The structural context matters. In Türkiye, teacher assignment in public schools is centrally regulated by the Ministry of National Education, but private school administrators make their own recruitment, interviewing, and hiring decisions. While this autonomy allows institutional flexibility, the researchers argue that it also creates a governance space in which informal criteria can operate alongside formal qualifications, raising the risk of subjective or discriminatory decision-making. Because teachers are the primary channel through which educational policy becomes classroom practice, the selection process is not a marginal administrative formality but a leadership-level decision with direct consequences for institutional performance, school climate, and parental trust.

To capture how private schools publicly express their expectations, the researchers analyzed teacher recruitment advertisements posted between March and April 2022 on Kariyer.net and Yenibiris.com, two of the largest online career platforms in the country. Kariyer.net has operated since 1999, hosts more than 28 million users, and receives roughly one million daily visits, while Yenibiris.com counts over 20 million registered users. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 648 advertisements remained for thematic content analysis. The postings were examined for recruitment criteria, candidate qualifications, job expectations, and potentially discriminatory or exclusionary language.

The advertisement analysis identified three recurring categories of expectations beyond professional qualifications: working conditions, appearance expectations, and communication and representation expectations. The most frequently identified code was flexible working hours, appearing 18 times, followed by the requirement to be presentable, which appeared 17 times, and proper diction, which appeared 11 times. Although such expressions may not always indicate explicit discrimination, the authors note that they create ambiguity in recruitment criteria and open space for subjective evaluation. The term presentable, in particular, lacks any clear operational definition, meaning it can function as a discretionary mechanism through which implicit biases are normalized under the appearance of institutional compatibility.

The second phase of the study brought these textual patterns into contact with lived experience. Eighteen teachers, twelve women and six men aged 25 to 41, were selected through purposive maximum-variation sampling to reflect diversity in subject area, gender, age, marital status, parental status, and years of experience, which ranged from 2 to 19 years. Semi-structured interviews explored whether participants had experienced discrimination during private school recruitment, on what basis it occurred, how they felt, and how they responded. Data collection continued until thematic saturation was reached, and the interview form was reviewed by two academics and one practicing teacher before pilot testing.

Participants reported perceived discrimination across seven themes: age, marital status, physical appearance, political opinion, gender, favoritism, and lifestyle. Age and marital status were the most frequently reported grounds, followed by lifestyle and political factors. One teacher recalled being offered a very low salary simply because she was a recent graduate, while another was told she looked too young for students to take seriously. Others were asked directly whether they planned to have children, or were told that being unmarried was a plus for the school. One participant with a young baby believed interviewers assumed she would be unable to concentrate fully on the job. Appearance-related comments ranged from criticism of a candidate’s high-pitched voice and short stature to questions about piercings and tattoos, and one teacher was warned that her clothing would need to align with the conservative values of parents.

Political and lifestyle discrimination also surfaced in striking forms. Participants described being evaluated according to a school’s political climate, including remarks about wearing an Atatürk badge, reading books from a particular publishing house, and speculation about religious identity. Some were asked about their daily observance of prayers. Accounts of favoritism centered on regional affiliation and personal referrals, with several participants suspecting that recommendations from acquaintances or a shared hometown with administrators influenced decisions. These perceptions echo earlier Turkish research in which teachers described favoritism as unfair advantage and bias, and international work showing that favoritism emerges when communal ties intersect with merit-based hiring expectations.

The emotional toll was substantial. The most frequently expressed emotion was anger, followed by resentment, helplessness, ambition, and pessimism, with sadness and disappointment also common. One teacher described crying from frustration after an interview despite having a résumé and work ethic above average for her age, while another said she felt helpless because prejudices are not easily broken and she was not even given a chance to prove otherwise. Cognitive responses included self-doubt, alienation, overgeneralization, and the need to defend oneself and the profession. Notably, the most common behavioral response was silence: most teachers reported no reaction, an inability to respond, or politely ending the interview, while a minority voiced explicit dissent or left the interview after stating their discomfort.

The authors interpret these patterns through organizational justice theory and Kanter’s theory of tokenism. The presence of appearance-related, lifestyle-based, and ideologically loaded criteria suggests potential failures of procedural justice, since such criteria may be neither job-related nor applied transparently. Perceived advantages for personal connections point to failures of distributive justice, where opportunities flow from social proximity rather than merit, while intrusive questions about marriage plans, childbearing intentions, and religious practices constitute failures of interactional justice, violating the respectful treatment candidates are entitled to expect. Tokenism theory helps explain how candidates outside a school’s dominant social or cultural profile may be structurally disadvantaged regardless of competence, a dynamic documented internationally in relation to racial isolation among teachers and in Türkiye in relation to religious visibility.

The findings also expose a legal gap. Article 5 of the Turkish Labor Law No. 4857 governs equal treatment within existing employment relationships but contains no explicit provision addressing discrimination at the application or interview stage. Protection at the recruitment stage instead rests on Article 6 of the Human Rights and Equality Institution Law No. 6701 and Article 122 of the Turkish Penal Code, which criminalizes obstructing employment on grounds including language, race, gender, disability, political opinion, or religion. The authors recommend that private schools restructure recruitment around transparent, measurable, merit-based criteria, train human resources staff to avoid inappropriate interview questions, establish explicit anti-discrimination policies, and monitor hiring regularly. They further suggest that job platforms refuse to publish discriminatory advertisements and that artificial intelligence tools be used to screen and revise such content. Teacher candidates, for their part, should be educated about their legal rights and encouraged to document unfair practices. The study’s limitations include its focus on two platforms over a two-month window and its reliance on the self-reported experiences of 18 teachers, but the authors argue the evidence is sufficient to conclude that merit is occasionally overlooked in private school recruitment, with consequences that can erode professional motivation, damage school climate, and ultimately affect the quality of teaching and learning.

Subject of Research: Discrimination against teachers during recruitment at private schools in Türkiye

Article Title: Discrimination in the recruitment process at private schools in Türkiye

Article References: Discrimination in the recruitment process at private schools in Türkiye. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-02197-z

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1007/s44217-026-02197-z

Keywords: teacher recruitment, discrimination, private schools, Türkiye, job interviews, organizational justice, tokenism, gender bias, marital status, appearance discrimination, favoritism, human resource management