<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>surface ice velocity &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/surface-ice-velocity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:35:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Shirase Glacier&#8217;s 2017 Calving Linked to Warm Ocean and Thin Sea Ice</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/shirase-glaciers-2017-calving-linked-to-warm-ocean-and-thin-sea-ice/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic glacier calving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Antarctic Ice Sheet vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Antarctica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Antarctica ice dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective strain rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of thin sea ice on calving events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERA-5 reanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaciology research on ice-ocean interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice tongue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of warm ocean temperatures on ice loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of atmospheric cooling on ice melt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landsat 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term glacier behavior studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lützow-Holm Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean-atmosphere interactions in Antarctica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite analysis of Antarctic ice sheets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea ice concentration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea ice thickness and glacier stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea surface temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shirase Glacier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shirase Glacier climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface ice velocity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=246838</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A decade of Landsat-8 observations reveals that Shirase Glacier's major 2017 calving event coincided with low sea ice, warm sea surface temperatures, and weakened atmospheric cooling.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of East Antarctica&#8217;s fastest-moving glaciers lost a chunk of its floating ice tongue in the autumn of 2017, and a new decade-long satellite analysis suggests the break-up coincided with unusually favorable conditions for calving: thin sea-ice cover, relatively warm sea surface temperatures, and a weakened atmospheric cooling signal. The study, published in the journal Ocean Dynamics, reconstructs the annual behavior of the Shirase Glacier from 2014 to 2024 and offers one of the most detailed year-by-year pictures yet of how oceanic and atmospheric variability shape the dynamics of a major East Antarctic outlet.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Dvija Dave of Gujarat University in collaboration with scientists at the Space Applications Centre of the Indian Space Research Organisation, focused on a glacier that has long fascinated glaciologists. Shirase Glacier drains a substantial portion of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet into Lützow-Holm Bay, and its floating ice tongue extends far out to sea, making it a natural laboratory for studying how ice, ocean, and atmosphere interact at the margin of a continent often considered more stable than its western counterpart. Previous work had already revealed that the glacier&#8217;s flow speed fluctuates noticeably from year to year, but the mechanisms driving those swings remained only partially understood.</p>
<p>To track the glacier&#8217;s motion, the team turned to a technique that has revolutionized cryospheric science: feature tracking of optical satellite imagery. Using data from the Landsat-8 satellite, the researchers processed pairs of images with an image cross-correlation approach, implemented with the ImGRAFT toolbox, a widely used open-source package for georectifying and tracking features in glacier imagery. The method works by identifying distinctive surface features, such as crevasses and flowlines, in one image and then searching for those same features in a later image. The displacement between the two positions, divided by the time elapsed between acquisitions, yields the surface ice velocity. This allowed the team to build annual velocity maps of the glacier and its tongue across the full decade.</p>
<p>The technique&#8217;s precision matters enormously for studies like this one, because small errors can masquerade as real changes in ice flow. The researchers quantified their uncertainty carefully, reporting velocity root-mean-square errors ranging from 3.72 to 21.80 meters per year, depending on the year and image quality. When they measured the area of ice lost during calving events, they estimated uncertainties of plus or minus 4.33 to 5.88 square kilometers, equivalent to roughly 0.80 to 0.88 percent of the measured areas. Such error bars are small enough that the major signals in the record stand out clearly against the noise.</p>
<p>Beyond velocity, the team computed the effective strain rate across the glacier, a measure of how rapidly the ice is deforming as it flows. Strain rates reveal where the ice is being stretched or compressed, and high strain near the glacier front often marks zones of mechanical weakness where calving is more likely. By analyzing annual surface ice velocity, effective strain rate, and ice detachment together, the researchers could connect the glacier&#8217;s internal dynamics to its frontal evolution over time, identifying periods of advance, stability, and abrupt loss.</p>
<p>The headline event of the decade came in the Southern Hemisphere autumn of 2017. Between April 29 and May 5 of that year, approximately 80 square kilometers of ice detached from the glacier front, a substantial calving event that reshaped the glacier&#8217;s floating tongue. The detachment followed a period of frontal advance between 2014 and 2016, during which the glacier tongue had pushed further out into the bay. That sequence, advance followed by abrupt retreat, is a classic calving cycle, but the timing of the 2017 break-up offered a clue about what might have tipped the ice over the edge.</p>
<p>To search for that clue, the researchers examined three environmental variables from the ERA-5 reanalysis dataset produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts: sea ice concentration, sea surface temperature, and the difference between skin temperature and near-surface air temperature. Sea ice acts as a mechanical buttress against glacier fronts, dampening waves and reducing the stress on the ice tongue, so low sea-ice concentration can leave a glacier front exposed and vulnerable. Sea surface temperature, meanwhile, influences the rate at which warm water can reach and melt the ice from below, a process that earlier research has shown to be remarkably intense beneath the Shirase Glacier tongue.</p>
<p>The temporal associations the team found were striking. Relatively low sea ice concentration in April and May 2017 coincided directly with the calving window, while comparatively high sea surface temperatures and the least negative skin-to-air temperature difference of the study period were also observed during those months. In other words, the glacier front lost its sea-ice buffer precisely when the ocean was warmest and the atmospheric temperature contrast was weakest. The pattern is suggestive: weakened buttressing combined with enhanced oceanic heat could have primed the front for detachment. The authors are careful, however, to note the limits of the inference. These temporal associations suggest that glacier flow and frontal evolution were related to calving and environmental variability, but they do not establish the individual causal contributions of sea ice, sea surface temperature, or atmospheric conditions. Correlation in time, even compelling correlation, is not proof of mechanism.</p>
<p>That caution is scientifically appropriate, and it situates the new study within a broader and sometimes contentious debate about East Antarctic stability. Earlier investigations documented strong ice-ocean interaction beneath the Shirase Glacier tongue, and other work attributed a slowdown of the glacier to strengthening alongshore winds, highlighting that atmospheric circulation can modulate the glacier&#8217;s speed independently of ocean temperature. The new decade-long record adds annual resolution to this picture, showing how the glacier&#8217;s velocity, strain, and frontal position evolve together through cycles of advance and detachment, and providing a benchmark against which future changes can be measured.</p>
<p>What makes the study broadly significant is its demonstration that even in East Antarctica, long portrayed as the quiet sibling of the rapidly changing Antarctic Peninsula and Amundsen Sea sector, outlet glaciers respond sensitively to their environment on short timescales. With roughly 80 square kilometers of ice vanishing in a single week, and with the environmental conditions preceding that loss now documented in detail, the Shirase Glacier offers a case study in how sea-ice loss, ocean warming, and atmospheric variability can converge on a single glacier front. Continued satellite monitoring, the authors suggest, will be essential to determine whether the associations they observed recur with future calving events, and whether the glacier&#8217;s decade of documented variability is a prelude to more sustained retreat.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Oceanic and atmospheric influences on the annual ice dynamics and calving of Shirase Glacier, East Antarctica, from 2014 to 2024</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Impact of oceanic and atmospheric variability on the annual ice dynamics of the Shirase Glacier (2014–2024), East Antarctica</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Impact of oceanic and atmospheric variability on the annual ice dynamics of the Shirase Glacier (2014–2024), East Antarctica. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-026-01864-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-026-01864-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-026-01864-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10236-026-01864-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Shirase Glacier, East Antarctica, calving, sea ice concentration, sea surface temperature, surface ice velocity, Landsat-8, feature tracking, ERA-5 reanalysis, effective strain rate, ice tongue, Lützow-Holm Bay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">246838</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Himalayan Glaciers Are Slowing Down and Shrinking, Thirty-Year Study of Ladakh&#8217;s Doda Basin Reveals</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/himalayan-glaciers-are-slowing-down-and-shrinking-thirty-year-study-of-ladakhs-doda-basin-reveals/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 10:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and mass balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comprehensive study of glacier dynamics in Zanskar region]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debris cover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doda basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of debris-covered glaciers on glacier stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of glacier thinning and slowing on water resources in Ladakh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geodetic mass balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glacier lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glacier retreat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Himalayan glacier retreat and shrinking trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of climate change on Western Himalaya glaciers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications of glacier retreat for Himalayan water reserves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indicators of glacier health including area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ladakh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ladakh's Doda Basin glacier health decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite data analysis of Himalayan glaciers from 1993 to 2023]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface ice velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western Himalaya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zanskar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=244137</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A three-decade satellite and field assessment shows glaciers in Ladakh's Doda sub-basin losing area, thinning rapidly and decelerating, with lake-terminating and smaller glaciers hit hardest.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High in the Zanskar region of Ladakh, the glaciers that feed the Doda River are quietly rewriting the story of the Western Himalaya&#8217;s frozen water reserves. A new study published in Regional Environmental Change by Ajay Singh Rana, Vinit Kumar and Manish Mehta of the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology has assembled one of the most comprehensive pictures yet of how these ice masses have behaved over three decades, combining field observations with a battery of satellite datasets spanning 1993 to 2023. The verdict is sobering: the basin&#8217;s glaciers are shrinking, thinning and slowing down simultaneously, and the smallest of them are suffering the most.</p>
<p>The research team quantified five independent indicators of glacier health: total glacial area, frontal retreat, surface ice velocity, surface elevation change and geodetic mass balance. Measuring several variables across the same basin matters because any single metric can mislead. A glacier&#8217;s snout may advance while the ice behind it thins, or a debris-covered tongue may hold its position while the ice beneath stagnates. By triangulating between morphology, dynamics and mass, the authors built a picture of glacier response to both climatic and non-climatic controls that is far harder to dispute than any one measurement alone.</p>
<p>The headline numbers tell a clear story. The total glacierized area of the Doda sub-basin declined from roughly 356 square kilometres in 2005 to about 346 square kilometres in 2023, a loss of around three percent of the mapped ice cover in less than two decades. That figure, modest as it sounds, conceals a sharp size-dependent pattern. Glaciers smaller than five square kilometres lost 12.15 percent of their area, the highest relative loss of any size class, while glaciers larger than ten square kilometres showed comparatively modest reductions. Small ice bodies have less mass to buffer them against warming; their volume-to-surface-area ratio works against them, and once a small glacier begins to retreat, it can vanish within a generation.</p>
<p>Frontal retreat across the basin ranged from 9 plus or minus 2 to 13 plus or minus 3 metres per year. But the most striking contrast emerged between glaciers that end in lakes and those that terminate on land. Lake-terminating glaciers such as Durung-Drung and Mulung retreated faster than glaciers with no glacier-lake interaction. The mechanism is well understood in glaciology: when a glacier front pushes into a proglacial lake, the water attacks the ice cliff, calving accelerates retreat, and the lake itself expands, further destabilizing the terminus. In the Doda basin, this feedback loop has turned some of the region&#8217;s largest glaciers into the fastest losers.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most technically significant result concerns ice velocity. Using repeat satellite imagery, the team found that surface ice velocity declined by 44 percent for large glaciers and 33 percent for medium-sized glaciers between the 1999-2000 and 2022-2023 intervals. Slower ice is not healthier ice. Glacier speed reflects the driving stress that pushes ice downhill; when accumulation thins and the ice mass shrinks, the flow decelerates. A decelerating glacier is effectively a glacier that can no longer replenish its lower reaches, so the tongue stagnates, melts in place and thins from below. Velocity decline is therefore an early-warning signal of long-term decline, often preceding dramatic area loss.</p>
<p>To quantify how much ice the basin has actually lost, the researchers performed a geodetic mass balance analysis by differencing digital elevation models derived from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission and ASTER satellite stereo imagery. The technique compares surface elevations at two points in time and converts the volume change into water equivalent using density assumptions. The result: a cumulative geodetic mass balance of minus 10.8 plus or minus 6.7 metres of water equivalent, or minus 0.60 plus or minus 0.44 metres per year, over the period 2000 to 2017. In plain terms, the basin&#8217;s glaciers lost the equivalent of nearly eleven metres of water spread across their entire surface in seventeen years, a rate consistent with accelerating ice loss documented across the Himalaya in recent global assessments.</p>
<p>The elevation-change maps revealed where the thinning concentrates. Enhanced thinning occurred near glacier termini and in zones with thin or patchy debris cover. This detail touches one of the more counterintuitive findings in Himalayan glaciology, first articulated in the classic work of Gösta Östrem in 1959: a thin layer of rock debris on ice absorbs more solar radiation than clean ice and actually accelerates melting, while only a thick debris blanket insulates the ice beneath. Patchy debris cover, therefore, creates a mosaic of enhanced ablation, and the Doda data show exactly that signature, with thin-debris zones thinning faster than either clean ice at altitude or thickly mantled tongues.</p>
<p>The climatic backdrop helps explain why. The team analysed a long-term climate record spanning 1901 to 2023 and found significant winter warming, with accumulation-season temperatures from November to April rising at roughly 0.01 degrees Celsius per year. Meanwhile, precipitation increased mainly during the ablation season from May to October. This combination is particularly damaging for glacier mass balance. Warmer winters mean more precipitation falls as rain rather than snow at glacier margins, reducing the snowpack that protects ice through the summer. Summer rainfall, by contrast, delivers energy that promotes melting precisely when the ice is most vulnerable, and rain falling on snow accelerates the loss of the reflective snow cover. The seasonal timing of these changes, rather than their magnitude alone, appears to have tipped the basin&#8217;s glaciers into sustained deficit.</p>
<p>The Doda sub-basin sits within the Zanskar Valley of Ladakh, a cold, arid, high-altitude environment where glaciers are the primary water infrastructure. Meltwater from the Durung-Drung and neighbouring glaciers sustains the Doda River, which joins the Zanskar and ultimately contributes to the Indus system on which agriculture and hydropower across the region depend. The authors highlight that the combined climatic and geomorphic factors accelerating glacier instability pose increasing risks to long-term water-resource sustainability in the Zanskar region. In a region where villages depend on glacier-fed streams for irrigation of barley and vegetable crops during the short growing season, the slow-motion loss of ice storage translates directly into future water insecurity, particularly in late summer when meltwater demand peaks.</p>
<p>What makes this study valuable beyond its regional findings is its methodological integration. Rather than relying on a single satellite record, the authors fused multi-source optical and radar datasets, validated them with field observations, and applied established statistical frameworks to the climate analysis. The size-dependent response they document, with small glaciers losing area fastest, lake-terminating glaciers retreating fastest and large glaciers losing velocity fastest, offers a template for predicting which ice masses in other Himalayan basins are most at risk. As the region&#8217;s glaciers continue their three-decade trajectory of shrinkage, slowdown and thinning, the Doda sub-basin stands as a detailed case study of how the Himalaya&#8217;s water towers are being drawn down, one melt season at a time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Multi-decadal glacier dynamics and mass loss in the Doda sub-basin, Western Himalaya</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Multi‑decadal assessment of glacier dynamics in the Doda sub‑Basin, Western Himalaya</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Rana, A. S., Kumar, V., &amp; Mehta, M. (2026). Multi‑decadal assessment of glacier dynamics in the Doda sub‑Basin, Western Himalaya. <em>Regional Environmental Change, 26</em>(4), Article 212. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-026-02700-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-026-02700-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-026-02700-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10113-026-02700-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> glacier retreat, Doda basin, Ladakh, Western Himalaya, geodetic mass balance, surface ice velocity, debris cover, glacier lakes, climate change, Zanskar, remote sensing, water resources</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">244137</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
