<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sewage sludge &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/sewage-sludge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 07:54:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Microplastics Pile Up in University Sewage Sludge as Campus Life Leaves a Measurable Plastic Fingerprint</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/microplastics-pile-up-in-university-sewage-sludge-as-campus-life-leaves-a-measurable-plastic-fingerprint/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 07:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced techniques for detecting microplastics in sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis of microplastic particles using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATR-FTIR spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campus occupancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental monitoring of microplastics in developing countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fibres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health and ecological risks of microplastic accumulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of campus activities on plastic pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term microplastic pollution monitoring in institutional settings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microplastic contamination in university sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastic pollution assessment in wastewater treatment plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics in laboratory and laundry wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nile Red staining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polymer identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of hybrid MBBR-ZLD systems in microplastic removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero liquid discharge]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=283366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A seven-month study of an Indian university's wastewater treatment system found microplastics in every sludge sample, with concentrations rising in step with campus occupancy.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every flush, laundry load, and laboratory rinse on a university campus eventually converges on a single destination: the sewage treatment plant. And according to a new study from India, what accumulates at the end of that journey is a startlingly rich archive of everyday plastic life. Researchers at BITS Pilani, Hyderabad campus, have documented microplastic contamination in sewage sludge from the institution&#8217;s own wastewater treatment system, finding plastic particles in every single sample collected over a seven-month monitoring campaign.</p>
<p>The study, published in the journal Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, focused on an academic facility operating a hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor combined with Zero Liquid Discharge technology, a configuration known as MBBR-ZLD. Between January and July, the team collected sludge samples fortnightly and subjected them to a battery of analytical techniques, including wet peroxide oxidation, density separation, stereomicroscopy, ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray analysis, and Nile Red fluorescence microscopy. The result was one of the most comprehensive portraits yet of microplastic pollution in an institutional treatment system in a developing country.</p>
<p>The numbers are striking. Microplastic concentrations in the sludge ranged from 120 to 1,145 particles per kilogram of dry weight, with considerable variation across the sampling period. Particle sizes spanned an enormous range, from just 7.02 micrometers to 4,592 micrometers, roughly the difference between a bacterium and a grain of rice. The 500 to 1,000 micrometer fraction emerged as the most prevalent size class, suggesting that mid-sized fragments and fibres survive the treatment process most effectively and become concentrated in the sludge matrix.</p>
<p>When the researchers examined particle morphology, a clear hierarchy emerged. Fibres dominated the assemblage, accounting for 43.3 percent of all microplastics identified. Fragments followed closely at 39.5 percent, while films made up 11.5 percent. This distribution tells a story about the sources of contamination on campus. Fibres typically originate from synthetic textiles shed during laundry, fragments from the mechanical breakdown of larger plastic items, and films from packaging materials. The near-even split between fibres and fragments suggests that both domestic activities and disposable plastic consumption contribute substantially to the pollution load.</p>
<p>Polymer identification using infrared spectroscopy revealed eight distinct plastic types in the sludge. Nylon-PA6 was the most abundant polymer at 37.7 percent, followed by low-density polyethylene at 16.0 percent. The remaining polymers included polyethylene terephthalate, polypropylene, polystyrene, polycarbonate, polymethyl methacrylate, and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. Each of these materials points to a specific origin. Nylon fibres are shed from synthetic clothing during washing, LDPE is ubiquitous in packaging and plastic bags, PET appears in beverage bottles, and polycarbonate and PMMA are common in laboratory equipment and consumer electronics. The diversity of polymers reflects the diversity of plastic use across a residential and academic campus.</p>
<p>One of the most methodologically important aspects of the study was its rigorous validation approach. The researchers used co-spiked reference materials to assess recovery efficiency, finding an overall recovery of 81.66 percent with a standard deviation of 2.51 percent. Crucially, recovery varied depending on particle type and size, meaning that some categories of microplastics were systematically undercounted or overcounted by the extraction procedure. To address this, the team applied correction factors to their raw data, improving the accuracy of their concentration estimates. This kind of methodological transparency is increasingly recognized as essential in microplastic research, where extraction losses can dramatically skew reported abundances.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most intriguing finding came from the temporal analysis. The researchers observed a strong positive Spearman rank correlation between campus occupancy and monthly mean microplastic concentration, with a correlation coefficient of 0.756 and a p-value of 0.049. In practical terms, this means that when more people were on campus, more microplastics ended up in the sludge. The relationship, while statistically significant at the conventional threshold, sits right at the boundary of the p-value cutoff, suggesting a real but not overwhelming signal. Still, the implication is clear: human activity is a primary driver of microplastic loading in institutional wastewater systems.</p>
<p>This finding has implications that extend far beyond a single university. Campuses, office complexes, hospitals, and other institutional facilities generate concentrated, predictable patterns of plastic consumption tied directly to occupancy. Laundry from hostels, cosmetics and personal care products washed off in showers, hygiene products, food packaging from canteens, and laboratory plastics all converge on the treatment plant. The study&#8217;s authors note that these diverse daily emissions from laundry, cosmetics, hygiene, packaging, and laboratories collectively shape the polymer profile found in the resulting sludge.</p>
<p>The broader context makes these findings particularly significant. Sewage sludge is increasingly recognized as a major reservoir and environmental pathway for microplastics. When sludge is applied to agricultural land as fertilizer or disposed of in landfills, the embedded microplastics can migrate into soils, waterways, and ultimately the food chain. Recent research has documented microplastic contamination in soils amended with treated sludge, raising concerns about long-term ecological and human health effects. Understanding the concentration, composition, and temporal dynamics of microplastics in sludge is therefore a critical step toward designing effective mitigation strategies.</p>
<p>The choice of an MBBR-ZLD system as the study site adds another layer of relevance. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors are widely deployed in India and other developing countries as compact, efficient treatment solutions, while Zero Liquid Discharge systems are designed to eliminate liquid effluent entirely by recovering water and concentrating waste into solid form. If microplastics accumulate in the sludge of such advanced systems, it suggests that even sophisticated treatment infrastructure cannot fully prevent plastic particles from concentrating in residual waste streams. The researchers argue that institutional usage patterns play a decisive role in microplastic accumulation within these systems, a conclusion that could inform both facility management and future regulatory frameworks. As plastic production continues to grow globally, studies like this one provide the granular, site-specific data needed to understand where microplastics come from, where they go, and how human behavior shapes their environmental trajectory.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microplastic contamination in sewage sludge from a university wastewater treatment system in India</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Occurrence, quantification, and characterization of microplastics in sewage sludge from a university wastewater treatment system</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Occurrence, quantification, and characterization of microplastics in sewage sludge from a university wastewater treatment system. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-15866-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-15866-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-15866-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10661-026-15866-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> microplastics, sewage sludge, wastewater treatment, MBBR, zero liquid discharge, ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, Nile Red staining, polymer identification, campus occupancy, India, environmental monitoring, fibres</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">283366</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sewage Sludge on Farmland Carries Microplastics, PFAS, and Drugs Into Soil</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/sewage-sludge-on-farmland-carries-microplastics-pfas-and-drugs-into-soil/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biosolids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circular economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental fate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of sludge application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term effects of sludge on soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics and drug residues in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics in farmland soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathways of contaminant transfer from sludge to crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persistent synthetic contaminants in soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFAS regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFAS transfer through biosolids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals in agricultural sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pyrolysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycling wastewater sludge in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation of biosolids for farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil–plant transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment plant waste management]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=270319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new comparative review shows that sewage sludge spread on farmland transfers microplastics, PFAS, and pharmaceutical residues to soil through three fundamentally different pathways, exposing major gaps in current sludge regulation and treatment.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time a wastewater treatment plant finishes its work, it produces a dark, nutrient-rich solid known as sewage sludge, or biosolids. Spreading this material on farmland is one of the world&#8217;s most common strategies for recycling the nitrogen, phosphorus, and organic matter it contains, and it diverts enormous volumes of waste from landfills and incinerators. But a new comparative review published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment warns that the same sludge that feeds crops also delivers an invisible cargo of persistent synthetic contaminants into agricultural soil. Berkin Üstünyıldız of Düzce University systematically compared three of the most worrying contaminant classes — microplastics, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and pharmaceutical residues — and found that each travels a fundamentally different route from treatment plant to farm field, a finding with major consequences for how we regulate and manage sludge.</p>
<p>The scale of the pathway is hard to overstate. Wastewater treatment plants are remarkably efficient at scrubbing pollutants from the water column, but efficiency for the effluent comes at a price: nearly everything the plant captures — from plastic fibers shed by synthetic clothing to drug metabolites excreted in urine — becomes concentrated in the sludge. When that sludge is land-applied, these captured contaminants are released directly into soils where food crops grow, where earthworms and microbes churn through the profile, and where rain can carry dissolved compounds toward groundwater. In effect, the treatment train that cleans the water writes a check that the soil may spend for decades.</p>
<p>Microplastics illustrate the physical end of the spectrum. Because they are solid particles, they are retained in sludge mainly through physical association with the solids themselves; they do not dissolve, degrade into benign products on any useful timescale, and they survive the conventional biological treatments — anaerobic and aerobic digestion — that stabilize sludge before land application. Once in soil, their environmental relevance stems from extreme persistence and a tendency to fragment. Field studies cited in the review, including investigations of soils decades after sludge application, show that ultraviolet exposure and tillage abrasion break larger plastic fragments into ever smaller particles, driving a size-dependent redistribution through the soil profile that makes older contamination increasingly difficult to detect and even harder to remove.</p>
<p>PFAS behave according to entirely different rules. These thousands of related chemicals, used for decades in water repellents, firefighting foams, and surface coatings, partition into sludge in compound-specific ways. The review emphasizes that the highly persistent perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) endure essentially indefinitely, while polymeric and other precursor compounds can transform in soil or during treatment into the very PFAAs that regulators measure. Critically, many shorter-chain PFAAs are more mobile than their long-chain cousins, meaning that sludge-derived PFAS can migrate downward through soil under certain conditions and reach groundwater. Landmark studies at long-term biosolids application sites — including soils near Decatur, Alabama, amended decades ago — have documented PFAS persistence in soil and uptake into crop plants, with wheat and other edible species accumulating perfluoroalkyl acids in roots, shoots, and grain.</p>
<p>Pharmaceutical residues occupy a third regime, defined by chemical variety and biological activity. Each drug compound exhibits its own balance of sorption to soil particles, microbial degradation, transformation into metabolites, mobility in soil water, and uptake by plants. Antibiotics, painkillers, antidepressants, and hormones all behave differently, and their behavior shifts with soil pH, organic content, and moisture. Field experiments following biosolids application have detected pharmaceuticals in groundwater, subsurface drainage, and even wheat grain, though concentrations and persistence vary enormously between compounds. The review also flags a concern that extends beyond the parent compounds themselves: the environmental dimension of antibiotic resistance, since sludge-derived pharmaceuticals can exert selective pressure on soil microbial communities, shaping the resistome of agricultural soils.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most sobering thread running through the review concerns what treatment actually accomplishes. Conventional sludge processes — digestion, dewatering, composting, lime stabilization — generally redistribute contaminants or alter the measured profile rather than destroying them. Anaerobic digestion can even make plastic particles bio-aged and more fragmented, while thermal hydrolysis of sludge partially removes some organic micropollutants without enhancing their subsequent biotransformation. In the PFAS realm, precursor transformation during conventional treatment means that standard target analysis can underestimate the total PFAS burden in biosolids, because unmeasured precursors convert to PFAAs after application.</p>
<p>High-temperature thermal processes offer a more destructive option, but with caveats. Pyrolysis of biosolids can eliminate microplastics, PFAS, and pharmaceutical residues under suitable operating conditions, producing biochar as a potentially safer product. Yet the review stresses that destruction is not automatically complete: studies have shown that pyrolysis can transport and transform PFAS into the pyrolysis liquid rather than fully mineralizing it. What is needed, the author argues, are transformation-aware whole-process mass balances that track every contaminant atom through the entire treatment chain, rather than single-point measurements that can mask the conversion of one problem compound into another.</p>
<p>Regulation, meanwhile, lags badly behind the science. The European Union&#8217;s main sludge directive, Council Directive 86/278/EEC, dates from 1986 and remains centered on conventional pollutants such as heavy metals, with a 2023 evaluation acknowledging that emerging contaminants fall outside its scope. In the United States, the 40 C.F.R. Part 503 standards governing sludge use and disposal similarly focus on traditional parameters. Change is stirring, however: the U.S. EPA has published Method 1633A for quantifying PFAS in biosolids, released a draft sewage sludge risk assessment for PFOA and PFOS, and issued draft guidance for reducing risk from these compounds in biosolids, while PFAS-related monitoring and management frameworks continue to develop in Europe and elsewhere.</p>
<p>The review&#8217;s central intellectual contribution is its argument that occurrence alone does not establish risk, and that no single, uniform monitoring or management framework can adequately govern all three contaminant classes. Microplastics demand particle counting, polymer identification, and fragmentation-aware assessment; PFAS require class-specific target and precursor-inclusive analysis, including tools like the total oxidizable precursor assay; pharmaceuticals call for compound-by-compound evaluation of sorption, degradation, and biological activity. Applying a heavy-metals-style regulatory template to any of them would miss the essential physics and chemistry that govern their fate.</p>
<p>What emerges is a call for environmentally defensible land application rather than a blanket prohibition. Class-specific monitoring programs, treatment evaluation grounded in whole-process mass balances, and — above all — long-term field evidence of how these contaminants behave in real agricultural soils over decades are the foundations the review says must underpin future policy. As societies push harder toward circular economies and nutrient recovery, the invisible passengers in sewage sludge will only grow more consequential. The soil, unlike the wastewater plant, offers no second treatment step; whatever we spread there is, in many cases, there to stay.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Land application of sewage sludge as a pathway for microplastics, PFAS, and pharmaceutical contaminants entering agricultural soil</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Land application of sewage sludge as a pathway for emerging contaminants: a comparative review of microplastics, PFAS, and pharmaceuticals</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Land application of sewage sludge as a pathway for emerging contaminants: a comparative review of microplastics, PFAS, and pharmaceuticals. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-16027-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-16027-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-16027-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10661-026-16027-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> sewage sludge, microplastics, PFAS, pharmaceuticals, biosolids, soil contamination, wastewater treatment, environmental fate, soil-plant transfer, PFAS regulation, pyrolysis, circular economy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">270319</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rice Straw and Sewage Sludge Compost Boosts Citrus Soil Health Without Hurting Fruit</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/rice-straw-and-sewage-sludge-compost-boosts-citrus-soil-health-without-hurting-fruit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits of organic waste-derived soil amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circular economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composting methods for citrus cultivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly farming practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of compost on citrus fruit quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial-scale compost production for fruit production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandarin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean citrus orchard soil fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient recycling in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic fertiliser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduction of open-field burning of rice straw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice straw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice straw and sewage sludge co-composting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice straw composting for citrus soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge reuse in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil organic matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable waste management for fruit orchards]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=250673</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A two-season field trial in Valencia shows industrially composted rice straw and sewage sludge improves citrus orchard soil fertility and can partially replace mineral phosphorus fertiliser without reducing yield or fruit quality.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every autumn, the rice paddies ringing Valencia&#8217;s Albufera Natural Park generate an estimated 75,000 to 90,000 tonnes of straw, much of which has historically been disposed of by open-field burning, a practice now increasingly restricted for its environmental toll. At the same time, Spain&#8217;s wastewater treatment plants produce roughly 1.2 million tonnes of sewage sludge each year, a nutrient-rich but problematic residue. A new field study published in the journal SOIL shows that these two waste streams can be transformed, at full industrial scale, into a compost that measurably improves the fertility of Mediterranean citrus orchards, without compromising yields or the quality of the mandarins that Spain ships across Europe.</p>
<p>Researchers from the Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA) in Moncada, Valencia, led by corresponding author Isabel Rodríguez-Carretero, spent two consecutive growing seasons testing composts in a commercial orchard of adult Tango mandarins grafted onto a hybrid rootstock and irrigated by traditional surface flooding. The team compared two industrially produced composts: one made from pruning residues and sewage sludge at a 1:3 fresh-weight ratio, the facility&#8217;s usual recipe, and a second made from rice straw and sewage sludge at a 1:8 ratio, using the rice straw as a locally available bulking agent. Composts were surface-applied each June within the tree canopy projection at two rates, 10 and 20 tonnes per hectare, alongside unfertilised-with-compost control plots, in a randomized complete block design with three replicates.</p>
<p>The chemical characterisation of the two composts revealed a striking difference. The rice straw–sewage sludge compost contained significantly higher total nitrogen, largely as organic nitrogen, and a lower carbon-to-nitrogen ratio of 10.3 compared with 13.8 for the pruning-residue version. Most notably, its phosphorus content, expressed as P2O5, was more than double that of the conventional compost and exceeded average values typically reported for livestock manures. The researchers suggest this makes the rice straw compost a promising phosphorus-rich organic fertiliser, a significant finding at a time when phosphate rock reserves are finite and Europe depends heavily on imported fertiliser raw materials.</p>
<p>Both composts met Spanish legal requirements for fertilising products, including minimum organic matter thresholds and maximum carbon-to-nitrogen ratios. One caveat emerged: the rice straw compost slightly exceeded the 500 milligrams per kilogram zinc limit for Class B classification under the older RD 506/2013 regulation, though it complied with the stricter thresholds of the more recent RD 1051/2022, which governs sustainable soil nutrition. The compost&#8217;s slightly acidic pH of 6.71, unusual for sewage sludge-based products, may actually be an advantage in the alkaline, carbonate-rich soils of eastern Spain, where it can enhance the solubility and availability of nutrients that are otherwise locked up by calcium carbonates.</p>
<p>In the field, the effects on soil chemistry unfolded over time. Soil organic matter and organic nitrogen rose significantly in the first season at both application rates, and in the second season at the double dose. Available phosphorus increased significantly in both seasons regardless of dose, pushing soil levels from normal or high into the high to very high categories used in citrus nutritional diagnostics. Available potassium rose significantly only at the double rate, by 17 percent in the first season and 29 percent in the second. Interestingly, exchangeable sodium decreased in composted plots in the second season, while soil pH dropped significantly under the double dose, a cumulative effect the authors attribute to repeated organic matter inputs and the release of organic acids during decomposition.</p>
<p>Salinity was the one indicator demanding caution. Electrical conductivity rose by 21 percent in the first season and 105 percent in the second under the double application rate, reflecting the salt load carried by successive compost additions. The values nonetheless remained below both the 4 dS per metre threshold that defines a saline soil and the 1.7 dS per metre level at which citrus yields begin to decline. The authors recommend that long-term management might involve reduced annual rates or biennial applications, combined with irrigation practices that promote salt leaching through the improved soil permeability that organic matter confers.</p>
<p>Soil biology responded quickly but transiently. In the first season, microbial biomass carbon jumped 65 percent under the double compost dose, and dehydrogenase activity, a standard proxy for overall microbial metabolic activity, increased under both rates. By the second season, however, no significant differences among treatments remained. The researchers suggest the first-year compost, richer in readily oxidisable organic carbon, offered microorganisms a more accessible substrate, and note that biological indicators are highly sensitive to soil moisture, temperature, and sampling timing. They call for future studies with multiple sampling dates across crop phenological stages to disentangle these dynamics.</p>
<p>Heavy metal concentrations in the soil, including copper, zinc, nickel, lead, cadmium, and chromium, stayed within permissible limits under both older and current Spanish regulations throughout the trial, although the double compost dose raised total soil zinc by roughly 17 to 18 percent in both seasons. Foliar nutrient analysis told a similarly reassuring story: macronutrient concentrations remained within optimal ranges in all treatments, with the sole exception of potassium in the second season. Compost significantly increased leaf zinc only in the first season. Encouragingly, because soil and foliar phosphorus were already elevated after the first compost application, the team cut mineral phosphorus fertilisation by 10 percent in the second season, and leaf phosphorus stayed optimal, evidence that compost-derived phosphorus can partially replace mineral P inputs under comparable conditions.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most commercially significant result is what did not change. Yield, fruit weight, diameter, peel thickness, colour index, total soluble solids, titratable acidity, and maturity index showed no agronomically relevant differences between composted and control trees in either season. All fruit met EU marketing standards for mandarins, with diameters above 45 millimetres, juice content above 33 percent, and maturity indices exceeding 7.5. Because mineral fertilisation met crop requirements across all plots, the soil fertility gains from composting simply had no yield gap to fill. The authors caution that their findings come from a flood-irrigated orchard, a system still used on roughly 13 percent of Spanish citrus acreage, and that responses under modern drip irrigation may differ. Still, the study demonstrates that industrial-scale composting of rice straw and sewage sludge is a technically viable, regulation-compliant route to closing nutrient loops in Mediterranean agriculture, turning two disposal headaches into a soil-building resource while keeping the region&#8217;s mandarins just as sweet.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of rice straw–sewage sludge compost on soil fertility, tree nutrition, and fruit quality in Mediterranean citrus orchards</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Field application of rice straw–sewage sludge compost in Mediterranean citrus orchards: effects on soil properties, nutrient status and fruit quality</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Rodríguez-Carretero, I., Canet, R., Pérez-Piqueres, A., &amp; Quiñones, A. (2026). Field application of rice straw–sewage sludge compost in Mediterranean citrus orchards: effects on soil properties, nutrient status and fruit quality. <em>SOIL, 12</em>(2), 841-853. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-12-841-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-12-841-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-12-841-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.5194/soil-12-841-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> compost, rice straw, sewage sludge, citrus, soil fertility, circular economy, phosphorus, soil organic matter, microbial biomass, Mediterranean agriculture, mandarin, organic fertiliser</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">250673</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiny Iron Particles and a Common Cleaner Supercharge Biogas from Sludge and Food Waste</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/tiny-iron-particles-and-a-common-cleaner-supercharge-biogas-from-sludge-and-food-waste/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acidification buffering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anaerobic co-digestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogas enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental sustainability in waste treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food waste recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen sulfide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane production optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano zero-valent iron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano zero-valent iron pretreatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic waste management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy from wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium percarbonate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium percarbonate in waste processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stable biogas generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volatile fatty acids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste-to-energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste-to-energy technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=240978</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A combined nano zero-valent iron and sodium percarbonate pretreatment boosted methane yields from sewage sludge and food waste co-digestion by 55.2 percent while buffering acidification and cutting hydrogen sulfide emissions.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sewage sludge and food waste are two of the most abundant organic residues generated by modern cities, and both carry enormous untapped energy in the form of methane. Anaerobic co-digestion, the process in which microorganisms break down mixed organic matter in oxygen-free reactors, is widely regarded as one of the most promising routes for converting these wastes into renewable biogas while simultaneously reducing the volume and odor of what would otherwise end up in landfills. Yet the technology has long been haunted by a stubborn mismatch: sewage sludge breaks down slowly and reluctantly, while food waste ferments so quickly that it floods the reactor with volatile fatty acids and drives the pH into a range that methanogenic microbes cannot tolerate. A new study published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research by Yao Kong, Jianwei Zhao, and Jie Liu reports that a combined pretreatment using nano zero-valent iron and sodium percarbonate can resolve this imbalance, boosting methane yields by more than half while keeping the digestion process remarkably stable.</p>
<p>The core challenge the researchers set out to address is the asymmetry between the two substrates. Sewage sludge is a complex matrix in which much of the organic material is locked inside microbial cells and wrapped in extracellular polymeric substances, making hydrolysis the rate-limiting step of the entire digestion chain. Food waste, by contrast, is rich in readily fermentable carbohydrates that acidogenic bacteria convert into volatile fatty acids almost immediately. When the two are co-digested without intervention, the food waste acidifies rapidly while the sludge has barely begun to release its own organic content, and the resulting acid load can suppress or even collapse the methanogenic community. Pretreatment strategies have therefore become a major focus of research, with the goal of pre-disintegrating the sludge and buffering the early acidification phase before the mixture ever reaches the digester.</p>
<p>The pretreatment tested by the team combines two reagents with complementary chemistry. Nano zero-valent iron, or nZVI, consists of iron particles at the nanometer scale that act as strong electron donors and can promote the disintegration of sludge flocs and the disruption of cell membranes, releasing soluble organic matter that hydrolytic enzymes and fermenters can then access. Sodium percarbonate, or SPC, is a solid source of hydrogen peroxide that decomposes to release reactive oxygen species capable of oxidizing recalcitrant sludge structures, while its carbonate by-product simultaneously raises the alkalinity of the mixture. The combination is attractive from a practical standpoint because both reagents are relatively inexpensive, easy to dose, and free of the heavy-metal contamination concerns associated with some other advanced oxidation catalysts.</p>
<p>The quantitative results reported in the study are striking. After the nZVI/SPC pretreatment, the initial soluble chemical oxygen demand of the substrate mixture reached 22,483.6 milligrams per liter, compared with only 8,493.7 milligrams per liter in the untreated control. Soluble chemical oxygen demand is a standard proxy for how much organic material has been transferred from the particulate phase into the dissolved phase where microbes can consume it, so a nearly threefold increase signals a dramatic acceleration of substrate disintegration. The researchers also observed markedly higher release of soluble proteins and polysaccharides, the two dominant classes of organic macromolecules in sludge, confirming that the pretreatment had effectively cracked open the cellular and polymeric barriers that normally shield this material from digestion.</p>
<p>The downstream consequences for methane production were equally impressive. The cumulative methane yield in the pretreated co-digestion reached 412.5 milliliters per gram of volatile solids, a figure 55.2 percent higher than the control. The maximum methane production rate climbed to 48.6 milliliters per gram of volatile solids per day, and the lag phase, the initial period during which the microbial community acclimates before gas production accelerates, shortened to just 0.52 days. In anaerobic digestion engineering, a short lag phase is highly valuable because it indicates that the microbial consortium can begin productive work almost immediately, which translates into shorter hydraulic residence times and smaller, cheaper reactors for the same throughput of waste.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most technically significant finding concerns process stability during the acidification surge. Volatile fatty acids in the pretreated reactors peaked at 8,124.6 milligrams per liter on day seven, a concentration that in many co-digestion systems would be associated with severe acid stress and methane inhibition. Yet the pH in the reactors remained between 6.99 and 7.41 throughout, comfortably within the optimal window for methanogens. The authors attribute this resilience to effective buffering by carbonate species derived from the sodium percarbonate, which neutralize the acid wave as it forms. In effect, the pretreatment allows the system to accumulate a large pool of volatile fatty acids, which are the direct precursors of methane, without ever crossing the pH threshold at which those intermediates become toxic to the archaea that convert them into biogas.</p>
<p>Biogas quality also improved in ways that matter for real-world deployment. The maximum methane content of the produced gas reached 71.2 percent, well above the roughly 50 to 65 percent typical of conventional digesters, which reduces the burden of downstream biogas upgrading. At the same time, the peak hydrogen sulfide concentration decreased by 49.6 percent. Hydrogen sulfide is a corrosive and toxic contaminant that must be scrubbed from biogas before it can be used in engines or fuel cells, and iron species are known to bind sulfide as insoluble iron sulfide. The nZVI in the pretreatment therefore appears to deliver a double benefit: it accelerates the digestion chemistry while simultaneously polishing the gas stream at its source.</p>
<p>Microbial community analysis provided mechanistic depth to these performance gains. The pretreated reactors showed enrichment of hydrolytic and syntrophic bacteria, including members of the genera Clostridium, Syntrophomonas, and Syntrophobacter. Clostridium species are prolific fermenters that break down sugars, proteins, and other polymers into volatile fatty acids and alcohols, while Syntrophomonas and Syntrophobacter specialize in the energetically demanding oxidation of longer-chain fatty acids and propionate, reactions that only proceed when paired with hydrogen-scavenging methanogens. On the archaeal side, the community was enriched in Methanosaeta and Methanobacterium, representing the acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenic pathways respectively. This combination indicates that the pretreatment cultivated a tightly coupled food web in which every intermediate, from complex polymers down to acetate and hydrogen, had a dedicated microbial specialist waiting to consume it.</p>
<p>The broader significance of the work lies in its integration of three historically separate concerns: substrate availability, acid-base management, and microbial ecology. Many pretreatment studies have focused solely on increasing solubilization, only to find that the extra soluble material simply worsens acidification. By pairing an oxidative disintegration agent with an alkalinity source in a single step, the nZVI/SPC approach addresses both sides of the problem at once, and the microbial data confirm that the resulting environment favors the exact organisms needed to convert the released organics into methane. The study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, and the authors suggest that the strategy offers a feasible pathway for efficient resource recovery from multiple organic waste streams simultaneously.</p>
<p>For wastewater treatment plants and biogas operators, the findings point toward a relatively low-barrier upgrade path. Both nZVI and sodium percarbonate can be dosed as solids or slurries into existing pretreatment tanks, and the improved buffering could reduce the need for external alkalinity addition, which is a recurring operating cost in food waste co-digestion. The higher methane content and lower hydrogen sulfide burden further cut downstream gas-cleaning expenses. As cities worldwide seek to divert organic waste from landfills and squeeze more energy from their wastewater infrastructure, pretreatments of this kind may prove to be among the most cost-effective levers available, turning two problematic waste streams into a cleaner, richer source of renewable fuel.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Nano zero-valent iron and sodium percarbonate pretreatment to enhance anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> New insights into nZVI/SPC pretreatment for enhanced anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste: substrate disintegration, acidification buffering and microbial responses</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kong, Y., Zhao, J., &amp; Liu, J. (2026). New insights into nZVI/SPC pretreatment for enhanced anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste: substrate disintegration, acidification buffering and microbial responses. <em>Environmental Science and Pollution Research</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38291-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38291-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38291-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11356-026-38291-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> anaerobic co-digestion, sewage sludge, food waste, nano zero-valent iron, sodium percarbonate, methane production, biogas, volatile fatty acids, acidification buffering, microbial community, hydrogen sulfide, waste-to-energy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">240978</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banana Peels Turn Into Catalysts That Boost Bio-Oil From Sewage Sludge</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/banana-peels-turn-into-catalysts-that-boost-bio-oil-from-sewage-sludge/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural residue waste management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banana peel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banana peel biochar catalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BET surface area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochar-enhanced bio-oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biocrude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuel precursors from sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biowaste valorization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circular economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas reduction through waste reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal liquefaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane emissions from landfilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic waste conversion to fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic waste valorization strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potassium carbonate activation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pyrolysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge hydrothermal liquefaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable waste recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste valorization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste-to-waste environmental solutions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=235226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Qatar-based researchers found that potassium-rich biochar made from banana peels can raise sewage-sludge biocrude yields from about 26 to nearly 38 percent during hydrothermal liquefaction, with potassium availability, not surface area, driving the catalytic effect.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, humanity flushes, dumps, and discards staggering quantities of organic waste. Global sewage sludge production reached 115 million tonnes of dry solids in 2020 and is projected to climb to 138 million tonnes by 2050, while roughly one billion tonnes of agricultural residues and 1.3 billion tonnes of food waste accumulate annually. Landfilling these streams alone accounts for about 18 percent of anthropogenic methane emissions, roughly 3.8 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions expressed as carbon dioxide equivalent. A new study published in Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering by researchers in Qatar now shows that two of these waste streams can be combined into a single, elegant solution: biochar made from banana peels and agricultural residues can act as a catalyst that significantly increases the amount of liquid fuel precursor extracted from sewage sludge during hydrothermal liquefaction.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Rim Ismail, Sabah Mariyam, Mohammad Alherbawi, and Tareq Al-Ansari, framed their work as a waste-to-waste valorization strategy. Rather than treating sludge, farm residues, and food waste as disposal problems, they converted each into functional materials and then used one to upgrade another. Three feedstocks were compared: dried sewage sludge pellets supplied by Qatar&#8217;s Public Works Authority, mixed dried agricultural residues from a local farm, and fresh banana peels from a single purchase batch. Each material was ground, homogenized, and sieved to particles below 120 micrometers to eliminate heat and mass transfer limitations, then characterized through proximate and ultimate analysis, calorimetry, electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.</p>
<p>The compositional differences among the feedstocks proved decisive. Banana peel stood out with the highest volatile matter content at 87.7 percent and the highest calorific value at 17.7 megajoules per kilogram, alongside a remarkably low ash fraction of just 7.52 percent. Sewage sludge, by contrast, contained 28.79 percent ash and only 31.10 percent carbon, yielding a modest heating value of 15.77 megajoules per kilogram. X-ray diffraction revealed that sludge was dominated by crystalline quartz, calcite, and calcium phosphate phases, while banana peel showed a broad amorphous hump typical of cellulose-rich biomass. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy also detected a notable potassium signal of 3.06 percent on the banana peel surface, a detail that would later prove central to the catalytic story.</p>
<p>Biochars were produced in a fixed-bed quartz reactor at 600 degrees Celsius under two atmospheres: inert nitrogen and reactive carbon dioxide. The carbon dioxide atmosphere enables in-situ activation through the Boudouard reaction, in which carbon reacts with carbon dioxide to form carbon monoxide, enlarging micropores and introducing oxygenated surface groups. Sewage sludge produced the highest biochar yields, reflecting its inorganic content, while agricultural residues produced the lowest, consistent with their readily decomposed cellulose and hemicellulose fractions. Thermogravimetric analysis showed that under carbon dioxide, the lignocellulosic feedstocks suffered sharp additional mass loss above roughly 700 degrees Celsius, whereas the mineral-rich sludge char resisted high-temperature conversion. All single-step biochars, however, exhibited disappointingly low surface areas below 4.2 square meters per gram, underscoring the limits of pyrolysis alone.</p>
<p>To unlock real porosity, the team applied a two-step chemical activation. Each biochar was impregnated with a one molar potassium carbonate solution at a one-to-three biochar-to-activator weight ratio, dried, and then heated to 700 degrees Celsius for two hours under nitrogen. Critically, the researchers skipped the acid-washing step commonly used to demineralize activated carbons, deliberately retaining potassium species within the carbon matrix. The result was a family of K-modified activated biochars rather than fully demineralized carbons. Scanning electron microscopy revealed dramatic transformations: the activated banana peel biochar developed a honeycomb-like network of thin walls and interconnected pores, while sludge-derived samples remained fragmented but mineral-dominated.</p>
<p>The headline result came from gas adsorption measurements. Potassium carbonate activation catapulted the surface area of carbon-dioxide-derived banana peel biochar from 3.17 to 311.9 square meters per gram, a hundredfold increase, with t-plot analysis confirming that micropores accounted for roughly 90.8 percent of that area. X-ray diffraction showed near-complete amorphization of the material, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy revealed an enhanced surface potassium signal. Yet the other feedstocks barely responded; sludge and agricultural residue biochars gained only a few square meters per gram, because their mineral contents hindered activator penetration and promoted side reactions. The banana peel material, BPBK-CO2, was selected for catalytic testing alongside its non-activated counterpart, BPB-CO2.</p>
<p>The proof-of-concept application targeted hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge, a process that converts wet biomass into biocrude at 250 to 370 degrees Celsius and elevated pressures without the energy penalty of drying. In a 500-milliliter batch reactor, 30 grams of sludge were processed with 170 milliliters of water at 310 degrees Celsius for 45 minutes, reaching autogenous pressures near 100 bar in subcritical water. Biochar catalysts were added at 5 weight percent of the dry feedstock. The catalyst-free baseline produced a biocrude yield of 25.75 percent. Adding the non-activated banana peel biochar raised this to 37.88 percent, while the activated, high-surface-area version yielded 31.35 percent, a striking inversion that challenged the assumption that porosity governs catalytic performance.</p>
<p>The explanation lay in potassium. Inductively coupled plasma analysis showed the non-activated biochar contained 189.3 milligrams of potassium per gram, more than double the 79.6 milligrams per gram in the activated material. During liquefaction, aqueous-phase potassium rose 3.56-fold over baseline with the non-activated char and 2.03-fold with the activated one, and biocrude yield tracked the aqueous potassium concentration almost perfectly. The researchers propose that dissolved alkali species promote hydrolysis, depolymerization, and decarboxylation of sludge macromolecules while suppressing the repolymerization of reactive intermediates into solids, with surface-associated potassium providing complementary basic sites. Consistent with this mechanism, carbon dioxide in the aqueous phase increased dramatically, from 17.47 percent of the headspace profile at baseline to over 56 percent with either biochar, signaling enhanced decarboxylation.</p>
<p>Biocrude quality improved across the board. The higher heating value rose from 30.15 megajoules per kilogram at baseline to 31.13 with the non-activated char and 31.86 with the activated char, both within the typical range for liquefaction biocrudes. Oxygenated compounds in the oil decreased from 43.18 percent to roughly 36 percent with both catalysts, a shift that could reduce hydrogen demand during downstream hydrodeoxygenation and improve storage stability. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry also revealed a strong shift toward lighter compounds: the fraction below C8 grew from 41.75 percent at baseline to 57.75 to 64.15 percent with the biochars. Notably, the activated biochar retained a larger share of the biocrude in the C8 to C16 range, the hydrocarbon window most relevant to jet fuel, suggesting activation moderated over-cracking by limiting potassium release.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s authors are careful to frame these results as a paired proof of concept rather than a comprehensive screening, and they acknowledge open questions, including the need for soluble-potassium and potassium-free controls, quantification of potassium leaching, catalyst reuse trials, and full elemental mass balances. Nevertheless, the implications are compelling. The best catalyst for maximizing biocrude yield was not the most porous one but the one richest in a naturally occurring alkali metal, meaning that the cheapest, least-processed waste char may outperform its engineered counterpart depending on the process objective. For a world drowning in sludge and food waste, the idea that banana peels discarded after breakfast could help transform a city&#8217;s sewage into liquid fuel is a vivid demonstration of circular bioenergy, where the byproducts of one waste stream become the key that unlocks the value of another.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Waste-derived potassium-modified activated biochars as catalysts for sewage-sludge hydrothermal liquefaction</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Comparative preparation of waste-derived K-modified activated biochars and proof-of-concept application in sewage-sludge hydrothermal liquefaction</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ismail, R., Mariyam, S., Alherbawi, M., &amp; Al-Ansari, T. (2026). Comparative preparation of waste-derived K-modified activated biochars and proof-of-concept application in sewage-sludge hydrothermal liquefaction. <em>Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 14</em>, Article 101493. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2026.101493" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2026.101493</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2026.101493" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.cscee.2026.101493</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> biochar, hydrothermal liquefaction, sewage sludge, banana peel, potassium carbonate activation, biocrude, pyrolysis, waste valorization, catalysis, renewable energy, BET surface area, circular economy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">235226</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Field to Fork: Microplastics Are Invading the Food We Grow</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/from-field-to-fork-microplastics-are-invading-the-food-we-grow/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 23:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural soil pollution by microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioremediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[degradation of plastic mulch films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of microplastics on crop tissues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental pathways of microplastics into human diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global plastic use in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of plastic pollution on food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics and nanoplastics in food chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics contamination in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics in soil and food systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics transfer from soil to crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant uptake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic debris in farmland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic mulch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic pollution in irrigation water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater irrigation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=232382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A comprehensive new review traces how microplastics and nanoplastics from mulch films, sewage sludge and wastewater travel through agricultural soils into edible crop tissues, raising urgent food safety concerns.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sweeping new review published in Discover Soil has pulled together the scattered evidence on one of the most unsettling environmental stories of our time: the movement of microplastics and nanoplastics from contaminated farmland into the edible tissues of the crops we eat. The analysis, led by Muhammad Khizar Hayat of Sakarya University of Applied Sciences and an international team of co-authors, synthesizes peer-reviewed research published between 2000 and 2025 and arrives at a stark conclusion. Agricultural soils, once considered merely a sink for plastic debris, are now understood to be an active conduit through which plastic particles travel from degraded mulch films, sewage sludge and wastewater irrigation into roots, stems, leaves and ultimately human diets.</p>
<p>The scale of the contamination problem begins with the sheer volume of plastic deployed in modern agriculture. According to a landmark assessment by the Food and Agriculture Organization cited in the review, more than 12.5 million tons of plastic products are used annually in plant and animal agriculture worldwide. Plastic mulch films, greenhouse covers, drip irrigation lines and silage wraps all fragment over time under ultraviolet radiation and mechanical abrasion, shedding particles that span the full size range of microplastics, defined here as particles between 1 micrometer and 5 millimeters, down to nanoplastics measuring roughly 1 to 150 nanometers. These particles are composed of common synthetic polymers including polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate and polyvinyl chloride, and they occur as fragments, fibers, films, beads and pellets.</p>
<p>The review identifies three dominant pathways delivering plastics to farmland. The first is the direct degradation of plastic mulching films, which are left in fields season after season and break down in place. The second is the land application of sewage sludge, or biosolids, which are rich in nutrients but also concentrate the microplastics that survive wastewater treatment. Treatment plants remove between 57 and 99 percent of incoming microplastics, but those captured particles accumulate in sludge at a median concentration of 22.41 particles per gram. Globally, the review estimates that between 8.2 times ten to the tenth and 1.29 times ten to the fifteenth microplastic particles, weighing between 0.4 and 6,430 tons, enter terrestrial environments through biosolids each year. Regional contributions are substantial: roughly 26,042 tonnes of microplastic-laden biosolids are recycled onto farmland annually in the European Union, about 21,249 in the United States, 13,660 in China, 1,518 in Canada and 1,241 in Australia.</p>
<p>The third pathway is wastewater irrigation, an increasingly common practice in water-scarce regions where treated effluent still carries microplastics that conventional treatment cannot fully remove. Field measurements reinforce the picture of accumulation. In agricultural facility soils, concentrations peak in the top 10 centimeters at 896.5 items per kilogram, dominated by polypropylene and polyethylene fibers that make up 72.2 percent of the particles, a profile the review classifies as risk level 4. Coastal plain farmland in China averages 314 items per kilogram, and a semi-arid barley system in Spain showed that sludge amendments containing 5,972 to 7,771 microplastics per kilogram of dry weight added roughly 16,000 particles to treated plots, where concentrations remained elevated and relatively constant over time. Notably, surface runoff mobilized only 0.2 to 0.4 percent of the added particles, suggesting that semi-arid agricultural soils act as long-term accumulators rather than temporary way stations.</p>
<p>Once embedded in the soil matrix, these particles do not sit inertly. The review documents measurable degradation of soil physicochemical properties, including altered bulk density and aggregate stability, alongside disruption of native microbial communities and their enzymatic activities. A global meta-analysis synthesized in the review found that while low concentrations of macroplastics, 30 to 240 kilograms per hectare, and microplastics, 0.01 to 100 milligrams per kilogram, sometimes produced no significant effects, higher concentrations and prolonged exposure consistently damaged crop growth and soil health. Plastic content, polymer type, particle size and the specific crop or soil animal involved emerged as the key variables governing these responses. The consequences for plants include compromised nutrient uptake, reduced photosynthetic efficiency and diminished biomass, with polystyrene particles as small as 0.08 micrometers at concentrations of 2,000 milligrams per liter producing the strongest inhibition of pea seed germination and growth.</p>
<p>The most consequential finding concerns translocation, the physical movement of particles from soil into plant tissue. Because intact microplastics are too large to pass through plant cell walls, direct penetration of root tissue was long considered implausible. The review, however, details a growing body of evidence that particles exploit alternative routes. Research on tobacco plants showed that while 100-nanometer polystyrene beads were not absorbed, beads of 20 to 40 nanometers were taken up directly through the cell wall. Fluorescently tagged 0.2-micrometer polystyrene microbeads were observed lodged in the mucilage layer outside the root cap, and a crack-entry mode has been documented whereby submicrometer particles exploit fissures at lateral root junctions to bypass the plant&#8217;s outer defenses. Foliar uptake adds another dimension: nanoplastics deposited on leaves can move through the plant&#8217;s vascular system, with maize studies demonstrating leaf-to-root translocation of particles whose behavior depends on their surface charge.</p>
<p>Inside the plant, the particles inflict damage through both physical and chemical mechanisms. Transmission electron microscopy of onion roots treated with polystyrene nanoplastics revealed cytoplasm densely packed with electron-dense structures, likely lipid bodies not yet mobilized, indicating cellular stress. Nanoplastic exposure triggers overproduction of reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage to DNA and lipids, and disruption of photosynthetic pigments. Shape matters as much as chemistry: in carrot studies, films and fibers reduced germination velocity, possibly by altering soil water dynamics, physically blocking pores or releasing toxic leachates, even though final germination percentages remained intact. Weathered plastic has even been shown to reduce seed germination across generations, with mother plants exposed to aged plastic producing seeds with impaired germination in the coastal dune species Cutandia maritima.</p>
<p>The review is candid that the human health implications remain incompletely quantified, but the pathway is clear. Particles that accumulate in edible tissues create a direct route of dietary exposure, and microplastics are known to act as vectors for other contaminants, adsorbing persistent organic pollutants, heavy metals and antibiotic-resistant microorganisms onto their large surface areas while simultaneously leaching plastic monomers and additives. The authors emphasize that standardized detection methods are urgently needed, since inconsistent analytical techniques make it difficult to compare concentrations across studies, and that transport models spanning from the cellular to the landscape scale are still in their infancy.</p>
<p>Mitigation, the review argues, must operate on multiple fronts simultaneously. Policy frameworks such as the FAO and UNEP Voluntary Code of Conduct for the Sustainable Use and Management of Plastics in Agriculture outline lifecycle management, promotion of biodegradable materials and circular economy approaches, while the European Union&#8217;s Directive 2019/904 and Circular Economy Action Plan, France&#8217;s mandate for biodegradable mulch films and China&#8217;s national standard on film thickness represent concrete regulatory steps. On the remediation side, physical techniques such as sieving and density separation achieve laboratory recoveries above 80 to 90 percent but remain practical only for small, heavily contaminated hotspots. Bioremediation offers broader promise: bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes secrete oxidases, hydrolases and alkane monooxygenases that depolymerize polyethylene, polystyrene, PET and polypropylene, with particularly potent degraders isolated from the guts of Zophobas atratus larvae. Phytoremediation adds another layer, as alfalfa grown in contaminated soil has been shown to enhance biodegradation of PET and polypropylene through combined root exudate and microbial activity.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most immediately actionable finding involves biochar, the carbon-rich material produced by pyrolyzing agricultural residues. Because of its porous structure and high surface area, biochar can adsorb microplastics, heavy metals and organic pollutants, limiting their transport through soil profiles and reducing plant uptake, while simultaneously improving soil aggregation, water-holding capacity and microbial diversity. Biochar-clay composites have shown high capacities for trapping microplastics in filtration experiments, and biochar derived from Solidago canadensis significantly enhanced soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass in soils contaminated with polyethylene and polylactic acid particles. Combined with conservation tillage, diverse crop rotations and carefully screened organic amendments, the review concludes, such strategies can buffer soils against the plastic burden already in the ground. But the authors are unequivocal that the deeper solution lies upstream: cutting avoidable plastic use, accelerating the transition to certified biodegradable alternatives, overhauling waste management and recycling infrastructure, and investing in the long-term ecological and toxicological research needed to quantify what the Plasticene era has quietly deposited on the world&#8217;s dinner plates.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microplastic and nanoplastic translocation from contaminated agricultural soils into food crops</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Assessing microplastic translocation from contaminated agricultural soils to food crops</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hayat, M. K., Arif, M., Turan, F., Mahmud, M. N., Batool, R., Cengiz, R., Tasnim, N., Shrabonti, R. M., &amp; Billah, J. (2026). Assessing microplastic translocation from contaminated agricultural soils to food crops. <em>Discover Soil, 3</em>(1), Article 124. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00281-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00281-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00281-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44378-026-00281-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> microplastics, nanoplastics, agricultural soils, food crops, sewage sludge, plastic mulch, wastewater irrigation, soil health, plant uptake, food security, biochar, bioremediation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">232382</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sea Floor Remembers: Israeli Shelf Recovers After Decades of Sewage Sludge</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/the-sea-floor-remembers-israeli-shelf-recovers-after-decades-of-sewage-sludge/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 08:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benthic macrofauna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitellids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological impact of industrial dumping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of cessation of sewage dumping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental assessment of sewage disposal sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli sewage sludge disposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli shelf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Levantine basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term marine pollution monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine biodiversity after pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine ecosystem restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine environmental monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean Sea floor recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution-tolerant worm dominance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polychaetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seabed sediment analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge contamination in Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total organic carbon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=226634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A twelve-year monitoring study shows how benthic macrofauna on the Israeli Mediterranean shelf responded to sewage-sludge disposal and rebounded after its cessation in 2017.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a stretch of sandy-silty sea floor off the Mediterranean coast of Israel, scientists have just completed one of the most detailed long-term audits of industrial dumping ever conducted in the eastern Mediterranean. Between 2011 and 2022, researchers Hadas Lubinevsky and Moshe Tom of Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research sampled the sediment of a designated sewage-sludge disposal area twice a year, in spring and fall, hauling up box cores of seabed and counting every visible animal larger than a millimeter. Their results, published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, trace a complete ecological arc: the smothering dominance of a single group of pollution-tolerant worms during decades of sludge disposal, a slow and puzzling transformation of the community in the years before the dumping stopped, and finally a decisive return to a new, healthier steady state within a year of cessation. The study offers a rare, decade-scale answer to a question regulators rarely get to ask in full: what actually happens to a marine ecosystem when we stop dumping on it?</p>
<p>The disposal site in question has long received sewage sludge from the Dan Region Wastewater project, known as SHAFDAN, the municipal treatment system serving the densely populated Tel Aviv metropolitan area. Sludge disposal at sea is a practice with a long and contested history worldwide, and the Israeli site has been monitored for decades precisely because the eastern Mediterranean shelf is an unusually demanding environment for such activity. The Levantine basin is warm, oligotrophic, and increasingly stressed by seawater warming, so any additional organic load delivered to the seabed lands on an ecosystem already near its tolerance limits. Earlier work by the same research group and by colleagues at the Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research had documented the chemical and biological footprint of the sludge, but the new study spans the full transition from active disposal to its complete cessation in March 2017, giving scientists an unusually clean before-and-after comparison.</p>
<p>The technical heart of the study is a twelve-year benthic time series built from box-corer samples collected aboard the research vessels Shikmona and Mediterranean Explorer. Each spring and fall, the team quantified macrofaunal abundance, the composition of taxa present, taxa richness, and the total organic carbon content of the sediment, commonly abbreviated TOC. TOC serves as a chemical proxy for organic enrichment: the more organic material, whether from sludge, phytoplankton debris, or other sources, has settled into the sediment, the higher the reading. Macrofauna, the worms, mollusks, crustaceans and other small animals living within the sediment, act as the biological counterpart to that chemical signal. Because different species have very different tolerances for organic loading and low oxygen, the identity and abundance of the animals present integrate the environmental history of the site over months to years. Reading the two signals together, chemistry and biology, is the standard logic of benthic impact monitoring, and it is what allowed the researchers to disentangle the effects of sludge from those of natural seasonality and regional warming.</p>
<p>During the active disposal period, before March 2017, the picture was stark. The community was overwhelmingly dominated by one or more opportunistic species of capitellid polychaetes, a family of segmented worms famous in marine ecology as classic indicators of disturbed, organically enriched sediments. Capitellids thrive where other animals cannot: they tolerate the hypoxic, sulfide-rich conditions that develop when excess organic matter fuels bacterial respiration in the seabed. Their monopolization of the disposal area is textbook ecological succession in reverse, a community pushed back to the earliest, most degraded stage described in the Pearson-Rosenberg model of organic enrichment. In practical terms, the sea floor beneath the disposal zone had been converted from a diverse shelf community into a monoculture of pollution-tolerant worms, a biological signature of chronic organic loading that persisted as long as the sludge kept arriving.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most striking finding from the disposal years is that the impact was not static but rhythmic. The researchers identified an annual cycle driven by the interplay between waste delivery and winter hydrodynamics. Sludge accumulated on the seabed through the summer months, and then winter storms dispersed it, scouring and redistributing the organic layer across the shelf. This accumulation-and-dispersion cycle produced a matching annual cycle in macrofaunal abundance, with the fall samples, taken after the summer accumulation phase, showing the strongest suppression. By fall, the accumulated sludge overrode every other environmental factor the team could evaluate, prominently attenuating the abundance of the macrofaunal community. TOC levels, meanwhile, remained stable and relatively high year-round during the disposal period, indicating that the sediment&#8217;s organic burden never fully cleared between dumping seasons. The system, in other words, was locked into a perpetual seasonal pulse of enrichment and partial recovery, never allowed to escape the disposal footprint.</p>
<p>Then came a twist that makes the study more than a routine impact assessment. Between 2012 and 2017, well before the disposal actually stopped, the community began to change in complex, gradual ways. The dominance of the opportunistic capitellids attenuated, a wider variety of other taxa entered the samples, and taxa richness shifted accordingly. Crucially, these changes were not timed with the cessation of sludge disposal, which did not occur until March 2017. The researchers initially hypothesized that the driver was the warming of the eastern Mediterranean seawater, a trend well documented for the Levantine basin and increasingly implicated in ecological upheavals across the region, from multi-species collapses at the warm edge of the sea to shifts in sponge and fish populations. Whatever the precise mechanism, the episode is a cautionary tale for monitoring programs everywhere: community change in a polluted area does not necessarily mean the pollution has changed, and attributing temporal shifts to a single management action requires careful timing analysis.</p>
<p>The cessation itself, when it finally came, produced a response that was both delayed and decisive. In 2018, one year after disposal ended, the disposal area settled into a new steady state that was unmistakably different from the disposal-era baseline. Macrofaunal abundance settled at low levels, but taxa richness was relatively high, the taxonomic composition stabilized in a new configuration, and TOC levels dropped to background levels comparable to unaffected shelf sediments. The chemical recovery was remarkably fast by marine standards; organic enrichment that had persisted year-round during the disposal period was effectively flushed from the system within a year once the source was cut. The biological community, however, did not simply revert to some pre-disposal original state. Instead, it reorganized into a novel assemblage, a reminder that recovered ecosystems are not always restored ecosystems, and that legacies of decades of disturbance can shape community structure long after the pressure is removed.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s spatial dimension adds further texture to the story. By sampling multiple stations across the disposal area and its surroundings, the team could distinguish the core impact zone, where sludge effects were strongest, from peripheral areas where the annual accumulation-dispersion cycle and the post-cessation recovery played out differently. This spatial gradient is what makes the dataset valuable beyond the Israeli coast. Similar disposal sites and wastewater outfalls around the world, from the New York Bight to Australian waters to the Gulf of Lions, have produced comparable patterns of opportunistic dominance and slow recovery, and the Israeli series confirms that the same ecological principles operate in the ultra-oligotrophic, rapidly warming eastern Mediterranean. It also demonstrates the value of sustained, twice-yearly sampling with consistent methods; a shorter or less frequent program could easily have missed either the pre-cessation community shift or the one-year chemical rebound, and drawn the wrong conclusion about cause and effect.</p>
<p>For marine managers, the takeaways are concrete. First, cessation works: cutting off the sludge source allowed the sediment chemistry to reset within roughly a year and released the macrofaunal community from its capitellid monoculture. Second, recovery is not instantaneous or symmetrical; the biological reorganization took years and produced a new steady state rather than a return to the past. Third, disentangling multiple stressors requires long time series, because climate-driven change can mimic, mask, or interact with local pollution signals in ways that short-term monitoring cannot resolve. As coastal nations worldwide phase out sea disposal of sewage sludge under international conventions, the Israeli shelf offers one of the clearest documented examples of what the other side of that decision looks like: a sea floor that, given the chance, reassembles itself into something more diverse, more stable, and far more representative of what a healthy Mediterranean shelf should be.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Long-term effects of sewage-sludge disposal and its cessation on benthic macrofaunal communities of the Israeli Mediterranean shelf</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Effects of sewage-sludge disposal and its cessation on benthic macrofaunal community on the Israeli Mediterranean shelf</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Lubinevsky, H., &amp; Tom, M. (2026). Effects of sewage-sludge disposal and its cessation on benthic macrofaunal community on the Israeli Mediterranean shelf. <em>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 198</em>(10), Article 1122. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-15967-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-15967-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-15967-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10661-026-15967-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> sewage sludge, benthic macrofauna, Mediterranean Sea, Israeli shelf, polychaetes, capitellids, total organic carbon, sediment monitoring, marine pollution, ecological recovery, Levantine basin, environmental monitoring</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">226634</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hidden Hazards in Sewage Sludge Fertilizer: Heavy Metals, Pathogens, and Microplastics</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hidden-hazards-in-sewage-sludge-fertilizer-heavy-metals-pathogens-and-microplastics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 00:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anaerobic digestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circular economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contaminants in fertilizer feedstock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental risks of sludge reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertilizer production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health implications of sludge application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy metal contamination in wastewater sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics in sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monitoring and regulation of biosolids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathogens in biosolids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pyrolysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory challenges in sludge management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory gaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sewage sludge fertilizer safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture with sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment technologies for sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment by-products]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=199912</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review warns that sewage sludge fertilizers carry heavy metals, pathogens, pharmaceuticals, and microplastics, arguing that safe agricultural reuse depends on advanced treatment and urgent regulatory reform.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sludge that settles at the bottom of wastewater treatment tanks has long been viewed as a liability: a soggy, odorous by-product that treatment plants spend an estimated 30 to 50 percent of their operating budgets simply to manage. Yet this same material is rich in nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and organic matter, which is precisely why researchers keep asking whether it could become a pillar of sustainable agriculture. A new structured narrative review published in Waste and Biomass Valorization systematically weighs that promise against a formidable list of dangers, concluding that sewage sludge can remain a valuable fertilizer feedstock only if it is paired with rigorous treatment, continuous monitoring, and a far clearer regulatory framework than currently exists in many jurisdictions. The review, led by Dawid Skrzypczak and Katarzyna Chojnacka of Wroclaw University of Science and Technology together with colleagues in Finland and Poland, synthesizes evidence from 173 publications and regulatory documents to map the contaminants lurking in sludge-derived fertilizers and the technologies that can neutralize them.</p>
<p>The agricultural case for sludge is genuinely strong when the material is clean. Field studies cited in the review show that sludge application can raise crop yields by as much as 60 percent, rivaling the effect of fertilizers made from non-renewable resources. Two years of sludge amendment increased not only soil organic matter but also the stability of soil aggregates, improving soil structure in ways that conventional mineral fertilizers cannot. Biosolids even boosted the phenolic content and antioxidant activity of sweet basil, hinting at quality benefits beyond sheer yield. In a world facing dwindling phosphorus reserves and a nitrogen fertilizer crisis, the logic of recycling nutrients from human waste back into farmland is compelling. Circular-economy advocates argue that every tonne of sludge diverted to agriculture is a tonne of mined phosphate rock that does not need to be extracted.</p>
<p>The problem is what else rides along with those nutrients. Heavy metals, including cadmium, zinc, copper, chromium, nickel, arsenic, silver, and lead, make up roughly 0.5 to 2.0 percent of sludge on a dry-weight basis, and they originate from both industrial discharges and everyday household plumbing. Once these metals enter soil they are not biodegradable and can persist in the environment for decades, migrating through soil profiles into groundwater and accumulating in the edible tissues of crops. One influential study found that while sludge boosted yields of mung bean by up to 60 percent, it simultaneously raised the accumulation of lead, nickel, and cadmium in the grain, undermining its suitability as food. Under European rules for organic-mineral fertilizers, permissible limits are 100 milligrams of chromium, 5 milligrams of cadmium, 60 milligrams of nickel, 140 milligrams of lead, and 2 milligrams of mercury per kilogram, but the actual metal content of a given sludge depends heavily on its origin, and the same production technology can deliver strikingly different results depending on whether the process runs at laboratory, pilot, or full industrial scale.</p>
<p>Pathogens constitute a second, more insidious barrier. Municipal sludge is a biological concentrate of fecal bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella, enteric viruses including rotavirus, norovirus, and hepatitis A, protozoan parasites like Giardia intestinalis, and fungal genera such as Aspergillus and Penicillium. Farmers handling sludge-based fertilizers report skin allergies, digestive ailments, and respiratory infections, and communities living near fields where sludge is sprayed face elevated risks of pharyngitis, coughing, and shortness of breath from airborne transmission. Contaminated soil can also shed pathogens into surface water and groundwater during rainfall, threatening drinking supplies and aquatic biodiversity. The review stresses a subtle analytical problem: pathogen counts measured with culture-based methods versus molecular assays such as quantitative PCR are not directly comparable, and detecting viral genetic material does not necessarily mean the virus is still infectious. Comparisons across studies are further muddied by differences in sludge stabilization history, storage conditions, and seasonal variation in the incoming wastewater.</p>
<p>Organic micropollutants form perhaps the most chemically diverse contaminant group. The most frequently detected compounds include linear alkylbenzenesulfonates from detergents, the plasticizer di-ethylhexylphthalate, nonylphenols, polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxins and furans, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which have been measured at concentrations ranging from 0.7 to 75.2 milligrams per kilogram in sludge. Persistent compounds such as DEHP and PAHs are of particular concern because they have been linked to cancer, reproductive damage, and metabolic disease. Pharmaceuticals add another layer: global antibiotic consumption rose 65 percent between 2000 and 2015, and most antibiotics pass through the human body unmetabolized, ending up in sludge at concentrations from micrograms to milligrams per kilogram. When antibiotic-laden sludge is applied to soil, it exerts selective pressure that fosters antibiotic-resistant bacteria, suppresses microbial diversity, and can inhibit carbon mineralization, nitrogen cycling, and enzyme activity. Natural and synthetic steroid hormones, active at vanishingly low concentrations, raise endocrine-disruption worries, while persistent pesticides accumulate in sludge solids because of their hydrophobic chemistry.</p>
<p>Microplastics have emerged as the contaminant that most sharply exposes the limits of current treatment and regulation. An estimated 3.2 million tonnes of primary microplastics enter the environment annually, and between 60 and 99.9 percent of the microplastics entering wastewater treatment plants are retained in the resulting biosolids. Studies report anywhere from hundreds of thousands to several millions of microplastic particles per kilogram of sludge, depending on the analytical method and particle-size range considered. Once sludge is spread on fields, these particles, which can adsorb dyes, heavy metals, and pharmaceuticals onto their surfaces, effectively seed agricultural soils with a persistent plastic burden and a mobile carrier for co-transported pollutants. The United Nations listed microplastic pollution among the top ten environmental issues requiring immediate attention in 2017, yet quality standards for biosolids and soils, many written three decades ago, still test only for heavy metals and a handful of persistent organic pollutants. Microplastics, pharmaceuticals, hormones, and antibiotic resistance determinants fall almost entirely outside the regulatory net.</p>
<p>The review catalogues a battery of treatment technologies that can shrink these risks, while candidly admitting that none is a universal solution. For heavy metals, options include alkaline modification with geopolymers that immobilize metals in monolithic matrices, chemical extraction using chelating agents such as EDTA and NTA followed by sulfide precipitation, microbiological bioleaching with organisms like Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans that achieved up to 39 percent lead removal in one study, and electrokinetic treatment that drives metal ions toward electrodes under a direct-current field. Each approach carries trade-offs: stabilization does not remove total metal mass and can reverse if soil pH or redox conditions shift, extraction generates secondary metal-rich effluents, bioleaching is slow and finicky, and electroreclamation is energy-hungry and electrode-sensitive. For pathogens, composting under controlled conditions eliminated 99 percent of Salmonella and 96 percent of fecal coliforms within a month, while thermophilic anaerobic digestion at 50 to 60 degrees Celsius denatures bacterial enzymes and outperforms mesophilic digestion. Quicklime treatment pushes pH above 12 and heats sludge to around 70 degrees, destroying organisms including Clostridium perfringens, Listeria, and Enterococcus, and hybrid schemes combining 160-degree thermal hydrolysis with anaerobic digestion came close to complete pathogen destruction, sparing only Clostridium perfringens. Irradiation with cobalt-60 or cesium-137 can shred pathogen DNA but remains rare at full scale because of cost and safety barriers.</p>
<p>For organic micropollutants, well-managed composting reduced hormones below detection limits in field-scale post-treatment, whereas uncontrolled open-air storage produced variable and often disappointing removal. Anaerobic digestion shows compound-specific performance, achieving over 80 percent removal for selected anti-inflammatory drugs under laboratory conditions but low or even negative removal for other pharmaceutical classes at full scale. Thermal routes are the heavy artillery: combustion at 850 to 1000 degrees destroys most organic micropollutants but transfers a fraction of them to flue-gas residues, and pyrolysis at 600 degrees reduced polychlorinated biphenyls, PAHs, and pharmaceutical and personal-care compounds by at least 99.9 percent in one comparative study, although contaminants can partition into condensates and oils that then require controlled disposal. Against microplastics, incineration removes roughly 99.9 percent of particles and pyrolysis achieves 91 to 97 percent removal, but both funnel nutrients out of closed-loop recycling into construction materials or energy, while emerging alternatives such as hydrothermal liquefaction and hyperthermophilic composting show promise yet rarely exceed 50 percent removal efficiency and remain poorly characterized in terms of degradation by-products.</p>
<p>The review&#8217;s most sobering findings concern the law rather than the lab. Council Directive 86/278/EEC protects soils by setting heavy-metal thresholds for agricultural sludge, but the EU fertilizer framework, Regulation 2019/1009, excludes sludge from its list of approved fertilizer ingredients precisely because of toxicity concerns, leaving farmers who wish to use it dependent on temporary national permits. Because member states write their own rules on application rates, permissible microorganism levels, microplastics, antibiotics, hormones, and pH, soil protection is inconsistent across the bloc, and internationally traded food faces uneven safety standards. The authors call for a harmonized directive specifying contaminant limits across all pollutant classes, mandatory annual soil testing for heavy metals, microplastics, hormones, and antibiotics, adoption of best available techniques, and on-site sludge processing to cut transport emissions. Public skepticism, fueled by odors and documented health complaints near land-application sites, adds a social dimension that educational campaigns and community engagement must address. The bottom line is pragmatic: sludge-derived fertilizers can genuinely anchor circular nutrient management in a phosphorus-scarce world, but only under science-based regulation, standardized analytical methods, and treatment strategies that account for contaminant fate, secondary waste streams, and real-world field conditions rather than laboratory promises alone.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Contaminant risks and mitigation strategies in sewage sludge-derived fertilizers</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Assessing and Mitigating Risks of Emerging Contaminants in Fertilizer Production from Sewage Sludge: Challenges and Opportunities</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Skrzypczak, D., Mikula, K., Izydorczyk, G., Samarina, T., Gil, F., Wijatkowska, A., Szyszka, D., &amp; Chojnacka, K. (2026). Assessing and Mitigating Risks of Emerging Contaminants in Fertilizer Production from Sewage Sludge: Challenges and Opportunities. <em>Waste and Biomass Valorization</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-026-03780-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-026-03780-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-026-03780-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s12649-026-03780-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> sewage sludge, heavy metals, pathogens, microplastics, pharmaceuticals, composting, anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, fertilizer production, circular economy, wastewater treatment, regulatory gaps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199912</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sewage Sludge Treatment May Transform, Not Destroy, Microplastics in Wastewater</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/sewage-sludge-treatment-may-transform-not-destroy-microplastics-in-wastewater/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 19:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circular economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of hydrothermal processes on microplastic pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of microplastics in wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fate of PET and polystyrene microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrochar production from sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal carbonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal carbonization wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastic pollution in water treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastic pollution mitigation strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microplastic transformation in sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics in urban wastewater management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics migration during sludge processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics removal challenges in biosolids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polymer degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polystyrene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater microplastics contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=197952</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research shows hydrothermal carbonization transforms rather than eliminates PET and polystyrene microplastics in sewage sludge, transferring substantial organic load into process water.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hydrothermal carbonization has been hailed as one of the most promising ways to deal with the mountains of sewage sludge that modern cities produce every day, a process that uses hot, pressurized water to convert wet organic waste into a carbon-rich solid called hydrochar without the need for energy-hungry drying. But a nagging question has lingered beneath the enthusiasm: what actually happens to the microplastics that concentrate in sludge during wastewater treatment? A new study from researchers at AGH University of Krakow in Poland, published in Energy Reports, offers one of the most detailed answers yet, and its conclusions are more sobering than the optimistic headlines suggest. Under the very conditions used to process sewage sludge, the two dominant microplastic pollutants in biosolids are not eliminated. They are transformed, and much of their material migrates into the process water, where it could pose new treatment challenges.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Zuzanna Prus-Frączek and including senior authors Katarzyna Styszko and Małgorzata Wilk, focused on polyethylene terephthalate, or PET, the polymer of water bottles and food packaging, and polystyrene, or PS, the aromatic plastic found in insulation, packaging foam, and countless disposable items. Both are among the most common polymers recovered from treated sludge, which can harbor hundreds to thousands of microplastic particles per kilogram of dry matter. Because European Union policy increasingly promotes the reuse of sludge as fertilizer and soil amendment on farmland, understanding whether hydrothermal treatment truly breaks these particles down is not an academic detail. It is central to whether plastic pollution quietly rides the circular economy back into the food chain.</p>
<p>Earlier studies had reported that hydrothermal carbonization can slash the number of microplastic particles detectable in sludge by up to 90 percent, with one study showing removal of particles larger than 50 micrometers jumping from about 11 percent to 85 percent as temperatures rose from 170 to 220 degrees Celsius. But a reduction in detectable particles is not the same as destruction. Fragments can shatter below the size limits of analytical instruments, and polymer-derived compounds can dissolve into the surrounding water without ever being mineralized. The Polish team set out to determine which of these fates actually befalls PET and PS, treating the two polymers separately in pure water at 220 degrees Celsius for one, two, and three hours, conditions carefully chosen to mirror real sewage sludge processing while eliminating interference from sludge-derived organic matter.</p>
<p>The results revealed a striking asymmetry between the two plastics. PET, whose backbone contains ester bonds that water can chemically attack, proved far more vulnerable. Thermogravimetric analysis showed that its degradation onset temperature, which stands at roughly 402 degrees Celsius in the raw polymer, plummeted to between 246 and 284 degrees Celsius after treatment. The pyrolytic residue left at 800 degrees Celsius collapsed from 12.7 percent to as little as 1.3 percent, indicating a severely diminished tendency to form stable carbon structures. Infrared and Raman spectroscopy painted a consistent picture: the sharp ester carbonyl band at 1714 inverse centimeters gave way to new dominant components near 1671 to 1677 inverse centimeters, signaling a heterogeneous mix of partially hydrolyzed ester bonds and newly formed oxygen-containing structures. Scanning electron microscopy showed surfaces transformed from smooth and compact into rough, cracked, and cavity-riddled landscapes.</p>
<p>Polystyrene, by contrast, emerged from the reactor remarkably intact. Its hydrophobic aromatic skeleton, held together by carbon-carbon bonds that water cannot easily cleave, resisted the conditions that visibly weakened PET. Treated PS samples retained a single-step thermal degradation profile with maximum decomposition temperatures of around 416 to 417 degrees Celsius, essentially unchanged from the raw material. The principal FTIR and Raman bands, including the characteristic aromatic ring breathing mode near 1001 inverse centimeters, remained within measurement uncertainty of their original positions. Only slight band broadening after three hours hinted at limited local disorder at the surface. The finding aligns with earlier work showing that complete PS decomposition demands 360 degrees Celsius and four hours, conditions far more severe than any sewage sludge reactor would employ.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential discovery came from analyzing the process water itself. When the researchers measured chemical oxygen demand and total organic carbon in the liquid phase, PET proved to be a prodigious polluter. Normalized to the initial polymer mass, PET released approximately 737 to 876 milligrams of COD and 320 to 343 milligrams of TOC per gram of plastic into the water, with absolute concentrations reaching 6145 to 7300 milligrams per liter of COD and around 2700 to 2855 milligrams per liter of TOC. Polystyrene, in comparison, contributed only 35 to 83 milligrams of COD and 99 to 140 milligrams of TOC per gram of polymer. The pH of the PET process water remained stubbornly acidic, between 3.8 and 3.9, consistent with the accumulation of acidic products from ester bond cleavage, while phenolic compounds slowly increased with longer treatment, suggesting the formation of refractory aromatic derivatives that resist further degradation.</p>
<p>These numbers carry a direct message for engineers designing full-scale sludge hydrothermal carbonization plants. Process water from sludge HTC is already heavily loaded with dissolved organics and can contain inhibitory or toxic compounds, and adding a substantial polymer-derived burden, particularly from PET-rich sludge, would amplify the challenge of treating or safely recirculating that water. Previous pilot-scale studies have shown that biological treatment of HTC process water can achieve COD removals of roughly 71 to 75 percent in membrane bioreactors and sequencing batch reactors, but the researchers caution that the added plastic-derived load could strain these systems further. Hydrochar yields added another layer of nuance: the most intensive apparent conversion for both polymers occurred at two hours, with yields for PS dropping to 75.6 percent and PET to 53.6 percent, and the non-monotonic trends hint at competing processes of depolymerization, dissolution, and secondary condensation of soluble intermediates back onto the solid phase.</p>
<p>The environmental implications extend beyond the treatment plant. Hydrochar from PET-containing sludge, with its weakened structure and earlier degradation onset, would likely be more susceptible to further fragmentation, oxidation, and weathering if applied to soils, potentially generating new generations of smaller plastic particles. The dramatic reduction in pyrolytic residue also suggests a diminished capacity for stable carbon sequestration in PET-derived char, undermining one of the climate arguments for hydrochar use in agriculture. Polystyrene-derived material, meanwhile, may remain embedded within or incorporated into the carbonized matrix despite surface alteration, retaining its aromatic identity. In neither case does the plastic vanish. As the authors put it, HTC should be understood primarily as a polymer-transformation and redistribution process, shifting material between the solid, liquid, and gas phases rather than eliminating it from the system.</p>
<p>The study does have limits that the team acknowledges candidly. The experiments used pristine, manually fragmented waste plastics in distilled water at a single temperature, rather than environmentally aged particles in a real sludge matrix, and the analyses could not identify specific molecular transformation products, distinguish hydrolysis from oxidation, or assess nanoplastic formation because samples were ground before imaging. Future work, the researchers argue, should incorporate real sewage sludge, replicate experiments across broader operating windows, and deploy gas and liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry to identify individual compounds, alongside leaching and ecotoxicity tests to evaluate the fate of released organics in soils. For now, the message for the water sector is clear and somewhat uncomfortable: hydrothermal carbonization remains a valuable technology for valorizing wet sludge, but claims of microplastic removal must be read as claims of microplastic transformation, and any credible plant design must treat the process water as a first-class waste stream, not an afterthought.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Hydrothermal carbonization of PET and polystyrene microplastics under sewage sludge treatment conditions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Hydrothermal carbonization of PET and PS microplastics under conditions relevant to sewage sludge treatment</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Prus-Frączek, Z., Kalemba-Rec, I., Magdziarz, A., Dróżdż, A., Chwiej, J., Styszko, K., &amp; Wilk, M. (2026). Hydrothermal carbonization of PET and PS microplastics under conditions relevant to sewage sludge treatment. <em>Energy Reports, 16</em>, Article 109697. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109697" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109697</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109697" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109697</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> microplastics, hydrothermal carbonization, sewage sludge, PET, polystyrene, hydrochar, process water, wastewater treatment, COD, TOC, polymer degradation, circular economy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">197952</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
