<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>single-particle analysis &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/single-particle-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:51:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Graphene Reservoirs Bring Precise Ice Thickness Control to Cryo-EM</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/graphene-reservoirs-bring-precise-ice-thickness-control-to-cryo-em/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Sanderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlling protein orientation in cryo-EM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryo-electron microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryo-EM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryo-EM imaging noise reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryo-EM sample preparation techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphene nanostructures for microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphene sandwich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphene-based ice reservoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-resolution cryo-EM sample stabilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice thickness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice thickness control in cryo-EM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanofluidics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanometer-scale ice thickness regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein sample preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proteins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sample preparation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-particle analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thin liquid film stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[van der Waals forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vitreous ice layer in cryo-EM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vitrification]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=247810</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have engineered sagging graphene reservoirs that confine liquid films to precise, reproducible nanometer-scale thicknesses, solving a decades-old bottleneck in cryo-EM sample preparation and enabling near-atomic structures of challenging proteins and RNA.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cryo-electron microscopy has transformed structural biology, but one stubborn problem has haunted the technique for decades: nobody could reliably control the thickness of the thin layer of vitreous ice in which protein samples are suspended before being flash-frozen. That layer is the entire imaging medium. If it is too thick, background noise swamps the signal from the molecules; if it is too thin, proteins get crushed against the air-water interface, denature, or adopt preferred orientations that ruin three-dimensional reconstruction. Now a team of researchers from Peking University, Tsinghua University, the University of Hong Kong and collaborators reports in Nature Methods a deceptively simple solution that turns an overlooked physical instability into an asset: tiny reservoirs made of sagging graphene that hold liquid at exactly the thickness researchers want.</p>
<p>The key insight of the study, led by Liming Zheng together with corresponding authors Hailin Peng and Hong-Wei Wang, is that the difficulty of ice control does not begin at the moment of freezing. It begins earlier, with the physics of the thin liquid film itself. Theoretical calculations show that once a liquid film thins below roughly 100 nanometers, the regime required for high-resolution cryo-EM, it becomes intrinsically unstable. The free energy of such a film depends on long-range van der Waals forces, which grow stronger as the film gets thinner. Thinner regions therefore experience a higher attractive force, prompting liquid to migrate spontaneously toward adjacent thicker areas. The film becomes increasingly prone to rupture, breaking into microscopic droplets in an unpredictable way. This instability, the authors argue, is the previously underappreciated determinant that has made ice thickness in cryo-EM a trial-and-error affair.</p>
<p>The team&#8217;s answer draws on the emerging physics of liquids under confinement. When water is squeezed into spaces only nanometers across, its molecular migration slows dramatically, with diffusion coefficients dropping two to eight orders of magnitude below bulk values, and the confining structure can spatially mold the liquid even at thicknesses of a few atomic layers. The researchers exploited a quirk of atomically thin graphene: when a graphene sheet is draped over a hole in a supporting film, van der Waals attraction pulls it against the hole&#8217;s sidewalls, causing the membrane to sag inward like a trampoline. This sagging creates a shallow, nanometer-scale basin, which the team calls a graphene reservoir, whose depth is set by the geometry of the hole.</p>
<p>Crucially, the depth of that basin can be engineered. By fabricating holes with smooth, rounded edges using industry-compatible deep-ultraviolet lithography, the researchers achieved highly uniform sagging depths of 31 plus or minus 2 nanometers in holes of 1,200-nanometer diameter, as measured by atomic force microscopy. Varying the hole diameter from 600 to 2,000 nanometers tuned the sagging depth from 14 plus or minus 1 nanometer up to 40 plus or minus 3 nanometers, in agreement with a theoretical model in which sagging depth scales with hole diameter, edge curvature radius, graphene-edge adhesion energy and the two-dimensional Young&#8217;s modulus of graphene. The strategy also worked on the backsides of several commercially available grids, including ANTcryo, C-flat, Quantifoil and UltrAufoil, meaning labs can adopt it without abandoning their existing consumables. Batch production of more than 500 homemade grids on a four-inch wafer demonstrated scalability.</p>
<p>The payoff shows up at blotting time. In conventional cryo-EM sample preparation, filter paper wicks away excess liquid for one to two seconds before the grid is plunged into liquid ethane, and the outcome is notoriously variable. On graphene reservoir grids, the confined liquid film remained stable even after 10 seconds of blotting, five to ten times longer than typical practice. Cryo-electron tomography revealed that the resulting vitreous ice matched the reservoir depth, about 30 nanometers, and that ice thickness plateaued at roughly 27 plus or minus 3 nanometers regardless of whether blotting lasted 10, 12, 15 or 20 seconds. Independent replicate experiments produced statistically comparable results, and overview atlas images showed uniform ice across entire grids. Numerical simulations explained why: liquid in thin peripheral regions flows faster than liquid inside the deeper reservoirs, so the reservoirs actively draw liquid in rather than losing it, inverting the usual instability.</p>
<p>Because the plateau thickness tracks the reservoir depth, ice thickness becomes a design parameter rather than a lottery. Grids with 600-, 800-, 1,200- and 2,000-nanometer holes yielded controllable ice thicknesses of 15 plus or minus 1, 20 plus or minus 2, 30 plus or minus 3 and 42 plus or minus 3 nanometers, closely matching the corresponding sagging depths. Thinner, more uniform ice translated directly into better images, with reduced B factors and decreased particle motion. By contrast, conventional grids with sharply protruding hole edges suffered liquid film rupture under the same 10-second blot, producing uneven ice, protein aggregation and denaturation, and a markedly lower fraction of usable particles for reconstruction.</p>
<p>The technique also cracks a long-standing problem with graphene sandwich specimens, in which a second graphene sheet is laid over the sample to encapsulate the liquid between two atomically thin membranes. Sandwiches promise to shield proteins from the damaging air-water interface, but conventional versions suffer from poorly controlled, heterogeneous ice thickness. In the new graphene reservoir sandwich, the reservoirs provide uniform dimensions, periodic arrangement and thermodynamically favorable liquid migration, so the encapsulated ice is far more homogeneous. Cryo-ET measurements showed a narrow thickness distribution centered at 30 nanometers, versus 52 plus or minus 18 nanometers for conventional sandwiches, and the thickness could be tuned downward to 19 plus or minus 2 nanometers simply by using trilayer instead of monolayer graphene, since the stiffer membrane sags less. Encapsulation efficiency exceeded 90 percent across 2,219 grid squares, compared with about 67 percent for the conventional method, and particles in the reservoir sandwich showed reduced beam-induced motion and faster convergence.</p>
<p>The structural biology results demonstrate what this control buys. The Ll.LtrB group II intron, an RNA molecule that typically fails on conventional grids because particles refuse to enter holes or aggregate, yielded a 2.7-angstrom reconstruction from graphene reservoir grids, with high contrast, well-distributed orientations and clearly resolved side chains. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein encapsulated in graphene reservoir sandwiches reconstructed to 2.9 angstroms. Most strikingly, streptavidin, a small 52-kilodalton protein whose low contrast makes it a nightmare for cryo-EM, was reconstructed at 2.46 angstroms in the reservoir sandwich, with individual amino acid side chains identifiable in the density map. Small proteins under 100 kilodaltons are frequent drug-discovery targets, and the authors note that uniform thin ice is precisely what such targets demand.</p>
<p>The implications extend beyond single-particle imaging. The authors anticipate that graphene reservoir sandwiches will benefit laser flash-melting approaches that overcome preferred orientation, time-resolved cryo-EM, and in situ liquid electron microscopy, where precisely manipulated confined liquids could reveal biological and chemical processes in their natively hydrated states. The method also meshes with spray-based sample preparation: after droplets are deposited on the grid, liquid spontaneously spreads into the reservoirs, producing uniform ice where conventional sprayed droplets leave only thick, uneven patches. With fabrication procedures compatible with standard blotting workflows and published step-by-step protocols, the barrier to adoption is low. After decades in which ice thickness was the uncontrolled variable at the heart of cryo-EM, a shallow dip in a one-atom-thick membrane may finally have tamed it.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Control of vitreous ice thickness in cryo-EM sample preparation using graphene liquid reservoirs</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Control of ice thickness in cryo-EM via confinement</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zheng, L., Song, J., Zhao, X., Cao, J., Xu, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, C., Sun, W., Chen, B., Gao, X., Liu, H., Yang, J., Xu, Y., Sun, L., Dai, Z., Wei, X., Liu, N., Peng, H., &amp; Wang, H.-W. (2026). Control of ice thickness in cryo-EM via confinement. <em>Nature Methods</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-026-03244-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-026-03244-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-026-03244-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41592-026-03244-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> cryo-EM, graphene, ice thickness, vitrification, sample preparation, structural biology, nanofluidics, van der Waals forces, graphene sandwich, single-particle analysis, proteins, RNA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">247810</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Flow Cytometry Benchmark Reveals How Instrument Generation Shapes Nanoparticle Detection</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-flow-cytometry-benchmark-reveals-how-instrument-generation-shapes-nanoparticle-detection/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements in flow cytometry technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BD Influx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CytoFLEX LX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extracellular vesicle characterization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extracellular vesicle detection techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extracellular vesicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flow cytometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flow cytometry instrument comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flow cytometry nanoparticle detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluorescence detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-sensitivity flow cytometers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light scatter detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquid biopsy nanoparticle analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NanoFCM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle analysis in biomedical research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle detection benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology in cell biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical configuration in cytometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sample concentration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silica nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-particle analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-particle measurement challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standardization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=204560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A controlled cross-platform study comparing three generations of high-sensitivity flow cytometers reveals how instrument configuration, detection strategy, and sample concentration shape the reliable detection and quantification of nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extracellular vesicles have moved from the margins of cell biology to the center of translational research, promising liquid biopsies, drug delivery platforms, and windows into intercellular communication. Yet the field has long been haunted by a deceptively simple problem: how do you reliably count and characterize particles that are smaller than the wavelength of visible light? A new peer-reviewed study published in Extracellular Vesicles and Circulating Nucleic Acids tackles this question head-on by putting three generations of high-sensitivity flow cytometers through a controlled, side-by-side comparison, and the results offer some of the most practical guidance to date for laboratories wrestling with single-particle measurements.</p>
<p>The research team evaluated three instruments that represent distinct eras and philosophies of high-sensitivity flow cytometry: the NanoFCM, the BD Influx, and the CytoFLEX LX. Each platform approaches the challenge of detecting nanoparticles differently, combining variations in optical configuration, illumination intensity, and signal processing. Because extracellular vesicles and engineered nanoparticles scatter light weakly and fall near or below the detection limits of conventional cytometers, even small differences in instrument design can translate into large differences in what a laboratory can actually see. The study&#8217;s controlled cross-platform design allowed the researchers to isolate those differences with unusual clarity.</p>
<p>To benchmark sensitivity, the investigators turned to silica nanoparticles with precisely defined diameters of 68, 91, 113, and 155 nanometers. These monodisperse reference particles serve as a kind of ruler for the instruments, revealing exactly where each platform&#8217;s light-scatter detection threshold lies. The findings were striking. The NanoFCM, a dedicated nano-flow cytometer, successfully detected particles as small as 68 nanometers. The BD Influx and the CytoFLEX LX, both general-purpose high-sensitivity instruments, reached down to 91 nanometers when their light-scatter parameters were carefully optimized. That gap of roughly 23 nanometers may sound modest, but in the world of extracellular vesicles, where many biologically relevant vesicles cluster between 50 and 150 nanometers, it determines whether an entire population of particles is visible or invisible.</p>
<p>The study went beyond simply ranking instruments by their detection limits. One of its most consequential findings concerns sample concentration, a variable that is often adjusted casually in practice but that the researchers showed exerts a powerful influence on particle discrimination. When samples are too concentrated, particles arrive at the detection point so close together that the instrument struggles to resolve them as individual events, distorting both counts and size distributions. When samples are too dilute, acquisition times balloon and rare populations become statistically fragile. Critically, the team demonstrated that the optimal dilution differs between platforms, meaning that a concentration protocol validated on one instrument cannot be blindly transferred to another without re-validation. This single insight could explain a substantial fraction of the inter-laboratory variability that has plagued extracellular vesicle research for years.</p>
<p>Light-scatter detection, while convenient, has inherent limitations when particles approach the size of the illumination wavelength. Scattering intensity depends strongly on particle size, refractive index, and shape, and for the smallest vesicles the signal drowns in background noise from molecular aggregates and instrument artifacts. To address this, the researchers incorporated fluorescent recombinant extracellular vesicles into their comparison. These engineered vesicles carry built-in fluorescent markers, allowing particles of interest to be identified through specific fluorescence signals rather than relying on scatter alone. The results confirmed what many in the field have suspected: fluorescence-based detection substantially improves the identification of relevant particles by suppressing background interference and enabling more reliable quantification of the populations that actually matter biologically.</p>
<p>The implications of this work extend well beyond the walls of the laboratories that performed it. Extracellular vesicle research is currently fragmented by methodological inconsistency, with different groups using different instruments, thresholds, and preparation protocols, making it genuinely difficult to compare results across studies. Meta-analyses and replication efforts in the field repeatedly cite measurement variability as a barrier to progress. By systematically mapping how three representative instruments perform on identical reference materials, and by quantifying the effect of concentration on each platform, the study lays groundwork for standardized characterization protocols that could be adopted across the community.</p>
<p>The choice of silica nanoparticles as size calibrators deserves particular attention. Unlike biological samples, which are heterogeneous and fragile, silica nanoparticles of defined diameters provide a reproducible, commercially available reference that any laboratory can obtain. By running the same four size populations through all three instruments under optimized conditions, the researchers created a sensitivity ladder that others can use to position their own instruments. A laboratory wondering whether its cytometer can resolve small extracellular vesicles can now consult this benchmark rather than discovering the answer through frustrated trial and error with precious biological samples.</p>
<p>The study also carries a quiet warning about the interpretation of existing data. Because detection thresholds vary so dramatically between instrument generations, size distributions and concentrations reported in older studies, or in studies using less sensitive platforms, may systematically underrepresent the smallest vesicle populations. Particles below the detection threshold simply do not register, skewing apparent size distributions toward larger vesicles and underestimating total particle counts. Researchers comparing their own results to published literature now have a concrete framework for judging whether such discrepancies might stem from instrument sensitivity rather than biology.</p>
<p>For the rapidly growing industry surrounding extracellular vesicle therapeutics and diagnostics, the stakes are even higher. Regulatory agencies increasingly demand rigorous, reproducible characterization of vesicle-based products, and batch-to-batch consistency is a prerequisite for clinical translation. The demonstration that instrument configuration, detection strategy, and sample concentration jointly determine measurement outcomes suggests that quality control programs must specify not only which instrument class is used but also the validated dilution and detection mode for each product. The fluorescent recombinant vesicle approach highlighted in the study offers one route toward more robust, background-resistant quantification in such pipelines.</p>
<p>Ultimately, this comparison of three generations of high-sensitivity flow cytometers delivers what the field has needed most: an honest, quantitative accounting of what these instruments can and cannot do at the single-particle level. It shows that dedicated nano-flow platforms push detection limits below what general-purpose cytometers achieve, that careful optimization of scatter parameters recovers meaningful performance even on older instrument architectures, that sample dilution must be treated as a critical experimental variable rather than an afterthought, and that fluorescence labeling remains the most reliable path to identifying specific vesicle populations amid biological noise. As extracellular vesicles continue their march toward clinical application, frameworks like this one transform single-particle characterization from an art into a science.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Cross-platform comparison of high-sensitivity flow cytometers for single-particle characterization of silica nanoparticles and fluorescent recombinant extracellular vesicles</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Characterization of nanoparticles and fluorescent recombinant extracellular vesicles using three different generations of high-sensitivity flow cytometers</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Characterization of nanoparticles and fluorescent recombinant extracellular vesicles using three different generations of high-sensitivity flow cytometers. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1144553" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> extracellular vesicles, flow cytometry, nanoparticles, NanoFCM, BD Influx, CytoFLEX LX, silica nanoparticles, light scatter detection, fluorescence detection, single-particle analysis, sample concentration, standardization</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">204560</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
