<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TADF OLED efficiency &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/tadf-oled-efficiency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:36:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Metal-ligand orbital hybridization boosts efficient, long-lasting TADF OLEDs</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/metal-ligand-orbital-hybridization-boosts-efficient-long-lasting-tadf-oleds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced OLED materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbene–metal–amide complexes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charge transfer in OLEDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coinage metal-based phosphorescent materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper silver gold emitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excited state dynamics in OLEDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exciton harvesting in OLEDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-lasting OLEDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal p-orbital and d-orbital mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal p-orbitals and d-orbitals mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metal–ligand orbital hybridization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecule twisting and light emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next-generation display materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OLED molecular design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorescence vs TADF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TADF OLED efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermally activated delayed fluorescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transition metal complexes in displays]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/metal-ligand-orbital-hybridization-boosts-efficient-long-lasting-tadf-oleds/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For more than a decade, display engineers have chased a class of glowing molecules that could finally make next-generation OLED televisions and smartphones both dazzlingly bright and impressively long-lived. Now, an international research team publishing in Advanced Science has cracked open one of the most persistent puzzles in the field: why certain copper, silver, and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more than a decade, display engineers have chased a class of glowing molecules that could finally make next-generation OLED televisions and smartphones both dazzlingly bright and impressively long-lived. Now, an international research team publishing in Advanced Science has cracked open one of the most persistent puzzles in the field: why certain copper, silver, and gold compounds emit light with dramatically different speeds, and how to exploit that difference to build better screens. Their answer lies in an unexpected place — the subtle way a metal atom&#8217;s empty p-orbitals mix with its filled d-orbitals, and how that mixing governs the twisting of a molecule as it glows.</p>
<p>The compounds in question are known as carbene–metal–amide (CMA) complexes, first reported in 2017. They feature a central coinage metal — gold(I), silver(I), or copper(I), each with a filled d10 electron shell — sandwiched between an N-heterocyclic carbene ligand and an electron-donating carbazole ligand. These emitters belong to a family of materials that exhibit thermally activated delayed fluorescence, or TADF, a mechanism that allows molecules to harvest both singlet and triplet excitons and convert them into light. In principle, this means every electrically generated exciton can contribute to the glow, promising internal quantum efficiencies approaching one hundred percent without relying on scarce iridium or platinum. CMA complexes are also relatively easy to synthesize, their emission colors are tunable across the visible spectrum, and they boast high radiative decay rates. Yet OLED devices built from them have stubbornly suffered from short operational lifetimes, a fatal flaw for commercial deployment.</p>
<p>The new study set out to resolve an unexplained experimental trend that has puzzled photochemists for years: measured TADF radiative decay rates, denoted kTADF, consistently follow the order silver > gold > copper across a wide range of structurally matched CMA emitters. Silver complexes can reach delayed-fluorescence rates of several million per second — for example, 31.3 × 10⁵ s⁻¹ in one benchmark compound measured in a thin film — while their copper analogues often lag by a factor of five or more. Nobody had convincingly explained why the metal atom, which is formally a spectator in what is essentially a ligand-to-ligand charge-transfer transition, should matter so much. To find out, the team deployed an unusually heavy computational arsenal: time-dependent density functional theory for geometry optimization, the high-accuracy STEOM-DLPNO-CCSD wavefunction method and the DFT/MRCI approach for excited-state energetics, and a battery of chemical bonding analyses including natural adaptive orbital (NAdO) analysis, energy decomposition analysis via ETS-NOCV, and charge decomposition analysis.</p>
<p>The first key insight concerns metal orbital hybridization. Although these metals are nominally d10 — with completely filled d-shells — the calculations revealed that the atoms carry a small but chemically crucial population in their outer (n+1)p orbitals, ranging from roughly 0.07 to 0.14 electrons depending on the metal and state. This (n+1)p–nd hybridization polarizes the spatial distribution of the d-orbitals: the bonding lobe is enlarged in one direction while the antibonding lobe is suppressed on the opposite side. The consequence is that genuine metal–ligand π-interactions can form even in formally saturated d10 complexes. Critically, the degree of this hybridization varies systematically across the coinage metals. Copper, with its smaller crystal field splitting and stronger d-orbital mixing, shows the greatest (n+1)p population; silver shows the least, with gold in between. This translates directly into bond strength: the metal–nitrogen π-interaction is weakest in silver complexes and strongest in copper ones.</p>
<p>The team then connected this bonding picture to molecular motion. In the excited state, the CMA molecules can rotate around the metal–nitrogen bond, swinging the carbazole and carbene ligands between semi-coplanar and orthogonal geometries. The calculations showed that this rotation preferentially occurs at the weaker M–N bond rather than the stronger M–C bond, and that the rotational flexibility follows the order silver > gold > copper — precisely the inverse of the metal–nitrogen π-interaction strength. ETS-NOCV analysis quantified the energetic stakes: in a representative gold complex, the Au–C π-interactions stabilized the excited state by about 27 kcal/mol, while the Au–N π-interaction contributed a softer but still significant 10.85 kcal/mol. Natural adaptive orbital analysis painted the same picture through eigenvalues of the π-type bonding orbitals, and excited-state potential energy surfaces computed at the STEOM-DLPNO-CCSD level confirmed that silver complexes rotate most freely.</p>
<p>Why does rotational flexibility matter so much for light emission? The answer lies in a fundamental trade-off in TADF design. To convert triplets back into emissive singlets efficiently, the singlet–triplet energy gap ΔE(S1–T1) must be small, which is achieved by minimizing the overlap between the highest occupied and lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals — for example, by twisting the donor and acceptor fragments into an orthogonal arrangement. But the same separation of orbitals guts the oscillator strength of the S1→S0 transition, slowing direct fluorescence. Conversely, a coplanar geometry boosts radiative decay but widens the singlet–triplet gap. A flexible molecule that can rapidly interconvert between semi-coplanar and orthogonal rotamers gets the best of both worlds: it can radiate promptly from the coplanar geometry while performing efficient reverse intersystem crossing from the twisted one. The team formalized this in a three-state kinetic model, solving rate equations for singlet and triplet populations across a full sweep of torsional angles and thermally weighting the resulting kTADF values. The computed rates matched experimental measurements in toluene solution remarkably well, and reproduced the silver > gold > copper order: silver&#8217;s floppy excited state, enabled by its feeble metal–nitrogen π-interaction, wins the race.</p>
<p>The work also clarified the role of spin–orbit coupling, the relativistic effect that permits singlet–triplet interconversion in the first place. Here the trend actually reverses: copper complexes show the largest spin–orbit coupling matrix elements, thanks to greater d-orbital participation in their charge-transfer states, while silver shows the smallest, with gold elevated above silver by the classic external heavy-atom effect. Yet since the reverse intersystem crossing rate also depends on the energy gap and reorganization energy via Marcus theory, no clean trend emerged across the series. The decisive factor, the authors conclude, is not spin–orbit coupling but rotational dynamics.</p>
<p>Beyond explaining a trend, the study delivers a practical design rule. If weakening the metal–nitrogen π-interaction speeds up emission, then ligand modifications that accomplish this should boost kTADF. The calculations showed that electron-withdrawing substituents such as cyano or trifluoromethyl groups on the carbazole ligand reduce the metal (n+1)p–nd hybridization, weaken the excited-state π-interaction, and increase rotational flexibility — a prediction borne out by experiment, where cyano-substituted gold emitters showed roughly doubled radiative decay rates compared with the unsubstituted parent. Conversely, electron-donating groups like methoxy and tert-butyl enhance the hybridization and slow the emission. π-extended substituents offer a second route: they pull the hole density away from the nitrogen atom, delocalizing the metal–nitrogen π-electrons and softening the interaction without changing the metal&#8217;s electronic configuration at all. The researchers also identified a convenient experimental descriptor — the oxidation potential measured by cyclic voltammetry correlates linearly with the computed excited-state π-interaction strength, giving chemists a quick electrochemical handle for screening candidate emitters.</p>
<p>But the story carries a caution. The very π-interaction whose weakening accelerates emission also anchors the metal–nitrogen bond; erode it too far and the bond becomes vulnerable to dissociation under the harsh electrical conditions inside a working OLED. To probe this, the team fabricated devices based on four gold emitters differing only in their carbazole substituents. At an initial luminance of 1000 cd m⁻², the device using the cyano-substituted emitter Au-1²ᶜᴺ showed an LT90 lifetime of just 0.37 hours — about 2.7 times shorter than the trifluoromethyl analogue Au-1²ᶜᶠ³ (1.01 hours) and roughly 4600 times shorter than the unsubstituted Au-1 (1709 hours), even though emission wavelengths differed by only a couple of nanometers in the matched comparison. The correlation with computed metal–nitrogen π-interaction strength held across all four compounds. While the authors stress that many factors govern OLED lifetime — emission energy, steric protection, molecular packing, exciton-induced degradation — the link between a soft excited-state bond and early device death offers a compelling new design consideration.</p>
<p>The broader message is that efficient and stable TADF emitters may demand a careful balance rather than a simple maximization: fast enough rotation and emission, but a metal–nitrogen interaction strong enough to survive electroluminescence. The researchers suggest that ligand architectures placing π-extended groups away from the bulky carbene substituent, and substituent choices tuned to preserve metal–ligand integrity, could thread this needle. For a display industry pouring billions into OLED manufacturing, and for blue and green emitters in particular where lifetimes remain the Achilles&#8217; heel, the insight that a fraction of an electron in a metal p-orbital can tip the balance between brilliance and fragility is likely to resonate far beyond the chemistry literature.</p>
<div class="scienmag-article-metadata"><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The role of metal (n+1)p–nd orbital hybridization, excited-state metal–ligand π-interactions, and rotational flexibility in the thermally activated delayed fluorescence of d10 carbene–metal–amide (Au(I), Ag(I), Cu(I)) emitters for OLEDs</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Metal (n+1)p‐nd Orbital Hybridization and Excited‐State Metal–Ligand π‐Interactions Enable d10 Carbene‐Metal‐Amide TADF OLEDs with High Efficiency and Long Operational Lifetime</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Xu, S., Tang, R., Wan, Q., Cheng, G., Yang, J., &amp; Che, C.-M. (2026). Metal (n+1)p‐nd Orbital Hybridization and Excited‐State Metal–Ligand π‐Interactions Enable d 10 Carbene‐Metal‐Amide TADF OLEDs with High Efficiency and Long Operational Lifetime. <em>Advanced Science, 13</em>(50), Article e00075. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202600075" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202600075</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202600075" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1002/advs.202600075</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> TADF, carbene–metal–amide complexes, OLED, coinage metals, metal–ligand π-interactions, orbital hybridization, radiative decay rate, spin–orbit coupling, reverse intersystem crossing, operational lifetime, ligand design, STEOM-DLPNO-CCSD</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">191141</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Metal–ligand orbital hybridization boosts efficient, long-lasting d10 carbene TADF OLEDs</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/metal-ligand-orbital-hybridization-boosts-efficient-long-lasting-d10-carbene-tadf-oleds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 09:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbene–metal–amide compound design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coinage metal complexes in optoelectronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coinage-metal chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d10 carbene complexes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficient light emission in organic electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold(I) and silver(I) TADF emitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold(I) silver(I) copper(I) complexes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ligand design for TADF emitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ligand-activation in OLED performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-lasting OLED performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-lasting organic light-emitting diodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metal–ligand orbital hybridization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum mechanical effects in OLEDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum mechanical orbital interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stable luminescent compounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable and cost-effective light-emitting materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TADF OLED efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TADF OLEDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermally activated delayed fluorescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermally activated delayed fluorescence mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[π-bond interactions in luminescent materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[π-bonding in OLED materials]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/metal-ligand-orbital-hybridization-boosts-efficient-long-lasting-d10-carbene-tadf-oleds/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Coinage-metal chemistry has long been viewed as a delicate balancing act between light emission and molecular fragility, but a new study published in Advanced Science offers the most detailed picture yet of why some of the most promising emitters for next-generation OLEDs shine brighter and longer than others. The research focuses on a class of [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coinage-metal chemistry has long been viewed as a delicate balancing act between light emission and molecular fragility, but a new study published in Advanced Science offers the most detailed picture yet of why some of the most promising emitters for next-generation OLEDs shine brighter and longer than others. The research focuses on a class of luminescent compounds known as d10 carbene–metal–amide (CMA) complexes, built around gold(I), silver(I), and copper(I) centers, and reveals that the secret to their thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) performance lies in a subtle quantum mechanical phenomenon: the hybridization of the metal&#8217;s outer s and p orbitals with its filled d orbitals, and the weak but consequential π-bonds this hybridization creates with surrounding ligands during the excited state.</p>
<p>CMA complexes were first reported in 2017 and quickly attracted attention as TADF emitters because they combine easy synthesis, tunable emission colors, and high internal and external quantum efficiencies with unusually fast radiative decay rates. TADF emitters work by harvesting both singlet and triplet excitons: triplet excitons undergo reverse intersystem crossing (rISC) back to the emissive singlet state, allowing nearly all electrically generated excitons to produce light without relying on scarce and expensive iridium or platinum phosphors. Yet despite their promise, OLED devices built from d10 CMA emitters with genuinely long operational lifetimes have remained extremely rare, and previous work by the same team showed that steric engineering of N-heterocyclic carbene ligands could push device lifetimes to LT95 values of up to 2082 hours for gold emitters and 3582 hours for copper emitters at a luminance of 1000 cd m−2. What was still missing was a rigorous, quantitative explanation of how the metal atom itself governs the emission kinetics.</p>
<p>The new study tackled this question with an unusually deep computational arsenal. Because conventional density functional theory (DFT) calculations are too approximate to capture the subtle energetics of these systems, the researchers combined time-dependent DFT with high-level ab initio methods, including similarity-transformed equation-of-motion domain-based local pair natural orbital coupled-cluster theory (STEOM-DLPNO-CCSD) and the combined DFT/multireference configuration interaction (DFT/MRCI) approach. They supplemented these with a battery of bonding analysis techniques — natural adaptive orbital (NAdO) analysis, extended transition-state natural orbitals for chemical valence (ETS-NOCV) decomposition, and charge decomposition analysis — to dissect, atom by atom and electron by electron, how the metal binds to its carbene and carbazole ligands in both ground and excited states.</p>
<p>The central discovery concerns the metal&#8217;s (n+1)p orbitals, which sit just above the filled d shell. In a naive picture, a d10 metal ion has no low-lying empty d orbitals to engage in conventional bonding, so metal–ligand π-interactions with strongly donating ligands such as carbazolide would seem improbable. But the calculations show that mixing between the (n+1)p orbital and the nd orbital polarizes the d orbital&#8217;s spatial distribution, enlarging its bonding lobe in one direction and suppressing its antibonding lobe in the other. This (n+1)p–nd hybridization creates genuine metal–ligand π-interactions that persist even in the excited state. Crucially, the degree of hybridization differs systematically across the coinage metals: copper displays the largest (n+1)p orbital population (roughly 0.10–0.14 electrons), gold an intermediate amount, and silver the smallest. This single electronic difference cascades through the entire photophysics of the emitter.</p>
<p>The practical consequence involves molecular rotation. In the excited singlet state, an electron is promoted from the highest occupied molecular orbital — largely localized on the carbazole ligand — to the lowest unoccupied orbital, producing a ligand-to-ligand charge-transfer (LLCT) transition. Because the HOMO is half-occupied in this state, the π-interaction between the metal and the carbazolyl nitrogen is actually enhanced relative to the ground state, and the nitrogen-side π-interaction is weaker than the corresponding metal–carbene carbon π-interaction. As a result, the carbazole and carbene ligands can rotate about the metal–nitrogen bond during the excited-state lifetime, swinging between semi-coplanar and orthogonal conformations. NAdO and ETS-NOCV analyses quantified these interactions, showing, for example, that the Au–N π-interaction stabilizes the excited state of a representative gold emitter by about 10.85 kcal/mol, compared with roughly 26.94 kcal/mol for the Au–C π-interactions — confirming that rotation occurs preferentially at the metal–nitrogen bond.</p>
<p>This rotational flexibility turns out to be the key to solving a longstanding trade-off in TADF design. Emitters need a small singlet–triplet energy gap (∆ES1–T1) to enable efficient reverse intersystem crossing, but the usual strategy for shrinking that gap — spatially separating the donor and acceptor orbitals — simultaneously reduces the oscillator strength of the S1→S0 transition, slowing prompt fluorescence. The study shows that flexible excited-state rotation offers an escape route: semi-coplanar rotamers provide large orbital overlap and a fast radiative rate, while orthogonal rotamers provide a small ∆ES1–T1, and rapid thermal interconversion between them allows the molecule to exploit both regimes simultaneously. Silver, with the weakest M–N π-interaction and the greatest rotational freedom, achieves the highest TADF radiative decay rates; copper, with the strongest π-interaction and stiffest rotation, the lowest. The predicted ordering — Ag > Au > Cu — matches experimental measurements across multiple emitter series and solvents, resolving a question that had persisted since the first CMA emitters were reported.</p>
<p>The team then translated this mechanistic insight into practical ligand design rules. Calculations of a series of gold emitters bearing electron-withdrawing groups (cyano, trifluoromethyl) or electron-donating groups (methoxy, tert-butyl) on the carbazole ligand revealed a clean trend: electron-withdrawing substituents reduce the metal&#8217;s (n+1)p–nd hybridization, weaken the excited-state M–N π-interaction, increase rotational flexibility, and thereby accelerate TADF. Electron-donating substituents do the opposite. Extending the π-system of the carbazole achieves a similar effect through a different route — the hole migrates onto the extended aromatic system, delocalizing the M–N π-electrons and loosening the nitrogen-side bond. The researchers also identified an experimentally accessible descriptor: the emitter&#8217;s oxidation potential, measured by cyclic voltammetry, correlates linearly with the calculated strength of the excited-state π(M…N) interaction, giving chemists a simple electrochemical handle for screening new candidates.</p>
<p>But the story comes with a crucial caveat. Weakening the excited-state M–N π-interaction also weakens the bond itself, making the metal–ligand framework more vulnerable to dissociation under the harsh conditions of electroluminescence. To test this, the team fabricated OLEDs based on four gold emitters with matched device structures: Au-1 and three derivatives carrying electron-withdrawing groups. While all emitted light in nearly the same spectral region — 467 to 469 nm — their operational lifetimes differed dramatically. The parent Au-1 device achieved an LT90 of 1709 hours, whereas devices based on Au-1CN, Au-12CF3, and Au-12CN lasted only 131, 1.01, and 0.37 hours, respectively, at an initial luminance of 1000 cd m−2. Because the substituents sit far from the metal center and exert negligible steric protection, the correlation points squarely at the strength of the excited-state M–N π-interaction as a determinant of device durability.</p>
<p>The implication is a genuine design dilemma: the same electronic tuning that maximizes radiative decay rate and efficiency may simultaneously shorten the operational lifetime of the device. The authors emphasize that many factors govern OLED stability — emission energy, steric shielding, molecular packing, and excited-state bond dissociation among them — but their data establish, for the first time, a clear and quantifiable correlation between excited-state metal–nitrogen π-interaction strength and device longevity in this emitter class. Navigating this trade-off, they suggest, will be essential for realizing the full industrial potential of d10 CMA emitters, particularly for blue and green devices where high-energy emission already stresses molecular stability.</p>
<p>Beyond its immediate practical guidance, the study provides a conceptual reframing of TADF mechanism in metal complexes. Rather than treating spin–orbit coupling and the singlet–triplet gap as the sole arbiters of delayed fluorescence kinetics, the work demonstrates that excited-state conformational dynamics — governed by orbitals that textbook bonding pictures would ignore — can dominate the radiative decay rate. The spin–orbit coupling matrix elements, which follow the order Cu > Au > Ag due to differences in d-orbital participation and heavy-atom effects, turn out to be of secondary importance compared with rotational flexibility. For a field racing to replace precious-metal phosphors with earth-abundant copper and silver emitters in displays and lighting, that insight reframes the design problem entirely: the fastest emitters may be those whose metal–ligand bonds are engineered to be just strong enough to survive, yet just weak enough to let the molecule dance.</p>
<div class="scienmag-article-metadata"><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Photophysical mechanisms and ligand design principles of d10 carbene–metal–amide (CMA) TADF emitters based on Au(I), Ag(I), and Cu(I) for high-efficiency, long-lifetime OLEDs</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Metal (n+1)p‐nd Orbital Hybridization and Excited‐State Metal–Ligand π‐Interactions Enable d10 Carbene‐Metal‐Amide TADF OLEDs with High Efficiency and Long Operational Lifetime</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Xu, S., Tang, R., Wan, Q., Cheng, G., Yang, J., &amp; Che, C.-M. (2026). Metal (n+1)p‐nd Orbital Hybridization and Excited‐State Metal–Ligand π‐Interactions Enable d 10 Carbene‐Metal‐Amide TADF OLEDs with High Efficiency and Long Operational Lifetime. <em>Advanced Science, 13</em>(50), Article e00075. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202600075" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202600075</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202600075" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1002/advs.202600075</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> TADF, carbene–metal–amide complexes, OLED, d10 metal complexes, orbital hybridization, metal–ligand π-interactions, reverse intersystem crossing, operational lifetime, NAdO analysis, ETS-NOCV, STEOM-DLPNO-CCSD, ligand design</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">190052</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
