<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sustainable concrete production &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/sustainable-concrete-production/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 04:14:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Dry ice and carbonation curing compared for concrete strength and durability</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/dry-ice-and-carbonation-curing-compared-for-concrete-strength-and-durability/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 04:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcium carbonate formation in cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcium carbonate formation in concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbonation curing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cement chemistry and carbonation reactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cement hydration chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemically stabilized concrete with CO₂]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO₂ sequestration in cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison of dry ice and chamber carbonation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concrete carbonation curing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dry ice concrete reinforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dry ice concrete treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durability enhancement through CO₂ curing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durability of CO₂-infused concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental benefits of carbonation curing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of carbonation methods on concrete strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of carbonation on concrete strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative concrete curing techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative methods for eco-friendly concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reducing carbon footprint in construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduction of greenhouse gases in construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable concrete manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable concrete production]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/dry-ice-and-carbonation-curing-compared-for-concrete-strength-and-durability/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Every ton of cement produced releases roughly as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as the chemical reaction it carries inside — and the concrete industry as a whole is responsible for approximately 8% of global anthropogenic CO₂ emissions. Now, a team of researchers from Saudi Arabia has reported a way to fight back from [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every ton of cement produced releases roughly as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as the chemical reaction it carries inside — and the concrete industry as a whole is responsible for approximately 8% of global anthropogenic CO₂ emissions. Now, a team of researchers from Saudi Arabia has reported a way to fight back from within the material itself, locking carbon dioxide permanently into concrete while simultaneously making it stronger. In a comprehensive comparative study published in <em>Case Studies in Construction Materials</em>, Firas Hilaloglu and colleagues systematically tested two very different ways of feeding CO₂ to concrete — dropping crushed dry ice directly into the mixer, and curing hardened specimens in a sealed, carbon-dioxide-rich chamber — and found that the two approaches produce strikingly different mechanical and durability outcomes depending on the cement chemistry and water content of the mix.</p>
<p>The core chemistry underlying both techniques is elegantly simple. Carbon dioxide reacts with alkaline cement hydration products, chiefly calcium hydroxide and calcium silicate hydrate, to precipitate calcium carbonate — a stable, solid mineral that effectively entombs the greenhouse gas within the concrete matrix. The reaction follows the straightforward stoichiometry of Ca(OH)₂ + CO₂ → CaCO₃ + H₂O. Historically, this carbonation process has been viewed with alarm by structural engineers, because it lowers the alkalinity of the pore solution surrounding steel reinforcement and thereby strips steel of its protective passive layer, opening the door to corrosion. What the new study joins is a growing body of work that reframes carbonation as an asset when it is deliberately controlled and applied early — a strategy known as accelerated carbonation curing, or ACC.</p>
<p>The experimental program was ambitious in scope. Eighteen distinct concrete batches were prepared, spanning three water-to-cement ratios (0.35, 0.45, and 0.55), two Portland cement types (Type I, the ordinary structural workhorse, and Type V, a sulfate-resistant formulation with markedly lower tricalcium aluminate content), and three curing regimes: conventional water curing as a control, dry ice carbonation followed by water curing, and accelerated carbonation curing in a chamber. Cylindrical specimens measuring 100 by 200 millimeters were cast for every combination, and compressive strength was tracked at 7, 28, and 56 days according to ASTM C39, alongside a battery of durability tests including rapid chloride permeability, surface electrical resistivity, volume of permeable voids, water absorption, and carbonation depth measured with a phenolphthalein pH indicator.</p>
<p>The two carbonation routes differ fundamentally in mechanism, and those differences shaped the results. Dry ice — solid CO₂ at roughly −78 °C — sublimates rapidly, so when crushed into a fine powder at a dosage of 0.5% by weight of cement and blended into fresh concrete, it delivers high-purity carbon dioxide directly at the mixing stage. The carbonation reaction proceeds simultaneously with early hydration, and the resulting calcium carbonate is dispersed relatively uniformly throughout the mixture. The dry ice also doubled as a cooling agent: fresh concrete temperatures dropped from 30–33 °C in the control batches to about 23 °C in the dry-ice batches, a side benefit for hot-climate concreting, though the sublimation left no consistent trend in slump across the mixes. Accelerated carbonation curing, by contrast, works from the outside in. Demolded specimens were sealed inside acrylic chambers where the CO₂ concentration was held at 20–25% by volume, monitored continuously by a non-dispersive infrared sensor, with temperature at 20–25 °C and relative humidity regulated at 75–80% using a saturated sodium chloride solution. The gas diffuses through the hardened pore network, so the carbonation products concentrate near the surface and taper toward the interior, filling and refining existing pores rather than dispersing through a developing matrix.</p>
<p>The headline mechanical result belonged to the chamber method. The Type V cement mixture with a water-to-cement ratio of 0.35 subjected to ACC achieved the highest 28-day compressive strength of the entire study, 53.67 megapascals — a 12.2% improvement over its identically proportioned water-cured control. In fact, the water-to-cement ratio emerged as the single most decisive variable governing whether carbonation curing helped at all. Low-w/c concretes (w/c = 0.35) benefited across the board, showing higher strength, lower chloride ion penetrability, higher electrical resistivity, and water absorption below 2%. High-w/c mixes told a bleaker story: batches at w/c = 0.55 never exceeded 30 megapascals and remained stubbornly in the &#8220;high&#8221; chloride penetrability classification no matter which carbonation treatment they received. Porous, moisture-rich microstructures apparently offer too much pathway and too little reactive substrate for the CO₂ treatment to meaningfully compensate.</p>
<p>Durability testing reinforced the same hierarchy. In the rapid chloride permeability test per ASTM C1202, thin concrete discs sandwiched between sodium chloride and sodium hydroxide solutions under 60 volts of direct current for six hours were judged by the total charge passed. The ACC-treated Type I concrete at w/c = 0.35 stood out: its surface resistivity climbed from 17.73 kilohm-centimeters at 28 days to 21.51 at 56 days, crossing the threshold from &#8220;moderate&#8221; into the &#8220;low&#8221; chloride penetrability category — a meaningful milestone for a material destined for aggressive service environments. Carbonation depths measured at 56 days ranged from just 0.11 to 3.1 millimeters across all ACC specimens, well below the 20-millimeter-plus cover depths typical of reinforced concrete, suggesting that deliberate early carbonation remains largely a near-surface phenomenon within the study&#8217;s timeframe.</p>
<p>One of the study&#8217;s most intriguing findings concerned cement chemistry. Type V cement, with only about 2% tricalcium aluminate (C₃A), consistently showed lower volumes of permeable voids and more favorable transport properties under carbonation curing than Type I cement, which contains about 6% C₃A. The authors attribute this to the susceptibility of AFm and AFt phases — hydrated products of C₃A — to carbonation-induced decomposition and transformation into carbonate-bearing phases, reactions that can be accompanied by shrinkage and microcracking that degrade pore connectivity. In other words, the wrong cement chemistry can turn a carbon-saving cure into a microstructural liability. The researchers caution that these explanations are literature-supported interpretations rather than direct observations, since no SEM, FTIR, or mercury intrusion porosimetry was performed; direct microstructural characterization is flagged as essential future work.</p>
<p>The dry ice results were more equivocal. Prior research by the field had suggested an optimal dry ice dosage of roughly 0.5–0.6% by weight of cement, capable of boosting compressive strength by as much as 31% in some systems, and the present study indeed found performance benefits under selected conditions — particularly in Type V mixes, where dry-ice batches showed reduced permeable void volume, with a maximum reduction of 14.63% at w/c = 0.45. But evaluated across the full matrix of mixes, the single tested dosage of 0.5% delivered less consistent and less reproducible gains than chamber-based ACC. The authors argue that the sealed chamber&#8217;s controlled environment produces uniform gas exposure and predictable reaction kinetics, making ACC the more reliable route for systematic enhancement — while conceding that dry ice optimization across wider dosages, moisture conditions, and mixing parameters remains unexplored territory with a distinct practical appeal, since it requires no special curing infrastructure.</p>
<p>Correlation analyses tied the story together. Compressive strength rose as carbonation depth fell, as permeable void volume dropped, and as surface resistivity climbed — with ACC mixtures generally showing steeper regression slopes than dry-ice mixtures, especially for Type V cement, indicating that mechanical performance under chamber curing is unusually sensitive to transport-related microstructure. The overall message for the industry is that carbon capture in concrete is not a one-size-fits-all proposition: the benefit depends on a trio of interlocking factors — the delivery method for the CO₂, the mineral composition of the cement, and the porosity of the mix, dictated largely by its water content. With 8% of global emissions riding on the outcome, the finding that a simple chamber, a salt solution, and a tank of CO₂ can deliver both sequestration and a 12% strength gain may prove to be one of the more commercially legible steps yet toward carbon-negative construction. The team, supported by the Saudi Standards, Metrology and Quality Organization (SASO), notes that longer-term studies must still confirm that early carbonation does not compromise reinforcement passivation over decades — the critical question that stands between laboratory promise and structural reality.</p>
<div class="scienmag-article-metadata"><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Mechanical and durability performance of concrete cured with dry ice carbonation and accelerated carbonation curing (ACC)</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mechanical and durability performance of concrete under dry ice and accelerated carbonation curing: A comparative study</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hilaloglu, F., Kanwal, Q., Badawi, M. A., Almarshoud, M. A., &amp; Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2026). Mechanical and durability performance of concrete under dry ice and accelerated carbonation curing: A comparative study. <em>Case Studies in Construction Materials, 25</em>, Article e06489. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06489" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06489</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06489" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06489</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> accelerated carbonation curing, dry ice, concrete, CO₂ sequestration, compressive strength, durability, chloride permeability, surface resistivity, Portland cement, low-carbon concrete</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">189889</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revolutionary Carbon-Negative Material Poised to Enhance Sustainability in Concrete and Cement Production</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/revolutionary-carbon-negative-material-poised-to-enhance-sustainability-in-concrete-and-cement-production/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 07:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and storage technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon-negative construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change mitigation strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 utilization in construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly material development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas emission reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative cement alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northwestern University research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seawater-based building materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable building practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable concrete production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transformative construction techniques]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/revolutionary-carbon-negative-material-poised-to-enhance-sustainability-in-concrete-and-cement-production/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a groundbreaking development within the realm of sustainable construction materials, scientists at Northwestern University have unveiled a novel carbon-negative building substance that has the potential to revolutionize the construction industry and significantly mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. This innovative material is produced by utilizing seawater, electricity, and carbon dioxide (CO₂), effectively transforming a waste product [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a groundbreaking development within the realm of sustainable construction materials, scientists at Northwestern University have unveiled a novel carbon-negative building substance that has the potential to revolutionize the construction industry and significantly mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. This innovative material is produced by utilizing seawater, electricity, and carbon dioxide (CO₂), effectively transforming a waste product into a valuable resource, thus addressing dual challenges in the fight against climate change.</p>
<p>In light of the escalating climate crisis, the extraction of CO₂ from the atmosphere and its secure storage has garnered increasing attention from researchers across the globe. In many existing carbon capture methods, while atmospheric CO₂ can be effectively sequestered, the inherent value of this greenhouse gas is often overlooked. The pioneering research led by a team from Northwestern takes a transformative approach by both capturing CO₂ and converting it into useful building materials like concrete, cement, plaster, and paint. This dual-purpose method not only reduces the atmospheric carbon burden but also contributes to the sustainable production of ubiquitous construction materials.</p>
<p>Led by Alessandro Rotta Loria, an assistant professor at Northwestern’s McCormick School of Engineering, the research team has successfully developed a method that leverages seawater and electrical energy to create sand-like materials. Cement and concrete are traditionally reliant on sand derived from the earth’s aggregates. The sustainable technique developed by Rotta Loria and his colleagues bypasses the need for mining these essential minerals. Instead, they utilize a combination of CO₂ injection and electrochemical processes to cultivate sand constituents directly in seawater.</p>
<p>The implications of this technology are profound. The captured CO₂, injected into seawater, engages in a chemical reaction whereby it alters the water&#8217;s composition, enhancing the concentration of bicarbonate ions. These ions then react with naturally occurring minerals in seawater such as calcium and magnesium to generate solidified materials like calcium carbonate and magnesium hydroxide. Not only do these substances serve as supplements in concrete and other construction products, but they also function as effective carbon sinks, substantially holding over half their weight in CO₂ emissions.</p>
<p>This carbon-negative material exemplifies nature’s ingenuity, echoing the processes seen in marine organisms like corals and mollusks, which utilize metabolic energy to create calcium carbonate for their shells. The Northwestern team, however, introduces a synergy of electrical energy and chemical manipulation, allowing for greater control over the materials generated. This control enables the examination of multiple factors, including electricity voltage, CO₂ flow rates, and timing, to meticulously tailor the resultant material&#8217;s properties. Consequently, a spectrum of textures ranging from porous to more compact forms can be consistently produced, paving the way for various applications in the construction sphere.</p>
<p>The significant milestone in this research includes not just the ability to supercharge the mineralization process with electricity but also its adaptability based on experimental conditions. This flexibility is a game-changer in material science, where the specific requirements for diverse applications can be met without compromising structural integrity. In a construction industry that heavily depends on aggregates for concrete, the promise of a sustainable substitute is both timely and critical amid global efforts to combat climate change.</p>
<p>Additionally, Rotta Loria&#8217;s vision extends beyond raw material production. The process can be integrated into modular systems, potentially positioned at shoreline cement plants where oceanic resources are readily available. This promises to streamline the supply chain while minimizing ecological disturbances, ensuring that marine ecosystems remain unaffected. By orchestrating these chemical processes in a controlled setting, the researchers can maintain optimal water quality and minimize detrimental environmental impacts.</p>
<p>In the broader context, the cement and concrete industries are significant contributors to global CO₂ emissions, accounting for around 8% of the total emissions frequently mentioned in climate discussions. By embedding carbon into the very materials that drive construction, Rotta Loria posits the feasibility of creating a circular economy embracing sustainability. A system where construction methods not only reduce the industry&#8217;s carbon footprint but also actively contribute to carbon sequestration aligns with global climate goals.</p>
<p>The prospective impact of this discovery is profound, suggesting that if these sustainable materials could be implemented on a large scale, it could lead to a major paradigm shift in how the construction industry operates. The widespread adoption of carbon-negative materials would potentially revolutionize the sector by integrating environmental responsibility into the very heart of construction practices.</p>
<p>In summary, the synthesis of carbon-negative building materials represents a significant leap forward in sustainable construction practices. This breakthrough not only addresses the urgent need for eco-friendly materials but also harnesses innovative science to combat the pernicious effects of climate change, turning the tide on CO₂ emissions associated with construction.</p>
<p>Such transformative research highlights the collaborative efforts between universities and industry leaders, exemplifying how innovation can lead to sustainable development. This milestone has been supported by the involvement of Cemex, an influential global building materials company dedicated to sustainability, indicating the potential for real-world applications that can extend beyond academic theory to practical implementation in construction.</p>
<p>The work will be featured in &quot;Advanced Sustainable Systems,&quot; thus contributing to the growing body of knowledge surrounding environmentally conscious building materials. It paves the way for further explorations into the use of carbon capture technologies in real-world applications, emphasizing the role of academia in addressing some of the most pressing issues of our time.</p>
<p>Ultimately, Northwestern’s groundbreaking advancement in material science reflects an exciting frontier of research and innovation, opening new possibilities for future studies aimed at integrating environmental sustainability with everyday practices in construction and manufacturing.</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Carbon-negative building materials<br />
<strong>Article Title</strong>: Electrodeposition of carbon-trapping minerals in seawater for variable electrochemical potentials and carbon dioxide injections<br />
<strong>News Publication Date</strong>: March 19, 2025<br />
<strong>Web References</strong>: <a href="https://www.mccormick.northwestern.edu/">Northwestern University</a><br />
<strong>References</strong>: Advanced Sustainable Systems<br />
<strong>Image Credits</strong>: Credit: Northwestern University  </p>
<h4><strong>Keywords</strong></h4>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">32291</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
