<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thermal shock &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/thermal-shock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 16:52:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Fire-Hit Cement Mortar Gains Strength at 300 Degrees, but Only If It Cools Slowly</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/fire-hit-cement-mortar-gains-strength-at-300-degrees-but-only-if-it-cools-slowly/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 16:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cement mortar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooling method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct shear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of rapid water cooling on fire-exposed mortar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elevated temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental study on fire-affected building materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire damage effects on cement mortar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire suppression techniques and material preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of cooling methods on damaged concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications for fire rescue and building safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of cooling rate on cement mortar integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microcracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-fire assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of heating and cooling processes in concrete strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning electron microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shear modulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow air cooling benefits for fire-damaged concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature thresholds for cement mortar strength changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal shock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal strengthening of cement mortar at 300 degrees Celsius]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=276213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New experiments show cement mortar heated to 300 degrees Celsius can gain shear stiffness when cooled slowly in air, but rapid water cooling causes monotonic and severe mechanical deterioration.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a building burns, firefighters face an agonizing choice: douse the flames with water or let the structure cool naturally. A new experimental study suggests that this split-second decision may leave a lasting fingerprint on the very material that holds the building together. Researchers in China have shown that cement mortar, after being baked at temperatures up to 500 degrees Celsius, can actually become stiffer in shear if it is allowed to cool slowly in air — but that quirk of physics vanishes, and turns into outright weakening, when the same hot material is plunged into water. The findings, published in Frontiers in Built Environment, offer a fresh warning that how a fire is extinguished matters almost as much as how hot the fire was.</p>
<p>The team, led by Yanfu Zhao and Hongtu Xiu of China Communications Construction Company First Highway Engineering Bureau Group, together with colleagues at Guizhou University and Beibu Gulf University, prepared cube-shaped cement mortar specimens measuring 70 by 70 by 70 millimeters. The mix was deliberately simple: Portland cement, standard sand and water in a mass ratio of 2:1:0.4, with no coarse aggregate at all. That choice matters, because it means the results describe mortar rather than structural concrete, and the authors are careful not to overreach. After casting, the specimens were demolded within 24 hours and cured for 28 days at 20 degrees Celsius and 95 percent relative humidity, giving the cement paste time to develop its full hydration skeleton before any thermal punishment began.</p>
<p>The heating protocol was methodical. Specimens were placed in a rapid-heating resistance furnace and raised at a steady 6 degrees Celsius per minute to one of six target temperatures: room temperature, 100, 200, 300, 400 or 500 degrees Celsius. Once the target was reached, the temperature was held constant for two hours, ensuring the interior of each cube experienced the same thermal exposure as its surface. Then came the experimental fork in the road. One group of specimens was dropped into a water tank for rapid cooling, while its twin was left to cool naturally in the surrounding air. For each temperature and cooling combination, three independent specimens were tested, and the reported mechanical values represent the means of those replicates.</p>
<p>With the specimens cooled, the researchers moved to the heart of the study: direct shear testing. Each cube was mounted in a rock mechanics system capable of applying up to 500 kilonewtons of horizontal load. The apparatus uses a shear box in which the upper half can slide horizontally while the lower half is fixed. Before any shear force was applied, a constant normal stress of 1 megapascal was pressed onto the specimen, simulating the confining pressure a material layer might experience in a real structure. Only then was the shear load ramped up until failure. The resulting stress-displacement curves all shared a recognizable anatomy: an initial compaction stage, a linear elastic stage, an elastic-plastic stage, and finally the post-peak descent into fracture.</p>
<p>The most striking result emerged from the air-cooled series. Peak shear stress and shear modulus did not simply fall as temperature rose. Instead, both parameters climbed with increasing temperature and reached a local maximum near 300 degrees Celsius, after which they collapsed. The shear modulus of air-cooled specimens heated to 300 degrees was a remarkable 78 percent higher than that of untreated material — a counterintuitive boost for a substance that most engineers assume only degrades with heat. Above that threshold, however, the decline was cliff-like. The authors stress that this apparent strengthening is condition-dependent rather than a universal thermal hardening effect, and they interpret it cautiously as a temporary reduction in mechanically active defects rather than proof of a unique strengthening mechanism.</p>
<p>Water-cooled specimens told a far grimmer story. Their peak shear stress decreased monotonically with temperature, a relationship the researchers could capture with a simple linear fit, and their shear modulus rose only slightly up to 100 degrees before declining linearly to just 22 percent of the untreated value at 500 degrees Celsius. At every temperature, the water-quenched material was weaker and more plastic than its air-cooled counterpart, deforming gradually rather than failing in the sudden brittle manner seen in the 300-degree air-cooled group, which exhibited the greatest brittleness of all. The message is unambiguous: thermal shock during rapid cooling inflicts additional, measurable damage on top of whatever the heating itself caused.</p>
<p>To understand why, the team listened to the material literally. Four acoustic emission sensors, coupled to the specimen surface with vaseline and calibrated by a pencil-lead-break test, recorded ultrasonic bursts at a 40-decibel threshold while the shear load was applied. In untreated specimens, the acoustic signature followed a clear two-stage pattern: a quiet, stable pre-peak phase during which cohesion in the cement matrix resisted the load, followed by an explosive post-peak surge as microcracks in the matrix and at the paste-sand interfaces linked up into a continuous shear fracture surface. After the peak, intense but decaying emissions continued as the two halves of the specimen ground against each other in frictional sliding, shedding debris from the fracture faces.</p>
<p>The acoustic records from heated specimens revealed something unexpected. In the 200- and 300-degree air-cooled groups, pre-peak acoustic activity was almost entirely absent, and cumulative event counts fell well below those of untreated specimens. Scanning electron microscopy offered a possible explanation: the shrinkage microcracks that normally pepper the paste-sand interface in cured mortar appeared narrower, or even vanished, after moderate heating. Differential thermal expansion and the removal of moisture may have pressed the cement paste into tighter contact with the sand grains, temporarily quieting the defects that would otherwise crack and pop under load. The authors are careful to note that SEM cannot directly quantify bond strength and that no phase-composition or pore-structure measurements were performed, so this mechanism remains a plausible interpretation rather than a verified conclusion. Above 400 degrees, the picture reversed: thermal microcracking spread through the paste and interfaces, and small acoustic events returned even before the peak load.</p>
<p>The microscopy also settled a question about where the final fracture travels. Post-failure surfaces showed most sand particles still embedded in the cement paste, with only some grains debonded or pulled out, leaving pits behind. There was no evidence of the shear plane slicing extensively through sand particles themselves, even though at 500 degrees thermally induced cracks had appeared locally within some grains. The macroscopic shear localization, in other words, follows the path of least resistance: through the cement paste matrix and along the paste-sand interfaces that bind the composite together. That detail matters for engineers, because it identifies the interfacial transition zone — the weakest link in cementitious materials — as the region where fire damage concentrates its attack.</p>
<p>The physics of water cooling explains the extra deterioration. When a hot specimen meets cold water, its surface temperature drops almost instantly while the interior remains hot, creating a steep thermal gradient. The chilled exterior tries to contract but is restrained by the hot interior, generating transient tensile stresses at the surface. Once those stresses exceed the material&#8217;s tensile strength, surface cracks open, and water then penetrates through them, softening the forces between cement gel particles and further eroding load-bearing capacity. The researchers&#8217; stress analysis predicts that shrinkage cracking should concentrate along particular planes of the cube — exactly where the experiments showed it did. For post-fire assessment, the practical implication is that inspectors must reconstruct not only the peak temperature a structure experienced but also how it was cooled, since a water-quenched element may be significantly more damaged than an identical one that cooled in air. The results provide a material-level reference for evaluating repair mortars, cementitious joints and other interface-dominated regions after fire, though the authors caution that their findings, based on mortar without coarse aggregate and a single normal stress of 1 megapascal, should not be directly generalized to structural concrete. Future work with X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis and computed tomography will be needed to trace the full three-dimensional evolution of pores and cracks through realistic fire-and-cooling histories.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of elevated temperature and cooling method on the shear behavior and microstructural damage of cement mortar</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Shear behavior of cement mortar after exposure to elevated temperatures under different cooling conditions</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Shear behavior of cement mortar after exposure to elevated temperatures under different cooling conditions. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2026.1949325" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2026.1949325</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2026.1949325" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3389/fbuil.2026.1949325</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> cement mortar, elevated temperature, cooling method, direct shear, acoustic emission, scanning electron microscopy, thermal shock, fire damage, shear modulus, microcracking, construction materials, post-fire assessment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">276213</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefighters&#8217; Choice of Coolant Shapes How Much Strength Concrete Keeps After a Blaze</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/firefighters-choice-of-coolant-shapes-how-much-strength-concrete-keeps-after-a-blaze/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 22:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison of water and foam fire suppression effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compressive strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooling methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental study on concrete heating and cooling methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire suppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire suppression strategies and structural preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire-damaged concrete load-bearing capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefighting coolant effects on concrete strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of water and foam suppression on structural integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of firefighting agents on concrete durability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microcracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practical framework for engineers assessing fire damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residual strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium bicarbonate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structure assessment after fire exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature effects on concrete during fires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature-controlled testing of fire-affected concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal damage assessment in concrete structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal shock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultrasonic pulse velocity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=245593</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study shows that the fire suppression method used to cool burning concrete dramatically affects how much strength the material retains, with foam cooling preserving the most and water quenching the least.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a building fire is finally knocked down, the damage to its concrete skeleton may not be over. A new experimental study suggests that the very substance firefighters use to quench the flames can determine how much load-bearing capacity the structure retains, with water — the most common firefighting agent — inflicting the greatest additional harm, and fire-suppression foam preserving the most strength. The findings, published in Case Studies in Construction Materials, offer a practical framework for engineers assessing fire-damaged structures and for fire services choosing suppression strategies.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Daniel Paul Thanaraj and colleagues including N. Anand and Éva Lublóy, heated M20-grade concrete specimens to 200, 400, 600 and 800 degrees Celsius in a programmable electric furnace, holding each target temperature for one hour at a slow heating rate of 10 degrees per minute. K-type thermocouples embedded at the surface and at the geometric core of 150-millimetre cubes confirmed that surface temperatures tracked the furnace closely while the core lagged behind, a gap that widened with higher target temperatures. After heating, the specimens were cooled in five different ways: passive natural air cooling, water sprayed from a hose, carbon dioxide gas from a standard extinguisher, sodium bicarbonate dry-powder extinguisher, and aqueous film-forming foam.</p>
<p>The choice of coolant mattered far more than the researchers expected. Foam-cooled specimens consistently retained the highest residual strength across all three mechanical tests — compression, split tension and flexure — while water-quenched specimens fared worst. After exposure to 800 degrees Celsius, foam-cooled cubes kept 73.35 percent of their original compressive strength of 25.52 megapascals, compared with only 47.49 percent for water-cooled specimens. Air cooling fell in between at 53.44 percent, while carbon dioxide and sodium bicarbonate cooling produced nearly identical intermediate results of roughly 67 percent. The spread between the best and worst coolant widened dramatically with temperature: a difference of just 7.6 percent at 200 degrees grew to 25.86 percent at 800 degrees.</p>
<p>The physics behind these differences is subtle. Water cooling, it turns out, is doubly damaging. When cold water strikes hot, low-permeability concrete, the steep thermal gradient generates tensile stresses that crack the surface, while simultaneously reintroducing moisture into a dehydrated pore network where vapour pressure drives further microcracking and spalling. Carbon dioxide cooling, by contrast, is cryogenic — the gas leaves the extinguisher at roughly minus 78 degrees Celsius — yet it outperformed water. The researchers attribute this to its dryness and speed: the hot surface reaches equilibrium with the gas quickly, shortening the cumulative time the concrete spends under differential thermal stress, and because no liquid is involved, there is no vapour-pressure damage pathway. Thermal damage, they note, is governed by both the magnitude of the temperature difference and how long that difference persists, not by the peak gradient alone.</p>
<p>Sodium bicarbonate powder cooling works through an entirely different, chemically active mechanism. When the powder hits the hot surface, it decomposes endothermically between about 87 and 177 degrees Celsius, breaking down into sodium carbonate, water vapour and carbon dioxide while absorbing heat. The team observed a visible white-grey residue on treated specimens, confirming the reaction had occurred. The resulting porous sodium carbonate layer acts as insulation, buffering the surface against temperature gradients, while the released gases provide additional cooling. Foam cooling, the top performer, relies on a gentler principle still: the air trapped in the thin liquid films of its bubble structure lowers the effective thermal conductivity of the layer, so heat is extracted smoothly rather than violently. Although foam&#8217;s average cooling rate was broadly comparable to water&#8217;s, the rate of change of the surface-to-core temperature difference was far smaller, and it is precisely that rate of change — not total heat extraction — that governs thermally induced cracking.</p>
<p>Non-destructive testing told the same story. Ultrasonic pulse velocity values, which drop as internal cracks and voids multiply, fell from an excellent 4.78 to 5.56 kilometres per second at 200 degrees to a doubtful 0.24 to 1.54 kilometres per second at 600 and 800 degrees. Water-cooled specimens recorded the lowest velocities at every temperature above 200 degrees, while foam and sodium-bicarbonate-cooled specimens scored highest. Regression analysis revealed a strong relationship between pulse velocity and compressive strength, with coefficients of determination between 0.93 and 0.98 across all cooling regimes — meaning engineers can use a simple ultrasonic survey to estimate residual strength in a fire-damaged structure with considerable confidence.</p>
<p>Statistical analysis reinforced the hierarchy of effects. A two-way analysis of variance showed that exposure temperature was overwhelmingly the dominant driver of strength loss, with partial eta-squared values approaching one for flexural strength, but cooling method remained a highly significant secondary factor. Tukey post-hoc comparisons confirmed that foam cooling significantly outperformed air cooling for all three strength measures, while the largest single drop in flexural strength occurred between 200 and 400 degrees — the range in which calcium silicate hydrate gel begins to dehydrate and microcracks initiate. Water cooling also introduced the greatest variability between specimens, with coefficients of variation exceeding 15 percent at the highest temperatures, a statistical fingerprint of the chaotic, non-uniform nature of thermal shock.</p>
<p>Physical inspection and microscopy made the damage visible. After exposure to 800 degrees, water-cooled specimens showed the widest thermal cracks, measuring up to 0.75 millimetres, followed by air-cooled specimens at 0.62 millimetres. Foam-cooled specimens showed the narrowest cracks at just 0.16 millimetres, with carbon dioxide and sodium bicarbonate in between. Scanning electron microscopy revealed severe networks of cracks and degraded interfacial transition zones in water-cooled samples, whereas foam-cooled samples retained a relatively dense calcium-silicate-hydrate structure with good bonding between aggregate and paste. Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis showed a pronounced depletion of calcium and oxygen peaks at 800 degrees, most severe in water-cooled specimens, consistent with the breakdown of calcium-bearing hydration products.</p>
<p>Even the aggregates inside the concrete suffered differently depending on the coolant. Recovered coarse aggregates from water-cooled specimens showed the greatest deterioration in specific gravity, water absorption and crushing value — at 800 degrees their water absorption was 4.85 percent, nearly double the 2.48 percent measured for foam-cooled counterparts — indicating that quenching damage penetrates deep into the mineral structure of the material. Mass loss followed the same pattern, with water-cooled specimens shedding 10.28 percent of their mass at 800 degrees against 6.06 percent for foam-cooled ones, reflecting spalling and the decomposition of hydration products.</p>
<p>The practical implications are significant. Flexural and tensile strengths proved more sensitive to cooling damage than compressive strength, since even small microcracks disproportionately degrade tension and bending performance — water-cooled beams retained only 15.33 percent of their flexural strength after 800-degree exposure, versus 29.32 percent for foam-cooled ones. Because the relative performance of coolants diverged most sharply at high temperatures, the choice of suppression agent matters most in severe fires. The authors suggest that for structures likely to survive a fire and be repaired rather than demolished, suppression strategies that moderate the cooling rate — such as foam — could preserve substantially more structural value, while ultrasonic pulse velocity surveys paired with the regression models developed here give assessors a fast, reliable tool for triage. The team cautions that continuous temperature instrumentation during cooling was not performed in this study, and recommends future work with embedded thermocouples and controlled flow rates to quantify cooling kinetics precisely.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effect of fire suppression and cooling methods on the residual mechanical properties of heat-damaged structural concrete</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Post-fire behaviour of structural concrete: Effect of different fire suppression methods on residual strength and damage recovery</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Thanaraj, D. P., G, A., Anand, N., A, D. A., &amp; Eszter, L. E. (2026). Post-fire behaviour of structural concrete: Effect of different fire suppression methods on residual strength and damage recovery. <em>Case Studies in Construction Materials, 25</em>, Article e06560. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06560" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06560</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06560" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06560</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> concrete, fire, residual strength, cooling methods, foam, thermal shock, ultrasonic pulse velocity, compressive strength, fire suppression, structural assessment, microcracking, sodium bicarbonate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">245593</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glass Fibers Help Geopolymer Concrete Survive Fire and Water Cooling</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/glass-fibers-help-geopolymer-concrete-survive-fire-and-water-cooling/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 01:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced materials for firefighting safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alkali-activated concrete alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alkali-activated materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blast furnace slag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions reduction in construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compressive strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooling regime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly building materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elevated temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of cement production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire and water cooling resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire-resistant construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexural strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolymer concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glass fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glass fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial by-products in construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microstructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable low-carbon concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal shock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal shock resistance in concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban infrastructure development]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=200540</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research shows that glass fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete retains superior strength after exposure to temperatures up to 750 degrees Celsius, with gradual air cooling preserving far more integrity than rapid water quenching.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concrete is the most consumed construction material on Earth, and its appetite is only growing. As urbanization accelerates, with two-thirds of the world&#8217;s population expected to live in cities by 2050, the demand for buildings, bridges, tunnels, and pavements continues to climb. Yet the Portland cement that binds most of this concrete carries a heavy environmental price: producing a single ton of cement releases roughly 0.82 to 0.95 tons of carbon dioxide, an output that accounts for nearly 7 percent of global CO2 emissions and could rise dramatically in the coming decades. Against this backdrop, a new study published in Cleaner Engineering and Technology offers a compelling vision of what fire-resilient, low-carbon concrete might look like, demonstrating that glass fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete can withstand extreme heat and even the brutal thermal shock of firefighting water.</p>
<p>The research, conducted by Fatih Kantarci and Moncef L. Nehdi, centers on geopolymer concrete, an alkali-activated alternative to Portland cement concrete that is synthesized from industrial by-products rich in aluminum and silicon, such as blast furnace slag, metakaolin, and fly ash. When these precursors are mixed with highly alkaline solutions like sodium hydroxide, a chemical process called geopolymerization forms three-dimensional Si-O-Al-O polymeric gels that bind aggregates into a solid mass. Depending on the precursor and activator chosen, geopolymer binders can cut CO2 emissions by up to 80 percent compared with Portland cement, while saving roughly 60 percent of the energy and reducing production costs by about 25 percent. Geopolymer concretes have already found their way into road pavements, precast elements, and fire-resistant construction in the United States, Australia, Europe, and India.</p>
<p>Like most cementitious materials, however, geopolymer concrete is inherently brittle and prone to cracking under moderate loads or shrinkage stresses. The established remedy is fiber reinforcement, which enhances crack resistance, tensile strength, ductility, and impact performance while redistributing stresses within the matrix. Among the many fiber types available, the researchers selected glass fiber for its affordability, ease of manufacture, corrosion resistance, and high tensile strength of 1300 megapascals. The glass fibers used in the study were just 6 millimeters long and 15 micrometers in diameter, with an elastic modulus of 72 gigapascals and, crucially, a melting point of approximately 850 degrees Celsius, meaning they retain structural stability throughout the temperature range examined.</p>
<p>The experimental program began with a careful optimization of the geopolymer mix itself. Blast furnace slag from a local plant, with a specific gravity of 2.84 and a cement-like fineness, served as the primary precursor at a dosage of 400 kilograms per cubic meter. The team varied the sodium hydroxide activator concentration across 10, 12, and 14 molar solutions and tested alkali activator solution-to-binder ratios of 0.50 and 0.60. Compressive strength measurements at 7, 28, and 90 days revealed a clear optimum: strength increased as the sodium hydroxide concentration rose to 12 molar, then declined at 14 molar. The researchers attribute the initial gain to higher alkalinity, which dissolves silicon and aluminum links in the raw precursor to form aluminosilicate gels, while the decline at 14 molar reflects inhibited condensation reactions of silicate species and the precipitation of geopolymer gels that ultimately weaken the matrix. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed the story, showing a dense, compact microstructure with low porosity in the strongest mixes and abundant large pores and cracks in the weakest.</p>
<p>With the optimum production parameters established at 12 molar sodium hydroxide and a 0.60 activator-to-binder ratio, the team incorporated glass fibers at volume fractions of 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 percent. Notably, the concrete was cured entirely under ambient laboratory conditions at 23 degrees Celsius and 55 percent relative humidity, with no steam or heat curing, removing a major barrier to casting geopolymer concrete on real construction sites. After 90 days of curing, the specimens were exposed to temperatures of 150, 300, 450, 600, and 750 degrees Celsius for one hour in a furnace heated at roughly 2 degrees Celsius per minute, then cooled under two contrasting regimes: gradual air cooling inside the opened furnace, or rapid immersion in room-temperature water, simulating the thermal shock that firefighting operations inflict on burning structures.</p>
<p>The results reveal a nuanced interplay between fiber content, temperature, and cooling method. Glass fibers improved compressive strength in both heated and unheated specimens, with the optimum at 0.6 percent by volume. At this dosage, fibers wrapped in geopolymer gel bond strongly to the matrix, bridging cracks, reducing stress concentrations at crack tips, and retarding crack propagation. The residual compressive strength of the fiber-reinforced samples actually increased up to 150 or 300 degrees Celsius, a phenomenon attributed to polycondensation and further densification of the tetrahedral aluminosilicate gels as moisture evaporates, before declining at higher temperatures. Remarkably, after exposure to 750 degrees Celsius, the water-cooled specimen containing 0.6 percent glass fiber retained a compressive strength approximately 33 percent higher than the plain, fiber-free samples. Beyond 450 degrees Celsius, however, the mismatch in thermal expansion coefficients between glass fibers and the geopolymer matrix generated interfacial stresses and microcracks, while partial softening of the fibers, dehydration of the gels, and thermal phase transformations further eroded strength.</p>
<p>The cooling regime proved to be a decisive variable. Water-cooled samples consistently exhibited lower residual compressive and flexural strengths than their air-cooled counterparts, because the steep temperature gradients during rapid quenching induce thermal shock, microstructural damage, and an elevated risk of explosive spalling. Flexural strength, which is particularly sensitive to crack initiation and propagation, benefited even more visibly from fiber reinforcement, since the three-dimensionally dispersed fibers direct crack paths and transfer stresses through a bridging effect that preserves specimen integrity. At all temperatures, the 0.6 percent fiber content delivered the highest flexural values, and the relative improvement from fiber addition was more pronounced in flexure than in compression, underscoring the dominant role of crack bridging in bending behavior.</p>
<p>Complementary measurements of weight loss and water absorption traced the progressive thermal deterioration of the material. Weight losses remained modest at 150 and 300 degrees Celsius, driven by the evaporation of free and absorbed water, but increased sharply after 450 degrees Celsius as thermal stress generated microcracks, and again at 750 degrees Celsius, where thermo-chemical damage degraded the geopolymer gel itself. The fiber-free air-cooled specimen lost 1.3 percent of its mass at 150 degrees Celsius but 7.1 percent at 750 degrees Celsius, roughly a five-and-a-half-fold increase, while 0.3 and 0.6 percent fiber additions reduced these losses by preserving microstructural integrity. Water absorption told a parallel story: values stayed nearly unchanged up to 450 degrees Celsius thanks to the dense matrix, then climbed as thermally induced shrinkage and thermal-shock microcracking opened new transport pathways. The fiber-free water-cooled sample doubled its water absorption from 4.3 to 8.6 percent after exposure to 750 degrees Celsius. Interestingly, the highest fiber dosage of 0.9 percent proved counterproductive, increasing water absorption because of poor workability, uneven fiber dispersion, and fiber balling, a reminder that more fiber is not always better.</p>
<p>Visual and microstructural examinations completed the picture. Sample surfaces brightened to a light brown up to 600 degrees Celsius and darkened to brown-black at 750 degrees Celsius, a coloration attributed to the gehlenite phase identified by X-ray diffraction, which also detected calcium silicate, calcium oxide, akermanite, and ilvaite. Crucially, the glass fibers did not melt even at 750 degrees Celsius, and no specimen fragmented, chipped, or disintegrated under either cooling regime, although water-cooled samples displayed more surface cracks. Scanning electron microscopy after 750 degrees Celsius showed that the fibrous air-cooled sample retained a dense, compact microstructure, while the non-fibrous water-cooled sample exhibited large cracks and spherical pores, with fiber-matrix debonding and increased microcrack density explaining the measured strength losses.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s conclusions carry practical weight for the construction industry&#8217;s decarbonization ambitions. An ambient-cured, slag-based geopolymer concrete reinforced with 0.6 percent glass fiber emerges as a promising candidate for fire-resilient structural applications, provided that workability and fiber dispersion are carefully controlled. The findings also deliver a clear warning for fire engineering: the way a structure cools after a fire matters nearly as much as the fire itself, with rapid water quenching inflicting measurable thermal-shock damage that gradual air cooling avoids. The authors point toward future research on long-term durability under diverse service environments and on extending the approach to other fiber types and cooling scenarios, steps that could help carry geopolymer composites from the laboratory into the load-bearing skeleton of sustainable cities.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Elevated-temperature resistance of glass fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete under different cooling regimes</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Elevated-temperature resistance of glass fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete under different cooling regimes</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kantarci, F., &amp; Nehdi, M. L. (2026). Elevated-temperature resistance of glass fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete under different cooling regimes. <em>Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 34</em>, Article 101311. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2026.101311" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2026.101311</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2026.101311" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.clet.2026.101311</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> geopolymer concrete, glass fiber, elevated temperature, fire resistance, cooling regime, thermal shock, blast furnace slag, compressive strength, flexural strength, sustainable construction, alkali-activated materials, microstructure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">200540</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Aramid Films Matched to Extreme Environments by Co-Monomer Design</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-aramid-films-matched-to-extreme-environments-by-co-monomer-design/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 11:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced industrial chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace aramid composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aramid film design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballistic protection materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical-resistant para-aramid films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-monomer design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-monomer design in polymers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extreme environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexible electronics durability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-performance aramid polymers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-performance polymers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen bonding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal-ion exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[para-aramid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polymer chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protective coatings for extreme environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stressor-matched material engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal shock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thin films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultra-thermal resistant aramid films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UV photo-aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UV-resistant aramid coatings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=193994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have developed a stressor-matched co-monomer design strategy that tailors para-aramid thin films to survive thermal shock, metal-ion exposure or UV aging in extreme industrial environments.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Para-aramid polymers such as poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide), better known by trade names like Kevlar, have long been celebrated for their extraordinary combination of strength, thermal stability and chemical resistance. A fully aromatic backbone locked together by dense intermolecular hydrogen bonding gives these materials the toughness demanded by aerospace structures, ballistic protection, flexible electronics and protective coatings. Yet as engineers push aramid films into ever more punishing service conditions, a stubborn problem has emerged: a formulation that thrives in one extreme environment often fails in another. A new study published in Advances in Industrial and Engineering Chemistry now offers a way out of that impasse, proposing a structure-driven, stressor-matched design strategy that pairs each aramid film with the specific hazard it is built to survive.</p>
<p>The research, led by Yeonhae Ryu and colleagues at Gyeongsang National University in the Republic of Korea, begins from a simple observation: different industries expose aramid films to fundamentally different stressors. Aerospace and defense components endure repeated thermal shocks, sometimes swinging more than 200 degrees Celsius during launch and re-entry. Optoelectronic devices and protective coatings face prolonged ultraviolet radiation that cleaves chemical bonds and discolors surfaces. Flexible and printed electronics suffer contamination from transition-metal ions shed by electrodes, solders and environmental exposure, which can erode dielectric reliability. Because these threats operate through entirely different chemical and physical pathways, the authors argue, a single compositional tweak cannot protect against all of them at once.</p>
<p>Previous attempts to harden aramids have largely relied on additives: inorganic fillers, polymer blends or nanostructured reinforcements grafted onto fiber surfaces. While such approaches can improve individual properties, the resulting performance is frequently inconsistent across stressors and shows weak or non-monotonic dependence on additive content. The Korean team instead modified the aramid backbone itself, incorporating three functionally distinct diamine co-monomers into the polymer chain through low-temperature solution polycondensation with p-phenylenediamine, 3,4&#8242;-oxydianiline and terephthaloyl chloride. Each co-monomer was selected for a molecular feature anticipated to counter a specific industrial threat, creating three copolymer systems designated BABP-ARP, PIPE-ARP and APA-ARP.</p>
<p>The first system, BABP-ARP, embeds 4,4&#8242;-bis(4-aminophenoxy)biphenyl, a rigid biphenyl unit that promotes chain stiffness and aromatic pi-pi stacking. The researchers reasoned that this enhanced cohesion would help the film resist the intermolecular disruption caused by thermal shock cycling. To test the idea, films containing 60 and 90 mole percent BABP were shuttled between chambers held at 250 degrees Celsius and minus 60 degrees Celsius, with one hour of dwell time at each extreme, for a cumulative 20 hours equivalent to ten full hot-cold cycles. The protocol mimics conditions encountered by structural films on high-altitude aerial systems and spacecraft thermal-management surfaces.</p>
<p>The results were strikingly composition-dependent. At 90 mole percent BABP, tensile strength, Young&#8217;s modulus and elongation at break were all retained within a few percent of their pre-cycling values, with narrow specimen-to-specimen scatter. At 60 mole percent, the same descriptors fluctuated far more widely, with elongation in particular showing both large mean changes and high variability. Thermogravimetric analysis reinforced the picture: the higher-loading films showed smaller post-cycling shifts in their five percent weight-loss temperature, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed that the hydrogen-bond environment, quantified through deconvolution of the amide I region, remained essentially unchanged. The authors interpret this as a percolative mechanism: only when enough biphenyl-bearing units are present do the cohesive contributions of chain stiffness, hydrogen bonding and aromatic stacking span the entire polymer matrix continuously.</p>
<p>The second system, PIPE-ARP, incorporates 4,4&#8242;-(piperazine-1,4-diyl)dianiline, whose piperazine nitrogens were expected to coordinate with transition-metal cations. Films containing 20 mole percent PIPE, the practical upper limit before gelation destroys film formation, were immersed for 20 hours in aqueous solutions of iron(III) chloride, copper(II) chloride and zinc(II) chloride at 0.1 and 0.5 molar concentrations. All three metals stiffened and embrittled the films, reducing tensile strength and elongation while raising modulus, with iron producing the largest perturbation and zinc the smallest. But the spectroscopic evidence overturned the team&#8217;s initial hypothesis about why.</p>
<p>X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy revealed that the pristine films carried piperazine nitrogens in a protonated, piperazinium-chloride-like state near 402 electron volts in binding energy, a legacy of hydrochloric acid generated during polycondensation. Upon metal exposure, the nitrogen 1s peak shifted downward to roughly 399 to 400 electron volts, the range of neutral amine environments, while the chloride 2p signal largely vanished for copper and zinc exposure. The direction of the shift is opposite to what dative nitrogen-to-metal coordination would produce, which would deplete electron density at nitrogen and raise the binding energy. Instead, the data point to counter-ion exchange: the incoming metal cation displaces the proton from the piperazinium nitrogen, and the departing proton leaves with its chloride counter-ion. The metal then polarizes the now-neutral nitrogen electrostatically. Iron behaved distinctly, retaining most of its chloride signal, suggesting that iron-exposed films accumulate additional iron-chloride species that act as stress concentrators and drive the disproportionate embrittlement observed.</p>
<p>The third system, APA-ARP, replaces a backbone aromatic ring with a pyridine unit via 6-(4-aminophenoxy)pyridin-3-amine, chosen for its relatively photostable chromophore. Films at 40 and 60 mole percent APA were exposed to UV-A radiation centered at 340 nanometers for 100 hours in an accelerated weathering chamber. The films yellowed visibly, a consequence of increased absorption in the blue-light region between 400 and 500 nanometers, consistent with the formation of UV-induced chromophoric species that extend conjugation. Mechanically, however, the higher APA loading fared markedly better: tensile strength fell by only about 10 percent at 60 mole percent APA compared with roughly 25 percent at 40 mole percent, and modulus and elongation changes were similarly muted. The pyridine unit thus confers partial, composition-dependent photostability rather than complete immunity, and the authors caution that applications demanding strict color stability would still require additional photo-stabilizers.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most conceptually important finding is what did not differ. At baseline, before any stressor exposure, the three systems showed nearly indistinguishable mechanical, thermal and optical properties. Mean thermal decomposition temperatures clustered between 483 and 489 degrees Celsius across all compositions, visible-light transmittance exceeded 80 percent for every film type, and hydrogen-bond fractions from infrared deconvolution varied by less than 0.05. The authors attribute this uniformity to the disordered, largely amorphous microstructure of solvent-cast films, in which randomly entangled chains prevent the cooperative hydrogen-bond networks that would otherwise amplify architecture-specific effects. Only under stressor exposure do the structural contributions of biphenyl, piperazine and pyridine moieties become mechanistically visible, with the co-monomer identity setting the qualitative response mechanism and its loading modulating the response strength.</p>
<p>The study thus delivers a practical selection guideline for engineers designing aramid films for extreme environments: high-load biphenyl co-monomers for thermal-cycling-dominated settings, high-load pyridine co-monomers for UV-dominated settings, and, for metal-ion environments, an appreciation that the governing interaction is counter-ion-mediated electrostatics rather than nitrogen coordination, meaning the accompanying anion in a contaminant can qualitatively shape the mechanical outcome. The authors acknowledge the limitations of their diagonal experimental matrix, in which each film faced only its matched stressor, and point to off-diagonal exposures and high-temperature chain-alignment post-treatments as natural next steps. If those follow-up experiments confirm the framework, the era of one-size-fits-all aramid protection may give way to a new generation of task-specific films, each molecularly tailored to the precise hell it is destined to endure.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Stressor-matched co-monomer design of para-aramid thin films for extreme environments</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Stressor-matched co-monomer design: a structure-driven framework for para-aramid thin films targeting industry-specific extreme environments</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ryu, Y., Nam, H., Im, J., Lee, J., Kim, D., &amp; Choi, H. H. (2026). Stressor-matched co-monomer design: a structure-driven framework for para-aramid thin films targeting industry-specific extreme environments. <em>Advances in Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2</em>(1), Article 6. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44405-026-00046-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44405-026-00046-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44405-026-00046-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44405-026-00046-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> para-aramid, thin films, co-monomer design, thermal shock, metal-ion exposure, UV photo-aging, XPS, hydrogen bonding, high-performance polymers, extreme environments, polymer chemistry, aerospace materials</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">193994</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
