<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>shear flow &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/shear-flow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 15:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Shear Instability Itself Can Twist Solar Jet Magnetic Fields, Study Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/shear-instability-itself-can-twist-solar-jet-magnetic-fields-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katie Riggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 15:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronal jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formation of helical solar coronal jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gauge invariance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideal incompressible MHD in astrophysical phenomena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of shear-induced instabilities on magnetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of fluid instabilities on magnetic field topology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelvin-Helmholtz instability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in magnetized plasma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic field twist and stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic flux ropes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic helicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic helicity generation in solar jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetohydrodynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetohydrodynamics analysis of plasma flows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MHD instabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasma flow instabilities and magnetic energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plasma Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of shear instabilities in solar corona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shear flow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shear layer dynamics in astrophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Corona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space plasma]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=238656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new analytical study shows that the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in magnetized plasma intrinsically generates magnetic helicity, potentially supplying the twist observed in solar coronal jets.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most familiar instabilities in fluid dynamics may be doing far more than shredding flows into vortices. A new analytical study published in Astrophysics and Space Science argues that the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, the same wave-growth mechanism that ruffles wind-blown water surfaces and rolls up clouds, can actively generate magnetic helicity in a magnetized plasma. Magnetic helicity is a measure of how much a magnetic field is twisted, knotted, and linked with itself, and it is a quantity that astrophysicists track carefully because it controls how magnetic structures store energy, become unstable, and eventually erupt. The result, derived by Mahboub Hosseinpour of the University of Tabriz, suggests that a process long viewed as mainly disruptive may quietly supply the twist that keeps solar coronal jets helical and stable.</p>
<p>The mathematical heart of the work lies in a careful treatment of the linearized equations of ideal, incompressible magnetohydrodynamics in a 2.5-dimensional configuration, meaning that the equilibrium quantities vary in only one direction while the perturbations are allowed to depend on all three spatial coordinates. Hosseinpour considers a shear layer in which a plasma flow slides past a magnetized background, the classic setup for the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. The key insight is that the operator governing the instability in this magnetized system is neither self-adjoint nor normal. In plain terms, the eigenmodes that describe the growing ripples do not behave like the well-behaved orthogonal modes of a simple vibrating string. Instead, they carry a complex phase asymmetry across the shear layer, with different parts of the wave pattern shifted in phase relative to one another in a way that a symmetric, self-adjoint operator would never produce.</p>
<p>That phase asymmetry turns out to have a striking physical consequence. When the perturbed electric field and the perturbed vector potential of the reference potential field are combined in the flux integral that governs relative magnetic helicity, the time average over an oscillation cycle no longer cancels to zero. The growing instability therefore drives a nonzero, time-averaged helicity flux through the boundaries of any subvolume that encloses the shear layer. Because the system is closed, this flux does not create helicity from nothing in a global sense; rather, it redistributes magnetic helicity within the system, pumping it from the shear interface into the surrounding jet boundary region. The paper derives a closed-form analytical expression for this helicity injection rate, a result that required a meticulous gauge-invariant formulation of the relative helicity evolution equation.</p>
<p>Gauge invariance is not a technical nicety here but the foundation of the claim. Magnetic helicity is defined through integrals involving the vector potential, and the vector potential is only defined up to a gauge transformation, an arbitrary redefinition that leaves the physical magnetic field unchanged. A sloppy gauge choice can make a helicity flux appear or disappear artificially. The study works through the derivation in detail, choosing the gauge on the boundaries of the slab so that the vector potential of the perturbed field matches that of the potential reference field in the components tangential to the boundary. With that choice, the volume terms in the helicity evolution equation vanish identically in ideal magnetohydrodynamics, because the electric field is perpendicular to the magnetic field, and the entire budget reduces to a surface integral of the cross product between the perturbed electric field and the vector potential of the reference field. The surviving expression is unambiguously gauge-invariant, which means the helicity injection it predicts is a genuine physical effect rather than an artifact of the bookkeeping.</p>
<p>The mathematical machinery behind the result is equally careful. Starting from the linearized momentum and induction equations, the analysis eliminates the total pressure perturbation and reduces the full system to a single second-order ordinary differential equation for the velocity perturbation normal to the shear layer. For the specific equilibrium considered, in which the flow profile is proportional to the magnetic field profile, a clever change of variables collapses the equation into a compact form that can be solved with a matched asymptotic expansion. In the outer regions far from the shear layer, where the equilibrium quantities are effectively constant, the equation reduces to a simple Helmholtz equation. Matching the inner and outer solutions then yields the eigenfunctions whose complex phase structure, as the paper shows, is precisely what generates the helicity flux.</p>
<p>To test whether the effect matters in the real universe, Hosseinpour applies the theory to solar coronal jets, narrow, spire-shaped eruptions that shoot plasma along magnetic field lines out of the solar corona. Observations frequently show Kelvin-Helmholtz instability developing at the interface between the fast-moving jet and the slower ambient plasma, appearing as rolled-up vortices along the jet boundary. Using representative jet parameters, a background magnetic field of roughly 10 gauss, a shear-flow Alfvén Mach number of about 1.36, a shear layer half-width of approximately 100 kilometers, and a perturbation wavelength near 10,000 kilometers, the calculation predicts that the linear instability injects magnetic helicity at a rate of about 10 to the 14 webers squared per second into the jet boundary region.</p>
<p>That number becomes meaningful when integrated over the growth time of the instability. The e-folding time, the interval over which the perturbation amplitude grows by a factor of e, is estimated at roughly 8 seconds for these parameters. Over such an interval, the accumulated helicity reaches a magnitude comparable to the twist inferred from observations of active-region jets. This is the most provocative claim of the paper: the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability alone may provide enough magnetic helicity to account for the helical structure and the resulting stability of coronal jets. If correct, it would resolve a persistent puzzle in solar physics, namely where the twist in these structures comes from, and it would elevate the instability from a mere source of turbulence to an active agent in structuring the corona.</p>
<p>The broader implications extend well beyond the Sun. Kelvin-Helmholtz instability is ubiquitous wherever fast plasma flows shear past slower ones, from the flanks of Earth&#8217;s magnetosphere, where rolled-up vortices have been observed to transport solar wind into the magnetosphere, to coronal streamers, prominence bubbles, and the boundaries of astrophysical jets on far larger scales. Magnetic helicity conservation and transport are central to dynamo theory, to the build-up of coronal mass ejections, and to the self-organization of laboratory plasmas. A mechanism that generates helicity flux at any sheared magnetized interface therefore touches a remarkably wide swath of plasma physics, and the analytical nature of the result makes it a benchmark against which numerical simulations can be tested.</p>
<p>It is worth emphasizing the limits of the theory as presented. The derivation assumes an ideal, incompressible plasma in a 2.5-dimensional geometry, with a linear analysis valid only while the perturbations remain small. Real coronal plasmas are compressible, the instability eventually saturates and becomes turbulent, and the nonlinear phase, where vortices merge and magnetic reconnection may set in, lies beyond the reach of the linear eigenmode calculation. The author notes that no datasets were generated or analyzed in the study, underscoring that this is a purely theoretical contribution whose predictions now await observational or numerical scrutiny. Still, the elegance of the result is hard to deny: a closed-form, gauge-invariant expression showing that the very act of shearing a magnetized flow imprints twist on the magnetic field. If future observations confirm that coronal jets acquire their helical structure on the timescales predicted, textbooks may need to add a new entry to the list of ways the universe winds up its magnetic fields, and it will be one written by an instability that scientists have been studying for more than a century and a half.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Generation of magnetic helicity by the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in magnetized plasma and its application to solar coronal jets</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> On the generation of magnetic helicity by the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in 2.5D incompressible MHD</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hosseinpour, M. (2026). On the generation of magnetic helicity by the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in 2.5D incompressible MHD. <em>Astrophysics and Space Science, 371</em>(10), Article 115. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-026-04648-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-026-04648-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-026-04648-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10509-026-04648-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> magnetic helicity, Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, magnetohydrodynamics, solar corona, coronal jets, plasma physics, shear flow, MHD instabilities, solar physics, gauge invariance, magnetic flux ropes, space plasma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">238656</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Cancer Cells Bend, Fold and Drift in Blood Flow: Shape and Stiffness Hold the Key</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/how-cancer-cells-bend-fold-and-drift-in-blood-flow-shape-and-stiffness-hold-the-key/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathaniel Bowman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 23:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood flow shear forces on tumor cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer cell deformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer cell deformation in blood flow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer cell membrane and nuclear stiffness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell deformation under mechanical stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulating tumor cell mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulating tumor cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational modeling of cancer cell transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnostic device design for cancer detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dissipative particle dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluid-structure interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immersed boundary method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of cell protrusions on metastasis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of cell shape and stiffness on metastasis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irregular cancer cell geometries in blood flow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanobiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membrane stiffness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metastasis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metastasis mechanisms in blood vessels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microfluidics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear stiffness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shape and mechanical properties of circulating tumor cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shear flow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=213479</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new hybrid simulation framework shows that a cancer cell's shape sets its deformation pathway in blood flow while membrane and nuclear stiffness fine-tune elongation, recovery and lateral migration.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every metastatic journey begins with a moment of extreme mechanical stress. When a tumor cell slips into the bloodstream and becomes a circulating tumor cell, it is squeezed, stretched and dragged by the shear forces of blood plasma moving through vessels far narrower than itself. A new computational study published in the Annals of Biomedical Engineering has now revealed, with unprecedented detail, that the way a cancer cell deforms under this assault is governed first by its shape and then fine-tuned by the stiffness of its membrane and nucleus. The findings offer a mechanistic framework that could reshape how scientists interpret circulating tumor cell transport, design diagnostic devices and even think about blocking metastasis.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Meraj Ahmed, Lahcen Akerkouch and Trung Bao Le at North Dakota State University, together with colleagues at the University of North Dakota, tackled a problem that has long frustrated modelers. Most previous simulations represented cancer cells as idealized spheres or capsules, an assumption that bears little resemblance to the irregular, protrusion-covered geometries seen under the microscope. To break free of that limitation, the team cultured breast cancer cells of the MDA-MB-231 line on glass coverslips, fixed and stained them, and then imaged individual cells with a Leica Stellaris confocal microscope at an axial step size of half a micrometer. From these image stacks, four distinct three-dimensional cell geometries, labeled M-1 through M-4, were reconstructed and converted into triangulated surface meshes that preserved the experimentally observed irregularity.</p>
<p>The simulation framework itself is a hybrid of two computational worlds. The cell membrane and the nuclear envelope were modeled using dissipative particle dynamics, a mesoscopic technique in which the membranes are represented as networks of nonlinear springs obeying a Helmholtz free energy functional. That energy accounts for in-plane stretching through a Wormlike Chain-Power formulation, bending resistance, and the conservation of surface area and enclosed volume, with an additional short-range repulsive potential preventing the membrane and nucleus from unphysically overlapping. The surrounding blood plasma, by contrast, was treated as a continuous incompressible Newtonian fluid governed by the three-dimensional unsteady Navier-Stokes equations. The two descriptions were stitched together with a sharp-interface curvilinear immersed boundary method, so that forces generated by the deforming membranes are transferred to the fluid while the local fluid velocity is interpolated back to the membrane nodes. Each of the four geometries was then simulated under three stiffness combinations, in which the Young&#8217;s moduli of the membrane and nucleus were varied from 1.26 to 2.52 times ten to the minus five newtons per meter, yielding twelve cases in total.</p>
<p>Before any flow was applied, the reconstructed cells had to be brought to mechanical equilibrium. Because scanned geometries cannot generally be represented by equilateral triangles, the team ran shape relaxation simulations for 900 milliseconds under force-free conditions, temporarily removed the scanned nuclei, and then reintroduced them as spheres inside the relaxed cell volumes. Only then were the cells placed in a rectangular microchannel with plasma viscosity of 1.2 times ten to the minus six square meters per second and a bulk velocity of one millimeter per second, ramped up over half a millisecond. The simulations, run on 64 CPUs at North Dakota State University&#8217;s computing cluster with a physical time step of one microsecond, captured the first ten milliseconds of deformation in exquisite detail.</p>
<p>The first striking result is how fast everything happens. All four cell models exhibited a rapid deformation response within the first one to two milliseconds of flow onset, followed by shape evolution that depended strongly on both morphology and stiffness. To classify the ever-changing shapes, the researchers introduced a scheme based on two classical indices, sphericity and aspect ratio, partitioning the shape space into five categories: round or compact, amoeboid ellipsoidal, lobed, elongated, and streamer. Model M-1, which began highly elongated with an aspect ratio above ten, remained streamer-like throughout. Model M-2, the most compact, stayed amoeboid ellipsoidal with remarkable stability, its aspect ratio hovering between roughly 4.4 and 5.3 and its sphericity near 0.8. The transition-prone models M-3 and M-4 told a more dramatic story, switching between compact, elongated, lobed and streamer states as time progressed and as stiffness changed.</p>
<p>Stiffness, it turns out, does not act uniformly. Membrane stiffening dominated elongation and the loss of compactness, while nuclear stiffening mainly modulated the timing and amplitude of deformation excursions and the degree of partial recovery. The most vivid example came from model M-3, which was compact ellipsoidal for all stiffness cases at five milliseconds but, by ten milliseconds, had transitioned to a streamer state only under the stiffest membrane and nucleus combination, a stiffness-induced switch from compact deformation to tether-dominated elongation. Model M-4 underwent a clear temporal transition, starting elongated, briefly becoming streamer-like, and then converging to a folded, lobed configuration by ten milliseconds regardless of stiffness, indicating that lobing and folding, rather than continued stretching, dominated its loss of compactness.</p>
<p>Because the framework resolves the extracellular flow as well as the cell, the researchers could watch how these shape changes reorganized the surrounding fluid. When membrane stiffening did not substantially change the cell&#8217;s shape class, the wake vortices were merely stretched and pushed closer to the membrane as near-surface velocity gradients sharpened. But when stiffness drove a genuine shape transition, as in M-3&#8217;s shift from compact to streamer, the flow responded dramatically: separation and reattachment points moved, recirculation zones shifted, and some vortices were effectively washed away. Traction maps, which combine pressure and viscous shear on the membrane surface, told a complementary story. The compact M-2 showed the smoothest and most symmetric loading with weak stiffness sensitivity, while the deformation-prone models concentrated traction into hot spots at geometric constrictions, high-curvature protrusions, neck and tether regions, and surface folds, with membrane stiffening sharpening these gradients into smaller, more intense patches.</p>
<p>The net hydrodynamic force on the membrane followed a common pattern across all models: a start-up rise within the first half millisecond followed by relaxation. Beyond that shared transient, morphology took over. The compact M-2 settled at the lowest and steadiest force levels, around 14 to 16 piconewtons, with the three stiffness curves nearly overlapping. M-1 stabilized near 18 to 20 piconewtons with mild unsteadiness. The deformation-prone models showed far richer behavior, including a compliant-case overshoot in M-3 reaching about 30 piconewtons at six to seven milliseconds, and late-time values up to 25 to 27 piconewtons in M-4 near ten milliseconds. Cross-sectional velocity and vorticity fields added the final piece, revealing a pronounced asymmetry about one lateral axis that produces a dominant hydrodynamic imbalance and drives lateral migration, with stiffness modulating the intensity of these features without changing their direction.</p>
<p>The clinical implications ripple outward in several directions. Highly deformable cells that adopt elongated or lobed configurations can pass through narrow capillaries more easily and are more likely to drift toward vessel walls, raising the probability of the adhesion and extravasation events that seed distant metastases, whereas stiffer cells tend to remain in the flow core. Cell deformability is increasingly recognized as a biophysical biomarker of malignancy, and the deformation-driven lateral migration described here could enable label-free microfluidic sorting of circulating tumor cells. Therapeutically, interventions that alter membrane or nuclear stiffness, such as cytoskeletal drugs or lamin-targeted strategies, might shift deformation pathways and reduce metastatic potential by limiting wall-ward transport. The authors caution that their simulations used periodic rather than no-slip lateral boundaries and did not include red blood cell collisions or the cell-free layer, effects they plan to incorporate in future work. They also note that the trends identified, with membrane stiffness controlling elongation and compactness and nuclear stiffness governing recovery and internal reorganization, are expected to hold qualitatively even in curved vessels and at higher velocities, even though exact transition thresholds may shift. For now, the study provides something the field has lacked: a mechanistic bridge linking what a cancer cell looks like, how stiff it is, and where the blood flow will carry it.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Cancer cell deformation under shear flow as governed by cell morphology and membrane and nuclear elasticity</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Impacts of Morphology and Elasticity on Cancer Cell Deformation in Shear Flows</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ahmed, M., Akerkouch, L., Vanyo, A., Haage, A., &amp; Le, T. B. (2026). Impacts of Morphology and Elasticity on Cancer Cell Deformation in Shear Flows. <em>Annals of Biomedical Engineering</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-026-04363-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-026-04363-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-026-04363-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10439-026-04363-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> circulating tumor cells, cancer cell deformation, shear flow, dissipative particle dynamics, immersed boundary method, membrane stiffness, nuclear stiffness, metastasis, mechanobiology, microfluidics, fluid-structure interaction, cell mechanics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">213479</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
