<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sparse data &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/sparse-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 23:16:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>New Sparse-Data Method Maps Ocean Temperatures Faster Than AI</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-sparse-data-method-maps-ocean-temperatures-faster-than-ai/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 23:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change data collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud interference in satellite measurements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data assimilation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrete empirical interpolation method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empirical interpolation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global sea surface temperature analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning vs classical interpolation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine ecosystem monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina State University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ocean temperature mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceanographic data accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceanography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapid ocean temperature reconstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recurrent neural networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S-DEIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S-DEIM algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite data limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea surface temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sparse data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sparse data interpolation techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather forecasting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=199592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers at North Carolina State University have developed S-DEIM, a method that reconstructs global sea surface temperatures from sparse observations with greater accuracy than existing interpolation techniques and a leading AI model while training in about one minute.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sea surface temperatures quietly govern much of what happens on our planet. They shape marine ecosystems, steer hurricanes, modulate rainfall across continents and serve as one of the clearest fingerprints of a warming climate. Yet measuring them comprehensively remains a stubborn challenge. Ships, buoys and drifting sensors cover only a tiny fraction of the ocean&#8217;s surface, and satellites, despite their global reach, can be misled by clouds, aerosols and atmospheric interference. The result is a data landscape that is accurate where instruments exist and murky everywhere else. A new study from North Carolina State University now offers a way to fill in those gaps with remarkable speed and precision, and it does so with a mathematical approach that outperforms both classical interpolation techniques and a heavyweight artificial intelligence model while training in about a minute.</p>
<p>The research, published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Machine Learning and Computation, introduces a technique called Sparse Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method, or S-DEIM. It was developed by Mohammad Farazmand, associate professor of mathematics at NC State, together with graduate student Louisa Ebby and a team of undergraduate researchers from institutions across the United States. According to the authors, the method reconstructs high-resolution global sea surface temperature fields from as few as 100 in situ observations, a sampling density that amounts to just 0.2 percent of the full spatial grid. Even with so little direct information, more than 90 percent of the S-DEIM estimates landed within one degree Celsius of the true values in the team&#8217;s benchmark tests.</p>
<p>The problem the researchers set out to solve is one that oceanographers and climate scientists have wrestled with for decades. Federal agencies such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have long relied on combinations of complicated differential equations to estimate temperatures across the vast unmonitored stretches of ocean. These model-based approaches are rigorous, but they are computationally demanding and depend on physical assumptions that may not hold perfectly across every ocean basin and season. Meanwhile, the explosive growth of machine learning has produced an alternative family of tools that can learn patterns directly from data, but at a steep price: deep neural networks often require hours of training on powerful hardware and enormous quantities of data before they can make a single useful prediction.</p>
<p>Somewhere in between sits the Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method, an established technique that the new work builds upon. Rather than modeling the ocean purely from physical first principles, DEIM specifies a basis, essentially a compact library of spatial patterns that jointly encode the structure of the temperature field being estimated. Given a handful of actual measurements, the method selects which of these patterns to activate and with what weights, producing a full-field estimate from sparse data. The approach is elegant and efficient, but it has a well-known weakness. When the available observations are truly sparse, as they typically are in the open ocean, the estimates it produces degrade considerably, because the method struggles to determine which patterns best explain a scattering of disconnected data points.</p>
<p>The NC State team&#8217;s insight was to bring historical information to bear on precisely this weakness. S-DEIM augments the classical framework with a so-called kernel vector, a quantity for which no closed-form mathematical formula exists, estimated instead from the long historical record of observations. In practice, the reconstruction produced by S-DEIM consists of two complementary terms. The first is computed from instantaneous in situ measurements using empirical interpolation, anchoring the estimate to what sensors are actually reporting right now. The second is learned from the historical time series using recurrent neural networks, which are particularly well suited to capturing how patterns in the data evolve over time. The marriage of the two allows the method to lean on decades of accumulated knowledge about ocean behavior while still respecting the fresh, if sparse, observations streaming in.</p>
<p>To train and test the method, the researchers used NOAA&#8217;s weekly high-resolution sea surface temperature dataset spanning 1989 through 2021, a record covering more than three decades of global ocean variability. The final year of the record, from January 2022 through January 2023, was withheld from the models entirely and reserved as a blind test. The team then asked S-DEIM, the classical DEIM method and a high-performing convolutional neural network to predict the sea surface temperatures for that unseen year, and compared their outputs against the actual historical data. This head-to-head design provided a rigorous measure of how each technique would perform under realistic conditions, where the future is genuinely unknown and the data available is sparse.</p>
<p>The results were striking. S-DEIM proved roughly 40 percent more accurate than DEIM, a substantial leap over the method it directly extends. More surprisingly, it also edged out the convolutional neural network, delivering estimates about 2 percent more accurate than the best AI model in the comparison. The efficiency gap was even more dramatic. Training the recurrent neural network at the heart of S-DEIM took approximately one minute, a one-time offline step, whereas the convolutional neural network required an hour and a half to train. Once trained, S-DEIM generates its full reconstructions in less than a second, making the approach practical for operational settings where forecasts must be produced continuously and quickly.</p>
<p>The method also displayed a robustness that matters greatly for real-world deployment. Sensor networks in the ocean are rarely arranged optimally; instruments drift, fail and are deployed wherever ships happen to travel. When the researchers distributed the sensors randomly rather than in favorable positions, the reconstruction error deteriorated by only 1 to 2 percent, suggesting that S-DEIM does not depend on carefully engineered measurement placements to deliver its accuracy. That resilience, combined with its computational thrift, makes the method attractive for agencies monitoring the ocean with limited and unevenly distributed instrumentation, and it opens the door to assimilating streaming observations in near real time.</p>
<p>The implications extend in two directions at once. In the short term, accurate and rapidly computed sea surface temperature fields feed directly into weather forecasting, where ocean conditions influence storm tracks, intensity and precipitation patterns on timescales of days to weeks. In the longer term, the same fields underpin climate models that track how the ocean absorbs and redistributes heat over decades. A tool that can deliver high-resolution temperature reconstructions from a sliver of the usual data, at a fraction of the computational cost, could meaningfully lower the barrier to both endeavors. The work also grew out of a National Science Foundation supported Research Experience for Undergraduates, with co-authors Cassidy All of the University of Colorado Boulder, Kevin Ho of Mississippi State University, Maya Magnuski of Bard College and Christopher Nicolaides of Indiana University contributing to the study alongside the NC State team.</p>
<p>Farazmand and his colleagues emphasize that this is not the end of the road. The team hopes to continue improving the accuracy of S-DEIM, and the framework&#8217;s flexibility suggests room for refinement, from richer historical models to better handling of measurement noise. For now, the study makes a compelling case that when data is scarce, a thoughtfully designed hybrid of classical interpolation and lightweight learning can beat brute-force deep learning on its own terms. In a field where every degree matters and every observation counts, S-DEIM offers a reminder that sometimes the smartest algorithm is not the biggest one, but the one that knows how to make the most of very little.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> A sparse-data interpolation method for rapidly reconstructing global sea surface temperatures from limited in situ observations.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> New method estimates sea surface temps quickly and accurately</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> New method estimates sea surface temps quickly and accurately. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1143267" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> sea surface temperature, S-DEIM, data assimilation, machine learning, recurrent neural networks, NOAA, climate modeling, oceanography, sparse data, empirical interpolation, weather forecasting, North Carolina State University</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199592</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fusing Browsing, Clicks and Purchases to Sharpen E-Commerce Recommendations</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/fusing-browsing-clicks-and-purchases-to-sharpen-e-commerce-recommendations/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral signal interdependencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsing and purchase data fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-commerce recommendation systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving recommendation accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modeling user interest heterogeneity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-behavior recommendation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-channel user data integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-source user behavior data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDCG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalized shopping experiences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendation system challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendation systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping cart abandonment analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sparse data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporal dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporal dynamics in e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user behavior modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user intent prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interest embeddings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=196487</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study shows that fusing browsing, clicking, carting and purchasing signals into a shared temporal representation space improves recommendation accuracy and stability, especially for inactive users.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every click, scroll and abandoned shopping cart on an e-commerce platform tells a fragment of a story about a shopper&#8217;s intent. Modern recommendation engines, however, have long struggled to assemble those fragments into a coherent picture. A study published in the Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing now proposes a personalized recommendation method built on the fusion of multi-source user behavior data, aiming to capture user interests more completely and consistently than conventional single-behavior approaches. The work, led by Lina Zhu of Changzhi Vocational and Technical College in Shanxi, China, tackles one of the most persistent weaknesses of e-commerce recommender systems: the failure to model the heterogeneity and interdependencies that exist among the many different behavioral signals a user leaves behind.</p>
<p>The core problem the research addresses is well known among practitioners. Browsing a product, clicking on it, adding it to a cart and finally purchasing it are actions of very different kinds, each carrying its own weight and its own temporal rhythm. When recommendation systems treat these signals in isolation, or simply pool them without accounting for their structural differences, the resulting picture of user interest becomes both incomplete and inconsistent. A user who browses dozens of laptops but purchases none is signaling something quite different from a user who browses two and buys one, and a system that cannot distinguish between these patterns will make unstable, inaccurate suggestions. Zhu&#8217;s framework responds by performing unified and standardized modeling of these diverse behavioral signals, so that each action type is represented in a form that can be compared and combined with the others.</p>
<p>Central to the method is the idea that preferences are not static. The framework constructs differentiated feature representations under temporal semantic constraints, meaning that the timing and sequence of behaviors shape how those behaviors are encoded. Preference intensity, how strongly a user leans toward a product category, and temporal dynamics, how that leaning shifts over time, are captured as distinct but related properties of the representation. This dual emphasis allows the model to reflect the reality that a user&#8217;s interest in, say, running shoes in January may fade by March, while their interest in a different category may surge in the interim. By encoding these dynamics explicitly rather than relying on aggregate counts, the method seeks to preserve the freshness and decay of interests that traditional collaborative filtering approaches often flatten away.</p>
<p>The fusion stage of the framework is where the technical architecture becomes most distinctive. Rather than concatenating features from different behavior sources or averaging their predictions, the method introduces a collaborative fusion mechanism operating within a shared representation space. In this space, multi-source behavioral information is jointly modeled so that the resulting user interest embeddings are structurally consistent, meaning they share a common geometry across behavior types, and informationally complementary, meaning each source contributes what the others lack. A purchase history, for example, is sparse but highly reliable, while browsing data is abundant but noisy; the fusion mechanism is designed to let the reliability of one signal compensate for the noise of another without allowing the noisy signal to overwhelm the trustworthy one.</p>
<p>Once these fused interest embeddings are generated, the framework performs user-item matching directly in the learned representation space. Items are embedded alongside users, and recommendations are produced by measuring the proximity between a user&#8217;s fused interest vector and candidate item vectors. Because the interest representation already accounts for multiple behavior types and their temporal structure, the matching step inherits that richness, and the authors argue this is what enables the improved accuracy and stability observed in their experiments.</p>
<p>The evaluation was conducted on the publicly available Amazon multi-behavior dataset, a widely used benchmark that records browsing, adding to cart and purchasing actions alongside clicks. Under the adopted evaluation setting, the proposed approach achieved a Precision@10 of 0.412, a Recall@10 of 0.356 and an NDCG@10 of 0.437. Precision@10 measures the fraction of the top ten recommended items that were actually relevant, Recall@10 captures how many of the user&#8217;s relevant items appeared in the top ten, and NDCG@10 rewards systems that place the most relevant items near the top of the ranked list. Together, these metrics indicate that the fused representations produce rankings that are both accurate and well ordered.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential finding concerns users who interact rarely with the platform. Sparse data has long been the Achilles&#8217; heel of personalization: users with few recorded actions leave too little evidence for most models to form a reliable interest profile, a phenomenon related to the cold-start and data-scarcity problems documented across the recommender systems literature. On inactive user subsets of the Amazon dataset, the method achieved an NDCG@10 of 0.398, showing that recommendation performance is retained even under the evaluated sparse interaction conditions. The authors attribute this resilience to the fusion design itself, in which weak evidence from one behavior source can be reinforced by complementary evidence from another, so that even a short click history can be enriched by consistent browsing patterns.</p>
<p>The significance of this work sits within a broader research wave on multi-behavior recommendation, where graph neural networks, attention mechanisms, contrastive learning and transformer architectures have all been applied to model interactions among behavior types. Recent studies have explored preference differences among behaviors, cross-attentive behavior-aware graph convolutions, hypergraph-enhanced multi-interest learning and temporal graph transformers, reflecting a consensus that purchase-level feedback alone is too sparse to support high-quality personalization at scale. Zhu&#8217;s contribution aligns with this consensus but places particular emphasis on the structural consistency of the shared representation space and the explicit use of temporal semantic constraints, two aspects the author identifies as the limiting factors when multi-source data is modeled insufficiently.</p>
<p>The author is careful to scope the claims. The experiments demonstrate effectiveness within the adopted evaluation setting on the Amazon multi-behavior dataset, and the study notes that the applicability of the learned representations to other e-commerce platforms and different behavioral distributions requires further empirical validation. The paper also reports that no datasets were generated or analyzed during the study beyond those used in the evaluation, and the declared funding for the work is listed as not applicable. Nevertheless, the reported results on inactive users suggest a practical direction for an industry problem that costs platforms real revenue: most visitors to a large online store interact only lightly, and any method that extracts reliable signals from sparse behavioral traces has immediate commercial value.</p>
<p>For the field of ambient intelligence and humanized computing, the study adds to a growing body of evidence that the future of personalization lies not in harvesting ever more data, but in modeling the relationships among the data already collected. As machine learning continues to transform e-commerce, from purchase-intention prediction to sentiment-enhanced recommendation, frameworks that respect the heterogeneity, interdependence and temporal structure of human behavior may prove to be the ones that finally deliver recommendations that feel genuinely personal. The open question, which the study itself flags, is whether interest embeddings learned on one platform&#8217;s behavioral distribution will transfer cleanly to another, a challenge that will shape the next generation of multi-source fusion research.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Personalized e-commerce recommendation using multi-source user behavior data fusion</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Personalized recommendation methods for e-commerce based on multi-source user behavior data fusion</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Personalized recommendation methods for e-commerce based on multi-source user behavior data fusion. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-026-05129-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-026-05129-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-026-05129-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s12652-026-05129-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> e-commerce, recommendation systems, multi-behavior recommendation, data fusion, user behavior modeling, temporal dynamics, user interest embeddings, NDCG, sparse data, Amazon dataset, machine learning, personalization</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">196487</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
