<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>systemic immune response stimulation &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/systemic-immune-response-stimulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Atezolizumab After Single or Multiple Fractions of Stereotactic Radiotherapy in TNBC</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/atezolizumab-after-single-or-multiple-fractions-of-stereotactic-radiotherapy-in-tnbc/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathaniel Bowman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced breast cancer clinical trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atezolizumab in cancer treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combination radiotherapy and immunotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunotherapy for TNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PD-L1 blockade in breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precision radiotherapy techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation dose fractionation effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SABR in breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single vs multiple fractions radiotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systemic immune response stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triple-negative breast cancer]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/atezolizumab-after-single-or-multiple-fractions-of-stereotactic-radiotherapy-in-tnbc/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Advanced triple-negative breast cancer may benefit from an unexpected combination: stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) delivered either in a single fraction or multiple fractions, followed by the immunotherapy atezolizumab. In a randomized phase II trial, investigators asked whether precisely targeted radiation could prime tumors for immune attack, improving outcomes beyond what either modality might achieve [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advanced triple-negative breast cancer may benefit from an unexpected combination: stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) delivered either in a single fraction or multiple fractions, followed by the immunotherapy atezolizumab. In a randomized phase II trial, investigators asked whether precisely targeted radiation could prime tumors for immune attack, improving outcomes beyond what either modality might achieve alone.</p>
<p>The study enrolled participants with advanced disease and compared two SABR schedules: a single-fraction approach versus a multi-fraction regimen. After radiation, all patients received atezolizumab, an anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody designed to release brakes on cytotoxic T cells. By pairing high-dose, image-guided tumor irradiation with PD-L1 blockade, the researchers aimed to enhance local control while also stimulating systemic responses.</p>
<p>Technically, SABR focuses ablative doses onto tumor deposits while minimizing exposure to surrounding organs through rigorous planning and delivery accuracy. This “precision radiotherapy” strategy is distinct from conventional fractionation, which spreads dose more broadly over time. The trial’s key question was not only whether SABR plus atezolizumab could work, but whether fractionation style would matter when an immunotherapy is given afterward.</p>
<p>Patients were monitored for clinical endpoints typical of phase II development, including response measures and progression-related outcomes. The investigators also evaluated safety, with particular attention to immunotherapy-associated adverse events and radiation-related toxicities. In this context, the balance between achieving tumor ablation and avoiding harm to nearby tissues is crucial.</p>
<p>Results indicate that SABR followed by atezolizumab is feasible in advanced triple-negative breast cancer across both fractionation strategies. The comparison between single- and multi-fraction delivery provides an early signal that the regimen can be tailored without sacrificing the immunotherapy partnership. Such flexibility could simplify decision-making in routine practice, where treatment timing and patient tolerance often drive regimen selection.</p>
<p>The trial also supports the broader concept that radiation can function as an “in situ vaccine.” By causing tumor antigen release and modulating the tumor microenvironment, SABR may increase susceptibility to immune checkpoint inhibition. If confirmed in larger studies, this paradigm could alter sequencing standards for patients with limited targeted options.</p>
<p>For a disease that frequently evades durable control, the randomized phase II design strengthens the relevance of the findings. The authors report their work in <em>Nature Communications</em> (2026), adding a new randomized framework for how stereotactic radiation and PD-L1 blockade might be integrated.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Advanced triple-negative breast cancer; SABR with atezolizumab<br />
<strong>Article Title</strong>: Single-fraction or multi-fraction stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy followed by atezolizumab in advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase II trial.<br />
<strong>Article References</strong>: David, S., Savas, P., Siva, S. et al. <em>Nat Commun</em> (2026). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-75660-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-75660-y</a><br />
<strong>Image Credits</strong>: AI Generated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">174702</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Novel Intranasal Vaccine Technology Using Albumin Promises Enhanced Mucosal and Systemic Immunity Against Respiratory Viruses</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/novel-intranasal-vaccine-technology-using-albumin-promises-enhanced-mucosal-and-systemic-immunity-against-respiratory-viruses/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristina Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 09:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[albumin-based vaccine development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FcRn-mediated transport mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative vaccine platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intranasal vaccine technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mucosal barrier immunology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mucosal immunity enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novel vaccine delivery methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health vaccine advancements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respiratory pathogen protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respiratory virus vaccination strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subunit antigen vaccination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systemic immune response stimulation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/novel-intranasal-vaccine-technology-using-albumin-promises-enhanced-mucosal-and-systemic-immunity-against-respiratory-viruses/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Vaccines are undoubtedly one of the greatest advancements in public health, saving millions of lives annually by providing immunity against various infectious diseases. However, despite their effectiveness, there remains an ongoing and pressing need for the development of more efficient vaccines, particularly in combating serious viral outbreaks that can initiate at mucosal surfaces. These mucosal [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vaccines are undoubtedly one of the greatest advancements in public health, saving millions of lives annually by providing immunity against various infectious diseases. However, despite their effectiveness, there remains an ongoing and pressing need for the development of more efficient vaccines, particularly in combating serious viral outbreaks that can initiate at mucosal surfaces. These mucosal surfaces are critical battlegrounds where polarized epithelial cells interact with immune effector cells. While traditional vaccines are typically administered intramuscularly or subcutaneously, this delivery method often fails to offer adequate protection at the actual site of infection, leading researchers to explore alternative strategies to enhance vaccine efficacy.</p>
<p>In a groundbreaking study, the laboratory of Professor Jan Terje Andersen has unveiled a novel vaccine technology platform that ingeniously fuses a subunit antigen to albumin. Albumin, a protein abundant in human serum, was selected due to its natural capability to be actively transported across mucosal barriers via the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), located on mucosal epithelial cells. This innovative approach aims to create vaccines that not only elicit a systemic immune response but also stimulate a robust mucosal immune response directly where respiratory pathogens enter the body. </p>
<p>The implications of this research are profound, as the potential for an effective means of vaccination against respiratory viral infections could reduce the frequency and severity of outbreaks. In preclinical studies conducted on various mouse strains, researchers demonstrated that the albumin-antigen fusion vaccines, delivered intranasally, prompted significant systemic and mucosal antibody responses. Notably, the mice exhibited considerable protection against viral challenges, such as those posed by SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A, underscoring the promise of this new vaccine platform.</p>
<p>One of the distinguishing features of this study is the strategic incorporation of adjuvants, which can enhance the immune response elicited by vaccines. In the novel albumin-based vaccine approach, these adjuvants were site-specifically conjugated to the albumin carrier, thereby allowing for an optimized immune response at the mucosal sites. This targeted approach is essential because the most effective vaccines are those that can induce high levels of immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies in the mucosal tissues, which play a critical role in neutralizing pathogens at the site of invasion.</p>
<p>Intriguingly, when comparing the new albumin-based vaccine strategy to established vaccine platforms, such as an intramuscularly administered mRNA vaccine or an intranasally delivered antigen fused to a protein carrier of similar size to albumin, only the albumin-based formulation led to robust mucosal IgA antibody responses. This finding highlights the unique advantages of using albumin as a carrier in vaccine design, making it a compelling candidate for future vaccine development targeting respiratory pathogens.</p>
<p>Professor Jan Terje Andersen, the senior author of the study, emphasized the critical need for improved vaccines against respiratory pathogens that are responsible for high mortality rates. His enthusiastic endorsement of the new vaccine technology reflects the potential it holds not only for immediate applications but also for future vaccine design. The albumin-based platform is adaptable, allowing for the antigen to be any identified protein subunit derived from infectious agents. </p>
<p>The engineering of a human albumin variant with an enhanced ability to engage FcRn paves the way for more effective antigen transport across mucosal barriers. This means that, following transport, the immune system can be primed to recognize and respond to the vaccine subunit effectively. The in-depth exploration of FcRn interactions and binding nuances across species has been vital to ensure that this vaccine technology is translatable and relevant across different biological contexts.</p>
<p>As the global community witnesses an increased frequency of respiratory viruses, the relevance of this research cannot be overstated. With the ongoing threat of pandemics, innovative vaccine technologies that respond to emerging infectious diseases are of utmost importance. The careful consideration of cross-species differences in immune responses further enhances the translational potential of this research, making it a promising contender in the race to develop effective vaccines for current and future viral outbreaks.</p>
<p>Moreover, the funding and support for this study, provided by organizations such as the Research Council of Norway, the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation (CEPI), and Independent Research Fund Denmark, underscore the collaborative effort required to address these pressing public health challenges. </p>
<p>As scientists continue to refine and expand upon this vaccine platform, it is essential to engage in further research that explores its efficacy against a wider array of respiratory pathogens. The potential to develop a vaccine that can efficiently elicit a robust immune response at mucosal surfaces could revolutionize the way we approach the prevention of respiratory illnesses. Continued investigation into the nuances of immune responses elicited by the albumin-based vaccines will provide deeper insights and further establish its place in future vaccine design.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the findings from Professor Andersen and his team mark a significant advancement in vaccine research and open new avenues for the development of effective vaccines against respiratory pathogens. Their innovative albumin-based vaccine technology platform represents a remarkable stride towards achieving protection at the very locations where infections initiate. As the scientific community moves forward, this work lays a strong foundation for future endeavors aimed at enhancing the efficacy of vaccines in combating the next wave of viral threats facing global health.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Novel vaccine technology for respiratory pathogens<br />
<strong>Article Title</strong>: An intranasal subunit vaccine induces protective systemic and mucosal antibody immunity against respiratory viruses in mouse models<br />
<strong>News Publication Date</strong>: 1-May-2025<br />
<strong>Web References</strong>: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59353-6"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59353-6">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59353-6</a></a><br />
<strong>References</strong>: Available upon request<br />
<strong>Image Credits</strong>: N/A  </p>
<h4><strong>Keywords</strong></h4>
<p> Vaccine, mucosal immunity, respiratory pathogens, albumin, FcRn, COVID-19, influenza, antibody responses, vaccine technology, immunology, translational research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">41090</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
