The study, led by Rasha A. Mohamed of Mansoura University and the University of Bisha together with an international team of nursing researchers, used a qualitative descriptive design to capture the lived experiences of nurses who deliver palliative care to patients with advanced cancer. Participants were recruited purposively, meaning the researchers deliberately selected nurses with direct, relevant experience rather than sampling at random. Data were gathered through four focus group discussions, each audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and then analyzed using an inductive thematic approach. In this method, researchers code the transcripts line by line, group the codes into categories, and iteratively refine overarching themes through team consensus, allowing the structure of the findings to emerge from the data itself rather than from a predetermined framework.

The setting matters. Saudi Arabia presents a distinctive context for end-of-life care, one in which cultural and religious values shape how death, dying, and family involvement are understood and navigated. The authors note that qualitative evidence on nurses’ experiences in this setting has been limited, despite the fact that palliative care is a crucial component of comprehensive cancer care. Understanding what nurses actually encounter, the researchers argue, is essential for building tailored strategies that strengthen palliative practice and support the workforce that sustains it. This is not an abstract concern: as cancer incidence rises globally and survival trajectories lengthen, the number of patients living with, and dying from, advanced disease continues to grow, and the nurses caring for them carry an increasingly complex professional and emotional load.

The first theme identified in the analysis, preserving dignity through holistic palliative care, speaks to the ethical core of the work. Nurses described their role as safeguarding the personhood of patients whose bodies and independence were being eroded by disease. Dignity preservation, in this framing, is not a courtesy but a clinical intervention in its own right, woven into everything from symptom management to the way nurses speak with patients about their condition. The finding echoes a long tradition in palliative care philosophy, which holds that a good death is defined not only by the absence of pain but by the presence of respect, autonomy, and comfort in the fullest sense.

The second theme, navigating multidimensional professional responsibilities throughout the illness trajectory, captures how the nurse’s job changes shape as a patient moves from diagnosis toward the end of life. Nurses in the study described acting as advocates for their patients, coordinating care across specialties and settings, and communicating in ways that are culturally and religiously sensitive. This is technically demanding work. It requires clinical judgment about symptom control, organizational skill to align families, physicians, and support services, and the communication finesse to discuss prognosis and goals of care in a manner consistent with patients’ values. The illness trajectory, the study suggests, is not a single care scenario but a shifting set of demands that nurses must continually renegotiate.

Central to the nurses’ accounts was the third theme: delivering holistic nursing care that integrates physical, emotional, and spiritual support. This multidimensional model treats the patient not as a set of failing organs but as a whole person facing existential as well as physical distress. Pain and other symptoms must be managed pharmacologically, but nurses also described attending to fear, grief, and spiritual needs, dimensions of care that are harder to measure and often under-resourced. In the Saudi context, spiritual support carries particular weight, since religious frameworks strongly inform how patients and families approach dying. Nurses who can work within these frameworks, rather than around them, are better positioned to provide care that patients and families actually experience as compassionate.

The fourth theme is where the study’s findings turn sobering: balancing compassionate care with emotional and organizational challenges. The nurses acknowledged significant emotional burdens inherent in repeated exposure to death and dying, a well-documented occupational hazard that can accumulate into burnout, moral distress, and attrition from the specialty. At the same time, they identified organizational obstacles, insufficient support structures, resource limitations, and the absence of policies that integrate palliative care smoothly across the illness trajectory. The interplay between these two categories of challenge is important from a health systems perspective. Emotional exhaustion is often treated as an individual problem to be managed with resilience training, but the study’s findings point toward a structural reading: when organizations fail to support nurses, the emotional costs of compassionate care compound rather than resolve.

The fifth theme looks forward. Nurses in the study envisioned a stronger palliative care system built on three pillars: education, collaboration, and public awareness. Targeted education would strengthen the clinical and communication skills that end-of-life care demands, from complex symptom management to difficult conversations about prognosis. Collaboration would knit together the multidisciplinary actors, physicians, nurses, social workers, chaplains, and family caregivers, whose coordination determines whether palliative care is seamless or fragmented. Public awareness initiatives, meanwhile, aligned with cultural and religious values, would help communities understand what palliative care is and is not, reducing stigma and encouraging earlier engagement with supportive services. The authors conclude that overcoming current barriers requires precisely this kind of coordinated intervention rather than piecemeal fixes.

What gives the study its force is the consistency of the underlying message across all five themes. Nurses see palliative care as a fundamentally holistic, person-centered practice, and they are committed to delivering it, yet they report that emotional, communication, educational, and organizational barriers repeatedly impede consistent, high-quality end-of-life care. That gap between ideal and reality is not unique to Saudi Arabia; studies across many health systems have documented similar strains. But the Saudi findings carry particular significance for a region where palliative care as a distinct specialty is still maturing and where cultural and religious considerations shape clinical practice in ways that imported models do not always anticipate. Locally grounded qualitative research of this kind provides the evidence base for adaptations that fit.

Methodologically, the study’s strengths lie in its transparency and rigor. The use of verbatim transcription, iterative coding, and team consensus in theme development guards against individual researcher bias, and the researchers report that findings were shared with participants for feedback on the relevance of the themes, a validation step that strengthens qualitative credibility. The protocol was approved by the University of Bisha’s Institutional Review Board, conducted under the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and all participants gave informed written consent. The study received no external funding, and the authors declare no competing interests. Published open access as an early, citable version with a permanent DOI, the research invites both scrutiny and uptake.

For health policymakers and hospital administrators, the implications are concrete. The study argues for organizational reforms that give palliative nurses the support structures their work requires, and for policies that embed palliative care across the entire cancer trajectory rather than reserving it for the final days. For nursing educators, it makes the case for curricula that build not only technical competence but also the communication skills and cultural literacy that end-of-life care demands. And for the public, it is a reminder that behind every well-managed death stands a nurse who has absorbed the physical, emotional, and spiritual weight of that process. Meeting the growing demand for palliative care will depend, above all, on whether health systems choose to support the people who provide it.

Subject of Research: Nurses' experiences delivering palliative care to patients with advanced cancer

Article Title: Exploring nurses experiences in delivering palliative care to patients with advanced cancer

Article References: Mohamed, R. A., Alkalash, S. H., Gab Allah, A. R., Alanazi, M. O., ElShora, S. N. A. E., Mohammed, S. F., Anbar, R., Dakhilallah, H., Alshahrani, M., Elfaki, E., & Almowafy, A. A. (2026). Exploring nurses experiences in delivering palliative care to patients with advanced cancer. BMC Nursing, 25(1), Article 879. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-05401-5

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12912-026-05401-5

Keywords: palliative care, advanced cancer, oncology nursing, nurses' experiences, qualitative research, end-of-life care, Saudi Arabia, holistic care, nursing education, burnout, patient dignity, health policy