<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>species records &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/species-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 07:08:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Two caddisfly species recorded for the first time in Georgia</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/two-caddisfly-species-recorded-for-the-first-time-in-georgia/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 07:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquatic insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity of Caucasus mountain streams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity research in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caddisflies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caddisfly species discovery in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calamoceras illiesi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calamoceras illiesi in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation importance of freshwater insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endemic species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freshwater biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freshwater biodiversity in the Caucasus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freshwater insect diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-horned caddisflies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mystacides azureus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mystacides azureus in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new insect records in Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[significance of caddisflies in aquatic ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Caucasus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trichoptera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unexplored insect fauna in Georgia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=282910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers report the first record of Calamoceras illiesi and confirm the occurrence of Mystacides azureus in Georgia, raising the country's caddisfly fauna to 250 species.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep in the mountain forests of western Georgia, in a small unnamed brook at the Kvereti Managed Reserve near Sachkhere, researchers have documented a caddisfly species never before seen in the country. The insect, Calamoceras illiesi, belongs to a family whose larvae are among the largest case-building caddisflies in the world, and its discovery in the South Caucasus marks a significant addition to the freshwater biodiversity of a region that is still proving remarkably rich in unexplored insect life.</p>
<p>The finding, published in the journal Caucasiana, is accompanied by a second milestone: the confirmation of Mystacides azureus, a long-horned caddisfly with a striking metallic blue sheen, as a resident of Georgia. Together, the two records raise the number of caddisfly species known from the country to 250, grouped into 55 genera and 19 families, and they underscore how much remains to be learned about the aquatic insects of the Caucasus.</p>
<p>Caddisflies, the order Trichoptera, are among the most diverse groups of freshwater insects globally, yet their fauna remains poorly studied in many developing countries. Georgia is no exception. The biodiversity of the country&#8217;s freshwater ecosystems has long been under-researched, and aquatic insects have been particularly neglected. This neglect is reflected in the pace of recent discovery: more than 100 caddisfly species have been added to the Georgian list in the 2020s alone, and researchers believe many more remain to be found.</p>
<p>The history of caddisfly research in Georgia and the Caucasus stretches back to the nineteenth century, when Robert McLachlan produced some of the earliest records. The most substantial early contributions, however, came from Andrey Martynov, who described 35 new species and recorded 46 species for the first time in Georgia in a series of publications between 1913 and 1934. In the following decades, local and foreign researchers added 18 more species and recorded numerous others for the first time in the country. A new era began in 2019, driven by the exceptionally productive work of János Oláh, who has described over a hundred species from the region.</p>
<p>Despite this progress, much of the Georgian caddisfly fauna remains unexplored. Through their investigation of the country&#8217;s caddisflies, the authors of the new study present two additional species: Calamoceras illiesi Malicky &amp; Kumanski, 1974, and Mystacides azureus Linnaeus, 1761, both recorded for the first time in Georgia.</p>
<p>The family Calamoceratidae, to which Calamoceras illiesi belongs, is primarily found in tropical and subtropical regions, with its presence in Europe limited to the genus Calamoceras. The larvae of this family are among the largest case-bearing caddisfly larvae, partly due to their distinctive body shape. They can be differentiated from similar families by morphological characteristics such as a transverse row of about 16 long stout setae in the central part of the labrum, sharp ventral anterior margins of the pronotum and dorsal plates of the mesonotum, and specific blurred margins. Larvae are found sporadically in detritus accumulations of stream pools.</p>
<p>Calamoceras larvae are characterised by a combination of features: a transverse row of 22 to 32 stout setae on the labrum; a hook-shaped fore trochantin; a pronotum with elongated and pointed anterolateral corners; roughly equal-length middle and hind legs with short forelegs; two sclerotised plates on the mesonotum; a membranous metanotum with four very small seta-bearing sclerites; and anal claws that possess an accessory hook. The case is made from pieces of wood. To date, the genus includes three species: C. markusha, C. illiesi, and the recently described C. riffensis from Morocco.</p>
<p>In the new study, researchers collected 2 females and 17 larvae of Calamoceras illiesi from a small, unnamed mountain brook in the Kvereti Managed Reserve, at an altitude of 1,774 metres above sea level. The larvae were caught using a hand net, while the adults were caught with a butterfly net. All specimens were preserved in 95% ethanol and stored in a freezer at −22 °C. When detailed examination of adults was necessary, the abdomens were cleaned in a 10% KOH solution and transferred to glycerol for further preservation. Identification of the larva and imago was based on the descriptions by Sipahiler and Malicky, and all examined material is kept in the collection of the Museum of the Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi.</p>
<p>Calamoceras illiesi has previously been recorded in Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Türkiye, and north-western Russia. In the Caucasus, the genus is represented by a single species, C. illiesi, which occurs in the Western Caucasus, including Novorossiysk and Sochi, and in the North Caucasus, in the southwest of Dagestan. The new record extends the known range of the species into the South Caucasus for the first time. Interestingly, an unknown representative of the genus Calamoceras was recorded by Martynov in 1913 in Akhali Atoni, in western Georgia. The authors assume that this record probably belongs to C. illiesi, but this assumption requires further confirmation, given the high diversity of trichopterans in the region.</p>
<p>In terms of its habitat, despite extensive and repeated sampling, Calamoceras illiesi larvae were found in only one stream, which fully matches the species&#8217; known habitat preferences. The specimens were located at the edge of a small pond, one to two metres wide, formed by a mountain spring, where the slowed flow allows the accumulation of woody debris and leaf litter. Larvae were absent from nearby streams, suggesting a small, microhabitat-dependent population and highlighting its vulnerability. Consequently, protecting this known habitat is essential for the conservation of this rare species.</p>
<p>The second species confirmed in the study, Mystacides azureus, belongs to the family Leptoceridae, commonly known as long-horned caddisflies, one of the largest families within the order, comprising over 1,970 described species classified into 46 extant genera globally. Adults of the family are characterised by extremely long, slender antennae, often two to three times the length of the forewings, which distinguishes them from most other caddisfly families. The head is broad and may bear distinctive sensory projections in some genera. Maxillary palps are five-segmented in both sexes, often modified in males, with the terminal segment annulated or whip-like. The forewings are narrow and covered in dense hairs, with simplified venation.</p>
<p>The genus Mystacides comprises 25 documented species and occurs across temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere as well as tropical and subtropical areas of Asia. Adults are medium-sized, with elongated slender bodies typically ranging from 7 to 12 millimetres, and wings that often carry a distinct metallic, dark brown to bluish iridescent sheen. The forewings are usually without any pattern or faintly spotted. Maxillary palps are composed of five parts, with sexually dimorphic segmentation in particular species, and the head is hypognathous, with large compound eyes.</p>
<p>Mystacides azureus is one of the most widely distributed species of the genus in Europe, having been recorded in numerous countries including the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, and the Balkan Peninsula. The species is also present in Japan, alongside two newly described species within the M. azureus species group. In the Caucasus region, M. azureus was previously reported from Russia. Notably, the first photographic record of this species in Georgia was made by amateur naturalist Giorgi Makharadze, who posted an image on the Facebook group Wildlife in Georgia in 2020.</p>
<p>In the new study, researchers collected specimens of Mystacides azureus from several locations across Georgia: 2 males and 1 female from Gaghma Dvabzu village in Guria, at 433 metres above sea level; 2 males, 2 females, and 1 larva from Kutaisi in Imereti, at 235 metres above sea level; and 1 male and 1 female from Lia in Samegrelo, at 634 metres above sea level. The initial photograph observation on social media was thus supported by the collection of specimens from multiple locations in the country, providing firm evidence of the species&#8217; occurrence in Georgia.</p>
<p>With the two new species reported in the study, the diversity of Georgian caddisfly fauna has increased to 250 species grouped into 55 genera and 19 families. Of these, 109 species, approximately 44%, are endemic to Georgia, while 141 species, approximately 56%, are endemic to the Caucasus. Among the species-rich families, Philopotamidae stands out with a particularly high level of local endemism, with 16 of 26 species found only in Georgia. An additional 37 Caucasian endemics remain unrecorded in Georgia, reinforcing the need for further research.</p>
<p>The new records highlight both the richness and the fragility of Georgia&#8217;s freshwater insect fauna. The discovery of Calamoceras illiesi in a single mountain brook, dependent on a microhabitat of slow-flowing water and accumulated woody debris, serves as a reminder that even common-seeming species can be rare and vulnerable at the local scale. As researchers continue to explore the caddisflies of the Caucasus, the protection of these small, specialised habitats will be essential for the survival of the species that depend on them.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> First record of Calamoceras illiesi and confirmation of Mystacides azureus (Trichoptera) in Georgia</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> The first record of Calamoceras illiesi Malicky &amp; Kumanski, 1974 ( Trichoptera , Calamoceratidae ) and confirmation of the occurrence of Mystacides azureus Linnaeus, 1761 ( Trichoptera , Leptoceridae ) from Georgia</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> The first record of Calamoceras illiesi Malicky &amp; Kumanski, 1974 ( Trichoptera , Calamoceratidae ) and confirmation of the occurrence of Mystacides azureus Linnaeus, 1761 ( Trichoptera , Leptoceridae ) from Georgia. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/caucasiana.4.e172790" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3897/caucasiana.4.e172790</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/caucasiana.4.e172790" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3897/caucasiana.4.e172790</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> caddisflies, Trichoptera, Calamoceras illiesi, Mystacides azureus, Georgia, South Caucasus, freshwater biodiversity, endemic species, aquatic insects, species records, first, record</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">282910</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swiss beetle census rewrites the record with 14 new species and 18 removals</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/swiss-beetle-census-rewrites-the-record-with-14-new-species-and-18-removals/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 07:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beetle species checklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beetle species documentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beetles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity monitoring methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Checklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coccinelloidea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation of Swiss insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cucujoidea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entomology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entomology research Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erotylidae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat-specific beetle species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insect biodiversity in Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insect collection analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latridiidae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primeval forest relicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of museums in insect research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saproxylic species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species record verification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swiss beetle diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swiss natural history collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=282894</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An exhaustive review of more than 53,000 beetle records from Swiss collections and literature confirms 183 species, removes 18 dubious entries, and documents 14 species never before recorded in the country.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than 53,000 beetle records gathered from Swiss museums, private drawers, and decades of literature have produced the most complete accounting yet of a little-known slice of Switzerland&#8217;s insect life. A team of entomologists has published an annotated checklist covering thirteen families of beetles in the superfamilies Coccinelloidea and Cucujoidea, groups that include minute fungus-feeders, bark-dwelling predators, and saproxylic specialists whose fates are tied to dead wood. The result, published in the journal Alpine Entomology, confirms 183 species as part of the Swiss fauna, strikes 18 previously listed species from the national record, and adds 14 species that had never before been documented in the country.</p>
<p>The scale of the underlying effort is remarkable. Researchers examined specimens held in more than twenty Swiss natural history collections, from the Naturhistorisches Museum Basel to the Museo cantonale di storia naturale in Lugano, alongside private collections maintained by professional and amateur entomologists. Roughly 42 percent of the compiled occurrences came from museum specimens, 5 percent from published literature, and 53 percent from other sources including volunteer observers, research institutes, and ecology offices. Every record was scrutinized against strict criteria before a species could be admitted to the national list.</p>
<p>That scrutiny proved decisive. Several historic Swiss collections, notably those assembled by Charles Maerky and Max Täschler, have long been regarded as problematic because they contain specimens whose original labels cannot be trusted. Records traced to these collections were systematically excluded, along with species cited in nineteenth-century catalogs without any supporting specimens, misidentified material, and isolated introductions of nonindigenous species that never established breeding populations. The authors applied an eight-point rubric of doubt, flagging records whose data sources could not be verified, whose identifications were wrong, or whose localities were confused with foreign place names sharing the same spelling.</p>
<p>The taxonomy itself has shifted beneath the checklist. Until 2015, the superfamily Coccinelloidea was folded inside Cucujoidea, when a major phylogenetic revision recognized the two as distinct lineages. Switzerland now hosts eight families within Coccinelloidea and ten within Cucujoidea, spanning an extraordinary range of ecological strategies. Among them are the Latridiidae, or minute brown scavenger beetles, which alone account for 77 of the 183 confirmed species, and the Monotomidae, slender root-eating beetles represented by 22 species. Several families had not received a national treatment in more than a century, with the last comprehensive catalogs dating to 1867 and 1900.</p>
<p>Fourteen species appear on the Swiss list for the first time. Among the Erotylidae, the pleasing fungus beetles Triplax collaris and Triplax elongata were captured only in recent years, the former in two northern localities since 2021 and the latter in beech forests of Ticino between 2019 and 2020. The Latridiidae contributed the largest share of newcomers, including Corticaria alleni, first found in 2016 in a thermophilic Alpine pine forest, and Corticaria interstitialis, a boreoalpine species so rare that a single male trapped in 2025 in an unmanaged high-altitude coniferous forest constituted its entire Swiss record. Melanophthalma rhenana, a species only described in 2007, was detected in Geneva and Ticino from 2019 onward.</p>
<p>Several of these newcomers share a telling ecological profile. Species such as Corticaria interstitialis, Latridius brevicollis, and Teredus opacus are classified as primeval forest relicts in Europe, organisms whose exacting requirements for old-growth conditions, continuous dead wood, and specific fungal associates make them among the first casualties of intensive forestry. Their appearance in Switzerland, often through the increasing use of flight interception traps placed in near-natural forests, suggests that remnant pockets of ancient woodland structure persist in the Alps and the southern lowlands, harboring fauna thought to have vanished from much of Central Europe.</p>
<p>The removals are equally instructive. Stephostethus lardarius, a hygrophilous species common in neighboring Germany and France, was struck from the Swiss list because every specimen labeled as Swiss traced back to the problematic Maerky collection. Pediacus fuscus, a Holarctic species with a distinctly northern distribution, had been cited for Switzerland since 1867, yet no supporting specimen exists in any examined collection, confirming a hypothesis first advanced in 1960. The myrmecophilous beetles Cholovocera formicaria and Merophysia formicaria, which live exclusively in ant nests of Mediterranean species absent from Switzerland, were excluded on both distributional and ecological grounds.</p>
<p>Not every exclusion is permanent. The authors note that Corticaria corsica, known from Corsica and southern France, could plausibly occur in Switzerland but awaits confirmation. Cryptolestes capensis, a cosmopolitan grain pest, was trapped once in the wild in Aargau in 2015 but withheld from the list until breeding in nature can be demonstrated. Similarly, Cartodere satelles, an Australian native recorded in Europe only in scattered introductions, was documented from a single 1954 specimen and set aside pending evidence of establishment.</p>
<p>Some species blur the boundary between native and introduced. The minute scavenger beetle Cartodere bifasciata, native to Australia and first described from a specimen found in German tobacco, has been observed regularly in Switzerland since 1984, almost exclusively in natural settings such as leaf litter and compost, and is now considered established. Corticarina cavicollis, another Nearctic arrival first documented in Europe in 1998, was found in 2023 beating oak branches in southern Ticino, where two specimens suggest naturalization. Migneauxia lederi, a cosmopolitan contaminant of stored rice and tea, now appears to reproduce and overwinter outdoors in Switzerland.</p>
<p>The checklist also documents species at the edge of their range. Anommatus besucheti, A. dentatus, and A. scherleri are known only from Switzerland and Italy, while A. ticinensis appears restricted to a single locality in southern Ticino, where seven specimens were found by sifting leaf litter in 1969. Triplax scutellaris, first recorded in Switzerland in 2015, has since been captured in both a lowland beech forest and a spruce stand at 1,580 meters, hinting at broader ecological flexibility than previously assumed. Tritoma subbasalis, known from just two specimens collected in Grisons in 1997, represents the westernmost extent of its entire distribution.</p>
<p>Climate change looms over the analysis. The authors note that Rhizophagus grandis, a predator deployed across Europe since the 1980s for the biological control of the spruce bark beetle Dendroctonus micans, has expanded markedly in Switzerland and is expected to benefit further as warming weakens spruce stands and favors its prey. Southern species may follow the same trajectory northward, while cosmopolitan biocontrol agents could appear in the fauna. The checklist provides the baseline against which such shifts will be measured.</p>
<p>For the researchers, the work represents a further step toward a comprehensive understanding of the entire Swiss beetle fauna, a project that has already produced revised treatments of other families in recent years. All validated data have been transmitted to GBIF, the global biodiversity information facility, and updated distribution maps are available through the Swiss info fauna cartographic server. Four families, including the Corylophidae, Cryptophagidae, Nitidulidae, and Phalacridae, remain to be updated in future publications, promising further revisions to a fauna that continues to yield surprises more than 150 years after the first national catalog appeared.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> An annotated checklist of Coccinelloidea and Cucujoidea beetle families in Switzerland based on museum specimens and literature records</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Annotated checklist of the Coccinelloidea (partim) ( Alexiidae , Bothrideridae , Cerylonidae , Endomychidae , Latridiidae , Teredidae ) and Cucujoidea (partim) ( Cucujidae , Erotylidae , Laemophloeidae , Monotomidae , Phloeostichidae , Silvanidae , Sphindidae ) of Switzerland ( Coleoptera )</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Annotated checklist of the Coccinelloidea (partim) ( Alexiidae , Bothrideridae , Cerylonidae , Endomychidae , Latridiidae , Teredidae ) and Cucujoidea (partim) ( Cucujidae , Erotylidae , Laemophloeidae , Monotomidae , Phloeostichidae , Silvanidae , Sphindidae ) of Switzerland ( Coleoptera ). (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/alpento.10.182286" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3897/alpento.10.182286</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/alpento.10.182286" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3897/alpento.10.182286</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> beetles, Switzerland, checklist, Coccinelloidea, Cucujoidea, biodiversity, entomology, saproxylic species, primeval forest relicts, Latridiidae, Erotylidae, species records</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">282894</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
