<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sexual reproduction &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/sexual-reproduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:28:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Molecular Switchboard Revealed: How Plant Sex Cells Coordinate Two Ancient Signalling Systems</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/molecular-switchboard-revealed-how-plant-sex-cells-coordinate-two-ancient-signalling-systems/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arabidopsis thaliana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AtSWAP70]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell polarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular coordination during plant fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endosomal trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integration of GTPase signaling systems in plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular mechanisms of plant reproductive success]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular switchboard in plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant cell architecture and vesicle transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant cell biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant cell membrane trafficking regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant reproductive cell signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant sex cell communication pathways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant signaling pathway cross-talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollen tube guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAB and ROP GTPase functions in plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAB5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REAP1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REAP1 protein in plant reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation of pollen tube growth in plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROP GTPases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signalling integration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=202880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A newly identified Arabidopsis protein, REAP1/AtSWAP70, physically links RAB5 endosomal trafficking with ROP polarity signalling to ensure successful pollen tube guidance and sperm delivery during fertilization.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sexual reproduction in plants depends on a feat of cellular logistics that unfolds in silence, at microscopic scale, and with almost no margin for error. When a grain of pollen lands on the stigma of a flower, it must germinate, extend a tube through maternal tissue, navigate to an ovule, and deliver two sperm cells to the female gametes waiting inside. Every stage of that journey is choreographed by molecular signals, and any breakdown in the choreography ends in sterility. A new study published in Nature Plants now identifies a protein, REAP1 — also known as AtSWAP70 — that acts as a molecular bridge between two of the cell&#8217;s most important signalling systems, revealing how plant cells integrate distinct communication pathways to keep the business of reproduction running on schedule.</p>
<p>The two systems in question are built around small GTPases, a superfamily of molecular switches found across all of life. In animal and fungal cells, RAB proteins regulate the trafficking of membrane-bound vesicles, deciding which cargo moves between cellular compartments and when. ROP proteins, the plant-specific cousins of the RHO family, govern the architecture of the cell, controlling where the cell wall expands, where the cytoskeleton assembles, and how a cell polarizes its growth. Both types of switch cycle between an active, GTP-bound state and an inactive, GDP-bound state, and both are notorious for talking to many different partners. What has been far less clear is whether, and how, the two systems talk to each other.</p>
<p>The new work shows that they do, and that the conversation matters most at a moment of exceptional cellular drama: the handover of sperm cells from the pollen tube to the female gametes. Using a combination of genetic screens, live-cell imaging, and cell biological analysis in the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana, the researchers found that mutants lacking functional REAP1/AtSWAP70 display striking defects in pollen tube guidance and sperm cell release. The pollen tubes of these mutants still grow, but they lose their way inside the ovule and fail to rupture at the right time and place, leaving the egg cell unfertilized. The phenotype is subtle enough to have escaped notice in coarse screens, yet severe enough that the plant&#8217;s fertility collapses when the gene is missing.</p>
<p>What makes the discovery conceptually important is where REAP1/AtSWAP70 sits in the network. The protein carries domains that allow it to bind active RAB5, the master regulator of the endosomal trafficking pathway, and the study demonstrates that it physically associates with components of ROP signalling as well. In other words, it is not merely a downstream target of one pathway or the other; it is a point of contact where the two pathways meet. When REAP1/AtSWAP70 is absent, the researchers observed that the spatial organization of active ROP signalling in the growing pollen tube becomes disordered, and the delivery of membrane material to the tube tip — a process that depends on RAB5-mediated endosomal traffic — is disrupted. The two failures are not independent; they are two faces of the same broken connection.</p>
<p>Endosomes have long been understood as the cell&#8217;s sorting office, receiving material from the plasma membrane, routing it for degradation or recycling, and dispatching it to new destinations. In a rapidly growing pollen tube, which can extend at rates of several micrometers per minute, this traffic is not housekeeping — it is the supply line. Membrane and cell wall precursors must be delivered to the apex continuously for growth to continue, and the polarity of that delivery defines the direction of the tube. RAB5 sits at the heart of this logistics network, marking the compartments that carry the cargo. The new findings suggest that REAP1/AtSWAP70 allows the RAB5 system to be steered by ROP signals, so that the logistics network responds in real time to the polarity cues that tell the tube where to grow and when to burst.</p>
<p>The name AtSWAP70 hints at an evolutionary story that adds weight to the result. SWAP-70 was originally characterized in animal cells as an actin-binding protein involved in immune cell function and in the remodeling of the cytoskeleton during endosomal trafficking. Finding a functional relative in plants, doing comparable work at the interface of endosomal traffic and cytoskeletal polarity during reproduction, suggests that the logic of coupling membrane traffic to cell polarity is an ancient solution that evolution has deployed more than once. Whether the plant and animal proteins are true orthologs or convergent solutions to a similar problem remains an open question, but the parallel is striking and biologically telling.</p>
<p>The experimental logic of the study is worth appreciating because it illustrates how modern plant cell biology dissects a problem of this kind. The researchers began with a mutant defective in fertilization and worked forward, mapping the mutation to the REAP1/AtSWAP70 locus. They then tagged the protein with fluorescent markers to establish where and when it accumulates, finding it enriched at the apical region of the growing pollen tube and in dynamic puncta consistent with endosomal compartments. Genetic interaction tests — combining the reap1 mutation with perturbations in RAB5 pathway components and in ROP signalling — placed the protein squarely at the junction of the two systems rather than in either pathway alone. Complementary imaging of active ROP using biosensors that report GTP-bound state showed that the normal apical polarization of ROP activity deteriorates in the mutant, connecting the molecular interaction to a visible cellular defect.</p>
<p>Why should this matter beyond the world of Arabidopsis genetics? Fertilization is the bottleneck of seed production, and seed production is the bottleneck of agriculture. Pollen tube guidance and sperm release are precisely the steps most sensitive to environmental stress — heat, drought, and poor nutrition all degrade pollen performance, and yield losses in crops during heat waves are frequently traced to failures at exactly this stage of the reproductive process. A molecular component that integrates the two core signalling systems controlling pollen tube behavior is therefore not just an elegant piece of cell biology; it is a potential point of leverage. If researchers can understand how REAP1/AtSWAP70 activity is regulated, they gain a handle on a process that limits fertility under stress, with implications for breeding crops that set seed reliably in a warming climate.</p>
<p>The study also contributes to a broader conceptual shift in how biologists think about cellular signalling. For decades, pathways were drawn as branching diagrams, with each cascade running in parallel from receptor to response. The reality emerging from work like this is far more reticulate: pathways cross-talk constantly, and dedicated connector proteins — of which REAP1/AtSWAP70 now stands as a plant example — exist precisely to make that cross-talk orderly rather than chaotic. Integration is not an accident of promiscuous biochemistry; it is a designed feature, embodied in molecules whose job is to let one system interrogate and modulate another. Understanding these connectors in pollen tubes may illuminate how integration is achieved in other polarized, rapidly growing cells, from root hairs to neurons, where the same two problems — directing traffic and defining polarity — must be solved together.</p>
<p>Open questions remain, and the authors are candid about them. The precise biochemical mechanism by which REAP1/AtSWAP70 links RAB5-positive endosomes to ROP signalling — whether it acts as a scaffold, an exchange factor, or an adaptor recruiting effectors — will require reconstitution in vitro and further structural work. It is also not yet known whether the protein plays comparable roles in other polarized plant cells, or whether related proteins in crop species perform the same function during their reproductive phase. But the core finding stands: a single protein, identified through the sterile phenotype of a tiny flowering plant, binds together two of the most fundamental signalling machines in the cell at the exact moment when their cooperation determines whether the next generation begins. In the microscopic drama of plant reproduction, the stagehands have just acquired a name.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Integration of RAB5 endosomal trafficking and ROP GTPase signalling by the REAP1/AtSWAP70 protein during sexual reproduction in Arabidopsis thaliana</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> REAP1/AtSWAP70 integrates RAB5 and ROP signalling during sexual reproduction</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ito, E., Rzepecka, N. J., Ito, Y., Hirano, T., Ebine, K., Oda, Y., Sato, M. H., Nakano, A., Uemura, T., &amp; Ueda, T. (2026). REAP1/AtSWAP70 integrates RAB5 and ROP signalling during sexual reproduction. <em>Nature Plants, 12</em>(9), 1814-1829. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-026-02368-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-026-02368-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-026-02368-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41477-026-02368-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> REAP1, AtSWAP70, RAB5, ROP GTPases, pollen tube guidance, sexual reproduction, Arabidopsis thaliana, endosomal trafficking, cell polarity, fertilization, plant cell biology, signalling integration</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">202880</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fungi Turn to Sex and Spores When Growth Becomes a Losing Gamble</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/fungi-turn-to-sex-and-spores-when-growth-becomes-a-losing-gamble/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Howard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 17:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A-to-I RNA editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptive responses of fungi to resource scarcity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cAMP-PKA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell biology of fungal dormancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disease management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental cues triggering fungal reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution of fungal dispersal methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolutionary biology of fungi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fitness-associated sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal life-history trade-offs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal reproductive strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal sexual development mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal sporulation in response to environmental stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOG MAPK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular genetics of fungal stress responses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient limitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient limitation and fungal life cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation of fungal reproductive switches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sporulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stress signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOR signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Velvet complex]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=196847</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review in Stress Biology explains how fungi convert nutrient limitation and environmental stress into controlled developmental switches toward sporulation, sexual reproduction, and dormancy.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When nutrients run low, water becomes scarce, or a host&#8217;s immune defenses close in, many fungi do something remarkable: they stop growing and start reproducing. A new review published in the journal Stress Biology synthesizes decades of research into this dramatic life-history pivot, arguing that fungal sporulation and sexual development are not passive consequences of environmental deterioration but actively controlled developmental decisions. Written by Jie Yang, Qinhu Wang, and Huiquan Liu of Northwest A&amp;F University in China, the review brings together molecular genetics, cell biology, and evolutionary theory to explain how fungi convert bad news about their surroundings into a coordinated switch from vegetative expansion toward spores, fruiting bodies, or dormant resting structures.</p>
<p>The central insight of the review is that nutrient limitation operates in two interconnected modes. On one hand, starvation is a metabolic stress that passively restricts growth by depriving cells of the energy and building blocks needed for proliferation. On the other hand, and more strikingly, nutrient scarcity functions as information: it tells the fungus that continued local growth is becoming unprofitable and that dispersal, dormancy, or recombination may offer better future returns. This adaptive duality, the authors argue, has driven the evolution of precise sensing pathways that transform an environmental deficit into an anticipatory cue for fitness realignment. The result is a developmental window in which fungi can commit to reproduction, but only if they retain enough physiological competence to complete the costly program.</p>
<p>The clearest illustration comes from budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which enters meiotic sporulation only under a specific combination of conditions: the cells must be diploid with both mating types, starved of nitrogen, depleted of fermentable glucose, and supplied with a non-fermentable carbon source such as acetate. Each element of this recipe is physiologically coherent. Nitrogen limitation reduces the value of mitotic division, glucose depletion lifts repression of respiratory and meiotic programs, and acetate fuels meiosis and spore-wall construction. Under nutrient-rich conditions, the conserved cAMP-PKA and TOR signaling pathways promote growth and actively suppress meiotic genes; when conditions turn unfavorable, that repression is relieved and the master meiotic regulators IME1 and IME2 are induced. Sporulation, in other words, is a conditional developmental program, not a nonspecific starvation collapse.</p>
<p>Fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, achieves a similar outcome through a different regulatory architecture. Nitrogen starvation is the principal cue that triggers sexual differentiation: compatible mating types arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, mate, fuse their nuclei, enter meiosis, and produce stress-resistant spores. The pathway runs through the transcription factor Ste11, which induces mating and meiotic genes once growth-promoting cAMP-PKA and TOR signals subside. Commitment is then controlled by a molecular switch involving the Pat1 kinase and the RNA-binding protein Mei2. During vegetative growth, Pat1 phosphorylates Mei2 and marks it for destruction; upon nitrogen starvation and successful conjugation, the inhibitor Mei3 is expressed, Pat1 is inactivated, and the cell becomes irreversibly committed to meiosis. The comparison between the two yeasts supports a modular model in which conserved nutrient-sensing pathways feed into species-specific reproductive circuits.</p>
<p>Filamentous fungi add further layers of complexity. In Aspergillus nidulans, the best-defined genetic model, asexual development depends on the BrlA-AbaA-WetA transcriptional cascade, with BrlA initiating conidiophore construction, AbaA directing phialide differentiation, and WetA ensuring spore maturation and long-term viability. Upstream regulators such as FluG and the Flb proteins connect colony state to this central cascade, while light and the Velvet complex bias the outcome: light generally favors asexual conidiation, whereas darkness promotes sexual development through the nuclear accumulation of the VeA protein. In Neurospora crassa, the White Collar Complex and the FRQ-based circadian clock generate rhythmic conidiation, timing spore production to predictable daily cycles. In plant pathogens such as Magnaporthe oryzae and Fusarium graminearum, nutrient limitation intertwines with host-derived stresses, and the resulting spores, conidia in rice blast or airborne ascospores in Fusarium head blight, are the engines of epidemic spread.</p>
<p>Human fungal pathogens reveal the clinical stakes of these switches. In Candida albicans, the white-opaque epigenetic switch has long been considered a prerequisite for mating, but recent work shows that glucose depletion can bypass it entirely, rendering white cells mating-competent without the switch. Phosphate limitation, acting through the PHO pathway, can similarly induce the opaque state even in otherwise mating-incompetent cells. In Cryptococcus neoformans, whose sexual reproduction produces the basidiospores that serve as primary infectious propagules, all fourteen core autophagy genes are required for meiotic progression and spore formation, and the heme activator protein complex links iron homeostasis directly to sexual development by repressing the pheromone-responsive Cpk1 MAPK pathway. These findings underscore that nutrient sensing and reproductive commitment are deeply entangled even under host-imposed selection.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most striking recent discovery concerns a post-transcriptional layer of control. In the class Sordariomycetes, sexual development is accompanied by extensive adenosine-to-inosine mRNA editing, mediated not by the animal-style ADAR enzymes but by a fungal-specific Tad2-Tad3-Ame1 complex. Because inosine is read as guanosine during translation, this editing generates transcript-level changes that alter codons without touching the genome. The editing occurs almost exclusively during fruiting-body development and ascospore formation, and experimental studies in Fusarium and Neurospora show that it contributes to perithecium development, meiosis, and spore maturation through targets such as Dbf2, Mus81, and Spo11. Crucially, by restricting reproduction-beneficial protein variants to the sexual phase, editing allows fungi to preserve vegetative stress resilience, such as Mus81-dependent heat tolerance, while still meeting the distinct genetic demands of meiosis, elegantly resolving the antagonistic pleiotropy between survival and reproduction.</p>
<p>Why should a fungus pay the steep cost of sex when clonal spores can disperse and survive just as well? The review evaluates two evolutionary frameworks. Fitness-associated sex theory proposes that low-fitness individuals benefit from recombination because sex allows alleles to escape maladapted genetic backgrounds. Experimental work in Aspergillus nidulans supports this: sexual reproduction is associated with low-fitness conditions, and sublethal fungicide stress increases outcrossing, with recombinant offspring showing improved performance under stress. The abandon-ship framework extends the logic, treating dispersal, dormancy, and sex as alternative escape routes from a deteriorating situation: escape in space through conidia, escape in time through chlamydospores and sclerotia, and escape in genetic identity through recombination. Both models predict that the beneficiaries of stress-induced sex may be the recombinant offspring rather than the stressed parent, a distinction that demands careful measurement of parental condition, propagule quality, and descendant performance.</p>
<p>The practical implications are substantial. In industrial biotechnology, a rational two-phase strategy, first building biomass under favorable conditions and then applying controlled developmental cues, can maximize yields of viable, stress-tolerant spores for biocontrol agents, inoculants, and fermentation starters, with mechanistic markers such as conidiation-regulator expression guiding the timing of the shift. In agriculture and medicine, anti-sporulation interventions range from highly specific targets such as the BrlA and WetA transcription factors to broader signaling nodes and environmental management of light, humidity, and crop residues. Yet the authors caution that conserved regulators carry risks for beneficial fungi and that strong selective pressure under field conditions can drive pathogens toward altered sporulation kinetics or cryptic alternative pathways. The review closes with a call for causal, ecologically grounded models that link environmental perception, molecular regulation, reproductive output, and fitness consequences, moving the field from describing stress-associated reproduction to predicting and ultimately manipulating fungal life-history decisions.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Stress-driven sporulation and sexual development in fungi</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> When growth becomes risky: stress-driven sporulation and sexual development in fungi</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Yang, J., Wang, Q., &amp; Liu, H. (2026). When growth becomes risky: stress-driven sporulation and sexual development in fungi. <em>Stress Biology, 6</em>(1), Article 55. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-026-00333-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-026-00333-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-026-00333-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44154-026-00333-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> fungal development, sporulation, sexual reproduction, nutrient limitation, stress signaling, cAMP-PKA, TOR signaling, HOG MAPK, Velvet complex, A-to-I RNA editing, fitness-associated sex, disease management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">196847</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
