<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sustainable biomass waste management &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/sustainable-biomass-waste-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:58:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Waste Rubber Seed Shells Become Ionic Liquid Coated Carbons That Capture More CO2</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/waste-rubber-seed-shells-become-ionic-liquid-coated-carbons-that-capture-more-co2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activated carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsorbent regeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodegradable ionic liquids for carbon adsorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomass waste to industrial carbon removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomass waste valorisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 adsorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2/N2 selectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of biomass decomposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global carbon dioxide emissions reduction strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-efficiency CO2 adsorbents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative activated carbon technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ionic liquid coated carbon for CO2 capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ionic liquids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Langmuir isotherm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-cost carbon capture materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microporous materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physisorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable waste-based carbon materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubber seed shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rubber seed shell-derived activated carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scalable agricultural waste recycling solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable biomass waste management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable materials]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=196683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers converted rubber seed shell biomass waste into ionic liquid functionalized activated carbon that captures 3.71 mmol/g of CO2 and retains 99.26 percent of capacity over ten adsorption cycles.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carbon dioxide removal is one of the defining engineering challenges of the century, and one of the most promising answers may be sitting in an agricultural waste pile. Researchers at Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS in Malaysia have transformed rubber seed shells, a discarded byproduct of the natural rubber industry, into high-performance activated carbon adsorbents and then supercharged them with a biodegradable ionic liquid. The result is a sustainable, low-cost material that captures carbon dioxide with remarkable efficiency, holds onto its capacity through repeated use, and could help close the loop between biomass waste management and industrial carbon capture.</p>
<p>The scale of the problem the team aimed to address is considerable. Global carbon dioxide emissions since 1850 have driven average temperatures up by roughly 0.8 degrees Celsius, with even steeper rises in warmer regions, while the world generates an estimated 140 gigatonnes of biomass waste every year, much of which decomposes or burns improperly and contributes as much as 18 percent of emissions. At the same time, the biomass recycling market is projected to reach 142.3 billion dollars by 2034, and the global activated carbon market is expected to top 7.3 billion dollars by 2030. Turning one waste stream into a solution for another is precisely the kind of circular economy logic that underpins bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, and it aligns squarely with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals on responsible consumption and climate action.</p>
<p>Rubber seed shell proved to be an ideal starting point because it contains about 64.5 percent carbon by mass. The researchers pre-treated the shells, ground them to a fine powder, and impregnated them with two different alkaline activating agents: potassium carbonate and potassium hydroxide, each mixed at an optimized two-to-one ratio with the biomass. After drying, the impregnated material was carbonized in a tube furnace at 800 degrees Celsius under a continuous nitrogen flow for three hours, then washed with dilute hydrochloric acid and distilled water until neutral. The yields were 37 percent for the potassium carbonate route and 29 percent for the potassium hydroxide route, conditions arrived at through systematic calibration of activator ratios, temperatures, and residence times.</p>
<p>The real innovation came next. Rather than leaving the carbon surface bare, the team functionalized it with ethanolammonium butyrate, an ammonium-based ionic liquid synthesized simply by adding ethanolamine dropwise to butyric acid at room temperature. This ionic liquid stands out among its peers because it is biodegradable, thermally stable, environmentally and economically sustainable, and has a moderate viscosity that eases processing. Loadings of 10, 20, and 30 weight percent were tested on both activation routes, and the samples were then subjected to a full battery of characterization techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry.</p>
<p>The performance results were striking. The best material, potassium carbonate activated carbon carrying 30 weight percent of the ionic liquid, adsorbed 3.71 millimoles of carbon dioxide per gram at 0 degrees Celsius and 2.49 millimoles per gram at 25 degrees Celsius at one bar. By contrast, the unmodified potassium hydroxide activated carbon managed only 0.95 millimoles per gram at 25 degrees Celsius. Adsorption rose with ionic liquid loading and fell with temperature, exactly as expected for an exothermic physisorption process in which higher molecular motion favors desorption. Interestingly, potassium carbonate activated samples outperformed their potassium hydroxide counterparts in carbon dioxide uptake even though the latter possessed superior textural properties, a discrepancy the authors attribute to pore structure collapse caused by the harsher activation chemistry of potassium hydroxide.</p>
<p>Equilibrium isotherm analysis told a consistent story. Among the four models tested, the Langmuir equation fit the experimental data best, with coefficient of determination values between 0.996 and 0.999, indicating that carbon dioxide adsorbs predominantly as a monolayer on energetically similar sites. The Langmuir affinity constant climbed with ionic liquid loading, confirming that the nitrogen-containing basic functionalities introduced by the ethanolammonium butyrate strengthen carbon dioxide affinity through weak Lewis acid-base interactions, while nitrogen is a poor match for these sites and passes through largely unretained.</p>
<p>Micropore analysis revealed a subtle but crucial trade-off. The pristine potassium hydroxide derived carbon boasted a specific surface area of 954 square meters per gram and a total pore volume of 0.43 cubic centimeters per gram, figures that progressively declined as ionic liquid loading increased, reaching 397 square meters per gram and 0.18 cubic centimeters per gram at 30 weight percent. Electron microscopy and elemental analysis confirmed the progressive surface coverage and the emergence of nitrogen and oxygen signals, while Raman spectroscopy showed rising defect density as the liquid infiltrated the pore network. Yet carbon dioxide uptake rose anyway, because the introduced functionalities more than compensated for the lost porosity. The team distilled this synergy into empirical equations linking the oxygen-to-carbon ratio, pore diameter, and Langmuir affinity, and derived a combined descriptor showing that surface chemistry enhancement constants were 29.25 for potassium carbonate samples and 6.60 for potassium hydroxide samples, underscoring that adsorption performance is governed by pore structure and surface chemistry together, not surface area alone.</p>
<p>Practical deployment demands more than raw capacity, and the optimized adsorbent passed those tests with distinction. The isosteric heat of adsorption ranged from 29.7 to 44.2 kilojoules per mole, well below the 50 kilojoule per mole threshold that signals chemisorption, confirming strong physisorption with modest regeneration energy requirements. Under simulated post-combustion conditions of 15 percent carbon dioxide and 85 percent nitrogen at one bar, the material achieved a carbon dioxide over nitrogen selectivity between 21.59 and 25.94, comparable to leading biomass-derived sorbents in recent literature. Most impressively, after ten consecutive adsorption-desorption cycles at 0 degrees Celsius, the material retained 99.26 percent of its original capacity, a figure that outperforms many previously reported cycling results and points to excellent structural durability for repeated industrial use.</p>
<p>The implications ripple outward in several directions. For carbon capture engineering, the study demonstrates that a deliberately greener ionic liquid, one that avoids the synthetic complexity and high viscosity of many amino acid and polymeric alternatives, can rival or exceed the performance of more exotic functionalization chemistries when paired with the right activation route. For waste valorisation, it shows that rubber seed shells, an abundant and largely untapped agricultural residue rich in carbon, can anchor a waste-to-resource supply chain for sorbent production. The authors caution that several questions remain before commercial deployment, including performance under humid conditions with mixed gas streams, adsorption kinetics and diffusion behavior, techno-economic feasibility, and life-cycle assessment at scale. They also suggest exploring other activating agents and wider operating windows. But the core message stands: with careful control of activation chemistry and a smart coating of sustainable ionic liquid, an agricultural throwaway can become a durable, selective, and regenerable weapon against rising carbon dioxide, and a template for the next generation of low-cost carbon capture materials.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Ionic liquid functionalized activated carbon derived from rubber seed shell biomass for enhanced carbon dioxide capture</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Sustainable ionic liquid functionalized activated carbon for enhanced CO 2 capture: Integrated textural properties, adsorption performance and isotherms</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Suleman, F., Borhan, A., Muhbat, S., Rashidi, N. A., Daood, S. S., &amp; Abdulalh, N. H. (2026). Sustainable ionic liquid functionalized activated carbon for enhanced CO2 capture: Integrated textural properties, adsorption performance and isotherms. <em>Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 34</em>, Article 101314. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2026.101314" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2026.101314</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> carbon capture, activated carbon, ionic liquids, rubber seed shell, biomass waste valorisation, CO2 adsorption, Langmuir isotherm, physisorption, CO2/N2 selectivity, microporous materials, adsorbent regeneration, sustainable materials</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">196683</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microwave-Produced Biochar Offers Promising Solution for Cleaner Water and Safer Soils from Waste Biomass</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/microwave-produced-biochar-offers-promising-solution-for-cleaner-water-and-safer-soils-from-waste-biomass/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural residue biochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochar for wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochar pollutant adsorption mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochar pore structure and surface chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochar soil remediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon sequestration with biochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conventional pyrolysis vs microwave pyrolysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental applications of biochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestry waste biochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microwave pyrolysis environmental benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microwave-assisted biochar production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable biomass waste management]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/microwave-produced-biochar-offers-promising-solution-for-cleaner-water-and-safer-soils-from-waste-biomass/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the relentless pursuit to manage waste biomass more effectively and to mitigate environmental contamination, biochar has emerged as a promising material with multifaceted applications. This carbon-rich substance, derived from the thermal decomposition of organic waste under low oxygen conditions, is at the forefront of research efforts seeking sustainable solutions for pollution control and resource [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the relentless pursuit to manage waste biomass more effectively and to mitigate environmental contamination, biochar has emerged as a promising material with multifaceted applications. This carbon-rich substance, derived from the thermal decomposition of organic waste under low oxygen conditions, is at the forefront of research efforts seeking sustainable solutions for pollution control and resource recovery. A recent comprehensive review published in the journal <em>Biochar</em> sheds light on two primary biochar production methodologies — conventional pyrolysis and microwave-assisted pyrolysis — elucidating how the nuances of each process affect the structural and chemical attributes of biochar, as well as its efficacy in environmental remediation.</p>
<p>Biochar production hinges on converting diverse organic wastes — ranging from agricultural and forestry residues to sewage sludge and animal manure — into stable, porous carbon matrices. Unlike incineration or landfill disposal, these carbonaceous materials trap carbon and can serve multiple environmental functions, such as adsorbing pollutants, enhancing soil fertility, and sequestering atmospheric CO2. However, the heterogeneity of biochar characteristics largely depends on the pyrolytic technique employed, which influences the development of surface morphology, pore architecture, and the retention of functional groups necessary for environmental applications.</p>
<p>Conventional pyrolysis operates on the principle of external heat transfer, whereby biomass is progressively heated from its exterior inward, a method proven effective for producing stable biochar products. Despite its wide industrial application, this approach inherently incurs longer processing durations and exhibits non-uniform temperature gradients within biomass particles. The uneven thermal distribution poses limitations on pore formation and can reduce the density of active surface chemical functionalities critical for pollutant adsorption, often hindering biochar&#8217;s environmental performance.</p>
<p>In contrast, microwave-assisted pyrolysis introduces electromagnetic radiation that penetrates biomass, generating heat volumetrically through dielectric heating. This internal heating mechanism accelerates pyrolysis reactions by uniformly raising the temperature throughout the material matrix. Importantly, this method substantially reduces residence time and promotes the formation of a more homogenous pore network. The review highlights that microwave-derived biochars display notably higher surface areas and enhanced mesoporosity, facilitating improved accessibility for contaminants. Additionally, these biochars exhibit superior graphitization and better preservation of oxygen-containing functional groups, which collectively amplify their adsorptive and catalytic capacities.</p>
<p>The physicochemical distinctions between biochars produced by the two methods profoundly influence their mechanisms for pollutant capture and transformation. Biochar interacts with contaminants through diverse pathways, including ion exchange, electrostatic forces, surface complexation, precipitation, redox reactions, hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions, and physical entrapment. Microwave-assisted biochars, with their optimized surface properties, demonstrate pronounced efficacy in sequestering hazardous heavy metals such as lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), and thallium (Tl). Furthermore, these biochars possess enhanced affinity for an array of organic pollutants, encompassing industrial dyes, pharmaceutical residues, phenolic compounds, pesticides, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and microplastic particles.</p>
<p>Beyond their role in environmental cleanup, biochars synthesized through advanced pyrolysis technologies hold promise in broader sectors. They are instrumental in soil amendment strategies, bolstering nutrient retention and microbial activity, and in organic waste composting by hastening decomposition and odor reduction. Their catalytic properties open avenues for chemical transformations, while their capacity for carbon storage underscores their relevance to climate change mitigation efforts. Emerging research even explores their utility as electrode materials in energy storage devices, reinforcing biochar&#8217;s versatility at the nexus of environmental sustainability and circular economy paradigms.</p>
<p>Despite the compelling advantages of microwave-assisted pyrolysis, the review underscores salient challenges impeding its widespread adoption. Substantial technical barriers persist, notably in scaling reactor systems to industrial volumes while maintaining uniform electromagnetic field distribution. The prevalence of hotspots during pyrolysis can lead to inconsistent biochar quality, demanding sophisticated reactor designs and control algorithms. The variable nature of feedstock – stemming from diverse organic compositions and moisture contents – further complicates process optimization. Energy efficiency, operational safety, and cost metrics necessitate rigorous techno-economic and life cycle assessments to validate this technology’s feasibility in real-world applications.</p>
<p>Recognizing these hurdles, the authors advocate for integrated research approaches that bridge reactor engineering with material science and environmental chemistry. They emphasize the importance of elucidating the correlation between pyrolysis parameters, resultant biochar microstructure, and mechanisms underlying pollutant sorption and transformation. Long-term studies evaluating biochar regeneration potential and environmental safety are deemed critical to engender trust and regulatory acceptance. This multidisciplinary strategy is poised to inform the rational design of next-generation biochars tailored for specific environmental challenges.</p>
<p>The evolution of microwave-assisted pyrolysis exemplifies the innovation imperative in the biochar domain, where tailoring material properties at the molecular and pore-structure scales unlocks superior functionality. The review presents a comprehensive framework that assimilates production processes, biochar characteristics, adsorption interactions, and application potentials, providing a strategic roadmap to harness biochar for waste valorization, water decontamination, soil rehabilitation, and climate change mitigation.</p>
<p>This synthesis of current knowledge suggests that while conventional pyrolysis remains a robust and established method for biochar generation, microwave-assisted pyrolysis introduces transformative possibilities for engineering highly efficient, application-specific biochars. Its capacity to deliver rapid, uniform thermal processing with tunable physicochemical outcomes positions microwave-assisted pyrolysis as a technology of high interest for advancing sustainable environmental technologies.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the promise of biochar as a multifaceted environmental material rests on careful optimization and validation of production systems. Continued efforts towards reactor scale-up, process standardization, and comprehensive performance evaluations under realistic operational conditions will pave the way for realizing the full potential of biochar-based solutions in addressing global challenges of waste management, pollution control, and resource sustainability.</p>
<hr />
<p>Subject of Research: Biochar production methods and their environmental remediation applications<br />
Article Title: Conventional and microwave-assisted pyrolysis biochars: comparative mechanistic insights, structural evolution, and environmental remediation applications<br />
News Publication Date: 28-Apr-2026<br />
Web References: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42773-026-00601-3">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42773-026-00601-3</a><br />
References: Rasool, A., Brožová, K., Chromíková, J. et al. <em>Biochar</em> 8, 98 (2026).<br />
Image Credits: Atta Rasool, Kateřina Brožová, Jitka Chromíková, Eva Pertile, Jan Halfar, Petra Malíková, Oldřich Motyka, Silvie Drabinová, Kristina Čabanová &amp; Silvie Heviánková</p>
<h4><strong>Keywords</strong></h4>
<p>Biochar, pyrolysis, microwave-assisted pyrolysis, environmental remediation, adsorption mechanisms, heavy metals removal, organic pollutants, carbon sequestration, sustainable waste management, soil amendment, pollutant sorption, material engineering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">168092</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
