The study was led by Ana Junça-Silva of the University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE) in Portugal. Drawing on posthumanist and sociomaterial perspectives, the author argues that organizations should be understood as relational spaces in which human and non-human actors jointly create value. This framing moves away from anthropocentric assumptions that treat animals as incidental to work life, and instead positions companion animals as participants whose presence can shape affective and performance-related outcomes.

The researcher proposed that human-animal interactions during work could function as exactly this kind of micro-event, generating positive emotions that then spill over into how people evaluate their jobs and how creatively they perform. The empirical design was longitudinal, with data collected from the same 284 human resources consultants at three separate time points. Human-animal interactions were measured at Time 1, positive emotions at Time 2, and both job satisfaction and innovative work behavior at Time 3.

The results indicated that human-animal interactions at Time 1 were indirectly associated with both innovative work behavior and job satisfaction at Time 3, with positive emotions at Time 2 serving as the linking mechanism. In other words, the data were consistent with a model in which contact with animals first lifts positive emotional states, and those states are then associated with more satisfied and more innovative employees. The author is careful to frame these findings in terms of association rather than proof of causation.

Because the study followed a sample of consultants over three waves rather than randomly assigning some workers to animal-friendly conditions and others to animal-free ones, it cannot rule out all alternative explanations. The findings arrive at a moment when animal-friendly organizational policies are gaining traction, even though empirical research on their effects remains limited, as the study itself notes. This study offers a theoretical account of why such policies might matter, pointing to the emotional channel as the mechanism through which animal contact connects to workplace outcomes.

According to the study, animal-friendly strategies combined with flexible work arrangements may foster more satisfying and innovative organizational environments. The results also underscore the value of adopting a multispecies lens in organizational research more broadly, highlighting the role of non-human actors in shaping affective and performance-related outcomes at work. For practitioners, the research suggests that the benefits of human-animal contact at work may operate through everyday emotional experiences rather than dramatic interventions.

However, the findings are specific to a sample of human resources consultants, and the study does not establish that every organization or every type of animal interaction would produce the same pattern.

Subject of Research: Human-animal interactions at work and their association with employee emotions, job satisfaction, and innovative behavior

Article Title: Beyond anthropocentric workplaces: a multispecies perspective on human-animal interactions and employee outcomes

Article References: Junça-Silva, A. (2026). Beyond Anthropocentric Workplaces: A Multispecies Perspective on Human-Animal Interactions and Employee Outcomes. Frontiers in Organizational Psychology, 4, 1903354. https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2026.1903354

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.3389/forgp.2026.1903354

Keywords: human-animal interactions, animal-friendly workplaces, Affective Events Theory, positive emotions, job satisfaction, innovative work behavior, multispecies workplaces, organizational psychology, posthumanism, longitudinal study, employee wellbeing, Beyond