Nurses stand on the frontlines when crises occur, whether responding to natural disasters, pandemics, or other emergencies. Their ability to effectively manage stress can significantly influence their readiness to respond. The framework of this study operates on the premise that self-efficacy—the belief in one’s capabilities—and family support act as mediators that can either bolster or hinder a nurse’s capacity to cope with the demands of disaster response. By focusing on these internal and external resources, the researchers hope to offer evidence-based recommendations that can lead to more resilient nursing practices.

At the heart of the study is self-efficacy, a psychological construct first introduced by Albert Bandura. It refers to an individual’s belief in their ability to execute behaviors necessary to produce specific performance attainments. In the nursing context, high levels of self-efficacy can result in greater confidence when faced with critical situations, allowing nurses to perform optimally under pressure. The research emphasizes that fostering this belief through targeted training and mentorship could mitigate the adverse effects of stress encountered during disaster response.

Complementing self-efficacy is the often-overlooked yet crucial role of family support. Nurses frequently juggle the demands of their profession with personal responsibilities, which can lead to heightened stress levels. The study reveals that when nurses perceive strong emotional and practical backing from their families, they are better equipped to handle professional pressures. This familial connection provides a sense of security and serves as a buffer against stress, ultimately enhancing their readiness to respond in emergencies. The interplay between personal life support and professional efficacy is a vital consideration for healthcare systems aiming to improve disaster response outcomes.

This study employs a mediation analysis approach, which allows the researchers to dissect the relationships between stress, self-efficacy, family support, and readiness for disaster response effectively. By utilizing quantitative data gathered from surveys and assessments among nurses, the researchers were able to pinpoint how varying levels of stress correlate with the perceived efficacy and support in their personal and professional lives. This analytical approach yields a robust understanding that could pave the way for new interventions aimed at improving disaster response training for nursing staff.

An interesting finding of the research is that the proactive enhancement of self-efficacy among nurses significantly mediates the effects of stress on their readiness for disaster responses. The implication is profound: if healthcare organizations focus on building strategies that enhance self-efficacy through training and skills development, they can potentially decrease the negative impacts of stress. Therefore, adopting practices like simulation training and mentorship programs can be beneficial in increasing nurses’ confidence to respond to disasters effectively.

Moreover, the importance of family support cannot be overstated. The researchers found that nurses with strong family support systems reported significantly lower stress and higher readiness levels. This highlights the necessity of a holistic approach to supporting healthcare professionals. Institutions should not only focus on the professional development of nurses but also consider the well-being and mental health of their family members. Programs that engage families and provide them with the tools to support their loved ones can foster a more resilient nursing workforce prepared to face crises head-on.

As healthcare systems continue to grapple with global challenges, understanding the psychological dimensions of nursing—especially concerning disaster response—is imperative. The findings of this study are timely, given the increasing frequency and severity of disasters provoked by climate change and other factors. By focusing on the relationships between self-efficacy, family support, and stress, healthcare leaders can better prepare their workforce to respond effectively when it matters most.

The relevance of this research extends beyond the immediate implications for nursing and disaster response. It serves as a call to action for policymakers and healthcare organizations to prioritize mental health supports and recognize the interconnected nature of personal and professional spheres. Developing comprehensive support systems that incorporate family dynamics into the equation of nurse training could lead to more effective and prepared healthcare systems.

In conclusion, the insights derived from this study present a transformative approach to strengthening disaster response capabilities among nurses. By recognizing the interplay between self-efficacy, family support, and stress, institutions can take strategic steps to cultivate a more supportive work environment. This proactive stance not only empowers nurses but ultimately ensures better outcomes for the patients and communities they serve during critical times of need.

The findings detailed in this analysis signify a promising direction for future research as well. It opens avenues for exploring how diverse factors such as workplace culture, peer support, and coping mechanisms can further influence nurses’ readiness and resilience. As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, the implications of this research will undoubtedly play a critical role in shaping how we support our frontline responders.

This study is more than just research; it is an imperative to act. With a clearer understanding of how self-efficacy and family support impact disaster readiness among nurses, the healthcare sector can begin implementing interventions that not only enhance performance but also promote psychological well-being. It is essential for the future of healthcare that we care for those who care for us.

In light of the critical findings presented, it is hoped that organizations will take heed of the evidence and develop programs that fortify nurses, ensuring they are not just equipped with the skills to respond but also the confidence and support to thrive under pressure. The collective well-being of nurses is a determinant not only of their professional effectiveness but of the health of the entire community they serve.

Ultimately, as we navigate through recurrent challenges in healthcare, the synthesis of personal empowerment and familial support emerges as a cornerstone of disaster readiness. It is clear that as we aim for more effective healthcare responses, we must look beyond merely technical training and embrace a more comprehensive strategy that acknowledges the emotional and social dimensions of nursing practice.

Subject of Research: The relationship between stress, self-efficacy, and family support in disaster response readiness among nurses.

Article Title: Self-efficacy and family support in the relationship between stress and readiness for disaster response among nurses: a mediation analysis.

Article References:

Hsiao, PC., Lee, SY., Lin, C. et al. Self-efficacy and family support in the relationship between stress and readiness for disaster response among nurses: a mediation analysis.
BMC Nurs (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04233-z

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI:

Keywords: Nurses, disaster response, self-efficacy, family support, stress management.

One of the critical findings of this study indicates that resilience is not merely an innate characteristic but can be cultivated through targeted interventions and supportive environments. The research team conducted numerous interviews and surveys aimed at identifying the stressors that nurses regularly face in their line of work. Their data suggest that resilience can be significantly enhanced by recognizing the importance of both personal and organizational factors that contribute to a nurse’s capacity to withstand challenges.

Moreover, the researchers have identified that issues such as work overload, emotional exhaustion, and the prevalence of burnout are factors that negatively impact nurses’ resilience levels. The study emphasizes that while some nurses demonstrate exceptional resilience, many struggle in environments that lack adequate support systems. This highlights the importance of workplace culture and organizational support in enhancing the resilience of nursing staff, suggesting a need for systemic changes within healthcare institutions.

By utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the researchers were able to gather both numerical data and personal narratives that provide a deeper context to the numbers. The qualitative data from interviews offered insight into the ways nurses perceive their own resilience and the factors that foster or hinder their ability to cope with stress. This dual methodology allows for a richer and more holistic understanding of the complexities surrounding nurses’ resilience.

The findings also indicate that resilience training programs tailored specifically for nurses could serve as an effective intervention. These programs should not only focus on individual skills but also incorporate elements that address collective resilience within nursing teams. The idea of fostering a sense of community and teamwork could act as a buffer against stress and burnout, making nurses feel more supported in their roles.

Moreover, the data suggest that organizational changes, such as implementing mentorship programs and fostering open communication channels between staff and management, could significantly impact nurses’ resilience. Creating an environment where nurses feel valued and heard is essential in promoting mental well-being and enhancing their capacity to deal with the inherent stresses of the profession.

The research highlights that the emotional toll on nurses, especially in the aftermath of crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, has brought the issue of resilience into sharp focus. During the pandemic, many nurses faced unprecedented levels of stress and demand, further underscoring the importance of resilience and organizational support. Acknowledging these challenges has become crucial in developing strategies for resilience enhancement that are effective and sustainable.

What emerges from this study is not only a reflection on the current state of nurses’ resilience but also a call to action for healthcare organizations to invest in their personnel. The emphasis lies on understanding that nurturing resilience is a reciprocal process that benefits both the nurses and the institutions they serve. By fostering strong, resilient nursing staff, organizations can better navigate the complexities of patient care and healthcare delivery.

In conclusion, the work by Khaleghparast and colleagues serves as a pivotal contribution to the discourse on nursing resilience. The insights gained from this research can be instrumental in guiding policy changes and educational programs within healthcare settings. The integration of resilience-building strategies could lead to improved job satisfaction and retention rates among nurses, ultimately enhancing patient care and the overall healthcare system’s effectiveness.

As we move forward, the challenge will be to implement the findings of this study into practical strategies that resonate with the realities of nursing work. It is vital that healthcare leaders and policymakers recognize the importance of resilience as not just a personal attribute, but a communal necessity that requires structured support and proactive measures.

Addressing resilience truly represents one of the most significant challenges and opportunities facing the nursing profession today. As we continue to explore and explain the intricacies of this vital trait, it is clear that building a resilient workforce is essential for the future of healthcare.

The implications of this research extend beyond the immediate realm of nursing, potentially influencing broader discussions within healthcare systems worldwide. As healthcare paradigms evolve, acknowledging and supporting the resilience of nursing staff will remain at the forefront of creating a sustainable and effective healthcare environment.

Finally, it is imperative for stakeholders at every level—from nurse educators to health administrators—to engage with these findings and work collaboratively to implement change that promotes resilience in nursing practice. In doing so, we not only enhance the well-being of nurses but also ensure a higher standard of care for the populations they serve.

Subject of Research: Resilience among nurses and strategies for its enhancement.

Article Title: Exploring and explaining nurses’ resilience and developing strategies for its enhancement: an explanatory sequential mixed method study.

Article References:

Khaleghparast, S., Nayeri, N.D., Shabani, F. et al. Exploring and explaining nurses’ resilience and developing strategies for its enhancement: an explanatory sequential mixed method study. BMC Nurs (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04223-1

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI:

Keywords: Resilience, nursing, mixed methods, healthcare, burnout, organizational support.

Occupational safety for nurses is a multifaceted issue that extends far beyond basic workplace protocols. It encompasses various elements such as proper staffing, mental health, physical well-being, and organizational culture. One of the main concerns highlighted in the study was the physical safety risks faced by nurses on a daily basis. These risks can range from lifting and transferring patients to exposure to infectious diseases. The study emphasizes the need for ongoing training and education, instilling proper techniques and practices that can mitigate these hazards.

In addition to physical safety, mental health challenges emerged as a significant concern. Nurses often experience high levels of stress, which can lead to burnout. The demanding nature of their role can create an environment where mental health is sidelined, affecting not only the nurses themselves but also the quality of care provided to patients. The researchers pointed out that institutions must foster supportive work environments that prioritize mental health resources and promote work-life balance.

Moreover, another critical factor identified was the organizational culture within healthcare settings. A positive culture that supports open communication and teamwork has been shown to enhance not only job satisfaction but also safety outcomes. The study illustrated that when nurses feel valued and empowered, they are more likely to adhere to safety protocols, report incidents, and participate in ongoing safety training.

Infection control emerged as a prevalent concern as well. Nurses are at the frontline, often being the first point of contact for patients, which places them at a heightened risk of exposure to infectious agents. The researchers highlighted the importance of intensive training in infection control measures and advocate for comprehensive programs that periodically refresh nurses’ knowledge in this critical area.

Interestingly, the study also examined the influence of external factors such as government regulations and institutional policies. As healthcare systems evolve, there are increasing demands for compliance with rigorous standards. The researchers emphasized that policymakers must collaborate with healthcare professionals to ensure that regulations account for the realities of nursing practice, fostering a safer working environment.

Technological advancements were also considered in the study. The integration of new tools and equipment has the potential to enhance operational efficiency while simultaneously addressing safety concerns. For instance, the use of telehealth technology can significantly reduce the need for face-to-face patient interactions, minimizing the risk of contagion and other associated hazards.

Moreover, the physical work environment was scrutinized. Conditions like overcrowded spaces, inadequate lighting, and poor ergonomic design can contribute to safety risks. The authors advocate for better-designed workspaces that prioritize nurse safety and comfort, showcasing how even architectural considerations can play a role in reducing risk.

As the research unfolded, nurses themselves were expressed as a valuable resource in evaluating safety conditions. Their frontline experience provides critical insights that can inform safety protocols and organizational policies. The study calls for healthcare institutions to actively involve nurses in safety discussions to drive meaningful change.

Training and education were underlined throughout the research. Continuous professional development is essential for nurses to stay ahead of evolving safety threats and best practices. The authors propose that healthcare organizations invest in regular workshops and training sessions focused on occupational safety.

Financial implications were also touched upon, as the researchers highlighted that a safer work environment can ultimately lead to cost savings for hospitals. Reduced injury rates translate to fewer absentee days, lower insurance premiums, and enhanced overall productivity. This dual focus on safety and financial stewardship can create a win-win situation for healthcare providers and staff alike.

Furthermore, the study encourages the exploration of interdisciplinary partnerships. Collaboration between nurses, administrators, and safety experts can forge a comprehensive approach to enhancing occupational safety. By pooling resources and knowledge, these groups can design innovative solutions that address specific safety challenges faced in internal medicine clinics.

As public awareness grows regarding the challenges faced by nurses, the findings of this study can galvanize support for change at multiple levels. Engaging stakeholders, including healthcare workers and the community, can foster a sense of shared responsibility for nurse safety. The research underscores the importance of advocacy and community involvement in elevating occupational safety standards.

In conclusion, the work conducted by Kocatepe, Yildirim, and Türkmenoğlu offers a critical examination of factors influencing the safety of nurses in internal medicine clinics. This study provides a foundation for ongoing dialogue and action needed to foster safer working environments for healthcare professionals. For nurses and policymakers alike, these findings reinforce the urgent need to prioritize occupational safety within the healthcare landscape.

Subject of Research: Occupational safety among nurses in internal medicine clinics.

Article Title: Evaluation of occupational safety and influencing factors among nurses working in internal medicine clinics.

Article References:
Kocatepe, V., Yildirim, D. & Türkmenoğlu, A. Evaluation of occupational safety and influencing factors among nurses working in internal medicine clinics.
BMC Nurs (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04153-y

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-04153-y

Keywords: Occupational safety, nurses, healthcare, internal medicine, mental health, infection control, organizational culture.

The study’s implications are especially significant given the contemporary challenges faced by oncology nurses. As frontline caregivers, these professionals navigate not only the physical demands of patient care but also the psychological strains that come with caring for individuals facing life-threatening illnesses. Nurses are often seen as the backbone of healthcare systems, yet their emotional well-being frequently takes a backseat, leading to increased burnout. Bakeries of this research indicate that when nurses possess higher levels of emotional intelligence, they are better equipped to manage stress and avoid burnout, ultimately benefiting the entire healthcare ecosystem.

Burnout among healthcare professionals is a critical issue that has garnered increasing attention. Defined as a state of emotional, mental, and physical exhaustion caused by prolonged and excessive stress, burnout can have dire consequences not just for nurses but also for patient care quality. The study presents alarming statistics that show a staggering percentage of oncology nurses reporting significant burnout, which in turn correlates with poorer patient outcomes and lower levels of patient satisfaction. The need for systemic interventions becomes paramount to reduce this phenomenon.

Alodhialah’s research specifically sheds light on the role of emotional intelligence in mediating the relationship between burnout and patient-centered communication. Emotional intelligence acts as a buffer, allowing nurses to connect more authentically with their patients. High emotional intelligence enables nurses to communicate effectively, fostering a healing environment conducive to patient recovery. This study effectively calls into question the conventional approaches to nurse training that may overlook the emotional dimension of nursing.

Furthermore, the research outlines several key mechanisms through which emotional intelligence exerts its influence on nursing practice. For instance, nurses displaying high emotional intelligence are more likely to engage in active listening and demonstrate empathy. This level of engagement has significant implications for patient communication, as patients feel more valued and understood. Enhanced patient-nurse interactions lead to improved adherence to treatment regimens, ultimately impacting patients’ physical and emotional well-being.

The study also emphasizes the need for ongoing professional development tailored to enhancing emotional intelligence among nurses. Training programs focusing on emotional skills can equip nursing staff with the tools they need to manage their emotions effectively and recognize the emotional states of their patients. By investing in such educational initiatives, healthcare organizations can directly impact nurse resilience, patient relationships, and overall care quality.

Engagement with emotional intelligence is not merely a pathway to reduce burnout; it is also a strategic investment in building a compassionate healthcare workforce. Alodhialah’s research advocates for healthcare executives to integrate emotional intelligence training into their core staff development programs. This proactive approach could lead to a more effective nursing workforce, capable of delivering exceptional care in the often daunting settings of oncology wards.

Moreover, the findings of this study contribute to the broader discourse on the importance of mental health in nursing. The profession faces significant stigma related to mental health struggles, often making nurses reluctant to seek help. By highlighting the interplay between emotional intelligence and burnout, the research aims to destigmatize seeking emotional support and promotes a culture where mental well-being is prioritized.

While the study provides significant insights, it also opens avenues for future research. Understanding the long-term effects of increased emotional intelligence on nursing practice and patient care presents an exciting opportunity for scholars in healthcare fields. Further longitudinal studies could more clearly delineate the impact of emotional intelligence interventions on burnout and communication over time.

In summary, Alodhialah’s research provides compelling evidence that emotional intelligence is not just a desirable trait for oncology nurses but a critical component that influences their well-being and effectiveness. By fostering environments where emotional competencies are nurtured, healthcare systems can enhance nurse satisfaction, reduce burnout, and ultimately improve patient-centered communication.

Adopting measures to encourage emotional intelligence is not simply about improving workplace morale; it directly correlates with the fundamental quality of care provided to patients. As healthcare systems worldwide contend with challenges ranging from staffing shortages to increasing patient demands, the lessons drawn from this study could offer vital strategies for sustaining the workforce and enhancing patient care.

Healthcare organizations must now recognize the paramount importance of emotional intelligence training in nursing curriculums. The growing body of evidence supporting the emotional dimensions of patient care underscores the necessity of these transformations in nursing education and professional development. As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, prioritizing the psychological well-being of nursing staff is essential for creating resilient healthcare systems.

Through its insightful findings, Alodhialah’s study not only sheds light on the challenges faced by oncology nurses but also presents an actionable roadmap for improving nursing practice and patient care quality. By implementing programs that cultivate emotional intelligence and foster supportive environments, healthcare organizations can empower nurses to excel, ultimately paving the way for a healthier and more compassionate society.

Subject of Research: The relationship between oncology nurses’ emotional intelligence, burnout, and patient-centered communication.

Article Title: The relationship between oncology nurses’ emotional intelligence, burnout, and patient-centered communication: a cross-sectional study.

Article References:

Alodhialah, A.M. The relationship between oncology nurses’ emotional intelligence, burnout, and patient-centered communication: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs 24, 1120 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03780-9

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-03780-9

Keywords: Oncology nursing, emotional intelligence, burnout, patient-centered communication, nursing practice, healthcare systems.

Nurses, often regarded as the backbone of healthcare delivery, frequently endure strenuous workloads that require not only clinical expertise but also substantial emotional regulation. Emotional labor—the process by which nurses manage and sometimes conceal their genuine feelings to fulfill professional roles—has emerged as a pivotal concern. The new study probes how this emotional effort intersects with nurses’ perceptions of social support, revealing nuanced pathways influencing their psychological resilience or vulnerability. Emotional labor’s toll is heightened in pandemic circumstances, when the gravity of patient illness, fears of contagion, and societal expectations coalesce to intensify workplace stress.

Perceived social support, encompassing emotional, informational, and instrumental assistance from colleagues, family, and the broader community, functions as a vital buffer against occupational stressors. The study underscores that nurses who perceive higher levels of social support demonstrate significantly lower psychiatric distress. This finding corroborates a growing body of evidence emphasizing the protective role of social networks in mitigating burnout, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorders within healthcare settings. The researchers elucidate that social support enhances coping capacities, facilitates emotional expression, and fosters a sense of belonging—elements critical to psychological well-being during crises.

Another dimension explored by the study concerns presenteeism—working despite illness or psychological distress—and its paradoxical consequences. While presenteeism may be driven by professional dedication or perceived obligations, it often exacerbates mental health issues and impairs job performance. The authors meticulously analyzed how presenteeism during the pandemic not only reflected the nurses’ commitment but also contributed to sustained psychiatric distress. By prolonging exposure to stress without adequate recovery, presenteeism emerges as a hidden yet potent factor undermining nurses’ mental health stability.

Methodologically, the study employed robust quantitative measures alongside validated psychometric instruments to capture the multifaceted experiences of nurses. The cross-sectional design enabled an extensive snapshot of the relationships among perceived social support, emotional labor, presenteeism, and psychiatric distress across diverse healthcare settings amid the pandemic. The analysis incorporated demographic variables, occupational factors, and contextual pandemic severity indicators to ensure comprehensive understanding. This methodological rigor fortifies the study’s contributions to occupational psychology and healthcare management literatures.

One of the novel contributions of the research lies in its integrative approach. Rather than isolating individual factors, the authors examined the dynamic interrelations—how emotional labor might mediate or moderate the impact of social support on psychiatric outcomes and how presenteeism interplays within this complex matrix. The findings advocate for multidimensional strategies in mental health interventions for nurses, recognizing that addressing emotional labor demands and fostering robust social support systems are equally essential to curbing presenteeism and associated distress.

The implications of these findings resonate profoundly in the context of policy and healthcare administration. The clear linkage between perceived social support and reduced psychiatric distress reinforces the imperative to cultivate supportive work environments. Initiatives such as peer support programs, open communication channels, and accessible mental health resources become indispensable. Moreover, organizational policies must acknowledge and mitigate the pressures leading to presenteeism, perhaps through flexible sick leave policies and stigma reduction regarding mental health disclosures.

From a clinical perspective, the study emphasizes the need for targeted psychological interventions that address emotional labor. Training programs designed to enhance emotional regulation skills, resilience-building workshops, and mindfulness-based stress reduction techniques hold promise. Implementation of such interventions, tailored to the pandemic’s unique stresses, could alleviate the cumulative psychological burden on nurses, thereby preserving workforce sustainability and quality of patient care.

Furthermore, the research invites broader societal recognition of nurses’ emotional contributions, which often remain invisible despite their centrality to healthcare delivery. Public health campaigns and media narratives might better capture the emotional realities faced by nurses, fostering empathy and community support. Given that social support extends beyond immediate workgroups to encompass societal attitudes, such cultural shifts could profoundly influence nurses’ psychological well-being.

The study also sheds light on the intersectionality of demographic variables, revealing differential impacts based on age, gender, and years of professional experience. For instance, younger nurses or those earlier in their careers exhibited heightened vulnerability to psychiatric distress, potentially due to less developed coping mechanisms or social support networks. Gender differences in emotional labor roles were observed, reflecting broader societal gender norms that shape emotional expression and labor expectations. These insights highlight the necessity of nuanced, tailored support strategies that respond to demographic diversity within the nursing workforce.

In the broader context of health crisis preparedness, the findings stress that psychological preparedness must be prioritized alongside logistical and clinical readiness. The pandemic underscored gaps in addressing healthcare workers’ mental health needs, and research such as this provides empirical foundations to redesign support systems. Investing in mental health infrastructures and embedding psychological resilience components in emergency planning will better position health systems to sustain workforce well-being in future crises.

Academic discourse around the pandemic’s psychological impact on healthcare workers is rapidly expanding, and this study stands as a pivotal contribution. By articulating the interwoven effects of social support, emotional labor, and presenteeism on psychiatric distress, it advances conceptual models of occupational stress and mental health in frontline nursing. The research bridges psychological theory and practical application, suggesting actionable pathways to enhance mental health outcomes while maintaining organizational effectiveness.

A particularly pressing takeaway is the pressing need to recognize and validate emotional labor as a formal dimension of occupational health considerations. Often overshadowed by physical workload and technical challenges, emotional labor demands substantial cognitive and affective resources, which, when unrecognized, lead to invisibilized burnout and psychological wear. This study calls for integrative occupational health paradigms that explicitly include emotional labor assessments and interventions.

In light of these findings, healthcare leaders are urged to re-examine staffing models, workload distributions, and support infrastructures. Ensuring adequate rest periods, psychological safety, and opportunities for peer connection during shifts could mitigate the cumulative psychological toll observed. Additionally, creating cultures where seeking mental health support is destigmatized and facilitated could reduce presenteeism and its deleterious effects.

Looking forward, the study opens avenues for longitudinal research investigating how these relationships evolve as pandemics transition to endemic phases or as healthcare systems undergo recovery processes. Understanding temporal dynamics of social support and emotional labor influences will better inform sustained mental health strategies. Moreover, expanding research to diverse geographical and cultural contexts can elucidate culturally specific factors and universal principles alike.

Ultimately, this landmark study elevates the discourse on nurses’ mental health by providing a rigorous, multifactorial analysis during one of modern history’s most challenging healthcare crises. Its insights serve as both a clarion call and a roadmap for healthcare systems, policymakers, and societies to prioritize psychological well-being alongside clinical efficacy. As the world continues to grapple with COVID-19 and prepares for future health emergencies, integrating these psychological insights will be critical to sustaining a resilient, compassionate, and effective nursing workforce.

Subject of Research: Psychological factors affecting nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on perceived social support, emotional labor, presenteeism, and psychiatric distress.

Article Title: Relationships between nurses’ perceived social support, emotional labor, presenteeism, and psychiatric distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

Article References:
Ebrahimi, H., Rahmani, F. & Ghorbani, K. Relationships between nurses’ perceived social support, emotional labor, presenteeism, and psychiatric distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychol 13, 458 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02721-0

Image Credits: AI Generated