<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>secondary flood peaks &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/secondary-flood-peaks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 05:48:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Model Links Tributary Inflows to Secondary Flood Peaks</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/model-links-tributary-inflows-to-secondary-flood-peaks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 05:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backwater effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel storage and backwater effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exponential decay model for flood recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood behavior in city river systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood peak timing and duration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood recession analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrodynamic modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrologic modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrologic-hydrodynamic flood simulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of flood magnitude and return period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levee breaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[return-flow processes in flood events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary flood peaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary peaks in urban flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tributary inflows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tributary inflows and secondary flood peaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban flood modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban levee breach flood dynamics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=332015</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A coupled model study found that tributary inflows, return flow, channel storage and backwater effects can generate delayed secondary peaks during recession after an urban levee breach.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A coupled one- and two-dimensional hydrologic–hydrodynamic model indicates that interactions between tributary and mainstream inflows can produce delayed secondary peaks during the recession following an urban levee breach. In the simulations, return-flow processes, channel storage and backwater effects jointly produced lagged replenishment of floodwater, allowing discharge to rise again after the initial breach-driven peak.</p>
<p>The computational study examined flood behavior in an urban river system under breach conditions. Across scenarios of increasing flood magnitude and return period, the model estimated that breach peak discharge increased with mainstream flood magnitude. Higher-return-period floods also began earlier and lasted longer, creating a timing pattern the authors describe as “small floods delay, large floods advance.” These findings are model-based estimates for simulated urban flooding rather than direct measurements from a breached city, limiting the conclusions that can be drawn about individual real-world events.</p>
<p>To analyze the recession after the initial maximum, the researchers introduced an exponential decay model combined with linear regression to estimate recession parameters. The approach represented the modeled evolution of flood discharge following the peak. Smaller floods tended to recede in a nearly linear manner, while larger floods showed delayed recession and, in some scenarios, secondary peaks. The framework provides a quantitative means of distinguishing a straightforward falling limb from a recession interrupted by renewed flow contributions.</p>
<p>Beyond a threshold in the disparity between tributary inflow and mainstream flow, secondary-peak intensity increased in the simulations. The researchers attributed these later crests to lagged replenishment associated with return flows, storage within the channel and backwater effects. Together, those modeled processes can interrupt the expected decline of breach-flow discharge and generate a subsequent maximum. The study therefore identifies a post-peak replenishment period that should be included when assessing flood risk after urban levee failures, while describing the exponential decay model as an extended framework for analyzing breach-flow recession.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Modeling flood recession and secondary peaks after urban levee breaches</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mechanisms of Secondary Peaks and Flood Recession in Urban Levee-Breach Events under Tributary–Mainstream Interactions</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Xiao, S., Hou, J., Ma, L., Xu, X., Li, D., Wang, T., Chen, G., Lv, J., &amp; Wang, Z. (2026). Mechanisms of Secondary Peaks and Flood Recession in Urban Levee-Breach Events under Tributary–Mainstream Interactions. <em>Water Resources Management, 40</em>(14), Article 541. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-025-04365-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-025-04365-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-025-04365-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11269-025-04365-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> urban flooding, levee breaches, secondary flood peaks, flood recession, tributary inflows, hydrologic modeling, hydrodynamic modeling, backwater effects, channel storage, flood risk, Mechanisms, Secondary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">332015</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
