<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>statistical heterogeneity &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/statistical-heterogeneity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 14:04:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Hybrid AI Learns to Spot Deepfakes Without Sharing Sensitive Data</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hybrid-ai-learns-to-spot-deepfakes-without-sharing-sensitive-data/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake Davidson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 14:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advances in generative models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative AI for media integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convolutional neural network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-domain deepfake detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decentralized training data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deepfake detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain generalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federated learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federated learning for deepfake detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FedHybrid-ViT architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-IID data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy risks in AI training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy-preserving AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-world deepfake challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robust deepfake detection systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistical heterogeneity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetic media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetic media security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vision transformer]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=244653</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have developed FedHybrid-ViT, a privacy-preserving framework that fuses convolutional and transformer models within federated learning to detect deepfakes across heterogeneous data sources, achieving an AUC of 0.925.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A team of researchers in Bangladesh has unveiled a new artificial intelligence framework that can detect deepfake images and videos with high accuracy while keeping the underlying training data decentralized and private. The system, called FedHybrid-ViT, was described in a paper published in the journal Machine Learning on 7 October 2026, and it tackles two of the most stubborn problems in the field of synthetic media detection: the tendency of detectors to fail when confronted with data from unfamiliar sources, and the privacy risks that come with pooling sensitive facial imagery in a single central repository.</p>
<p>Deepfakes have grown dramatically more convincing and easier to produce as generative models have advanced. What once required Hollywood-grade visual effects studios can now be done on a laptop with open-source software, and manipulated videos of politicians, celebrities, and ordinary people have become a genuine threat to public trust, digital integrity, and information security. Detection systems have kept pace on paper, often reporting near-perfect accuracy on standard benchmark datasets, but that laboratory performance frequently evaporates in the real world. A detector trained on one set of manipulation techniques may be nearly blind to forgeries produced by a different generator, a phenomenon researchers call domain shift.</p>
<p>The new framework, developed by Abdullah Mohammad Sakib, Md. Mohashin Hossain, Mahedy Hasan Foysal, Ishtiak Al Mamoon, and colleagues at the International University of Business Agriculture and Technology and United International University in Dhaka, addresses the generalization problem with a hybrid neural architecture. The system combines two complementary types of deep learning models inside a single detector. The first branch is a convolutional neural network, or CNN, the workhorse of modern image analysis. Convolutional filters excel at picking up local, high-frequency patterns, and in the deepfake context that means subtle forensic traces: blending seams where a synthesized face meets the original head, compression artifacts left behind by the generation pipeline, and other pixel-level inconsistencies that betray manipulation.</p>
<p>The second branch is a Vision Transformer, or ViT, a relatively newer architecture that treats an image as a sequence of small patches and uses attention mechanisms to model relationships between distant parts of the picture. Where the CNN sees the fine texture of a boundary, the transformer captures the global semantic structure of a face: whether the eyes, nose, mouth, and surrounding regions are mutually consistent in lighting, geometry, and expression. Deepfake artifacts often manifest at both scales simultaneously, so fusing the local evidence from the CNN with the global reasoning of the ViT gives the detector a multi-scale representation that neither model could achieve alone. The authors report that this fused representation is what allows the system to remain robust when the characteristics of the data shift between sources.</p>
<p>The second half of the innovation lies in how the model is trained. In conventional machine learning, all data is gathered into one place and the model learns from it centrally. That approach is problematic for deepfake detection because the training material consists largely of real faces, and collecting facial imagery from hospitals, social media platforms, banks, or government agencies into a single database raises serious privacy and legal concerns. Federated learning offers an alternative: instead of sending data to the model, the model is sent to the data. Multiple clients, such as institutions or devices, each train the model locally on their own private data, and only the resulting parameter updates, not the raw images, are shared and aggregated into a global model.</p>
<p>Federated learning, however, comes with its own well-known difficulty. When the data held by different clients is statistically dissimilar, a situation known as non-independent and identically distributed, or non-IID, data, the local updates can pull the shared model in conflicting directions, causing unstable convergence and degraded performance. A hospital&#8217;s dataset might contain mostly one type of manipulation, while a social media company&#8217;s dataset contains entirely different forgery methods and image qualities. Standard federated optimization can struggle to reconcile these divergent signals. The researchers designed FedHybrid-ViT around this challenge, using a collaborative federated optimization protocol intended to keep training stable even under highly heterogeneous client distributions.</p>
<p>To test the framework rigorously, the team constructed a heterogeneous multi-source dataset from publicly available deepfake benchmarks, including FaceForensics++, a widely used collection of manipulated facial videos, and evaluated the system under both independent and non-IID distribution settings. The non-IID configuration simulates the messy reality of deployment, where each participating client sees only a narrow and skewed slice of the world&#8217;s deepfake varieties. The results showed that FedHybrid-ViT consistently outperformed standalone CNN models, standalone ViT models, and standard federated learning baselines across the test conditions.</p>
<p>The headline number is an area under the curve, or AUC, score of 0.925. AUC measures a detector&#8217;s ability to distinguish genuine media from fakes across all possible decision thresholds, with 1.0 representing perfect separation and 0.5 representing random guessing. A score of 0.925 indicates strong discriminative power, but the more significant finding, according to the paper, is the stability of that performance across highly heterogeneous conditions. Detectors that overfit to dataset-specific artifacts typically show sharp performance drops when evaluated on data from sources they never saw during training. The hybrid federated model maintained its accuracy under exactly those stresses, suggesting that the combination of dual-stream architecture and federated optimization genuinely improves generalization rather than merely inflating benchmark scores.</p>
<p>The implications extend beyond the immediate technical achievement. A privacy-preserving deepfake detector that generalizes across data sources could be deployed in federated settings where no single organization can or should aggregate facial data: networks of banks verifying customer identities, social media platforms moderating content, or forensic labs collaborating across jurisdictions. Each participant would benefit from a detector trained on the collective experience of the network without ever exposing its own users&#8217; images. The authors argue that this makes the approach promising for scalable, distributed deepfake detection scenarios, where the diversity of manipulation techniques is precisely what defeats centralized models trained on narrow datasets.</p>
<p>The work also reflects a broader trend in machine learning research toward architectures that combine the complementary strengths of convolutional and transformer-based models, and toward training paradigms that respect data sovereignty. As generative models continue to improve, the arms race between forgery and detection will likely intensify, and the systems that endure may be those that can learn from many distributed sources of evidence without collapsing under the weight of their diversity. FedHybrid-ViT, with its reported AUC of 0.925 and stable behavior on non-IID data, offers one blueprint for that next generation of detectors, demonstrating that the path to robust synthetic media forensics may run not through bigger centralized datasets, but through smarter collaboration among many smaller ones.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> A federated hybrid CNN and Vision Transformer framework for privacy-preserving, generalizable deepfake detection on heterogeneous non-IID data</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> FedHybrid-ViT: A Federated-Hybrid Framework for Generalizable Deepfake Detection on Heterogeneous Data</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Sakib, A. M., Hossain, M. M., Foysal, M. H., Muzahidul Islam, A. K. M., &amp; Mamoon, I. A. (2026). FedHybrid-ViT: A Federated-Hybrid Framework for Generalizable Deepfake Detection on Heterogeneous Data. <em>Machine Learning, 115</em>(10), Article 235. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-026-07171-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-026-07171-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-026-07171-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10994-026-07171-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> deepfake detection, federated learning, vision transformer, convolutional neural network, non-IID data, domain generalization, privacy-preserving AI, hybrid models, statistical heterogeneity, machine learning, media forensics, synthetic media</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">244653</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reinforcement Learning Picks the Right Devices to Speed Up Federated Learning</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/reinforcement-learning-picks-the-right-devices-to-speed-up-federated-learning/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veronica Carney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptive device selection for federated learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIFAR-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[client selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[client selection algorithms for federated learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Deep Q-Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic participant selection in federated systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy-efficient device participation in federated learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhancing federated learning performance with reinforcement learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federated learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federated learning device selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FL training efficiency improvements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet of Things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning on distributed edge devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MNIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimizing device participation in federated models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy-preserving machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reinforcement learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reinforcement learning in federated training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reinforcement learning-based device scheduling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistical heterogeneity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system heterogeneity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=214598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new reinforcement learning framework called FLASH-DRM selects the most valuable devices for each federated learning round, improving accuracy, latency and energy efficiency across benchmark datasets.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federated learning has become one of the most important ideas in modern machine learning because it allows many devices to train a shared model without ever sending their raw data to a central server. Instead of collecting millions of private records in one place, the server distributes the current model, each participant improves it locally on its own data, and only the resulting parameter updates are sent back and combined. This architecture promises to protect privacy while still exploiting the enormous amount of information that lives on smartphones, sensors, vehicles and other connected devices. Yet the very feature that makes federated learning attractive, namely its reliance on thousands of geographically and technically diverse participants, also creates one of its hardest unsolved problems: the participants are not equal, and treating them as if they were can badly damage training.</p>
<p>Researchers at Guizhou University in China, led by Haiming Luo and corresponding author Fu Yan, together with Yuling Chen and Changgen Peng, have now proposed a new way to decide which devices should participate in each round of federated training. Writing in the journal Complex &amp; Intelligent Systems, they describe a client selection framework called FLASH-DRM, built on a reinforcement learning technique known as Double Deep Q-Learning. The central insight of their work is that the choice of which clients to involve in a given training round is itself a decision problem that can be learned, and that a well-trained selection agent can simultaneously improve accuracy, reduce latency and cut the energy consumed by the whole system.</p>
<p>The problem the authors attack is usually described as heterogeneity, and it comes in two distinct forms. Statistical heterogeneity refers to the fact that different clients hold different data distributions. A keyboard prediction model trained on the phones of ten thousand users will see wildly different vocabularies, languages and typing habits from one device to the next, so the locally computed updates are not drawn from the same distribution and can pull the shared model in conflicting directions. System heterogeneity, by contrast, is about the hardware and network conditions of the participants themselves: some devices are powerful and connected over fast Wi-Fi, while others are battery-constrained, intermittently online or reachable only through slow links.</p>
<p>In very large Internet of Things deployments, where the number of available devices can be enormous, it is not practical for every client to take part in every round. The communication overhead alone would be crushing, because each round requires the server to broadcast the model and each selected client to upload its update. Selecting a subset of clients per round has therefore become a common requirement, but the selection strategy matters enormously. If the server systematically picks fast, powerful devices, the rounds complete quickly but the data held by slow or unpopular devices is underrepresented, and the global model becomes biased. If it picks devices purely to balance the data distribution, it may repeatedly wait on stragglers that delay convergence. Balancing this trade-off between system heterogeneity and statistical heterogeneity is the key challenge that FLASH-DRM is designed to address, because the choice directly determines both the efficiency and the stability of global training.</p>
<p>The framework treats client selection as a sequential decision process. An intelligent agent observes the state of the federated system and chooses which subset of clients to activate in each round. Rather than a hand-crafted rule, the agent learns a selection policy through Double Deep Q-Learning, an algorithm that improves on classical Q-learning by using two separate neural networks to decouple the selection of the best action from the evaluation of that action&#8217;s value. This decoupling is well known to reduce the overestimation bias that can destabilise value-based reinforcement learning, which matters here because the agent must estimate the long-term contribution of each client choice across many training rounds.</p>
<p>Two design elements distinguish FLASH-DRM from earlier attempts. The first is a utility-based reputation function that quantifies the contribution of individual clients to the global model. Each client accumulates a reputation score based on how useful its updates actually turn out to be, which gives the agent a principled signal for rewarding devices that reliably improve the shared model rather than devices that merely appear attractive on paper. The second element is a reward path that directly links the agent&#8217;s client selection to the global accuracy of the federated model. This means the agent does not optimise a proxy; it is explicitly trained to consider how both the individual utility of each selected client and their collective utility as a group affect the quality of the final global model in each round.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most appealing practical property of the approach is what it does not cost. The combined utility measure integrated into FLASH-DRM incurs virtually no additional communication overhead, which is a crucial consideration in settings where bandwidth is the dominant bottleneck. Many sophisticated federated learning techniques have failed to move from paper to practice precisely because the bookkeeping they require consumes the very resources they are meant to save. By keeping the information flow between server and clients essentially unchanged, the framework ensures that its intelligence is applied at the point of decision, the server-side selection step, without inflating the per-round data transfer.</p>
<p>The authors evaluated FLASH-DRM in a variety of heterogeneous dataset environments, training it on three widely used benchmark test suites: CIFAR-10, MNIST and EMNIST. These datasets span natural images, handwritten digits and handwritten letters, and by partitioning them in non-identical ways across simulated clients the experiments recreate the unbalanced, non-independent data distributions that characterise real federated deployments. The framework was compared against a strong field of state-of-the-art baselines, including FedAvg, the foundational averaging algorithm of federated learning, FAVOR, FedGCS, FLASH-RL, FedProx and FedMSC, each of which represents a different strategy for coping with heterogeneity or for steering client participation.</p>
<p>The experimental results show that FLASH-DRM generally outperforms all of these competing methods across three metrics that matter in deployed systems: accuracy, latency and energy consumption. Achieving gains on all three at once is notable because these objectives frequently conflict. A selection policy that maximises accuracy by repeatedly involving slow but data-rich clients will typically inflate both latency and energy use, while a policy that optimises for speed may starve parts of the data distribution and depress final accuracy. The reinforcement learning agent, guided by its accuracy-linked reward and its reputation scores, appears to find selections that respect both sides of the trade-off, producing a global model that converges to higher quality in less time and with lower total energy expenditure across the participating devices.</p>
<p>The implications reach well beyond the benchmarks. As federated learning moves into healthcare, automotive systems, industrial IoT and edge computing, the diversity of participating hardware and data will only grow, and naive selection strategies will become an increasingly expensive liability. The Guizhou team&#8217;s work suggests that the tools of deep reinforcement learning, already proven in domains from game playing to robotics, can be repurposed as orchestration engines for distributed training itself. By learning to answer the deceptively simple question of which devices should contribute in the next round, FLASH-DRM offers a template for making collaborative machine learning faster, greener and more accurate without asking any participant to give up a single byte of their private data. The study is published open access, allowing researchers worldwide to build on the framework as the field continues to wrestle with heterogeneity in the federated setting.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Reinforcement learning-based client selection to mitigate system and statistical heterogeneity in federated learning</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mitigating client heterogeneity in federated learning: a reinforcement learning approach for efficient client selection</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Luo, H., Yan, F., Chen, Y., &amp; Peng, C. (2026). Mitigating client heterogeneity in federated learning: a reinforcement learning approach for efficient client selection. <em>Complex &amp;amp; Intelligent Systems</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-026-02519-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-026-02519-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-026-02519-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s40747-026-02519-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> federated learning, reinforcement learning, client selection, Double Deep Q-Learning, system heterogeneity, statistical heterogeneity, Internet of Things, DDQL, distributed machine learning, energy efficiency, CIFAR-10, MNIST</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">214598</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
