<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>soil texture &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/soil-texture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 01:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Global Farming Overhaul Boosts Microbial Carbon in World&#8217;s Cropland Soils</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/global-farming-overhaul-boosts-microbial-carbon-in-worlds-cropland-soils/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 01:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aridity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate resilience through soil microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation tillage benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop diversification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop diversification effects on soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop residue management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[croplands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drylands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental management and sustainable farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global soil health assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated fertilization impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial activity indicators in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic amendments and microbial biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer-reviewed soil science studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbial biomass carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soil microbial carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable land management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable land management practices]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=214035</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A global synthesis of 221 studies finds that sustainable land management practices raise soil microbial biomass carbon by an average of 23.5 percent in croplands, with integrated fertilization and crop diversification proving most effective across all aridity zones.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath every harvested field lies an invisible workforce that determines whether agriculture thrives or declines. Soil microorganisms, bacteria and fungi packed into every handful of earth, store carbon in their living cells and drive the nutrient cycles on which crops depend. A new global synthesis published in Environmental Management suggests that the way farmers manage their land can substantially enlarge this microbial carbon reservoir, offering a surprisingly powerful lever for soil health and climate resilience at the same time.</p>
<p>The study, led by Demesew A. Mhiret of Bahir Dar University and Tottori University together with an international team of soil scientists, compiled data from 221 peer-reviewed studies spanning 1988 to 2024. The researchers evaluated six categories of sustainable land management practices in croplands worldwide: organic amendments such as manure and compost, inorganic fertilization, integrated fertilization combining organic and mineral inputs, conservation tillage, crop diversification, and crop residue management. Their goal was to quantify how each practice affects soil microbial biomass carbon, or SMBC, a widely used indicator of microbial activity and overall soil health.</p>
<p>The headline finding is striking. Across the compiled global database, treatment plots under sustainable management exhibited on average 23.5 percent higher SMBC concentration than control plots. Every practice category except inorganic fertilization was associated with higher microbial biomass carbon, and inorganic fertilization alone showed a slight negative effect. In other words, feeding soils with mineral fertilizer alone does not nourish the microbial community, while practices that add organic matter, diversify crops, or disturb the soil less tend to build microbial populations and the carbon they hold.</p>
<p>SMBC matters because it functions as the living engine of the soil. Microbial biomass represents a small but dynamic fraction of total soil organic carbon, yet it controls decomposition, nutrient mineralization, and the formation of stable soil aggregates. When microbial biomass declines, soils lose fertility, structure, and resilience to drought. Because microbial cells turn over relatively quickly, SMBC responds to management changes faster than bulk soil organic carbon, making it a sensitive early-warning indicator for land degradation or recovery.</p>
<p>The synthesis also revealed that environmental context strongly modulates these effects. The degree of SMBC response varied primarily with aridity and soil texture. Subgroup analyses confirmed that soil texture, aridity, and management practices each significantly affected microbial biomass carbon. However, the researchers observed notable combined effects on SMBC only when two environmental factors changed at the same time. This suggests that while sustainable land management can buffer the harms of single stressors, the simultaneous action of multiple stressors, for instance high aridity combined with unfavorable texture, can substantially alter microbial carbon dynamics in ways that are harder to predict.</p>
<p>Two practices stood out for their consistency. Integrated fertilization, which blends organic inputs with mineral fertilizers, and crop diversification proved particularly effective across all aridity classes, from humid to dry regions. This is a meaningful result for dryland agriculture, where water scarcity and organic matter depletion often undermine soil biology. Prior research has shown that increasing aridity reduces soil microbial diversity and abundance globally, so finding management strategies that lift microbial biomass even in drier climates carries considerable practical weight for the world&#8217;s semi-arid farming regions.</p>
<p>Scaling the results from plots to the planet, the team used a compiled dataset and an extrapolation approach to estimate that adopting sustainable land management practices could be associated with roughly a 27 percent increase in global SMBC stocks. That corresponds to approximately 322 million tonnes of microbial carbon across the world&#8217;s croplands. The authors are careful to caution that this estimate should be interpreted with restraint, because data coverage is spatially heterogeneous and the extrapolation relies on generalized assumptions about bulk density and soil depth that introduce uncertainty. Even so, the order of magnitude underscores how much living carbon is at stake in everyday farm decisions.</p>
<p>The implications extend beyond soil biology into climate policy. Soil microbial biomass is intimately linked to the stabilization of soil organic matter, and agricultural soils represent one of the few carbon pools that land managers can deliberately influence within a human timescale. Practices that enlarge the microbial carbon pool tend also to enhance carbon sequestration, reduce erosion, and improve water retention. International initiatives on soil health, including efforts by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the European Commission&#8217;s soil mission, have emphasized the need for measurable indicators of soil biological quality, and SMBC fits that role well.</p>
<p>For farmers and policymakers, the central message is that one-size-fits-all prescriptions will not work. The authors highlight the importance of developing context-specific sustainable land management strategies tailored to local aridity, soil texture, and cropping systems. In practice, that could mean prioritizing manure or compost applications where organic resources are available, combining them with judicious mineral fertilization rather than relying on either input alone, diversifying rotations, retaining crop residues on the field, and minimizing tillage. Such integrated approaches appear to deliver the largest gains in microbial carbon across the widest range of environments.</p>
<p>The study also exposes gaps that future research must fill. Data coverage remains uneven across regions, particularly in parts of Africa, South America, and Central Asia where cropland degradation pressures are acute. Long-term experiments tracking SMBC under combined practices are scarce, and the interactions between multiple environmental stressors deserve closer study. Nevertheless, by synthesizing more than three decades of field measurements into a coherent global picture, the work provides land managers, policymakers, and farmers with evidence that rebuilding the living fraction of soil carbon is achievable, measurable, and central to creating more resilient and sustainable agricultural systems worldwide.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of sustainable land management practices on soil microbial biomass carbon in global croplands</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Sustainable Land Management Practices Enhance Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon in Global Croplands</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Mhiret, D. A., Tsunekawa, A., Haregeweyn, N., Fenta, A. A., Sultan, D., Abe, T., Kassa, S. B., Hailu, Y. B., Endalamaw, B., Abebe, G., &amp; Meshesha, T. M. (2026). Sustainable Land Management Practices Enhance Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon in Global Croplands. <em>Environmental Management, 76</em>(10), Article 329. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-026-02631-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-026-02631-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-026-02631-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00267-026-02631-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> soil microbial biomass carbon, sustainable land management, croplands, soil health, meta-analysis, aridity, soil texture, integrated fertilization, crop diversification, organic amendments, carbon sequestration, drylands</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">214035</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forest Structure and Soil Texture Steer Carbon Storage in Nepal&#8217;s Community Forests</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/forest-structure-and-soil-texture-steer-carbon-storage-in-nepals-community-forests/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[above-ground forest architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropogenic disturbance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basal area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[below-ground soil organic carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotic and abiotic factors in carbon storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canopy cover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon measurement in forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy and forest management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community forests in Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest carbon storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest structure influence on climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest types in Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Himalayan forest ecosystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDD+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shorea robusta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil and vegetation interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil organic carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil texture impact on carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stand structure]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=206559</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A study of Nepal's mid-hill community forests finds that stand structure, especially basal area and canopy cover, drives vegetation carbon storage while soil texture, particularly silt and sand content, regulates soil organic carbon.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep in the mid-hills of Nepal, where community-managed forests blanket steep slopes above the Pokhara Valley, scientists have uncovered a deceptively simple truth about how forests lock away carbon: what matters most above ground is the architecture of the trees themselves, while what matters below ground is the texture of the soil. A new study published in Discover Forests provides one of the most integrated assessments to date of the biotic and abiotic forces governing carbon storage in community forests, and its findings carry immediate consequences for climate policy in the Himalayan region and beyond.</p>
<p>The research, led by Binayak Poudel of the Institute of Forestry at Tribhuvan University, together with colleagues in Canada and Nepal, quantified both vegetation carbon and soil organic carbon across three dominant forest types: Shorea robusta (sal), Pinus roxburghii (chir pine), and mixed broadleaved forests. Working in two community forests in Kaski District—the 162-hectare Sityum Kasyari and Simsar Patleswara Jukepani Community Forest and the 14-hectare Banpale Community Forest—the team established nineteen nested circular plots of 500 square meters each, measuring every tree with a diameter at breast height of at least five centimeters. Soil samples were collected from four depth intervals reaching down to 80 centimeters, with five subsamples composited at each depth to smooth out local heterogeneity.</p>
<p>The results were striking. Shorea robusta forests emerged as the undisputed carbon champions, storing 113.5 plus or minus 7.1 megagrams of carbon per hectare in vegetation and 102.0 plus or minus 2.3 megagrams per hectare in soil—substantially more than chir pine forests, which held 96.5 and 85.5 megagrams respectively, and far ahead of mixed broadleaved forests at just 64.2 and 84.9 megagrams. Together, the sal forests banked roughly 215 megagrams of carbon per hectare across vegetation and soil combined, placing them at the upper end of the range reported for South Asian subtropical forests.</p>
<p>But the real analytical payoff came from teasing apart why these differences exist. The researchers evaluated fourteen predictors spanning stand structure, anthropogenic disturbance, soil properties, topography, and climate, using Pearson correlation analysis and principal component analysis to identify the dominant drivers. For tree carbon, two structural variables towered above the rest: basal area, with a correlation coefficient of 0.641, and canopy cover, at 0.635, both highly significant. Tree height and stem density, by contrast, showed only weak, non-significant positive relationships—a reminder that a forest crowded with small stems stores far less carbon than one anchored by a few massive trunks.</p>
<p>Equally important was what the analysis revealed about human pressure. The team constructed an Anthropogenic Disturbance Index combining stem cutting, leaf litter collection, lopping intensity, and fire influence, each weighted equally. This index correlated negatively with tree carbon at r equals minus 0.60, a statistically significant signal that where people extract biomass, carbon stocks suffer. Mixed broadleaved forests, which local communities depend on most heavily for fuelwood and cattle fodder, showed the highest disturbance levels and the lowest carbon stocks. Chir pine forests, whose needles are unsuitable for composting or fodder, experienced the least disturbance.</p>
<p>Soil organic carbon told a different story entirely. Here, the strongest correlate was not a property of the trees but a property of the ground itself: soil texture. Silt content correlated positively with SOC at r equals 0.587, while sand content showed a significant negative correlation at r equals minus 0.581. This pattern reflects a well-established mechanism in soil science—fine mineral particles form stable organo-mineral complexes that physically shield organic matter from microbial decomposition, whereas sandy soils, with poor aggregate structure and low water retention, accelerate mineralization. Canopy cover was the only structural variable significantly associated with soil carbon, at r equals 0.560, suggesting that dense canopies moderate soil temperature and moisture in ways that favor organic matter accumulation.</p>
<p>Principal component analysis confirmed this division of labor. For tree carbon, the first two principal components explained 53.2 percent of total variance, with carbon clustering alongside basal area, canopy cover, and stem density. For soil carbon, the first two components accounted for 52.8 percent of variation, dominated by textural and site variables. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance showed that forest type explained 45 to 46 percent of the variation in both pools—statistically significant for each. Intriguingly, elevation correlated negatively with soil carbon while aspect correlated positively with tree carbon, and mean annual temperature showed a positive relationship with SOC that the authors attribute to the co-distribution of warmer, more productive lower-elevation sal forests rather than a direct climatic effect.</p>
<p>The comparison with earlier Nepalese and Himalayan studies adds valuable context. Previous work in Makawanpur district reported sal forest biomass as high as 313.69 megagrams per hectare in well-managed community forests, while degraded stands in Dang district stored barely 99 megagrams. Protected-area studies in Shuklaphanta National Park found core-zone carbon stocks of 258.56 megagrams per hectare versus 193.3 in buffer zones—a protected-area effect that mirrors the disturbance gradient documented in the new study. The authors also note that Nepal&#8217;s total forest topsoil SOC has been estimated at 494 million tons, a figure that local-scale studies like this one help refine for national inventories.</p>
<p>The study is candid about its limitations. Nineteen plots distributed unevenly across three forest types constrain statistical power, and the geographic scope of two community forests in a single district limits extrapolation. The analysis relies on correlation and PCA, which identify associations without establishing causality, and the disturbance index applies equal weights to pressures that likely differ in carbon impact. Climate data at 1-kilometer resolution from WorldClim varied too little across plots to serve as strong predictors, and the fieldwork captured only a single post-monsoon season. The authors recommend denser plot networks, structural equation modeling, soil carbon fractionation, and longer observation windows in future work.</p>
<p>Yet the management implications are clear and actionable. Because basal area, canopy cover, and disturbance intensity are readily measurable in routine forest inventories, they can be embedded directly into community forest operational plans and carbon monitoring frameworks. Protecting large-diameter trees, maintaining canopy closure, and strictly regulating cutting, lopping, litter removal, and fire emerge as the highest-leverage interventions for maximizing ecosystem carbon. For Nepal&#8217;s REDD+ program and national carbon accounting, the message is that structural integrity—rather than forest type alone—should anchor carbon-oriented planning in the country&#8217;s community forests, which cover nearly 45 percent of the national land area and represent one of the developing world&#8217;s most celebrated conservation success stories.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Carbon storage drivers in Nepalese mid-hill community forests</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Stand structure drives vegetation carbon storage while soil texture regulates soil organic carbon in Nepalese mid-hill community forests</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Poudel, B., Bhattarai, S., Koirala, S., Chapagain, J., &amp; Timilsina, S. (2026). Stand structure drives vegetation carbon storage while soil texture regulates soil organic carbon in Nepalese mid-hill community forests. <em>Discover Forests, 2</em>(1), Article 69. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-026-00130-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-026-00130-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-026-00130-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44415-026-00130-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> forest carbon, soil organic carbon, stand structure, basal area, canopy cover, Shorea robusta, anthropogenic disturbance, soil texture, community forestry, Nepal, REDD+, carbon stocks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">206559</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monsoon Rhythms Reshape the Fertility of India&#8217;s Crucial Farming Soils</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/monsoon-rhythms-reshape-the-fertility-of-indias-crucial-farming-soils/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 23:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change and agricultural sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop productivity and soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of monsoon on soil chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food security in northern India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-Gangetic Plain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-Gangetic Plain agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linear mixed models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term soil monitoring in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moisture variation in farming soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monsoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monsoon impact on soil fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principal Component Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resilience of farming systems to monsoon variability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal soil changes in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal variation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil organic carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil physical property shifts due to climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil sampling and analysis in Indian farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uttar Pradesh]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=199528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A two-year study of wheat, rice, and mustard fields in Lucknow district reveals that monsoon-driven seasonal shifts in soil texture, moisture, organic carbon, and potassium could reshape fertilizer management across the Indo-Gangetic Plain.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across the wheat, rice, and mustard fields of Lucknow district in northern India, the soil beneath farmers&#8217; feet is not a static foundation but a shifting, seasonal system. A two-year study of agricultural soils in this corner of the Indo-Gangetic Plain has now documented, in unusually fine detail, how the dramatic swings between monsoon downpours and dry pre-monsoon heat rewrite the physical and chemical character of the region&#8217;s farmland. The findings, published in the journal Discover Soil, carry weighty implications for the roughly 21 percent of the district&#8217;s population that depends on agriculture, and for the food security of a plain that feeds hundreds of millions.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Nistha Khanna of Mizoram University together with colleagues from Nagaland University and O.P. Jindal Global University, sampled soils from six agricultural sites spread across six of Lucknow district&#8217;s eight administrative blocks between 2023 and 2025. Sampling was conducted three times each year: in April and May before the monsoon, in June and July during the monsoon itself, and in October and November after the rains had passed. At each site, soils were drawn from two depths, 0 to 15 centimeters and 15 to 30 centimeters, using a soil corer, then brought to the laboratory for analysis using long-established techniques, including the Walkley and Black titration for organic carbon and the Bray and Kurtz extraction for available phosphorus.</p>
<p>The region receives an average of 896 millimeters of rainfall annually, almost all of it delivered by the southwest monsoon between June and October. This single hydrological pulse, the researchers hypothesized, would leave a measurable fingerprint on nearly every property of the soil. Their hypothesis was largely confirmed. Textures shifted across seasons: pre-monsoon samples mixed sandy clay loam, clay loam, and loam, while monsoon samples were dominated by clay loam and loam, and post-monsoon samples leaned toward sandy clay loam and sandy clay. On average, the soils contained about 45 percent sand, 30 percent clay, and 25 percent silt.</p>
<p>Statistical analysis using linear mixed models revealed that the seasonal signal was strongest for the coarse and fine mineral fractions themselves. Sand content varied dramatically with season, and clay content did likewise, both with p-values below 0.001, an indication that the monsoon physically redistributes particles through percolation and structural change. Soil organic carbon and organic matter also fluctuated strongly across seasons, peaking in the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon periods and dipping during the rains. Soil moisture content and available potassium likewise changed significantly from season to season, while soil pH, bulk density, available nitrogen, available phosphorus, water-holding capacity, and silt content remained comparatively stable.</p>
<p>The measured nutrient levels told a generally encouraging story. Available nitrogen was high across all sites, ranging from 102.23 to 396.08 kilograms per hectare, with the highest value recorded at Site S5 in the surface layer after the monsoon, a pattern the authors attribute to enhanced microbial mineralization of organic matter once the rains replenish soil moisture. Available potassium ranged from 125 to 300 kilograms per hectare and tended to be slightly higher after the monsoon, while available phosphorus spanned 7.53 to 34.3 kilograms per hectare. Soil pH remained in a near-ideal window for nutrient uptake, between 6.5 and 8.12, and average soil organic carbon stood at about 2.5 percent, a level many degraded Indo-Gangetic soils no longer reach.</p>
<p>Correlation analysis added texture to the picture. Soil organic carbon correlated positively with sand content and negatively with clay, suggesting that the coarser soils in the study area may accumulate organic matter more readily, perhaps because better aeration and drainage support microbial litter processing. Phosphorus and potassium moved together closely, hinting at shared geochemical controls, while the negative relationship between silt and pH pointed to subtle acidification tendencies in finer sediments.</p>
<p>To distill this tangle of interacting variables, the team employed principal component analysis, a multivariate technique that compresses correlated measurements into a few independent axes of variation. The first three components accounted for the largest shares of the dataset&#8217;s variance, at 29.6, 20.7, and 11.9 percent respectively, and the first five components together explained 79.3 percent. The dominant gradient, the first component, contrasted clay-dominated soils with sandy, organic-rich ones, while the second captured a nutrient-moisture axis that separated fertile, wet soils from comparatively depleted ones. In plain terms, the fate of a Lucknow field is governed first by its texture and organic matter, and second by how water and nutrients travel through it.</p>
<p>Why does this matter beyond the district boundary? The rice-wheat-mustard rotation that dominates Lucknow&#8217;s farmland extracts nutrients continuously throughout the year, and flooded rice cultivation alters soil redox chemistry in ways that reshape nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics. Continuous fertilizer application without soil testing, the authors note, frequently produces nutrient imbalances, declining organic carbon, and wasteful nutrient use. By mapping how fertility indicators swing with the seasons, the study gives farmers and policymakers a timing framework: post-monsoon mineralization offers a natural nitrogen flush, potassium availability improves after the rains, and organic carbon conservation efforts are best judged against seasonal baselines rather than single snapshots.</p>
<p>The study is not without limits. The authors acknowledge that environmental drivers such as rainfall intensity and microbial activity, which likely mediate many of the observed seasonal shifts, were not directly measured. Nor does the two-year window capture longer climatic oscillations. Still, by combining principal component analysis with linear mixed models, a methodological pairing rarely applied to seasonal soil data in this district, the work provides something previous single-season surveys could not: a statistically grounded picture of soil as a living, breathing system that inhales with the monsoon and exhales through the dry months. The researchers suggest that season-sensitive management, periodic organic inputs, moisture conservation, and balanced nutrition, will be essential to keeping these soils productive for generations to come.</p>
<p>For the farmers of Lucknow district, whose average land holdings are barely 0.8 hectares, the message is both practical and hopeful. Their soils, the study concludes, retain a moderate to good fertility and a strong capacity for long-term management. The monsoon that floods their paddies and sows their wheat is the same force that reorganizes their soil each year, and understanding that rhythm may prove to be one of the cheapest tools available for sustaining the harvest.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Seasonal variation in the physicochemical properties of agricultural soils in Lucknow district, Uttar Pradesh, India</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Seasonal variation in physicochemical properties of some agricultural soils in Lucknow district, Uttar Pradesh of India</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Khanna, N., Lalruatkimi, C., Devi, K. B., Adam, A. A., Yam, G., &amp; Tripathi, O. P. (2026). Seasonal variation in physicochemical properties of some agricultural soils in Lucknow district, Uttar Pradesh of India. <em>Discover Soil, 3</em>(1), Article 147. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00302-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00302-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00302-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44378-026-00302-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> soil science, Indo-Gangetic Plain, seasonal variation, soil fertility, soil organic carbon, monsoon, principal component analysis, linear mixed models, sustainable agriculture, Uttar Pradesh, nutrient management, soil texture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199528</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soil Texture Emerges as the Hidden Variable Deciding When Crops Truly Need Water</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/soil-texture-emerges-as-the-hidden-variable-deciding-when-crops-truly-need-water/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[available water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decagon EC-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[differences in sand and clay soil moisture dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irrigation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimizing water use in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precision agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precision agriculture irrigation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensor calibration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil moisture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil moisture sensors calibration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil physics and plant water uptake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil physics research on irrigation sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soil texture and crop water requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil texture impact on irrigation thresholds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil water potential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil water potential and plant stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable water management in farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USDA soil textural classes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volumetric soil water content measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watermark 200SS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=195287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research across all twelve USDA soil textural classes shows that soil texture fundamentally controls the relationship between soil water content and plant-available water, challenging universal irrigation thresholds.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A single irrigation sensor can mean the difference between a thriving field and a thirsty one, but new research suggests that the same sensor reading may tell two entirely different stories depending on the soil it is buried in. In a study published in the journal Discover Soil, researchers José O. Payero and Selvaraj Selvalakshmi of Clemson University systematically calibrated two widely used soil moisture sensors across all twelve USDA soil textural classes, from pure sand to heavy clay, and found that soil texture fundamentally reshapes the relationship between how much water a soil holds and how hard plants must work to extract it. The findings deliver a pointed warning for precision agriculture: irrigation thresholds cannot be universally applied across contrasting soil textures without risking wasted water or stressed crops.</p>
<p>The study tackles a distinction that is easy to overlook but central to soil physics. Volumetric soil water content, symbolized as θv, measures the sheer quantity of water stored in the soil, expressed as a percentage of soil volume. Soil water potential, denoted Ψ, measures something subtly different: the energy status of that water, or how much suction a plant root must exert to pull it out. Two soils can hold identical amounts of water while offering dramatically different availability to crops, because the force binding water to soil particles depends on pore size, and pore size depends on texture. Sand, with its large macropores, releases water readily but drains quickly. Clay, packed with micropores, clings to water tenaciously even when quantities look abundant.</p>
<p>To untangle these relationships, the team conducted an outdoor experiment at the Edisto Research and Education Center in Blackville, South Carolina, from late November 2017 to early February 2018. Rather than digging up twelve naturally occurring soils, they constructed the textural spectrum themselves, mixing commercially available sand, silt, and clay in precise proportions defined by the USDA classification system. This yielded twelve soil mixtures representing sand, loamy sand, sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt, sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty clay, and clay. Each soil was packed into replicate plastic containers, each holding 700 cubic centimeters, and instrumented with two affordable and widely deployed sensors: the Decagon EC-5, a capacitance-based device that estimates volumetric water content by measuring dielectric permittivity at 70 MHz, and the Watermark 200SS, a granular matrix sensor that gauges soil water potential through electrical resistance within a hydrated gypsum matrix.</p>
<p>The experimental protocol was elegantly simple. The researchers saturated each container with water, then let the soil dry naturally under ambient outdoor conditions while recording sensor outputs and total system weight every morning at nine. Because the container weights were known when dry and wet, the team could compute gravimetrically determined water content at every time point, providing a trusted reference against which to judge both sensors. Particle-size distributions were verified with the hydrometer method, and bulk density was calculated from the oven-dry mass packed into each known volume. Field capacity, permanent wilting point, and available water were then estimated for each texture using the generalized soil water characteristic equations of Saxton and colleagues.</p>
<p>The drying patterns that emerged were starkly texture-dependent. Clay-rich soils began the experiment holding enormous quantities of water, with clay at roughly 50 percent volumetric water content, silty clay at 47 percent, and sandy clay at 45 percent. Sand, by contrast, started at only about 15 percent and loamy sand at 20 percent. As drying progressed, fine-textured soils retained residual water contents of 8 to 12 percent while coarse soils fell to just 2 to 5 percent, a direct consequence of pore-size distribution. The Watermark sensors told the complementary energy story: near saturation, all soils read close to minus 10 kilopascals, but sandy soils plummeted rapidly toward minus 150 to minus 200 kilopascals, the sensor&#8217;s practical detection limit, while clay and silty clay lingered between minus 40 and minus 60 kilopascals far longer, releasing their water grudgingly.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most practically valuable result came from the team&#8217;s use of segmented regression, a statistical technique that locates breakpoints in nonlinear relationships. Applied to the drying curves, this analysis identified threshold soil water potential values, the points beyond which a small loss of water content triggers a steep drop in water potential and a corresponding crash in plant availability. Across all textures, average thresholds landed at approximately 40 kilopascals for the gravimetric-Watermark pairing and 44 kilopascals for the EC-5-Watermark pairing, but individual textures ranged widely, from minus 18 to minus 52 kilopascals in the gravimetric comparisons. These breakpoints, the authors argue, offer texture-specific reference points for irrigation scheduling that a single universal threshold simply cannot provide.</p>
<p>The calibration performance of the sensors themselves also diverged by texture. The Decagon EC-5 showed outstanding agreement with gravimetric measurements, with coefficients of determination between 0.987 and 0.997 across all twelve soils, and root mean square errors from just 0.29 percent in sand to 4.94 percent in clay. Polynomial models, mostly quadratic or cubic, provided the best fit, including sand at R² of 0.994, sandy clay at 0.992, silty clay at 0.997, and clay loam at 0.995. The higher errors in clay-dominated soils reflect the greater variability in dielectric response that clay content introduces, reinforcing a theme from the broader sensor literature that soil-specific calibration beats factory defaults. Under extremely dry conditions, the EC-5 even produced slightly negative readings in sand, an artifact of diminished dielectric contrast and poor probe-soil contact in nearly waterless coarse material.</p>
<p>The Watermark sensor, meanwhile, proved more texture-sensitive. Its relationship with gravimetrically measured water content ranged from a moderate R² of 0.745 in sand to a strong 0.970 in clay and silty clay, consistent with earlier reports that granular matrix sensors struggle in low-water-retention sandy profiles. Yet comparisons between the Watermark&#8217;s potential readings and the EC-5&#8217;s content readings remained consistently strong across textures, with R² values from 0.896 to 0.978, suggesting the two sensing principles can be meaningfully linked once soil-specific calibration curves are in place. Such linkage matters because capacitance and resistance sensors answer different questions: one reports how much water is present, the other how available it is to roots.</p>
<p>The authors are candid about the study&#8217;s boundaries. The experiment used disturbed, prepared soil mixtures under outdoor container conditions, so real-world complications like soil structure, organic matter, root activity, and weather variability were not captured. The Watermark&#8217;s operating range of roughly 0 to minus 200 kilopascals also left the dry end of the retention curve, including the permanent wilting point near minus 1500 kilopascals, outside measurable reach, and hydraulic properties were estimated from texture rather than measured with pressure-plate apparatus. These constraints prevented fitting mechanistic models such as the van Genuchten equation. Still, the empirical relationships developed here, spanning all twelve USDA textural classes under a single unified framework, appear to be the first of their kind reported for South Carolina, a state where irrigated acreage is expanding rapidly across highly heterogeneous soils.</p>
<p>The practical message is resonating in an era when smart irrigation systems promise water savings through automation. As the study concludes, accurate interpretation of soil moisture data demands that soil texture and soil-specific relationships between water content and water potential be considered alongside sensor calibration. A grower reading minus 40 kilopascals in a loamy sand is witnessing a very different soil condition than one reading minus 40 kilopascals in clay, and irrigating both fields identically will inevitably overwater one and shortchange the other. The texture-specific thresholds and calibration curves published in this work offer a concrete starting point for building such nuance into irrigation decision tools, though the authors stress that field validation across diverse crops and climates is still required before widespread deployment.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Empirical relationships between soil moisture and soil water potential across soil textural classes for irrigation management</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Influence of soil texture on soil moisture and soil water potential dynamics</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Payero, J. O., &amp; Selvalakshmi, S. (2026). Influence of soil texture on soil moisture and soil water potential dynamics. <em>Discover Soil, 3</em>(1), Article 152. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00305-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00305-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00305-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44378-026-00305-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> soil texture, soil moisture, soil water potential, irrigation management, sensor calibration, water retention, Decagon EC-5, Watermark 200SS, field capacity, available water, soil physics, precision agriculture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">195287</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simple Equations Map How Much Water Punjab Soils Can Hold</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/simple-equations-map-how-much-water-punjab-soils-can-hold/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 05:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agricultural hydrology and soil properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural water management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[available water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulk density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost-effective soil analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital mapping of soil characteristics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irrigation scheduling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedotransfer functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent wilting point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punjab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punjab agricultural sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QGIS mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regretion equations for soil data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soil laboratory vs field measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil moisture and crop productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil moisture measurement techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil moisture retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil organic carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soil science research in Punjab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soil testing and calibration methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soil water retention and plant health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soil water retention in Punjab]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=192406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers at Punjab Agricultural University validated and mapped pedotransfer functions that predict how much plant-available water Punjab's soils can store, offering farmers a low-cost alternative to expensive pressure plate analysis.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A handful of soil can tell a remarkable story. Squeeze it, weigh it, dry it in an oven, and the numbers that emerge describe exactly how much water that soil can store for a crop between a rainy day and a drought. For the farmers of Punjab, India&#8217;s celebrated grain bowl, those numbers have long been locked behind an expensive and laborious laboratory instrument. Now a team of soil scientists at Punjab Agricultural University in Ludhiana has shown that a set of simple, decades-old regression equations, carefully recalibrated with local soil data, can unlock the same information at a fraction of the cost, and then paint it across the entire state in vivid digital maps.</p>
<p>The study, published in the open-access journal Discover Soil, addresses a fundamental quantity in agricultural hydrology known as soil moisture retention. This property describes the relationship between the volume of water held in soil and the suction with which that water is bound to soil particles. Two reference points matter most. Field capacity marks the maximum water a soil retains after gravity has drained away the excess, conventionally measured at a pressure of −0.33 bar. The permanent wilting point marks the dryness at which plant roots can no longer extract water fast enough to survive, measured at −15 bar. The difference between the two is available water, the share of soil moisture genuinely accessible to crops, and it is the number on which irrigation schedules, hydrological models, and crop choices ultimately depend.</p>
<p>Measuring these constants traditionally requires a pressure plate apparatus, a device in which saturated soil samples sit on porous ceramic plates inside an airtight chamber. Increasing air pressure forces pore water through the plate until equilibrium is reached, a process that takes roughly a week across the full range of suction levels. The method is reliable but slow, costly, and demanding of technical expertise, which is precisely why characterisations of field capacity and permanent wilting point remain unavailable for many of the world&#8217;s agricultural regions. Punjab Agricultural University&#8217;s soil testing laboratory receives samples from farmers across the state, yet the sheer scale of demand far outstrips what pressure plate analysis can deliver.</p>
<p>The researchers, led by Swati Kashyap together with Bharat Bhushan Vashisht, Harsimran Kaur and Mohit Arora, took the modelling route instead. They assembled nine well-known pedotransfer functions, equations that translate easily measured soil properties such as sand, silt, clay content, soil organic carbon and bulk density into estimates of water retention. Pedotransfer functions were first proposed in the late 1980s as a way of adding value to routine soil survey data, and they have since been tested from the Congo basin to the Mekong Delta. The catch is that an equation calibrated on Ugandan ferrallitic soils or Brazilian Amazonian clays does not necessarily perform well on the alluvial sandy loams of north-western India, so local evaluation is essential.</p>
<p>To provide that evaluation, the team collected around 200 surface soil samples from 0 to 15 centimetres depth across Punjab&#8217;s different agroclimatic zones, drawing on farmer submissions held by the university&#8217;s Soil Testing Laboratory and on research fields. Seventy-eight samples were used to calibrate the candidate equations and forty independent samples were reserved for validation. Each sample was analysed for particle size distribution by the pipette method, organic carbon by wet oxidation, and water retention by the pressure plate apparatus itself, giving the researchers ground truth against which every model prediction could be scored. Performance was judged with three statistical indicators: root mean square error, which penalises large deviations; the index of agreement, which ranges from zero to one; and mean absolute error, which measures average prediction offset.</p>
<p>The results were strikingly clear. For field capacity, an equation published by J. D. Pidgeon in 1972 for ferrallitic soils in Uganda outperformed the field, achieving a root mean square error of 0.05 cubic centimetres of water per cubic centimetre of soil on validation, an index of agreement of 0.72 and a mean absolute error of 0.049. For the permanent wilting point, the 1979 equation of S. Gupta and W. E. Larson, built on particle size distribution, organic matter and bulk density, proved best, with an RMSE of 0.048, an index of agreement of 0.77 and a mean absolute error of 0.041. Critically, the researchers found that raw application of these imported equations systematically over- or under-estimated water contents. By adding a simple bias correction factor derived from the calibration data, −0.018 for the Pidgeon model at field capacity and +0.008 for the Gupta–Larson model at the wilting point, prediction accuracy improved markedly, shifting predicted values visibly closer to the one-to-one line when plotted against observations.</p>
<p>The physics behind the correlations is instructive. Silt, clay and organic carbon all correlated positively with water content at field capacity, while sand content correlated negatively with both constants. Clay governed retention at the wilting point more strongly than at field capacity, whereas organic carbon mattered more at field capacity. This makes sense because water held at low suction depends on the architecture of pore spaces, which organic matter helps build, while water held near the dry end is governed by adsorption forces on particle surfaces, a function of texture. Bulk density, meanwhile, increased retention at −15 bar, echoing earlier Indian studies on the influence of compaction on dry-end moisture.</p>
<p>With validated equations in hand, the team scaled up. Using soil maps covering 520 pedons, the basic mapping units of soil classification, compiled by the Department of Soil Science at Punjab Agricultural University, they extracted sand, silt, clay and organic carbon values for every pedon and predicted field capacity and permanent wilting point state-wide. Texture-specific bulk density values, ranging from 1.70 grams per cubic centimetre for sandy soils to 1.30 for clay loams, completed the input set. The predictions were then loaded into QGIS, the open-source geographic information system, and symbolised in graduated classes across four agroclimatic zones: the sub-mountain undulating region, the undulating alluvial plain, the central plain and the western alluvial plain.</p>
<p>The maps reveal a state with substantial but uneven water-holding wealth. Field capacity across Punjab soils ranges from 0.131 to 0.387 cubic centimetres per cubic centimetre, with roughly two-thirds of the land falling in a good band of 0.200 to 0.300. Permanent wilting point values span 0.009 to 0.228, with about 65 percent of soils in the 0.050 to 0.150 interval. Available water ranges from 0.113 to 0.183, and fully 93 percent of the state sits in the 0.120 to 0.160 band, a limited-to-good status in which ideal conditions are notably absent. The driest retention profiles appear in the arid western zone, where sandy loam and loamy sand textures combine with low organic carbon and clay. Intriguingly, the finest-textured clay loams, despite holding the most total water, show reduced availability, because water molecules bond tightly to negatively charged clay surfaces and resist extraction by roots.</p>
<p>For a state where rice and wheat consume some 61 percent of total water demand and unregulated groundwater extraction has created genuine scarcity, the practical implications are considerable. A farmer or irrigation planner equipped with these maps and a basic soil test can now estimate plant-available water for a specific field without ever touching a pressure plate, and schedule irrigation to match what the soil can actually store. The authors suggest the calibrated equations could be extended under different management systems for crop-specific water budgeting under a changing climate. More broadly, the study is a demonstration of a quiet but powerful idea in soil science: that the right simple model, rigorously calibrated and validated against local ground truth, can democratise information that expensive instruments have long reserved for a privileged few. In Punjab&#8217;s water-stressed fields, that democratisation may arrive just in time.</p>
<p>It is worth noting that the predictive skill reported in the study, while respectable, still leaves room for uncertainty. An index of agreement near 0.75 indicates that the calibrated equations capture the broad pattern of retention across Punjab&#8217;s soils but not every local deviation, so the mapped values are best treated as planning-grade estimates rather than substitutes for direct measurement where high-stakes decisions depend on precise water budgets.</p>
<p>The regional context also matters. Punjab&#8217;s soils are dominated by Inceptisols and Entisols developed on alluvial plains under a hyperthermic temperature regime, with annual rainfall between 400 and 1300 millimetres concentrated in the July-to-September monsoon. In such settings, sandy loam textures prevail, and coarse particles paired with low organic carbon naturally depress both field capacity and wilting point, which is consistent with the drier retention profiles the maps show in the arid western zone.</p>
<p>The approach also fits a wider trend in soil science toward digital soil mapping, where sparse laboratory measurements are extrapolated through pedotransfer functions and geographic information systems to produce continuous property surfaces. Because the underlying inputs, particle size distribution and organic carbon, are already collected routinely by soil testing laboratories, the framework could be updated cheaply as management practices change, and adapted to neighbouring alluvial regions facing similar groundwater stress.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Modelling and mapping of soil moisture retention characteristics of Punjab soils using pedotransfer functions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Modelling and mapping of soil moisture characteristics of the Punjab soils</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kashyap, S., Vashisht, B. B., Kaur, H., &amp; Arora, M. (2026). Modelling and mapping of soil moisture characteristics of the Punjab soils. <em>Discover Soil, 3</em>(1), Article 153. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00307-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00307-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00307-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44378-026-00307-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> soil moisture retention, field capacity, permanent wilting point, available water, pedotransfer functions, Punjab, QGIS mapping, soil organic carbon, bulk density, irrigation scheduling, agricultural water management, soil texture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">192406</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
