<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>seed-borne pathogens &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/seed-borne-pathogens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:43:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>New Antibody Tests Outperform PCR in Detecting Devastating Rice Panicle Blight Pathogens</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-antibody-tests-outperform-pcr-in-detecting-devastating-rice-panicle-blight-pathogens/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burkholderia glumae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia plantarii identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burkholderia plantarii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dot-ELISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dot-ELISA and colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip for rice disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global spread of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of rice bacterial panicle blight on crop yields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monoclonal antibody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-laboratory-based diagnostic tests for rice diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant disease diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarantine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapid diagnostic platforms for rice pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice bacterial panicle blight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rice bacterial panicle blight detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice disease diagnostic tools in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seed-borne pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensitive detection methods for rice bacterial pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serological detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serological techniques outperform PCR in plant pathogen detection]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=213679</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chinese researchers have developed monoclonal antibody-based Dot-ELISA and colloidal gold strip tests that detect the rice bacterial panicle blight pathogens Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia plantarii more sensitively than PCR within minutes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rice farmers and quarantine inspectors may soon have a powerful new weapon against one of the world&#8217;s most destructive rice diseases. A research team in China has developed two rapid diagnostic platforms—a dot-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Dot-ELISA) and a colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip (CGICS)—that can detect Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia plantarii, the primary bacterial agents behind rice bacterial panicle blight (RBPB). Remarkably, both serological techniques proved more sensitive than conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the current gold standard in molecular diagnostics, while requiring no expensive laboratory equipment. The work, published in the journal Crop Health, addresses a long-standing gap: until now, no serological tools existed for detecting these quarantine-significant pathogens.</p>
<p>Rice bacterial panicle blight was first documented in Japan in the 1950s and has since spread to rice-growing regions across Africa, Asia, North America, and South America. The disease typically causes yield losses of around 15 percent, but a severe outbreak in Vietnam in 1992 demonstrated its devastating potential, with recorded losses reaching as high as 75 percent. The pathogens behind the disease are Gram-negative bacteria of the Burkholderia genus, with B. glumae acting as the dominant causal agent. Surveys of diseased rice plants in the United States found that B. glumae, B. gladioli, B. multivorans, and B. plantarii together accounted for 90 percent of isolated Burkholderia strains, underscoring the central role these species play in the disease.</p>
<p>Diagnosing RBPB in the field is notoriously difficult. Typical symptoms include browning of the flag leaf sheath and ligule, death of the panicle, and a sharp demarcation between diseased and healthy grains—the upper portion of infected grains appears water-soaked, grayish-white, or yellowish-brown while the lower part remains normal. Yet other pathogens and abiotic stresses can produce similar symptoms, making symptom-based diagnosis inaccurate and untimely. Complicating matters further, the bacteria are seed-borne and can persist in a dormant state within seedlings, only triggering disease later in the growing season, from booting through heading. Warm, humid conditions favor outbreaks: the optimal growth temperature for B. glumae sits between 30 and 35 degrees Celsius, making tropical and subtropical regions particularly vulnerable.</p>
<p>Existing diagnostic approaches have significant drawbacks. Conventional methods rely on pathogen isolation and cultivation, pathogenicity analysis, Biolog microbial identification, and fatty acid profiling—all labor-intensive procedures. Molecular approaches based on PCR target genomic loci such as the internal transcribed spacer between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes and the gyrB gene, but they demand thermal cyclers, electrophoresis equipment, trained technicians, and multiple handling steps. One multiplex PCR assay designed to detect B. plantarii in rice seeds exhibited a sensitivity of only 1.0 × 10⁸ colony-forming units (CFU) per milliliter, insufficient for low-concentration samples. Serological techniques, by contrast, offer simplicity, speed, low cost, and suitability for high-throughput screening at ports and in the field.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Jie Dong and Jianxiang Wu of Zhejiang University, began by generating monoclonal antibodies against the two target pathogens. They used formaldehyde-inactivated cells of B. glumae strain Os48 and B. plantarii strain ZJ171 as immunogens, injecting them into BALB/c mice emulsified with Freund&#8217;s adjuvant. Spleen lymphocytes from the mice with the highest serum titers were fused with Sp2/0 myeloma cells using polyethylene glycol, and hybridoma lines were screened by indirect ELISA and cloned by limiting dilution. This process yielded two hybridoma lines secreting antibodies against B. glumae, designated 4A7 and 8C5, and two secreting antibodies against B. plantarii, designated 12B5 and 14B3. All four monoclonal antibodies were identified as IgG1 with kappa light chains and exhibited high titers of 10⁻⁷.</p>
<p>The high antigenic similarity among Burkholderia species makes antibody specificity a formidable challenge, since cross-reactivity between closely related species is a common pitfall. The team&#8217;s specificity testing, however, delivered striking results. The Dot-ELISAs built on antibodies 4A7 and 8C5 detected all five tested B. glumae strains while showing no cross-reaction with B. plantarii, B. gladioli, B. vietnamiensis, B. ambifaria, B. cenocepacia, B. pyrrocinia, B. cepacia, or control bacteria including Xanthomonas oryzae and Acidovorax oryzae. Similarly, the antibodies 12B5 and 14B3 recognized all three tested B. plantarii strains without reacting with any of the thirteen non-target organisms. This clean discrimination across the notoriously slippery Burkholderia genus is one of the study&#8217;s most significant achievements.</p>
<p>Sensitivity figures were equally impressive. The Dot-ELISAs detected B. glumae or B. plantarii at concentrations as low as 1.96 × 10⁴ CFU per milliliter—roughly two to four times more sensitive than the conventional PCR assays run in parallel, which detected the pathogens only down to 3.91 × 10⁴ and 7.81 × 10⁴ CFU per milliliter respectively. In infected rice grain homogenates, the Dot-ELISAs produced positive results at dilutions of 1:7680, twice the sensitivity of PCR, which reached only 1:3840. The assay procedure is straightforward: ground rice grain samples are homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline, spotted onto nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with the monoclonal antibody followed by an enzyme-conjugated secondary antibody. A purple dot signals infection within roughly two hours.</p>
<p>For true on-site testing, the team engineered colloidal gold immunochromatographic strips—lateral-flow devices similar in principle to at-home pregnancy tests. Thirty-nanometer gold nanoparticles were synthesized by citrate reduction and conjugated with the monoclonal antibodies. After systematic optimization of capture antibody concentration, gold-labeled antibody loading, and pH adjustment with potassium carbonate, the finished strips delivered results in just five to ten minutes from a drop of sample on the pad. Two red lines indicate a positive result; a single control line indicates a negative one. The strips detected both pathogens at concentrations as low as 9.78 × 10³ CFU per milliliter, making them four to eight times more sensitive than conventional PCR, and they matched the Dot-ELISA&#8217;s 1:7680 detection limit in infected grain homogenates.</p>
<p>Field validation sealed the case. The researchers collected fourteen rice samples suspected of RBPB infection from paddies in Yunnan Province, Zhejiang Province, and Chongqing Municipality during the 2025 growing season. Both serological platforms identified nine samples infected with B. glumae and five with B. plantarii, with samples six and eleven harboring both pathogens simultaneously. Every result matched conventional PCR exactly. In a separate test of six rice leaf samples from Zhejiang, the assays again agreed with PCR, correctly identifying one leaf co-infected with both bacteria. The ability to detect coinfections is particularly valuable, as simultaneous infection by B. glumae and B. gladioli is known to complicate disease control.</p>
<p>The implications extend beyond agronomy. B. glumae has been shown to pose a threat to human health: in 2007, researchers reported a case of chronic granulomatous disease in a child&#8217;s lungs caused by B. glumae, revealing the bacterium&#8217;s cross-species pathogenic potential. Reliable, rapid quarantine tools are therefore needed not only to protect rice yields but also to ensure the safe global circulation of certified pathogen-free rice seed. The authors note that further work remains, including testing how storage conditions affect assay performance, evaluating detection of coinfections at extremely low bacterial loads, and assessing the influence of operator subjectivity in visually reading results. Still, with four ultra-sensitive monoclonal antibodies and two field-ready platforms in hand, the study delivers practical instruments for epidemiological surveillance and quarantine inspection—tools that could help curb the international spread of two of rice&#8217;s most dangerous bacterial enemies.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Development of monoclonal antibody-based serological assays for detecting the rice bacterial panicle blight pathogens Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia plantarii</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Highly specific and super-sensitive Dot-ELISA and colloidal gold immunochromatographic strips for the detection of Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia plantarii of Rice bacterial panicle blight</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Dong, J., Mao, W., Zhang, C., Li, B., An, Z., Luo, J., &amp; Wu, J. (2026). Highly specific and super-sensitive Dot-ELISA and colloidal gold immunochromatographic strips for the detection of Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia plantarii of Rice bacterial panicle blight. <em>Crop Health, 4</em>(1), Article 5. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44297-026-00067-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44297-026-00067-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44297-026-00067-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44297-026-00067-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> rice bacterial panicle blight, Burkholderia glumae, Burkholderia plantarii, monoclonal antibody, Dot-ELISA, colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip, plant disease diagnostics, PCR, quarantine, rice, serological detection, seed-borne pathogens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">213679</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyperspectral Imaging and Machine Learning Detect Seed-Borne Virus in Faba Beans Without Damage</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hyperspectral-imaging-and-machine-learning-detect-seed-borne-virus-in-faba-beans-without-damage/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 02:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced imaging technology in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agricultural imaging and machine learning integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI-based plant disease diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faba bean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faba bean seed health screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hyperspectral imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyperspectral imaging in seed disease detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legume crop disease management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning for plant pathogen identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NMR metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-destructive seed health testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-destructive testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant virus detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSbMV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSbMV virus detection methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulse crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rapid seed certification techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seed health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seed-borne pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seed-borne virus detection in legumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectral classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support vector machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virus spread through seed transmission]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=200724</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[University of Saskatchewan researchers show that hyperspectral imaging paired with machine learning can identify pea seed-borne mosaic virus in individual faba bean seeds with up to 98.3 percent accuracy without destroying the seed.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A team of researchers at the University of Saskatchewan has demonstrated that hyperspectral imaging combined with machine learning can detect pea seed-borne mosaic virus (PSbMV) in individual faba bean seeds without destroying them, achieving accuracy levels approaching 98 percent. The work, published in the journal Plant Methods, offers a potential alternative to the slow, labor-intensive, and destructive laboratory methods currently used to screen pulse crop seed lots for one of their most economically damaging seed-transmitted pathogens. Because PSbMV is carried within the seed itself and often produces no visible symptoms on the seed coat, infected seeds can silently enter the planting chain, establishing virus in fields and spreading through aphid vectors before growers realize anything is wrong.</p>
<p>PSbMV is a potyvirus that infects a wide range of legume species, including pea, faba bean, lentil, and chickpea. When it is transmitted through seed, the virus can reduce both yield and seed quality, and infected plants serve as inoculum sources for aphid-mediated spread within and between fields. Seed health certification programs rely on laboratory assays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and grow-out tests to detect the pathogen. These methods are accurate but each seed tested is consumed in the process, and screening the large numbers of individual seeds needed to certify a commercial seed lot is expensive and time-consuming. The search for a rapid, non-destructive, and scalable screening technology has therefore been a long-standing goal in seed pathology.</p>
<p>The Saskatchewan research group, led by Simin Sabaghian of the Department of Plant Sciences with collaborators in Mechanical Engineering, hypothesized that viral infection produces measurable changes in the optical properties of seeds. Virus replication alters host metabolism, affecting moisture content, the concentration of phenolic compounds, starch composition, and tissue structure. Each of these biochemical and physical changes can modify how seed tissue reflects and absorbs light across the visible, near-infrared, and shortwave-infrared portions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Hyperspectral imaging captures this information in detail: rather than recording three broad color bands like a conventional camera, a hyperspectral system records a continuous reflectance spectrum for every pixel in an image, allowing researchers to detect subtle spectral fingerprints invisible to the human eye.</p>
<p>In the study, individual faba bean seeds were imaged using two hyperspectral systems covering the visible and near-infrared range together with the shortwave-infrared range, spanning approximately 400 to 1700 nanometers. Directional reflectance spectra were extracted from the calibrated images after preprocessing. The researchers used principal component analysis to explore the data and found that, although infected and healthy seeds are visually indistinguishable, they separate subtly but consistently along principal component axes. This confirmed that infection does leave a detectable optical signature, providing the statistical foundation for building classification models.</p>
<p>The team then trained and compared several supervised machine learning classifiers on the spectral data, testing different preprocessing strategies to maximize discrimination. The best-performing combination was a support vector machine coupled with standard normal variate preprocessing, a technique that normalizes each spectrum to correct for scattering effects and baseline shifts. This model achieved a mean fivefold cross-validation accuracy of 97.2 percent and, critically, an independent holdout accuracy of 98.3 percent, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.994. The near-perfect ROC-AUC indicates that the model separates infected from healthy seeds almost flawlessly across all decision thresholds, a level of performance that suggests the spectral signature of infection is robust rather than an artifact of the training data.</p>
<p>Recognizing that full-spectrum hyperspectral systems are expensive and data-heavy, the researchers also sought to reduce the dimensionality of the problem. Competitive adaptive reweighted sampling, a variable selection algorithm, was used to identify a compact subset of the most informative wavelengths. The selected bands were distributed across the visible, near-infrared, and shortwave-infrared regions, consistent with the idea that multiple biochemical features, including pigmentation, water absorption features, and phenolic-related absorptions, contribute to the classification signal. When the reduced set of wavelengths was used to retrain the model, discrimination remained strong, with cross-validation and holdout accuracies of 96.2 percent and 90.8 percent respectively and a holdout ROC-AUC of 0.974. The modest drop in holdout performance is the expected trade-off of model simplification, but the result demonstrates that a much smaller and cheaper sensor could plausibly deliver near-comparable screening performance in a commercial setting.</p>
<p>To ground the spectral findings in plant biology, the researchers quantified seed moisture content and performed proton nuclear magnetic resonance metabolite profiling on the seeds. The metabolomic analysis revealed elevated phenolic signals in virus-infected seeds, indicating that PSbMV infection triggers a measurable shift in seed secondary metabolism. Phenolic compounds are common components of plant defense responses, and their accumulation likely alters reflectance in both the visible range, where they influence coloration, and the near-infrared and shortwave-infrared ranges, where they modify absorption features. This mechanistic link between infection-induced biochemistry and optical response strengthens the case that the classifier is genuinely detecting disease physiology rather than confounding factors such as seed size, shape, or surface texture.</p>
<p>The practical implications extend across the pulse seed industry. A hyperspectral screening line could potentially evaluate thousands of individual seeds per hour without consuming any of them, allowing certified seed producers to identify and remove infected seeds before planting or sale. Because the seeds remain intact, positive findings could be verified with molecular assays while non-infected seed is preserved. The single-seed resolution is particularly important for seed-borne pathogens, where infection levels are often low and bulked sampling can dilute the signal; a system that scores every seed individually provides a direct estimate of infection incidence within a lot. The Saskatchewan group suggests that the approach could form the foundation for rapid, non-destructive seed health assessment tools and integrated virus management strategies in pulse crops.</p>
<p>Challenges remain before the technology reaches commercial deployment. The models were developed and validated on faba bean seeds under controlled laboratory conditions, and performance will need to be confirmed across different faba bean varieties, growing environments, infection severities, and seed lots to ensure the spectral models generalize beyond the training population. Instrument calibration transfer between hyperspectral cameras, the integration of imaging hardware into high-throughput sorting equipment, and regulatory acceptance of optical screening in certification programs are additional hurdles. Nevertheless, the study provides a rigorous proof of concept, supported by independent validation, wavelength reduction, and metabolomic corroboration, that a virus hiding inside a seed can be exposed by the light it reflects. As pulse production expands globally to meet growing demand for plant protein, tools that protect seed health without sacrificing seed will become increasingly valuable, and this work marks a significant step toward that goal.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Non-destructive detection of pea seed-borne mosaic virus in faba bean seeds using hyperspectral imaging and machine learning</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Non-destructive hyperspectral imaging and machine learning for detection of pea seed-borne mosaic virus in faba bean seeds</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Sabaghian, S., Jaliliantabar, F., Noble, S. D., Onu, G., &amp; Prager, S. M. (2026). Non-destructive hyperspectral imaging and machine learning for detection of pea seed-borne mosaic virus in faba bean seeds. <em>Plant Methods</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-026-01588-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-026-01588-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-026-01588-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s13007-026-01588-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> hyperspectral imaging, machine learning, PSbMV, faba bean, seed health, plant virus detection, support vector machine, non-destructive testing, seed-borne pathogens, pulse crops, NMR metabolomics, spectral classification</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">200724</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
