<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Single embryo transfer boosts modern IVF success rates to 68% &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/single-embryo-transfer-boosts-modern-ivf-success-rates-to-68/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 01:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Return exactly one rewritten English science news headline for the original title below. Maximum 12 words. Output plain text only. Do not use HTML, Markdown, quotes, labels, explanations, bullets, numbering, or multiple options. Original title: Modern IVF achieves higher success rates with single embryo transfer, major study finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/return-exactly-one-rewritten-english-science-news-headline-for-the-original-title-below-maximum-12-words-output-plain-text-only-do-not-use-html-markdown-quotes-labels-explanations-bullets-num-17/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SCIENMAG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 01:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single embryo transfer boosts modern IVF success rates to 68%]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/return-exactly-one-rewritten-english-science-news-headline-for-the-original-title-below-maximum-12-words-output-plain-text-only-do-not-use-html-markdown-quotes-labels-explanations-bullets-num-17/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(London, United Kingdom) Modern IVF treatment can now achieve substantially higher success rates than historical approaches while dramatically reducing twin and triplet pregnancies, according to new research presented today at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE).[1] In one of the largest IVF studies of its kind, researchers [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>                            <strong>(London, United Kingdom) Modern IVF treatment can now achieve substantially higher success rates than historical approaches while dramatically reducing twin and triplet pregnancies, according to new research presented today at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE).[1]</strong></p>
<p>In one of the largest IVF studies of its kind, researchers analysed outcomes from 18,396 women undergoing their first IVF cycle between January 2012 and December 2021 across seven Australian fertility clinics, with follow-up through December 2023.</p>
<p>The research found that modern IVF clinical practices achieved a 68.2% cumulative live birth rate over three treatment cycles, while using single embryo transfer in 95.3% of embryo transfers and maintaining a multiple birth rate of just 2.9%.</p>
<p>The findings mark a notable improvement on historical IVF outcomes. Earlier studies, conducted before the widespread adoption of modern IVF laboratory techniques, reported three-cycle cumulative live birth rates of around 53–59%, often alongside multiple pregnancy rates exceeding 20%. The researchers say the improved outcomes likely reflect advances including blastocyst culture, embryo vitrification, freeze-all strategies and optimised frozen embryo transfer protocols, now widely used in contemporary IVF care.</p>
<p>Researchers examined cumulative live birth rates across up to three IVF cycles using contemporary clinical protocols, including extended blastocyst culture (day 5–6 embryo development), embryo vitrification (rapid freezing) and elective freeze-all approaches where appropriate. Women using donor eggs, frozen eggs or specific genetic testing pathways were excluded from the analysis. Across all women, the cumulative live birth rate over three treatment cycles reached 58.7% using intention-to-treat analysis and 68.2% using optimal per-protocol analysis.</p>
<p>Success rates varied substantially by age. Women under 35 achieved an optimal cumulative live birth rate of 84.5%, compared with 74.4% for women aged 35–37, 57.7% for women aged 38–40 and 30.1% for women aged 41–42.</p>
<p>Lead author Dr Dean Morbeck said the findings reflect a decade of incremental advances in IVF laboratory and clinical practice.</p>
<p>“The biggest shift has been that blastocyst culture has moved from being an exception to becoming the default,” Dr Morbeck explained. “That change drove improvements across IVF laboratories, including reduced oxygen conditions, purpose-built incubators and minimised disruption to embryos during culture.”</p>
<p>“Blastocyst culture also became much more effective with vitrification, which dramatically improved embryo survival after freezing and warming, making frozen embryo transfer outcomes comparable to fresh transfers. Together, these advances enabled approaches such as freeze-all treatment, where embryos are transferred one at a time later, rather than during the initial stimulation cycle.”</p>
<p>The study also examined changes over time, comparing outcomes before and after laboratory improvements introduced from 2016 onwards, including single-step culture medium and time-lapse embryo culture. Between 2012–2015 and 2017–2021, the proportion of fertilised eggs developing into usable blastocysts increased from 48.3% to 57.6%, while single embryo transfer increased from 92.8% to 97.3%. Over the same period, the multiple birth rate fell from 3.2% to 2.7%.</p>
<p>Dr Morbeck said the findings challenge the longstanding assumption that transferring multiple embryos is necessary to maximise IVF success.</p>
<p>“For many years, transferring two embryos increased the chance of pregnancy from any one transfer, but often came with twin pregnancy rates approaching 30%,” he explained. “What our data show is that this trade-off has largely disappeared.”</p>
<p>“Across more than 18,000 women, we achieved strong cumulative live birth rates while using single embryo transfer in 95% of cases and maintaining a twin birth rate under 3%. A concerted effort to reduce twin pregnancies has not cost patients their chance of taking home a baby – it has coincided with that chance increasing.”</p>
<p>The findings also suggest that strong IVF outcomes can be achieved without routine use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) – a test used to screen embryos for chromosomal abnormalities before transfer – in all patients.</p>
<p>PGT-A was used in one or more treatment cycles in 25% of women included in the study. However, Dr Morbeck noted that most live births occurred without routine embryo genetic testing.</p>
<p>“PGT-A has an important role for some patients, particularly women of advanced maternal age and those with recurrent pregnancy loss,” he said. “But our findings should reassure many patients that strong IVF outcomes are achievable without routine genetic testing necessarily being required.”</p>
<p>Discussing the implications of the findings, Dr Morbeck said the results support continued efforts to increase access to single embryo transfer internationally. “The future of IVF is continuing to improve the success rate of each embryo transfer while maintaining the safety gains we’ve achieved,” he said.</p>
<p>Reflecting on the significance of the research, Professor Borut Kovacic, Chair-elect of ESHRE, said: “Improvements in IVF are typically driven by steady, incremental advances rather than dramatic breakthroughs. This study demonstrates that optimising laboratory practices, adhering to evidence-based guidelines and adopting a relatively conservative treatment approach can progressively increase cumulative live birth rates while reducing multiple births – two outcomes that matter most to patients seeking a safe and cost-effective route to parenthood within a single stimulation cycle.”</p>
<p>The study abstract will be published today in <em>Human Reproduction</em>, one of the world’s leading reproductive medicine journals.</p>
<p style="text-align:center">
<strong>ENDS</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Notes to editors:</strong></p>
<p>A reference to the ESHRE Annual Meeting must be included in all coverage and/or articles associated with this study.</p>
<p>For more information or to arrange an expert interview, please contact the ESHRE Press Office at: press@eshre.eu<br />
 </p>
<p><strong>About the study author:</strong></p>
<p>Dr Dean Morbeck is Chief Scientific Officer at Genea Fertility in Sydney and an adjunct Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Monash University, Melbourne. A clinical embryologist by training, he has led IVF laboratory and scientific programmes across Australia, Thailand, New Zealand, Malaysia and the United States – including roles as Scientific Director at Fertility Associates (New Zealand) and Sunfert International (Malaysia), Chief Scientific Officer at Kindbody and Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology at the Mayo Clinic. His work focuses on embryo culture and laboratory quality and their influence on IVF outcomes. He currently serves as Secretary of Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and holds a BSc from the University of Wisconsin, an MSc and PhD in Physiology from North Carolina State University and an MBA from Augsburg College.</p>
<p>
<strong>About the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology:</strong></p>
<p>The main aim of ESHRE is to promote interest in infertility care and to aim for a holistic understanding of reproductive biology and medicine.</p>
<p>ESHRE collaborates world-wide and advocates universal improvements in scientific research, encourages and evaluates new developments in the field, and fosters harmonisation in clinical practice. It also provides guidance to enhance effectiveness, safety and quality assurance in clinical and laboratory procedures, psychosocial care, and promotes ethical practice. ESHRE also fosters prevention of infertility and related educational programmes and promotes reproductive rights regardless of the individual’s background. ESHRE’s activities include teaching, training, professional accreditations, mentoring and career planning for junior professionals, as well as developing and maintaining data registries. It also facilitates and disseminates research in human reproduction and embryology to the general public, scientists, clinicians, allied personnel and patient associations.</p>
<p>Website: <a href=""></a></p>
<p>
<strong>About <em>Human Reproduction: </em></strong></p>
<p><em>Human Reproduction</em> is a monthly journal of ESHRE and is one of the top three journals in the world in the field of reproductive biology, obstetrics and gynaecology. It is published by Oxford Journals, a division of Oxford University Press.<br />
 </p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<p>[1] Morbeck, D., et al. (2026). Modern IVF clinical practices achieve superior cumulative live birth rates with near-universal single embryo transfer: A multi-cycle cohort study. <em>Human Reproduction</em>.</p>
<p> </p>
<hr class="hidden-xs hidden-sm">
<hr class="major visible-sm">
<div class="featured_image">
<div class="details">
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            </div></div></div>
<p></p>
<div class="contact-info">
                <strong>Media Contact</strong></p>
<p>                                    ESHRE Press Office</p>
<p>                    European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</p>
<p>                press@eshre.eu<br />
            </p></div>
<p></p>
<dl class="dl-horizontal meta stacked">
<dt class="red">Meeting</dt>
<dd class="red">ESHRE 42nd Annual Meeting</dd>
</dl>
<p></p>
<div class="details">
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            </div>
<p></p>
<div class="col-sm-6 col-md-12">
<h4 class="widget-subtitle">Tags</h4>
<nav class="tag-cloud">
<ul class="tags">
<li class="active ea-keyword">
                            <a href="#"><br />
                              <span class="ea-keyword__path">/Health and medicine/Human health/Human biology/Human reproduction/</span><span class="ea-keyword__short">In vitro fertilization</span><br />
                            </a>
                        </li>
<li class="ea-keyword">
                                <a href="#"><br />
                                  <span class="ea-keyword__path">/Health and medicine/Human health/Human biology/Human reproduction/</span><span class="ea-keyword__short">Human fertilization</span><br />
                                </a>
                            </li>
<li class="ea-keyword">
                                <a href="#"><br />
                                  <span class="ea-keyword__path"> /Health and medicine/Human health/</span><span class="ea-keyword__short">Public health</span><br />
                                </a>
                            </li>
<li class="ea-keyword">
                                <a href="#"><br />
                                  <span class="ea-keyword__path"> /Health and medicine/Human health/Human biology/</span><span class="ea-keyword__short">Human reproduction</span><br />
                                </a>
                            </li>
<li class="ea-keyword">
                                <a href="#"><br />
                                  <span class="ea-keyword__path"> /Life sciences/Developmental biology/Ontogeny/</span><span class="ea-keyword__short">Embryology</span><br />
                                </a>
                            </li>
<li class="ea-keyword">
                                <a href="#"><br />
                                  <span class="ea-keyword__path"> /Health and medicine/Diseases and disorders/Reproductive disorders/</span><span class="ea-keyword__short">Infertility</span><br />
                                </a>
                            </li>
<li class="ea-keyword">
                                <a href="#"><br />
                                  <span class="ea-keyword__path"> /Health and medicine/Diseases and disorders/</span><span class="ea-keyword__short">Reproductive disorders</span><br />
                                </a>
                            </li>
<li class="ea-keyword">
                                <a href="#"><br />
                                  <span class="ea-keyword__path"> /Social sciences/Demography/Vital statistics/</span><span class="ea-keyword__short">Birth rates</span><br />
                                </a>
                            </li>
<li class="ea-keyword">
                                <a href="#"><br />
                                  <span class="ea-keyword__path"> /Health and medicine/Human health/Human biology/Human reproduction/</span><span class="ea-keyword__short">Pregnancy</span><br />
                                </a>
                            </li>
<li class="ea-keyword">
                                <a href="#"><br />
                                  <span class="ea-keyword__path"> /Social sciences/Sociology/Society/Human relations/Family/Siblings/</span><span class="ea-keyword__short">Multiple birth siblings</span><br />
                                </a>
                            </li>
</ul>
</nav></div>
<p>bu içeriği 600 ile 800 kelime arasında olacak şekilde ve alt başlıklar ve madde içermiyecek şekilde ünlü bir science magazine için İngilizce olarak yeniden yaz. Teknik açıklamalar içersin ve Viral science news olacak şekilde İngilizce yaz. Haber dışında başka bir şey içermesin. Haber içerisinde 8 ile 10 paragraf olsun ve toplam uzunluk 600 ile 800 kelime arasında kalsın.  Cevapta sadece haber olsun. Ayrıca haberi yazdıktan sonra içerikten yararlanarak aşağıdaki başlıkların bilgisi var ise haberin altında doldur. Eğer yoksa bilgisi ilgili kısmı yazma.:<br />
<strong>Subject of Research</strong>:<br />
<strong>Article Title</strong>:<br />
<strong>News Publication Date</strong>:<br />
<strong>Web References</strong>:<br />
<strong>References</strong>:<br />
<strong>Image Credits</strong>:</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">170456</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
