<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>solid waste recycling &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/solid-waste-recycling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 22:20:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Waste Phosphogypsum Finds New Life in 3D-Printed Buildings Through Smart Additive Chemistry</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/waste-phosphogypsum-finds-new-life-in-3d-printed-buildings-through-smart-additive-chemistry/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 22:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D printed construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[additive chemistry in construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[additive manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buildability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical modification for 3D printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compressive strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gypsum crystals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial byproduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial waste reutilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative use of industrial waste in architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphogypsum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphogypsum slurry optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactive waste management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapid-setting and premixed 3D printing strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retarders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rheology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[setting time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid waste recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable building materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste phosphogypsum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water reducers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=229327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers show that route-specific admixture chemistry can turn stockpiled phosphogypsum waste into printable, load-bearing 3D-printed building structures.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, the global fertilizer industry buries a mountain of waste. Phosphogypsum, the radioactive-tinged byproduct of wet-process phosphoric acid production, has accumulated in open-air stockpiles exceeding six to eight billion tons worldwide, leaching impurities into soil and groundwater while consuming vast tracts of land. Now, a team of Chinese and Japanese researchers has demonstrated a route to transform this industrial liability into printable building material, and in doing so they have uncovered a principle that could reshape how chemically modified materials are designed for construction-scale 3D printing: the best additive is not the one that maximizes any single property, but the one that matches the specific printing route.</p>
<p>The study, published in Case Studies in Construction Materials, systematically evaluated how water reducers and retarders govern the behavior of phosphogypsum-based slurries across two fundamentally different extrusion printing strategies. In the rapid-setting route, mixing, stirring, and extrusion are compressed into a window of just three to five seconds using a rotary planetary printhead whose outer cylinder and inner blades counter-rotate to homogenize the paste on the fly. In the premixed route, by contrast, the slurry must survive premixing, storage, and delivery before it ever reaches a 10-millimeter nozzle. Each route places contradictory demands on the fresh material, and the researchers showed that admixture selection must be tailored accordingly rather than borrowed from conventional casting practice.</p>
<p>The raw phosphogypsum itself is dominated by calcium sulfate dihydrate, with rhombic plate-like crystals carrying residual silica and trace phosphate, fluoride, and metal impurities. These soluble phosphorus species and impurity ions interfere with crystal growth and setting behavior, which is why untreated phosphogypsum historically has been confined to low-value blocks and panels. The team tested three water reducers for the rapid route, a naphthalene-based system, a melamine-based system, and a polycarboxylate ether, each representing a distinct dispersion mechanism. The naphthalene and melamine chemistries disperse particles primarily through electrostatic repulsion, while the comb-shaped polycarboxylate molecule adds steric hindrance, physically preventing particles from approaching one another.</p>
<p>Setting measurements revealed striking differences. The polycarboxylate system produced an initial setting time of nine minutes and a final set at nineteen minutes, the broadest working interval among the water reducers, while the melamine system set fastest at four and nine minutes. But the researchers caution that setting time alone is a misleading proxy for printability. In extrusion printing, the material must flow continuously under shear inside the delivery system and nozzle, then recover structural resistance almost immediately after deposition to hold its filament geometry and bear the weight of subsequent layers. A slurry that is too fluid slumps; one that is too stiff clogs the pump.</p>
<p>Rheometry using a rotational rheometer with a stepwise shear protocol, ramping from rest to 140 reciprocal seconds and back down, quantified this trade-off. The polycarboxylate-modified slurry showed the highest torque, indicating strong structural resistance that favored filament integrity after extrusion, yet it still extruded continuously and produced a smooth filament surface with only isolated pores. The melamine system, though less resistant, achieved the smallest single-filament lateral path deviation, roughly 0.5 to 0.7 millimeters, compared with about 2.1 to 2.6 millimeters for the polycarboxylate. The naphthalene system fared worst, with porous surfaces and boundary fluctuations near two millimeters. The lesson is that extrusion continuity, surface quality, and path accuracy are related but non-equivalent measures of printability, and the highest rheological resistance does not automatically deliver the most accurate geometry.</p>
<p>The premixed route told an even clearer story about the limits of retardation. Three retarders were compared at identical dosage: a bio-based commercial retarder, citric acid, and sodium gluconate. Sodium gluconate extended setting the longest, to twenty-six minutes initial and thirty-six minutes final, yet its printed filaments fractured, spalled, and contracted, with path deviations of 3.8 to 5.3 millimeters. Citric acid flowed easily but left periodic surface ridges and lateral wandering of nearly four to 5.6 millimeters because the deposited material remained too deformable. Only the bio-based retarder, occupying an intermediate setting and rheological regime, balanced open time against post-deposition structural build-up, holding deviations to 0.6 to 0.8 millimeters. In premixed printing, more retardation is emphatically not better; the optimum is a middle ground.</p>
<p>Multilayer tests confirmed the fresh-state findings at structural scale. Seven-layer specimens printed with the polycarboxylate system formed a complete square column 114.9 millimeters tall, though layer heights drifted from 18.5 millimeters at the base to 13.8 at the top, revealing cumulative compression. The bio-retarder system produced a circular structure of 121.4 millimeters with remarkably uniform layers between 17.0 and 17.3 millimeters, indicating excellent layer-height control during vertical accumulation. Neither system collapsed or delaminated, demonstrating that properly regulated phosphogypsum can sustain genuine multilayer construction rather than single decorative filaments.</p>
<p>Hardened-state characterization explained the strength differences without invoking new chemistry. X-ray diffraction and thermogravimetric analysis showed that every admixture system retained gypsum dihydrate as the dominant phase with essentially unchanged dehydration behavior, so no admixture fundamentally altered the reaction pathway. Nitrogen adsorption and electron microscopy, however, revealed dramatic differences in pore structure and crystal packing. The polycarboxylate and bio-retarder specimens developed dense, interlocking networks of short columnar and acicular crystals with few large voids, reaching compressive strengths of 15.5 and 17.1 megapascals respectively. The naphthalene, citric acid, and sodium gluconate systems left looser, more heterogeneous skeletons with visible pores and discontinuous crystal contacts, consistent with their lower strengths.</p>
<p>The broader significance extends beyond one waste stream. The authors frame their results through two stage-dependent pathways: a fresh-state pathway in which admixtures govern setting and rheology to control extrusion and buildability, and a hardened-state pathway in which they shape crystal growth and pore development to control strength. Crucially, the microstructure is not treated as the direct cause of printing behavior, avoiding a common conflation in the additive manufacturing literature. For a field racing to print with alternative binders, earth, geopolymers, gypsum, and low-carbon concretes, the message is that admixture effectiveness is route-dependent, and material design must target a process-specific window rather than maximize flowability, setting delay, or strength in isolation.</p>
<p>For the billions of tons of phosphogypsum languishing in stockpiles, the demonstration that pretreated material can be printed into sound multilayer structures with compressive strength above 17 megapascals opens a credible path to high-value utilization compatible with automated construction. Gypsum&#8217;s inherent advantages, rapid setting, early strength, and good shape retention, make it unusually well suited to extrusion printing, provided the chemistry is tuned to the machine. Turning a disposal problem into printable walls would be a satisfying circular-economy outcome; the deeper contribution may be the design principle that makes it possible.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Admixture regulation of phosphogypsum-based materials for extrusion-based 3D printing in construction</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Evolution of extrusion, buildability, and mechanical properties of phosphogypsum-based 3D printing materials under admixture regulation</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wang, Y., Li, G., Wen, Y., Tamon, U., Zhang, T., Chang, J., &amp; Wang, L. (2026). Evolution of extrusion, buildability, and mechanical properties of phosphogypsum-based 3D printing materials under admixture regulation. <em>Case Studies in Construction Materials, 25</em>, Article e06540. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06540" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06540</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06540" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06540</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> phosphogypsum, 3D printing, additive manufacturing, water reducers, retarders, rheology, setting time, buildability, compressive strength, gypsum crystals, solid waste recycling, construction materials</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">229327</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turning Coal Waste Into Tougher Concrete: Coating the Weak Link at the Interface</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/turning-coal-waste-into-tougher-concrete-coating-the-weak-link-at-the-interface/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Sanderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 19:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal gangue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal gangue recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal waste concrete enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal waste utilization in construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal-based binder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durability of coal gangue concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeze-thaw resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeze-thaw resistance in recycled concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative construction material technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial transition zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial transition zone improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limestone powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mineral coating for aggregate strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoindentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reducing coal mining waste environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silica fume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium silicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid waste recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface coating for recycled aggregates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction materials]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=228935</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers coated coal gangue aggregate with sodium silicate, silica fume, or limestone powder and showed that the right coating dramatically strengthens the concrete's weakest interfacial zone against wet-dry and freeze-thaw cycling.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, coal mining leaves behind mountains of coal gangue, a rocky byproduct of mining, washing, and separation that piles up across vast tracts of land, sheds dust, risks spontaneous combustion, and leaches acidic drainage into surrounding soil and water. At the same time, the construction industry consumes enormous quantities of natural sand and gravel, driving demand for alternative aggregate resources. A new study published in Case Studies in Construction Materials offers a strikingly practical answer to both problems: crush coal gangue into concrete aggregate, then coat each particle with cheap, locally available minerals to fix the one weakness that has always held this recycled material back. The research, led by Yaoyu Wang and colleagues, demonstrates that the right surface treatment can transform coal gangue concrete from a material that crumbles under freezing conditions into one that survives dozens of punishing cycles with most of its strength intact.</p>
<p>The core challenge lies in something invisible to the naked eye: the interfacial transition zone, or ITZ, the thin band of cement paste that bonds directly to the surface of each aggregate particle. In ordinary concrete, the ITZ is often the weakest region of the whole material, but coal gangue makes the problem dramatically worse. The rock is riddled with pores, bedding-related defects, pre-existing microcracks, and weak mineral regions, and its exposed surface is dominated by aluminosilicate minerals that react only weakly under normal curing conditions. Although the angular, rough texture of crushed gangue does provide good mechanical interlocking with the surrounding paste, that advantage cannot compensate for the discontinuous, mechanically feeble boundary that forms where aggregate meets binder. When water finds its way into these surface-connected defects, differences in pore structure and stiffness between the aggregate and the paste concentrate stress near the interface and invite cracks to begin exactly where the material can least afford them.</p>
<p>The research team attacked this weakness with three humble modifiers, all readily available in coal-mining regions: sodium silicate, silica fume, and limestone powder. Each works through a different route. Sodium silicate can penetrate and seal open pores and microdefects, while its soluble silicate species participate in reactions near the aggregate surface that improve interfacial continuity. Silica fume, an ultrafine powder of nearly pure amorphous silica, physically fills surface irregularities and interfacial voids and can later react pozzolanically to refine the surrounding cementitious products. Limestone powder contributes mainly through particle packing, heterogeneous nucleation of hydration products, and carbonate-related interactions with aluminate-bearing phases. The researchers applied each modifier at dosages of 2, 3, and 4 percent by aggregate mass, dry-mixing the powder onto washed, surface-dried gangue particles before the concrete was batched.</p>
<p>The concrete itself was deliberately unconventional. Instead of ordinary Portland cement, the team used a coal-based solid-waste binder containing 50 percent benchmark cement, 25 percent calcined coal gangue powder, 10 percent limestone powder, 10 percent fly ash, and 5 percent flue gas desulfurization gypsum, a formulation that turns more mining and power-plant waste into a useful building material. The calcined gangue powder was produced by heating ground raw gangue first to 500 degrees Celsius and then to 800 degrees, activating its aluminosilicate content. All mixtures shared a fixed water-to-binder ratio of 0.40 and an aggregate-to-binder ratio of 1.50, so that the only variable was the type and dosage of the surface coating. Compressive strength screening at 3, 7, and 28 days identified the best dosage for each modifier: 4 percent sodium silicate, 3 percent silica fume, and 4 percent limestone powder.</p>
<p>The most revealing part of the study came from nanoindentation, a technique that presses a microscopic diamond tip into a polished specimen surface to measure local stiffness point by point. The researchers ran indentation paths of 25 points, spaced 10 micrometers apart, across the aggregate, the ITZ, and the paste on either side. In every mixture, the modulus held steady at roughly 50 to 55 gigapascals inside the aggregate, plunged within the interfacial zone, bottomed out near 110 micrometers from the boundary, and then recovered toward the paste. But the depth of that plunge depended strongly on the treatment. The unmodified concrete reached a minimum of about 18 gigapascals; limestone powder raised it to 22, silica fume to 26, and sodium silicate to 33 gigapascals, the latter producing the smoothest mechanical transition across the entire interface.</p>
<p>Scanning electron microscopy gave those numbers a visible structure. The unmodified interface showed coarse residual particles, loose agglomerates, open pores, and discontinuous patches. Sodium silicate treatment, by contrast, produced abundant flocculent, fibrous, and fine granular products distributed around the aggregate surface, yielding a comparatively continuous and compact boundary. Silica fume yielded a more uniform fine-grained morphology, though some spherical residual particles remained visible. Limestone powder produced a heterogeneous picture, with compact product-rich regions coexisting alongside loose, porous zones and needle-like, plate-like reaction products morphologically consistent with carbonate-bearing AFm-type phases such as monocarboaluminate and hemicarboaluminate, though the authors caution that SEM alone cannot confirm phase identity.</p>
<p>Then came the durability trials, framed in an unusual but physically precise vocabulary. Rather than the conventional labels of wet-dry and freeze-thaw cycling, the researchers speak of liquid-vapor and liquid-solid phase cycling, emphasizing what the pore water itself is doing. In the liquid-vapor test, specimens spent 8 hours immersed in water, 8 hours drying naturally, and 8 hours in a 75-degree-Celsius oven, repeating the absorption-evaporation cycle up to 30 times. In the liquid-solid test, a rapid freeze-thaw apparatus swung the specimen core temperature between minus 35 and plus 20 degrees Celsius every 5 hours, forcing pore water to freeze, redistribute, and melt again and again. The results diverged sharply. After 30 liquid-vapor cycles, silica fume-modified concrete lost only 9.3 percent of its compressive strength, dropping from 27.9 to 25.3 megapascals, while the unmodified control lost 18.8 percent. Freezing proved far more brutal: after 15 liquid-solid cycles, the unmodified and limestone-modified specimens had lost roughly 70 and 67 percent of their strength, and by 30 cycles both had collapsed beyond the point of valid testing.</p>
<p>The survivors told the most important story. Sodium silicate-modified concrete, which had not been the best performer in the wet-dry regime, proved the champion of freeze-thaw resistance, retaining the highest residual strength, 9.7 megapascals after 30 cycles, and enough structural integrity to keep testing. Post-cycling nanoindentation after 15 cycles confirmed that the damage was concentrated precisely where the team expected: the aggregate region barely changed, the paste weakened moderately, and the ITZ deteriorated most severely. Silica fume&#8217;s interface lost only 3.8 percent of its minimum modulus under liquid-vapor cycling, while sodium silicate&#8217;s interface retained both the highest absolute modulus and the smallest relative loss, 24.8 percent, under liquid-solid cycling. The lesson is that different coatings build different kinds of interfacial quality, and the best choice depends on the environment the concrete will face.</p>
<p>The mechanistic explanation ties the whole picture together. Surface modification does not eliminate water-induced deterioration; it delays its initiation, localization, and propagation within the ITZ. Silica fume&#8217;s fine particles plug the small voids where moisture redistribution would otherwise nucleate microcracks, making it ideal for hot, drying climates with repeated wetting. Sodium silicate, supplying soluble silicate species into an alkaline local environment, appears to foster a more continuous, product-rich interfacial fabric that can distribute the internal pressures generated by ice formation and delay debonding and crack coalescence, making it the better choice for cold regions. Limestone powder, with its more heterogeneous product distribution, offered the least protection against either regime. The authors note that water-migration pathways were inferred from combined macroscopic, microscopic, and nanoindentation evidence rather than directly measured, and that local alkalinity changes and individual reaction products were not quantified.</p>
<p>What makes this work resonate beyond the laboratory is its double dividend: it converts an environmental liability into infrastructure material while simultaneously making that material tougher than anyone expected. Because the binder itself is built from calcined coal gangue, fly ash, and desulfurization gypsum, an entire concrete could one day be assembled almost entirely from industrial byproducts, with nothing more exotic than sodium silicate, silica fume, or ground limestone standing between a weak interface and a durable one. For coal regions searching for a future after mining, and for a construction sector under pressure to cut its carbon and resource footprint, the humble act of coating a waste rock particle before it enters a mixer may prove to be one of the most consequential steps in sustainable materials engineering.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Surface modification of coal gangue aggregate to strengthen the interfacial transition zone in coal-based solid-waste concrete</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Surface modified coal gangue aggregate in coal-based solid-waste concrete: ITZ strengthening and resistance to water phase-transition cycling</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Yu, C., Li, R., Chang, J., &amp; Zhang, T. (2026). Surface modified coal gangue aggregate in coal-based solid-waste concrete: ITZ strengthening and resistance to water phase-transition cycling. <em>Case Studies in Construction Materials, 25</em>, Article e06572. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06572" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06572</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06572" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06572</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> coal gangue, concrete, interfacial transition zone, surface modification, sodium silicate, silica fume, limestone powder, freeze-thaw resistance, solid waste recycling, nanoindentation, sustainable construction, coal-based binder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">228935</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oyster Shell Waste and Problem Soil Turned Into Superhydrophobic Slope Barrier</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/oyster-shell-waste-and-problem-soil-turned-into-superhydrophobic-slope-barrier/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coastal waste material utilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crack grouting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly landslide prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly slope reinforcement solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expansive soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geological disaster mitigation techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotechnical engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative approaches to shallow landslide prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landslide prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-carbon alternative to cement grouting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montmorillonite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[octadecylamine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic waxy molecules for water-repellent materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oyster shell waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oyster shell waste recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainfall infiltration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slope stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid waste recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superhydrophobic slope barrier development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superhydrophobic soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable slope stabilization methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment of expansive clay soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use of discarded oyster shells in geotechnical engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water repellency]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=219434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in Guangxi have converted waste oyster shells and problematic expansive soil into a durable superhydrophobic filling material that blocks rainfall infiltration in cracked slopes and could replace carbon-intensive cement grouting.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the subtropical coast of Qinzhou, in China&#8217;s Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, two unwanted piles of material keep growing: mountains of discarded oyster shells left behind by a booming aquaculture industry, and fields of expansive clay soil that swells and cracks with every change in moisture. A new study published in Environmental Earth Sciences shows that these two local liabilities, when combined with a small dose of a waxy organic molecule, can be transformed into a durable, water-repelling filling material that keeps rainwater out of cracked rock slopes. The work, led by Song Yang and colleagues at Beibu Gulf University, offers a low-carbon alternative to conventional cement grouting and could reshape how engineers approach shallow landslide prevention.</p>
<p>The problem the researchers set out to solve is one of the most common triggers of geological disaster worldwide. When sandstone slopes develop vertical fissures, rainwater penetrates deep into the cracks and dramatically reduces the shear strength of the rock mass, setting the stage for catastrophic sliding. The standard remedy, filling cracks with cement grout or chemical slurries, works only temporarily and comes with heavy costs: high energy consumption, substantial carbon emissions, and the risk of secondary pollution. Cement-based fillers are also poorly suited to shallow, low-stress surface layers, where their expense and rigidity offer little ecological or economic advantage.</p>
<p>The team&#8217;s insight was to look at what the region already had in abundance. Oyster shells, composed mainly of calcium carbonate, are piled along the shores of the Beibu Gulf, where open stacking and landfilling consume land and threaten coastal environments. Expansive soil, meanwhile, blankets much of Guangxi and is notorious in geotechnical circles for its swelling-shrinkage behavior under alternating wet and dry conditions, which causes foundation deformation and shallow slope collapse. All three sampling sites, the cracked sandstone slope, the expansive soil deposit, and the shell-strewn coastline, lie within 30.7 kilometers of one another, meaning the raw materials for crack repair can be sourced locally, cutting transport costs and improving sustainability.</p>
<p>The recipe is deceptively simple. Crushed oyster shell powder and sieved expansive soil were mixed with octadecylamine, or ODA, an alkylamine compound with a long hydrophobic carbon chain, and heated to 70 degrees Celsius for an hour, just above ODA&#8217;s melting point. In its liquid state, the molecule spreads easily over soil particles. The researchers tested ODA dosages of 0.8, 1.6, 2.4, and 3.2 percent by mass of dry soil, and oyster shell powder contents of 10, 20, and 30 percent, screening each combination through standardized water-repellency and swelling tests.</p>
<p>Water repellency was assessed with two complementary measures. The water droplet penetration time, or WDPT, records how long a standard droplet sits on the soil surface before soaking in, while the contact angle measures the angle between the droplet and the solid surface. At the lowest ODA dosage of 0.8 percent, performance was erratic: contact angles swung from 86.7 degrees down to 24.4 degrees over twelve drying-wetting cycles, and penetration times fluctuated between 91 and 409 seconds. At 2.4 percent ODA, however, the material achieved durable superhydrophobicity, maintaining contact angles above 90 degrees and WDPT values exceeding 3600 seconds, the threshold for extremely water-repellent soil, throughout all twelve accelerated wet-dry cycles. Because 3.2 percent ODA performed no better, 2.4 percent was selected as the optimal, most economical dosage.</p>
<p>The oyster shell powder plays a different but equally important role. As an inert, coarser-grained filler, it dilutes the swelling montmorillonite clay minerals and occupies pore space within the soil. The free swelling rate of the expansive soil dropped from 92 percent in its raw state to 48 percent with 30 percent shell powder added. Shell powder alone also reduced the surface crack ratio after drying, from 25.4 percent for untreated soil to 19.3 percent. But the real breakthrough came from the synergy between the two additives: when 2.4 percent ODA was combined with 30 percent shell powder, the desiccation crack ratio plummeted to 5.47 percent, a 78.5 percent reduction compared with untreated expansive soil, far outperforming either additive on its own.</p>
<p>To understand why the composite works so well, the team turned to a battery of microscopic techniques. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the sharp-edged, porous lamellar structure of raw expansive soil became coated with a continuous amorphous film after ODA treatment, with particle edges softened and micropores blocked. X-ray diffraction showed the montmorillonite basal diffraction peak shifting to a lower angle, indicating that ODA&#8217;s long alkyl chains had intercalated into the clay&#8217;s interlayer spaces, expanding the basal spacing by about 9.5 percent, from roughly 1.47 to 1.61 nanometers. This nanoscale intercalation, confirmed by infrared spectroscopy through new CH2 absorption peaks and weakened interlayer water bands, fundamentally converts the hydrophilic clay mineral into a water-repellent one. Thermogravimetric analysis added further evidence, showing reduced water loss in modified samples and a characteristic decomposition peak of ODA&#8217;s organic chains near 320 degrees Celsius.</p>
<p>Mechanical testing reinforced the practical value of the modification. In unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests after twelve drying-wetting cycles, raw expansive soil lost cohesion steadily, falling from 20.4 kilopascals to 14.3 kilopascals, while the composite material retained far higher strength values, with differences between the two reaching as much as 220.5 kilopascals at the eighth cycle. Because water barely infiltrates the hydrophobic composite, the wetting and drying that normally degrades clay strength simply cannot reach the material&#8217;s interior, preserving its shear parameters over time. Soil-water characteristic curves also showed that at low water contents, below 20 percent, the modified soil sustains significantly higher matric suction, since only its large pores participate in water migration while the small hydrophobic pores resist saturation.</p>
<p>The decisive test came from a 134-day field-scale model experiment. The team built two artificial model cracks, each 150 centimeters long, 20 centimeters wide, and 100 centimeters deep, filled one with untreated expansive soil and the other with the composite material, and instrumented both with moisture sensors at depths of 5, 25, 45, 65, and 85 centimeters, recording data every two hours through both rainy and dry seasons totaling 1055 millimeters of rainfall. The contrast was stark. In the untreated crack, a 210-millimeter-per-day storm raised saturation at 25 centimeters depth from 25.4 to 77.2 percent within 13 hours, and within roughly 60 hours water had percolated the full 85-centimeter depth, eventually saturating the bottom layer completely. Saturation fluctuations across depths ranged from 34.2 to 75.1 percentage points. In the composite-filled crack, by comparison, fluctuations never exceeded 7.2 percentage points at any depth, and only 2.2 points at 85 centimeters, demonstrating that rainfall had essentially no influence on the material&#8217;s interior.</p>
<p>The researchers describe the approach as treating hazards with waste: a surface barrier of hydrophobic composite material placed at the top of a crack intercepts rainfall recharge before it can penetrate, converting two problematic local waste streams into a value-added geotechnical product. Beyond the engineering performance, the environmental accounting is compelling, since the method avoids the carbon emissions of cement grout production while reducing the methane emissions and land occupation associated with shell dumping. With raw materials that are abundant, cheap, and locally available, and with the 134-day field observation validating the laboratory&#8217;s accelerated wet-dry cycling as a realistic proxy for natural conditions, the technique offers a genuinely green route to shallow landslide prevention, one that could be replicated wherever coastal shell waste and expansive soils coexist.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Development of a hydrophobic crack-filling material from waste oyster shells and expansive soil for slope stabilization</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> From waste to a watershed-scale solution: Transforming oyster shell and expansive soil into a hydrophobic barrier for intercepting rainfall recharge and stabilizing slopes</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> From waste to a watershed-scale solution: Transforming oyster shell and expansive soil into a hydrophobic barrier for intercepting rainfall recharge and stabilizing slopes. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-026-13149-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-026-13149-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-026-13149-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s12665-026-13149-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> oyster shell waste, expansive soil, octadecylamine, superhydrophobic soil, slope stability, landslide prevention, rainfall infiltration, montmorillonite, geotechnical engineering, solid waste recycling, water repellency, crack grouting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">219434</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nano-silica turns industrial red mud waste into stronger, greener cement</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/nano-silica-turns-industrial-red-mud-waste-into-stronger-greener-cement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alkaline waste treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aluminum industry waste management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compressive strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly cement additives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green building materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydration kinetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial waste valorization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative cement production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mechanical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano-silica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano-silica in cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pore structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pozzolanic reaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red mud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red mud environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red mud reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid waste recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strengthening concrete with nano-silica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplementary cementitious materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste-to-resource conversion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=195267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Adding small doses of nano-silica transforms red mud, one of the world's largest industrial waste streams, into a strength-boosting component of cement while keeping hazardous leaching in check.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, the global aluminium industry churns out more than 150 million tonnes of red mud, a highly alkaline sludge left over when bauxite ore is processed into alumina. Stockpiles around the world have now swelled to an estimated 7 to 8 billion tonnes, yet fewer than 5 percent of this waste is ever reused. Rainwater percolating through open-air ponds produces leachate with a pH between 10 and 12.5, threatening soil and groundwater on a massive scale. A new study published in Case Studies in Construction Materials offers a strikingly simple remedy: sprinkle in a tiny amount of nano-silica and red mud can become a high-performance ingredient of cement itself, rather than an environmental liability.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Yifan Li and colleagues at institutions working with Bayer-process red mud from Wenshan in Yunnan, China, set out to solve the two problems that have long prevented red mud from replacing ordinary Portland cement at scale. The first is its intrinsically low reactivity: red mud contains almost none of the highly reactive calcium silicate clinker minerals that give cement its binding power, so substituting it for cement simply dilutes the mixture and weakens the resulting concrete. The second is its high alkalinity, which interferes with the delicate chemistry of cement hydration. Previous remedies, such as thermal treatment, aggressive grinding, or full alkali activation, tend to be expensive, energy-hungry, or only partially effective.</p>
<p>Nano-silica offered a chemically elegant alternative. Because it consists almost entirely of amorphous silicon dioxide, the same chemical family as the calcium-silicate-hydrate gel that cements everything together, it can participate directly in the pozzolanic reaction, consuming calcium hydroxide released by cement hydration and converting it into additional binding gel. Its particles, averaging just 30 nanometres with a specific surface area of roughly 200 square metres per gram, also serve as thousands of microscopic nucleation platforms onto which early hydration products can precipitate. The question was whether these benefits would survive in the hostile, chemically complex environment that red mud creates.</p>
<p>To find out, the researchers prepared nine paste formulations, combining red mud replacement levels of 0, 10 and 20 percent with nano-silica dosages of 0, 1 and 3 percent, all at a fixed water-to-binder ratio of 0.3. The red mud, milled for 15 minutes in a planetary ball mill, was remarkably fine, with a median particle size of 3.06 micrometres, about a quarter that of the cement, and a specific surface area more than twice as high. Nano-silica was dispersed ultrasonically in the mixing water before blending. Specimens were cured at 20 degrees Celsius and 98 percent relative humidity and tested at 3, 7 and 28 days for compressive strength, with six replicates per mixture analysed statistically using two-way analysis of variance.</p>
<p>The results were unambiguous. Adding red mud alone reduced strength at every age, and the penalty grew worse as the replacement level rose: at 20 percent substitution, the 28-day strength fell from 59.3 megapascals for the plain paste to 48.9 megapascals. But nano-silica clawed much of that loss back. At 20 percent red mud, the 3 percent nano-silica mix reached 54.9 megapascals at 28 days, a statistically significant gain of 6 megapascals over the red-mud-only mix, with adjusted p-values below 0.001 at all three curing ages. More telling was the cement-normalised strength, which divides measured strength by the actual cement content to strip out the dilution effect. By this measure, the 20 percent red mud plus 3 percent nano-silica blend used its cement 34.58 percent more efficiently than plain paste at 3 days and 20.23 percent more efficiently at 28 days, evidence that the combination genuinely improves the chemistry rather than merely offsetting dilution.</p>
<p>The microscopic evidence explains why. X-ray diffraction and thermogravimetric analysis showed no new crystalline phases, but revealed steady consumption of calcium hydroxide in the nano-silica mixes, the fingerprint of ongoing pozzolanic reaction. The 3 percent dosage cut calcium hydroxide content by roughly 17 to 20 percent relative to the red-mud-only system at 3 and 28 days, while mass loss associated with hydrate gels rose 8.2 percent at early age, confirming accelerated product formation. Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance, which maps pore sizes through hydrogen relaxation times, showed that nano-silica shifted the pore network decisively toward harmless gel pores: at 3 days the harmless pore volume nearly doubled or more, and by 28 days the higher dosage produced the densest structure of all, as secondary gel generated by sustained pozzolanic reaction filled the voids left by early hydration.</p>
<p>Isothermal calorimetry and the Krstulovic-Dabic kinetic model added a dynamic picture. Red mud alone lowered the peak heat release and extended the induction period, symptoms of its dilution and low reactivity, and delayed the secondary aluminate-related exotherm to about 20 hours as reactive aluminium and silicon species dissolved slowly from the mud. Nano-silica reversed these trends, raising the nucleation-and-growth rate constant and the interfacial reaction constant while slightly lowering the diffusion constant, a signature of a matrix so dense that water and ions struggle to move through it. Backscattered electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy confirmed the visual outcome: after 28 days, the nano-silica-modified blend showed a more continuous, homogeneous matrix, with residual iron- and titanium-rich red mud particles embedded in a Ca-Si-Al hydrate gel whose calcium-to-silicon ratio had drifted slightly downward, exactly as expected when reactive silica joins the reaction.</p>
<p>Environmental safety, often the Achilles heel of red mud reuse, also held up. Leaching tests on 28-day specimens following the Chinese HJ/T 299-2007 protocol showed arsenic, lead and nickel below detection limits in both mixes, chromium at just 3.8 micrograms per litre, and copper falling from 3.6 micrograms per litre to below detection once nano-silica was added. Every measured element sat comfortably beneath Class III groundwater quality limits, indicating that the mechanical upgrades did not come at the cost of mobilising hazardous elements from the waste.</p>
<p>Economics remain the honest caveat. Replacing 20 percent of cement with red mud cut the direct binder cost by 10.5 percent, to 285.29 yuan per tonne, even after including transport and milling expenses. But the 3 percent nano-silica addition drove the total to 1701.79 yuan per tonne, with the nanomaterial alone accounting for roughly 1404 yuan, so the additive only makes sense where its strength gains are genuinely needed or where nano-silica prices fall with scale. The authors also note limitations: workability and setting behaviour were not measured, phase analysis remained qualitative, and long-term durability tests such as freeze-thaw and sulfate exposure are still to come. Even so, the study delivers a compelling proof of concept that a cheap industrial nuisance and a well-chosen nanomaterial can team up to make cement stronger, denser and cleaner, turning one of the world&#8217;s largest waste streams into part of the solution rather than part of the problem.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Nano-silica modification of red mud-cement composite binders to improve mechanical properties and hydration kinetics</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Effect of nano-silica on the mechanical properties and hydration kinetics of red mud-cement based composite cementitious materials</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Li, Y., Guo, R., Pan, T., Zhu, Y., Tang, X., Fu, C., &amp; Li, Y. (2026). Effect of nano-silica on the mechanical properties and hydration kinetics of red mud-cement based composite cementitious materials. <em>Case Studies in Construction Materials, 25</em>, Article e06502. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06502" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06502</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06502" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06502</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> red mud, nano-silica, cement, hydration kinetics, compressive strength, pore structure, pozzolanic reaction, solid waste recycling, supplementary cementitious materials, sustainable construction, Effect, mechanical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">195267</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Materials Reports: Solid Waste and Ecomaterials Journal Invites Submissions</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/materials-reports-solid-waste-and-ecomaterials-journal-invites-submissions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 02:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural residue utilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction debris reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecomaterials development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact reduction in waste processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazardous waste management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative waste transformation processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-carbon material innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mineral resource recovery from waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining and industrial waste valorization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid waste recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste-to-resource technologies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/materials-reports-solid-waste-and-ecomaterials-journal-invites-submissions/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new scientific journal is inviting researchers to rethink one of the planet’s most persistent problems: what happens to solid waste after it leaves the construction site, factory, mine, power plant, or farm. Materials Reports: Solidwaste and Ecomaterials, known as MRSE, began publication in 2025 with a mission to transform discarded materials into useful, safe, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new scientific journal is inviting researchers to rethink one of the planet’s most persistent problems: what happens to solid waste after it leaves the construction site, factory, mine, power plant, or farm. Materials Reports: Solidwaste and Ecomaterials, known as MRSE, began publication in 2025 with a mission to transform discarded materials into useful, safe, and high-value products. Published by Tsinghua University Press through its SciOpen platform, the journal is welcoming submissions covering original research, reviews, progress reports, and communications. Its central idea is both scientifically ambitious and urgently practical: waste should not be treated only as a disposal challenge, but as a secondary resource that can be engineered into new materials for a lower-carbon future.</p>
<p>The journal focuses on the science and technology required to convert a remarkably diverse range of wastes into functional ecomaterials. These include construction and demolition debris, mining tailings, coal combustion byproducts, metallurgical slags, industrial hazardous wastes, and agricultural residues. Although these materials differ substantially in chemical composition, particle size, mineral structure, and contamination risk, many contain valuable components such as aluminosilicates, calcium-bearing phases, iron oxides, carbon, and other mineral resources. Through processes including separation, grinding, thermal treatment, chemical activation, blending, and mineral carbonation, researchers can alter their physical and chemical properties. The goal is to produce materials that are unhazardous, durable, affordable, and suitable for applications ranging from infrastructure and construction to environmental remediation.</p>
<p>One important research pathway highlighted by MRSE is the development of low-carbon cementitious systems and alkali-activated binders. Conventional Portland cement is widely used because it provides strength and durability, but its manufacture requires high-temperature processing and contributes significantly to global carbon dioxide emissions. Waste-derived binders offer a possible alternative by using reactive industrial residues, such as fly ash, slag, and other aluminosilicate-rich materials. When these wastes are combined with alkaline activators, their internal structures can dissolve and reorganize into binding phases capable of hardening at ambient or moderately controlled conditions. The resulting materials may reduce the need for clinker while also diverting large waste streams from landfills and storage ponds. Their performance, however, depends on careful control of composition, curing, durability, and potential leaching.</p>
<p>MRSE also welcomes research on mine backfill materials, an area where waste valorization could directly support safer and more sustainable mining. Mine backfill is placed underground to stabilize excavated areas, control ground movement, and improve worker safety. It can be produced from tailings, waste rock, metallurgical residues, cementitious additives, and other industrial byproducts. Designing an effective backfill requires engineers to balance compressive strength, flowability, setting time, permeability, and long-term chemical stability. If properly engineered, waste-based backfill can reduce the volume of tailings stored at the surface while replacing part of the virgin materials traditionally required for underground support. Researchers must also examine how toxic elements behave under changing groundwater conditions, since a material that performs well mechanically must also remain environmentally secure over decades.</p>
<p>Another technology receiving attention is mineral carbonation, which uses chemical reactions to lock carbon dioxide into stable carbonate minerals. Many alkaline wastes, including certain slags, mine residues, and cement-related materials, contain calcium or magnesium that can react with carbon dioxide. In theory, this process can provide two environmental benefits at once: it can consume industrial waste and permanently store carbon in a solid form. The reaction may also improve the durability and dimensional stability of some waste-derived products. Scientists are investigating methods to accelerate carbonation, including controlled gas exposure, moisture management, particle-size reduction, and integrated curing systems. The challenge is to ensure that the energy and infrastructure needed for processing do not cancel out the environmental gains. MRSE provides a platform for studies that measure both technical performance and full life-cycle impacts.</p>
<p>The journal’s editors are particularly interested in the growing connection between artificial intelligence, data science, and waste valorization. Waste streams are often highly variable, making it difficult to predict how a particular residue will behave in a cementitious mixture, composite, or ceramic product. Machine-learning models can analyze large datasets containing chemical composition, mineralogy, particle characteristics, processing conditions, strength development, and durability results. These models may help researchers identify promising formulations before conducting extensive laboratory testing. Artificial intelligence could also assist with automated sorting, where computer-vision systems distinguish plastics, metals, concrete, glass, and contaminated materials on rapidly moving conveyor belts. In material design, data-driven methods may reveal combinations of wastes and additives that would be difficult to discover through conventional trial and error.</p>
<p>The practical value of such research extends beyond laboratories and academic publications. MRSE is inviting reports from industry describing successful projects in which solid wastes have been converted into materials for real construction or engineering applications. These projects could provide crucial evidence about scalability, supply-chain reliability, regulatory approval, cost, maintenance, and performance under weather and loading conditions. A material that works in a controlled laboratory experiment may face very different challenges when produced thousands of tonnes at a time. Variations in waste composition, transportation distances, processing energy, worker safety, and local environmental regulations can determine whether a promising technology becomes commercially viable. By encouraging technically structured industry reports, the journal aims to connect scientific discovery with the complex realities of deploying circular-economy technologies.</p>
<p>The broader ambition behind MRSE is to help establish a new framework for materials science based on secondary resources rather than continuous extraction of virgin raw materials. The built environment consumes enormous quantities of minerals, aggregates, cement, metals, and energy, while simultaneously generating vast amounts of waste. A circular approach seeks to keep these resources in use for as long as possible through reuse, recycling, recovery, and redesign. This does not mean every waste stream can or should be transformed into a new product. Some materials contain persistent contaminants or require more energy to process than the resulting product is worth. For that reason, reliable assessment must include toxicology, life-cycle analysis, carbon accounting, durability testing, and end-of-life planning. The journal’s stated objective is to support solutions that are not merely technically possible, but genuinely beneficial for ecosystems and communities.</p>
<p>MRSE is led by Dongmin Wang of China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), who serves as founding Editor-in-Chief. The Co-Editors-in-Chief are Chi Sun Poon of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hongzhi Cui of Shenzhen University, and Zuhua Zhang of Tongji University. Peiliang Shen of Wuhan University of Technology serves as an Associate Editor. According to the editorial team, manuscripts are handled through the ScholarOne submission system and undergo peer review intended to be fair, timely, and constructive. Accepted papers are expected to appear online as “Just Accepted” articles within two weeks through SciOpen. The journal is also waiving article processing charges until the end of 2026, a policy designed to make publication more accessible to researchers worldwide and to encourage contributions from both established laboratories and emerging research groups.</p>
<p>By bringing together waste chemistry, civil engineering, environmental science, materials design, artificial intelligence, and industrial practice, Materials Reports: Solidwaste and Ecomaterials is positioning itself at the intersection of several fast-moving scientific fields. Its success will depend on whether published research can move beyond the language of waste reduction to demonstrate measurable improvements in carbon emissions, resource efficiency, safety, cost, and long-term performance. Yet the opportunity is substantial. Tailings, slags, ash, demolition debris, and agricultural residues are often seen as symbols of industrial excess; with the right science, they could become feedstocks for a more circular built environment. As cities expand and pressure grows on landfills, mines, and climate targets, the materials discarded today may become some of the most important ingredients in tomorrow’s infrastructure.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>:<br />
Conversion of solid wastes into safe, functional, valuable, and environmentally friendly ecomaterials.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>:<br />
A New Journal Aims to Turn the World’s Solid Waste into Tomorrow’s Ecomaterials</p>
<p><strong>Web References</strong>:<br />
https://www.sciopen.com/journal/3078-4093<br />
https://www.sciopen.com/journal/join_journal/about_journal?id=1834035204970827778&#038;issn=3078-4093<br />
https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/mrse</p>
<p><strong>References</strong>:<br />
Materials Reports: Solidwaste and Ecomaterials, Tsinghua University Press and SciOpen.</p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>:<br />
Materials Reports: Solidwaste and Ecomaterials</p>
<h4><strong>Keywords</strong></h4>
<p>solid waste, ecomaterials, waste valorization, circular economy, sustainable materials, low-carbon cement, alkali-activated binders, mine backfill, mineral carbonation, artificial intelligence, materials engineering, environmental engineering, zero-waste society</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">180741</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
