated by inhibition of α7 nicotinic receptors in the proximal tubule. Because residues can persist at contaminated sites, disrupting microbial communities, reducing soil fertility, and entering aquatic systems where they harm non-target invertebrates, the search for effective degradation strategies has taken on real urgency.</p>
<p>Physical approaches such as soil solarization and land farming have proven largely ineffective against persistent pesticides, while chemical treatments are costly, slow, and inconsistently successful. Microbial remediation, by contrast, is environmentally benign and comparatively cheap, and decades of research have identified a growing roster of thiamethoxam-degrading microorganisms, including species of Bacillus, Ensifer, Sphingomonas, Streptomyces, Catenulispora, Chloroflexi, Nitrospirae, and Labrys, alongside numerous Pseudomonas strains. What set the new study apart was its origin: no previous work had isolated thiamethoxam-degrading bacteria from the rhizospheric soil of a mango orchard, and the enzymatic machinery responsible for degradation remained poorly characterized.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Pradeep Kumar Shukla and Govind Kumar, employed a culture enrichment technique on contaminated orchard soil and recovered eight gram-negative bacterial isolates. Molecular identification based on partial 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing, with BLAST alignment against the NCBI database and phylogenetic tree construction using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA version 5, pinpointed two standout strains: Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain A2 (accession OP597530) and a Pseudomonas sp. strain C1 (accession OP678013). Both carried an impressive suite of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria traits. Strain A2 solubilized phosphate at 0.85 milligrams of phosphorus per milligram of protein, produced 9.05 micrograms of indole acetic acid per milligram of protein, 421.22 micrograms of gibberellic acid per milligram of protein, and 73.11 micrograms of ammonia per milligram of protein, alongside potassium and zinc solubilization, hydrogen cyanide production, and catalase activity. Strain C1 matched these capabilities closely, with phosphate solubilization of 0.88 milligrams per milligram of protein, 9.02 micrograms of indole acetic acid, and 455.13 micrograms of gibberellic acid per milligram of protein.</p>
<p>Degradation performance was tested rigorously across three systems: mineral salt medium broth, autoclaved sterile soil, and non-sterile soil, each fortified with thiamethoxam at 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 grams per kilogram or liter, and monitored over 210 days at ambient temperature. Residues were quantified by ultra fast liquid chromatography on a reverse-phase C-18 column with photodiode array detection at 242 nanometers, and validated by ultra high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to a SCIEX QTRAP 5500 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Recovery efficiencies from soil ranged from 90.35 to 95.39 percent across five fortification levels, confirming the reliability of the analytical pipeline. In broth after 210 days, strain C1 degraded 98.33, 96.67, and 95.92 percent of the pesticide at the three concentrations respectively, while strain A2 achieved 96.15, 95.83, and 89.79 percent. Uninoculated controls managed only 41.18, 33.33, and 25.53 percent, roughly a third of the bacterial performance.</p>
<p>In sterile soil, both strains exceeded 90 percent degradation at the two lower doses, with A2 reaching 97.06 percent at 0.2 grams per kilogram while controls lagged at 35.29 percent. Non-sterile soil produced the single highest figure of the study: A2 degraded 99.09 percent of thiamethoxam at 0.5 grams per kilogram, against 40.74 percent in the corresponding control. Interestingly, degradation in non-sterile control soil exceeded that in sterile controls, suggesting that indigenous microbial communities contribute meaningfully to breakdown, yet the inoculated strains still outperformed them decisively. Kinetic modeling using a pseudo-first-order exponential model revealed the practical stakes: half-lives in inoculated broth ranged from 49.50 to 138.60 days, compared with 346.50 to 693.00 days in untreated controls, with similar reductions in both soil systems. Degradation followed a two-phase pattern, rapid for the first 120 days and slower thereafter, and efficiency consistently declined as initial pesticide concentration rose, with colony-forming-unit counts dropping at the highest dose, a sign of microbial inhibition under chemical stress.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most mechanistically revealing result came from enzyme localization experiments. The researchers fractionated bacterial cells into extracellular supernatant, outer membrane, inner membrane, and cytosolic fractions, incubated each with thiamethoxam for 30 days, and tracked residual pesticide. Starting from an average residue of 13.78 micrograms per gram at day zero, strain A2 reduced residues to 10.03 micrograms per gram in the extracellular fraction but to 0.63, 0.83, and 0.89 micrograms per gram in the outer membrane, inner membrane, and cytosolic fractions respectively, with strain C1 showing a parallel pattern. Degradation is therefore mediated primarily by membrane-bound enzymes, with negligible extracellular activity, likely because enzyme-substrate interaction outside the cell is limited. The finding echoes earlier work on periplasmic detoxification enzymes such as organophosphorus hydrolase and carbaryl hydrolase in Pseudomonas species, and it suggests that the bacteria must first take up the pesticide before dismantling it, an important consideration for engineering or selecting strains with maximal substrate access.</p>
<p>The soil health dimension of the study adds ecological weight to the biodegradation data. Dehydrogenase activity, an intracellular marker of overall microbial metabolism, and fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis, a proxy for total microbial activity encompassing lipases, esterases, and proteases, were tracked in both sterile and non-sterile soils. At lower thiamethoxam doses of 0.2 and 0.5 grams per kilogram, both indicators remained largely stable, indicating minimal disruption to soil biochemistry, and the inoculated strains helped sustain enzymatic function over the full 210 days. At 1.0 grams per kilogram, however, dehydrogenase activity in A2-treated sterile soil collapsed from 2.01 to 0.83 TPF micrograms per gram over 20 hours, and fluorescein diacetate activity fell sharply, confirming a dose-dependent toxicity to the soil microbial community. Bacterial counts told the same story: populations remained robust at lower doses, peaking at 61 and 67 million colony-forming units per milliliter in non-sterile and sterile soils respectively, but were consistently suppressed at the highest concentration.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that a thiamethoxam dose of 0.2 grams per kilogram is appropriate for field use, escalating to 0.5 grams per kilogram only if pest resistance emerges, and that their Pseudomonas isolates, combining degradative power with plant growth-promoting traits, are promising agents for in situ remediation of contaminated orchard soils. The persistence of detectable residues even at the lowest dose for 210 days underscores how difficult natural attenuation alone will be. Field validation across diverse soils and climates remains the necessary next step, but the vision is compelling: orchards that can be protected from insect pests while native, pesticide-trained bacteria quietly restore the ground beneath them, turning the soil&#8217;s own microbiology into a sustainable engine of detoxification.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microbial biodegradation of the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam in mango orchard soil by Pseudomonas strains</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Biodegradation of thiamethoxam in mango orchards by Pseudomonas spp.: a study on soil health and sustainability</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Shukla, P. K., Kumar, G., Soni, S. K., Lal, S., Singh, N. S., Bhattacherjee, A. K., &amp; Saxena, R. K. (2025). Biodegradation of thiamethoxam in mango orchards by Pseudomonas spp.: a study on soil health and sustainability. <em>BMC Environmental Science, 2</em>(1), Article 19. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44329-025-00032-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s44329-025-00032-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44329-025-00032-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s44329-025-00032-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> thiamethoxam, Pseudomonas, biodegradation, bioremediation, neonicotinoid, mango orchard, soil health, soil enzymes, pesticide residues, PGPR, degradation kinetics, UFLC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">224370</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Common Pesticide Damages DNA in Bullfrog Tadpoles at Real-World Doses</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/common-pesticide-damages-dna-in-bullfrog-tadpoles-at-real-world-doses/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Porter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 23:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amphibian decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullfrog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comet assay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA cytotoxicity in bullfrog tadpoles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecotoxicology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecotoxicology of agricultural chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental concentrations of thiamethoxam in aquatic ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genotoxicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genotoxicity and mutagenicity of systemic insecticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global decline of amphibian populations due to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of pesticides on amphibian biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithobates catesbeianus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micronucleus test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neonicotinoid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neonicotinoid insecticide effects on tadpole genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticide residues in streams and ponds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pesticide-induced DNA damage in amphibian larvae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risks of neonicotinoids to aquatic wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tadpoles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thiamethoxam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water contamination]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=224366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research shows that the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam causes lethal, genotoxic, mutagenic, and cytotoxic damage in bullfrog tadpoles at concentrations routinely detected in contaminated waterways.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the world&#8217;s most widely used insecticides can inflict measurable damage on the genetic material of amphibian larvae at concentrations actually found in streams and ponds, according to a new study published in the journal Ecotoxicology. The research, led by Aline Arantes De Oliveira of the Federal University of Goiás in Brazil and the University of Aveiro in Portugal, exposed bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) tadpoles to thiamethoxam, a neonicotinoid insecticide applied across more than 120 countries, and found lethal, genotoxic, mutagenic, and cytotoxic effects spanning doses from just a few micrograms to several milligrams per liter. Because the lowest damaging concentrations overlap with levels routinely detected in agricultural surface waters, the findings raise pressing questions about the hidden costs of neonicotinoid use for aquatic biodiversity, particularly for amphibians, a class already in steep global decline.</p>
<p>Neonicotinoids are systemic insecticides that act as agonists of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, the molecular switches that nerve cells use to communicate. They were engineered to bind insect receptors far more strongly than vertebrate ones, which long underpinned claims of their relative safety for wildlife with backbones. Yet their chemical stability, rapid absorption, and resistance to degradation mean they persist in soils and waterways, and thiamethoxam in particular is frequently detected in surface waters and sediments of farming regions at concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 225 micrograms per liter. Adding to the concern, thiamethoxam converts in insects, plants, and the environment into clothianidin, a metabolite that behaves as an even more potent receptor agonist, meaning organisms may face a shifting and potentially more toxic chemical landscape than exposure measurements alone suggest.</p>
<p>Amphibians are uniquely positioned to absorb this chemical burden. Their skin is highly permeable, their eggs and larvae develop directly in water, and their biphasic life cycle ties them to both aquatic and terrestrial habitats, multiplying the routes by which pesticides can enter their bodies. These traits make anurans classic sentinel organisms, early-warning sensors whose biological responses flag environmental degradation before it becomes catastrophic. With amphibian populations collapsing worldwide and emerging pollutants increasingly implicated in the decline, the research team set out to close a conspicuous gap: while neonicotinoid effects on bees and aquatic invertebrates are well documented, the genetic and lethal toxicity of thiamethoxam in frogs had been barely explored.</p>
<p>The experiment followed internationally recognized testing guidelines and was anchored in environmentally realistic concentrations. Tadpoles at Gosner stage 25, obtained from a Brazilian breeding facility, were acclimated in dechlorinated water and then exposed for 96 hours to seven concentrations of a commercial thiamethoxam formulation, Cruiser 350 FS, ranging from 14.40 to 3516 micrograms of active ingredient per liter. The intermediate dose of 225 micrograms per liter was chosen to mirror concentrations reported in the field. Actual exposure levels were verified by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry at the Federal University of Goiás, a rigorous analytical step that confirmed the insecticide was the sole pesticide present and that the test concentrations were accurate. Water quality parameters, including pH, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, and ammonia, remained within ranges compatible with valid acute toxicity testing throughout the study.</p>
<p>The lethal results were striking. Probit analysis estimated the concentration killing 10 percent of tadpoles within 96 hours at 624.44 micrograms of active ingredient per liter, the LC50 at 1070.13 micrograms per liter, and the LC90 at 1833.03 micrograms per liter. Those figures place the American bullfrog among the most sensitive amphibian species ever tested against this class of chemicals. For comparison, earlier studies reported 96-hour LC50 values for other South American anurans exposed to thiamethoxam ranging from 11.28 to more than 71.2 milligrams per liter, roughly ten to seventy times higher than the bullfrog&#8217;s threshold. Against the related neonicotinoid imidacloprid, the contrast is even sharper: values of 82 milligrams per liter for Rana limnocharis, 74.18 for Xenopus laevis, and 173.55 for Rana nigromaculata dwarf the bullfrog&#8217;s 1.07 milligrams per liter, which is approximately 98 percent lower than the 52.62 milligrams per liter recorded for Hypsiboas pulchellus exposed to a commercial imidacloprid product.</p>
<p>More alarming still were the sublethal findings. The team exposed a second cohort of tadpoles to 9.4, 31, and 59 micrograms of active ingredient per liter, corresponding to 1.25, 2.5, and 5 percent of the LC50, doses squarely within the range measured in contaminated waterways. Using the Comet assay, a technique that detects DNA strand breaks in individual cells by measuring how fragmented genetic material migrates during electrophoresis, the researchers analyzed 1,600 nuclei per treatment group across three damage metrics: tail length, percentage of DNA in the tail, and the Olive Tail Moment. All three parameters responded significantly, with damage peaking at the intermediate concentration of 31 micrograms per liter. The Micronucleus test, which scores permanent chromosomal damage in dividing cells, revealed increased frequencies of lobed nuclei, nuclear budding, and anucleated cells, with mutagenic effects most pronounced at the highest dose of 59 micrograms per liter.</p>
<p>The non-monotonic pattern, in which an intermediate dose produced more DNA damage than a higher one, is a signature increasingly recognized in neuroactive compounds. The authors suggest several non-exclusive explanations. At lower concentrations, neonicotinoids may destabilize cellular processes through partial receptor activation, while at higher doses the damage may become so severe that cells die outright, removing the most injured cells from the assay and producing an apparent dip in measured genotoxicity. The significant rise in anucleated cells at 59 micrograms per liter, indicating loss of nuclear integrity, is consistent with advanced cytotoxic processes of exactly this kind. Guidelines for the Comet assay from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development explicitly warn that high cytotoxicity can mask genotoxic responses, a caveat the researchers took seriously in interpreting their dose-response curve.</p>
<p>Mechanistically, the study situates its results within a growing literature showing that thiamethoxam genotoxicity is driven largely by oxidative stress. Exposure to the compound has been linked to overproduction of reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation, and disruption of antioxidant defenses including superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione, and glutathione peroxidase. This redox imbalance promotes oxidative DNA lesions such as 8-hydroxy-2&#8242;-deoxyguanosine, a hallmark of oxidized nucleotides, which manifests as the strand breaks the Comet assay detects. Beyond direct chemical attack on DNA, thiamethoxam has been shown in vertebrate models to alter the expression of genes governing xenobiotic metabolism, cell cycle control, and apoptosis, while promoting inflammatory signaling and, at high doses, mitochondrial dysfunction and ferroptosis. The positive correlations the Brazilian team found between Comet parameters and lobed nuclei frequencies suggest a mechanistic continuum: primary, potentially repairable DNA lesions that escape repair before cell division can progress into chromosome fragmentation, spindle errors, and the fixed nuclear abnormalities scored in the Micronucleus test.</p>
<p>The ecological implications extend beyond individual tadpoles. DNA damage in amphibians has been experimentally linked to malformations, reduced growth, behavioral impairment, and diminished fitness, and genomic instability is a recognized precursor of tumor transformation in the framework of cancer biology. Even subclinical cellular injury can erode body condition, reproductive capacity, and survival, with cumulative effects that ripple through population dynamics. The authors also note a regulatory blind spot: commercial formulations like Cruiser 350 FS contain 83 percent unspecified co-formulants, solvents and surfactants legally classified as inert but capable of altering the bioavailability and toxicity of the active ingredient, and whose identities remain hidden from researchers. Prior work has shown that stressors such as ranavirus infection can lower thiamethoxam&#8217;s LC50 in wood frogs to near environmental concentrations, hinting that real-world toxicity under multiple stressors may exceed laboratory estimates.</p>
<p>The study concludes that thiamethoxam disrupts essential cellular processes in amphibians at concentrations found in the environment, and it positions the American bullfrog as a sensitive bioindicator for aquatic contamination. The Comet assay proved the more sensitive instrument for catching early, transient DNA lesions during short exposures, while the Micronucleus test captured the establishment of persistent chromosomal alterations, underscoring the value of deploying both biomarkers in tandem. The researchers call for future work across additional species, developmental stages, and biomarkers tied to cholinergic signaling, DNA repair, and cell death, to clarify the non-monotonic responses and to build more realistic ecotoxicological risk assessments for neonicotinoids. For now, the message for freshwater ecosystems is sobering: an insecticide designed to spare vertebrates is leaving its mark on their genomes at doses they actually encounter.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam on bullfrog tadpoles</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Environmentally relevant concentrations of thiamethoxam cause cytotoxic and genotoxic damage in bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) tadpoles</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> De Oliveira, A. A., Barradas, M. C., Tomaz, A. A., da Silva Lima, D., Assis, J. V. B., Chaves, A. R., Vieira, T. B., Monteiro, M. S., Sarmento, R. A., de Souza Saraiva, A., &amp; De Melo e Silva, D. (2026). Environmentally relevant concentrations of thiamethoxam cause cytotoxic and genotoxic damage in bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) tadpoles. <em>Ecotoxicology, 35</em>(8), Article 182. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-026-03154-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-026-03154-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-026-03154-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10646-026-03154-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> thiamethoxam, neonicotinoid, bullfrog, Lithobates catesbeianus, tadpoles, genotoxicity, Comet assay, micronucleus test, DNA damage, ecotoxicology, amphibian decline, water contamination</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">224366</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neonicotinoid Seed Treatments Quietly Reshape Soil Fungal Communities Over Time</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/neonicotinoid-seed-treatments-quietly-reshape-soil-fungal-communities-over-time/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 22:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agroecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clothianidin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological consequences of neonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of neonicotinoids beyond pollinators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imidacloprid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of systemic insecticides on soil microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of seed coatings on soil microbial ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITS amplicon sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term effects of seed treatments on soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neonicotinoid soil fungal community disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neonicotinoids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of soil fungi in nutrient cycling affected by pesticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saprotrophs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil fungi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil fungi diversity changes due to neonicotinoids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbial community shifts from chemical seed treatments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subterranean effects of neonicotinoid pesticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbiotrophs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporal dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thiamethoxam]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=214988</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new microcosm study finds that imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and clothianidin seed treatments cause compound-specific and time-dependent shifts in soil fungal diversity, composition, and ecological function.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neonicotinoid insecticides have long been scrutinized for their effects on bees, butterflies, and other pollinators, but a new study suggests that another, far less visible set of victims may be sitting quietly in the dirt beneath treated crops. Soil fungi, the microscopic architects of healthy farmland, appear to shift in diversity and composition after exposure to three of the most widely used neonicotinoid seed treatments, according to research published in the journal Microbial Ecology. The findings, led by Sharmin Akter of the Fenner School of Environment and Society at the Australian National University, add a subterranean dimension to the ongoing debate over these controversial chemicals.</p>
<p>Neonicotinoids are systemic insecticides applied as coatings on crop seeds before planting. As the seed germinates and grows, the chemical is taken up into plant tissues, protecting the young seedling from chewing and sucking insects. But only a fraction of the active ingredient ends up inside the plant. The rest can persist in the soil, where it encounters an enormous community of microorganisms that drive nutrient cycling, decompose organic matter, and form partnerships with plant roots. While the impacts of neonicotinoids on insects and aquatic invertebrates have been studied extensively, their effects on soil fungal communities have remained surprisingly underexplored, a gap the new research set out to fill.</p>
<p>The team designed a controlled microcosm experiment in which soil was treated with three commonly applied neonicotinoids: imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and clothianidin. These compounds represent the backbone of modern seed-treatment agriculture, coating millions of tonnes of seed annually across the world&#8217;s major cropping systems. By working in microcosms, the researchers could isolate the effect of each compound on the fungal community without the confounding noise of weather, cropping history, or management variation that complicates field studies. Soil samples were then collected at multiple time points after exposure, allowing the team to track not just whether the fungi responded, but when.</p>
<p>To profile the fungal communities, the researchers turned to amplicon sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer, or ITS, region of fungal DNA. The ITS region is the standard molecular barcode for fungi, allowing scientists to identify which fungal taxa are present in a soil sample even when those organisms cannot be cultured in the laboratory. This technique revealed hundreds of fungal taxa across the samples, spanning dominant phyla such as Ascomycota and Basidiomycota as well as rarer, more enigmatic lineages. Sequencing-based approaches like this have transformed microbial ecology in recent years, making it possible to detect subtle community shifts that would be invisible under a microscope.</p>
<p>One of the study&#8217;s most striking findings concerns timing. Overall diversity indices remained largely stable across the treatments when averaged over the whole experiment, which might initially suggest the fungicide exposure had little effect. But post-hoc comparisons told a different story: on day 10, fungal diversity dropped significantly under both imidacloprid and thiamethoxam exposure. This kind of delayed, transient response is exactly the sort of signal that single end-point sampling would miss. The lesson, the authors suggest, is that the ecological footprint of a pesticide cannot be judged from a single snapshot in time.</p>
<p>Beta diversity analysis, which measures how community composition differs between samples, reinforced this temporal picture. The researchers found significant effects of sampling day and, critically, a treatment-by-time interaction, meaning the fungal communities under different insecticide treatments did not simply follow the same trajectory. Instead, each compound appeared to push the community along its own path as the experiment unfolded. Such temporally variable responses complicate risk assessment, because a pesticide that looks benign in one week of a field season may produce measurable disruption in another.</p>
<p>Not all fungi responded equally. The dominant phyla, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, which include many decomposers and plant-associated species, remained relatively stable throughout the experiment. But several less abundant phyla declined over time, including Mortierellomycota, Rozellomycota, and Olpidiomycota. These obscure-sounding groups are far from ecologically trivial. Mortierellomycota species are important decomposers and plant growth promoters, Rozellomycota comprises widespread intracellular parasites of other microorganisms, and Olpidiomycota includes fungi that can vector plant viruses. A decline in these rarer lineages may signal subtle erosion of functions that only become apparent when soil health degrades.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential result came from functional guild analysis, which classifies fungi by their ecological roles rather than their taxonomy. Here the researchers found that clothianidin exposure drove an increase in saprotroph abundance, the fungi that break down dead organic matter, alongside a decrease in symbiotroph abundance, the fungi that live in mutually beneficial partnerships with plants. The most important symbiotrophs in agricultural soil are the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, which colonize crop roots and exchange soil nutrients for plant sugars. A shift away from symbiotrophs and toward saprotrophs could alter how nutrients flow through the soil food web, potentially affecting crop nutrition in ways that standard pesticide evaluations never measure.</p>
<p>Differential abundance analysis, a statistical technique for identifying which taxa increase or decrease under specific conditions, revealed that each compound left its own fingerprint on the community. Imidacloprid was associated exclusively with suppressed fungal biomarkers, meaning every taxon linked to this compound was depleted rather than enriched. Thiamethoxam induced both enriched and depleted taxa, suggesting a more mixed restructuring of the community. Clothianidin stood out as the most disruptive of the three, associated with the greatest number of discriminatory fungal biomarkers and accompanied by the increase in saprotrophs and reduction in symbiotrophs. The compound-specific nature of these responses suggests that treating all neonicotinoids as a single ecological hazard may obscure important differences among them.</p>
<p>The study, which was funded by the Australian National University and conducted with colleagues Julia F. Jasonsmith, Nilantha R. Hulugalle, and Craig L. Strong, carries implications well beyond the laboratory. As regulators and farmers weigh the costs and benefits of neonicotinoid seed treatments, fungal communities have rarely featured in the calculus, even though these organisms underpin soil fertility, carbon storage, and crop resilience. The authors argue that fungal community responses deserve a place in evaluations of the broader ecological effects of neonicotinoids, and they call for long-term, functionally oriented studies in real agroecosystem contexts. A ten-day microcosm can reveal the shape of a disturbance, but only sustained field research can determine whether these shifts persist, compound across seasons, or ultimately translate into measurable consequences for the crops that depend on the hidden life below ground.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of neonicotinoid seed treatments on soil fungal community diversity, composition, and function over time</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Fungal Responses to Neonicotinoid Seed Treatments in Soil: Temporal Shifts in Community Diversity and Composition</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Akter, S., Jasonsmith, J. F., Hulugalle, N. R., &amp; Strong, C. L. (2026). Fungal Responses to Neonicotinoid Seed Treatments in Soil: Temporal Shifts in Community Diversity and Composition. <em>Microbial Ecology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02892-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02892-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02892-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00248-026-02892-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> neonicotinoids, soil fungi, fungal diversity, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, clothianidin, ITS amplicon sequencing, soil microbiome, temporal dynamics, saprotrophs, symbiotrophs, agroecosystems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">214988</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
