The team conducted the study between March and October 2025, recruiting 19 participants through purposive and snowball sampling. Rather than sampling patients alone, the researchers included mental health service providers, policymakers, health managers, patients, and family members, allowing the analysis to capture stigma’s consequences from multiple vantage points across the care system.

Data collection relied on semi-structured interviews, all recorded with participants’ consent. Interviewing continued until data saturation was reached. The researchers then analyzed the interview material using thematic analysis, with repeated readings of the transcripts leading to the emergence of recurring patterns.

This process yielded four subthemes grouped under one overarching theme of the consequences of stigma among individuals with mental disorders in Iran: individual consequences, treatment-related consequences, family and interpersonal consequences, and economic and occupational consequences. According to the study’s conclusion, stigma associated with mental health disorders extends far beyond social attitudes, shaping lived experiences in ways that affect health, relationships, and economic stability.

The authors state that these effects appeared to be shaped by the specific contexts represented in the research, including cultural expectations, the dynamics of family and interpersonal relationships, and structural obstacles to accessing care. The findings therefore describe how stigma’s consequences were perceived across personal, clinical, relational, and financial domains within the settings studied, rather than as a single isolated problem.

The study’s background notes that, similar to other countries, stigma among individuals with mental disorders in Iran is a problem with various consequences, and that understanding and awareness of these consequences are essential in order to be able to help individuals with mental disorders in various aspects of their lives. The authors present the study as an investigation of these consequences in the Iranian setting.

As a qualitative study, the work does not quantify how common each consequence is or establish causal effects; instead, it documents how service providers, policymakers, health managers, patients, and families in the Iranian setting perceive and describe stigma’s impact. The scope of the findings is limited to the contexts represented by the 19 participants and the settings in which they work and live.

The article was published as an early shared version of peer-reviewed, accepted research, citable with a permanent DOI and subject to further edits before the final version of record replaces it. The authors conclude that stigma’s consequences within the contexts represented in this study affect health, relationships, and economic stability, and that awareness of these consequences is a stated prerequisite for supporting individuals with mental disorders across various aspects of their lives.

Subject of Research: A qualitative study of consequences of stigma against individuals with mental disorders in Iran

Article Title: A qualitative study of consequences of stigma against individuals with mental disorders in Iran

Article References: Hajizadeh, A., Rajabi, F., Amini, H., Kafrani, S. D., & Kakemam, E. (2026). A qualitative study of consequences of stigma against individuals with mental disorders in Iran. Discover Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-026-00636-9

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1007/s44192-026-00636-9

Keywords: qualitative, consequences, stigma, against, individuals, mental, disorders, Iran, scientific research