<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>seabirds &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/seabirds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:27:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Record-Breaking Nasal Mite Burdens Found in Kelp Gulls Along Southern Brazil</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/record-breaking-nasal-mite-burdens-found-in-kelp-gulls-along-southern-brazil/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological implications of nasal mite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extreme nasal mite populations in birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[host-parasite interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of nasal mites on seabird respiratory health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infection intensity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelp Gull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelp Gulls parasite burden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larinyssus orbicularis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larinyssus orbicularis in South American seabirds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larus dominicanus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine bird parasite studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasal mite infestations in seabirds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasal mites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic burden in Brazilian seabirds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitological baseline for Kelp Gulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevalence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhinonyssidae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning electron microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seabird health and parasitology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seabird-mite host-parasite dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seabirds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underreported seabird parasitic infections]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=205855</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A seven-year survey of 171 Kelp Gulls in southern Brazil found the nasal mite Larinyssus orbicularis in nearly a third of birds, including a record-breaking individual burden of 197 mites.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep inside the nasal passages of one of the southern hemisphere&#8217;s most familiar seabirds, a tiny blood-feeding mite has been quietly building up populations that dwarf anything previously recorded for its genus. A new study of Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus) collected along the Brazilian coast has revealed that nearly a third of these birds carry the nasal mite Larinyssus orbicularis, and that a single gull can harbor as many as 197 of the microscopic parasites — a figure far exceeding every previous record for mites of this genus. The findings, published in the journal Acta Parasitologica, provide the most detailed parasitological baseline yet assembled for this host-parasite pairing and suggest that nasal mite infections may be a significantly underappreciated component of seabird health.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Silvia Bainy Gastal of the Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), together with Carolina Silveira Mascarenhas and Leandro Bugoni, examined the nasal cavities of 171 Kelp Gulls collected between 2015 and 2022 in the Brazilian states of Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. Most of the birds (146 individuals) had died under care at marine animal rehabilitation centers, while 25 were recovered during routine beach surveys. All carcasses were collected within 24 hours of the animal&#8217;s death, and none of the examined birds had received any antiparasitic treatment, ensuring that the mite counts reflected natural infection levels rather than the effects of medication.</p>
<p>Of the 171 gulls dissected, 56 — or 32.7 percent — were parasitized by rhinonyssid mites, and every specimen identified in the analyzed subsample proved to be Larinyssus orbicularis, a species first described in 1948 and known to specialize on gulls and terns. In total, the researchers recovered 2,224 mites, with a mean abundance of 13.0 mites per host across the whole sample and a mean intensity of 39.7 mites per parasitized bird. The species was confirmed using both light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, the latter proving essential because the dorsal plates that serve as the mite&#8217;s diagnostic features were difficult to resolve with conventional optical equipment. Supplementary characters, including the shape and dimensions of the idiosoma, leg length, and the chaetotaxy of the dorsum, venter and gnathosoma, all matched the original description of L. orbicularis.</p>
<p>One of the study&#8217;s most striking results concerns infection intensity. Individual burdens ranged from a single mite to the record-setting 197, and because no standardized classification of Larinyssus infections in gulls existed before, the team proposed a semi-quantitative scheme based on the distribution of counts they observed: low infections of 1 to 20 mites, moderate infections of 21 to 50, and heavy infections exceeding 50 mites. Under this framework, 48.2 percent of parasitized gulls fell into the low category, 30.3 percent into the moderate category, and 21.5 percent carried heavy infections — meaning that roughly one in five infected birds hosted a substantial parasite load capable of occupying much of the nasal cavity.</p>
<p>Anatomically, the mites occupied the full length of the upper respiratory tract, from the rostral nasal conchae through the middle and caudal conchae. In heavily parasitized birds, the parasites were also found around the choana — the nasal opening of the palate — and very close to the nostrils, in some cases visible externally through the nares. Gross pathological examination revealed that most mites adhered to host tissue with only limited mucus, but in some individuals the researchers observed accumulated mucoid material, including tenacious mucus and bloody tenacious mucus surrounding the parasites. These observations echo earlier findings in Gouldian Finches infected with the related mite Sternostoma tracheacolum, suggesting that respiratory mite infections may produce similar mucosal changes across widely divergent bird groups.</p>
<p>Statistical analysis of the parasitological indices revealed a clear age-related pattern. Prevalence did not differ between male and female gulls, a result consistent with studies of Rhinonyssidae in other hosts such as the Rosy-billed Pochard and the Magellanic Penguin, and one that the authors interpret as evidence that transmission — whether during parental care or after fledging — is carried out equally by both sexes in these monogamous birds. Age, however, mattered significantly: only 11.8 percent of juveniles were infected, compared with 43.3 percent of immatures and 36.4 percent of adults. This mirrors the classic pattern reported by TerBush in 1963 for Herring Gulls in the United States, where juveniles showed similarly low infection rates, and supports the hypothesis that mite transmission to young gulls occurs predominantly after chicks have left the nest rather than inside the colony.</p>
<p>Geographically, the picture was equally telling. Of the 56 parasitized hosts, 55 were collected in Santa Catarina and just one in Rio Grande do Sul, while no mites were found in any of the gulls from São Paulo or Rio de Janeiro, despite those states contributing a smaller but meaningful number of carcasses. The authors caution that limited sampling in the northern states may partly explain the absence of positive records there, but they also point to host ecology as a plausible driver. In Brazil, Kelp Gulls breed on coastal islands along roughly 850 kilometers of shoreline, from Laguna in Santa Catarina northward to Rio de Janeiro, and the species relies on the coastal zone for foraging and resting. Because gulls gather in groups — including mixed flocks with tern species known to carry the same mite species — areas of high host density and overlapping species distributions may foster both intra- and interspecific mite transmission, shaping the observed latitudinal gradient in prevalence.</p>
<p>The transmission biology of rhinonyssid mites adds further ecological context. These obligate, blood-feeding endoparasites typically disperse through direct contact, moving between hosts when infected adults regurgitate food to nestlings or during courtship, although indirect transmission across water, perches and contaminated surfaces has also been documented. The researchers suggest that L. orbicularis, naturally associated with Kelp Gulls, may occasionally spill over into terns that share the same coastal environments, much as captive canaries have become secondarily infected with other rhinonyssids in regions where they were introduced. Such dynamics could help explain why the same mite species shows markedly different prevalence in different hosts — 9.1 percent in South American Terns and 50 percent in Cabot&#8217;s Terns in an earlier Brazilian study, versus 32.7 percent in Kelp Gulls here, and 24.8 percent and 4.5 percent in Herring Gulls previously examined in the United States and Russia respectively.</p>
<p>While rhinonyssids are generally considered to cause limited harm, the literature documents a range of potential pathologies: injury to the nasal epithelium and blood vessels, pulmonary congestion, rhinitis and sinusitis, and in captive birds even anorexia, aphonia, cachexia, air-sac inflammation, tracheitis and pneumonia that can prove fatal. The authors emphasize that future work should incorporate histopathological analysis of nasal tissues in parasitized gulls to determine whether L. orbicularis infections are associated with tissue lesions or respiratory disease, and they advocate for observations of clinical signs during rehabilitation combined with postmortem examinations as a practical pathway for studying live-host interactions. Because nasal mite infections cannot yet be readily diagnosed in living birds, carcasses from rehabilitation centers represent an invaluable but underused window into this hidden facet of avian health.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the study expands the known geographic distribution of L. orbicularis in Brazil, delivers the largest parasitological dataset ever compiled for nasal mites in gulls, and sets a methodological benchmark by demonstrating the value of scanning electron microscopy for species-level identification. The record intensity of 197 mites in a single bird, and the substantial proportion of heavily infected hosts, together make a compelling case that these minute inhabitants of the nasal cavity deserve far greater attention from ornithologists, parasitologists and wildlife rehabilitators alike. Whether Kelp Gulls have simply learned to tolerate their tenacious tenants, or whether the heaviest burdens carry hidden costs to survival and reproduction, remains an open question — but one that this new baseline now makes possible to answer.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Prevalence, geographic distribution and parasitological indices of the nasal mite Larinyssus orbicularis in Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus) in Brazil</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Nasal Mites of Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus) in Brazil: Geographic Distribution and Parasitological Indices</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Nasal Mites of Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus) in Brazil: Geographic Distribution and Parasitological Indices. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-026-01396-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-026-01396-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-026-01396-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11686-026-01396-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Kelp Gull, Larus dominicanus, nasal mites, Larinyssus orbicularis, Rhinonyssidae, parasitology, seabirds, Brazil, infection intensity, prevalence, scanning electron microscopy, host-parasite interaction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">205855</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gulls Teach Each Other New Tricks: Urban Kelp Gulls Learn Foraging by Watching</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/gulls-teach-each-other-new-tricks-urban-kelp-gulls-learn-foraging-by-watching/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 17:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal behavior research in human-modified habitats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal cognition studies on gulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral flexibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral traditions in urban bird populations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological success of opportunistic scavengers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental evidence of social learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extractive foraging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foraging behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foraging behavior in city-dwelling gulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foraging innovation in urban birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of human activity on bird behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelp Gull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelp Gulls adaptation to urban environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larus dominicanus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning through observation in wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seabirds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social learning in birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two-action task]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban gulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urbanization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=196759</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Urban Kelp Gulls can learn a novel foraging task by watching a companion, with adult observers solving a puzzle box far more often than uninformed birds.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the bustling sprawl of cities, animals that thrive are often those that can learn quickly, adapt flexibly, and exploit the strange new resources that humans leave behind. Among the most successful of these urban adapters are gulls, birds whose scavenging exploits at landfills, beaches, and parking lots have made them both ecological winners and cultural icons of opportunism. A new study published in the journal Animal Cognition now provides some of the clearest experimental evidence yet that one of the keys to this success may be social learning, the ability to acquire new behaviors by watching others rather than through slow individual trial and error. Working with urban Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus) captured near a landfill in Argentina, researchers showed that simply observing a skilled companion dramatically improved a gull&#8217;s chances of solving a novel foraging puzzle, a finding with broad implications for understanding how behavioral traditions can spread through animal populations living in human-modified environments.</p>
<p>The research, conducted by M. Candelaria Biagiotti Barchiesi, Germán O. García, Melina V. Castano, and Laura M. Biondi of the Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras at the Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata and CONICET, focused on a species that has become a textbook example of ecological flexibility. Kelp Gulls are generalist foragers with a remarkably diverse repertoire of feeding tactics, from probing intertidal mudflats to scavenging at waste facilities and even preying on other seabirds. Because these birds frequently feed on anthropogenic food resources, the team hypothesized that social learning might play a central role in how individuals discover and master new ways of exploiting them. To test this idea rigorously, they designed a controlled experiment in which naïve gulls, birds with no prior experience of the task, were given the opportunity to watch a demonstrator solve a problem before attempting it themselves.</p>
<p>The experimental apparatus was an opaque box containing food, a classic extractive foraging task that requires the animal to discover that a specific action, in this case manipulating the lid, releases the reward. Because the box was opaque, success could not be achieved by simply seeing the food; the birds had to learn the technique itself. The study involved twenty-five naïve observer gulls, thirteen adults and twelve immatures, along with six control individuals that received no demonstration. In a baseline phase conducted before any demonstration took place, only twenty-eight percent of the future observers and thirty-three percent of the controls managed to solve the box on their own, confirming that the task was genuinely difficult for an uninstructed gull. This low baseline success rate set the stage for a clean test of whether social information could change the odds.</p>
<p>The results were striking. During the test phase, after observers had watched a demonstrator open the box, not a single control bird solved the task, while fifty-two percent of the observers succeeded. In other words, watching a companion roughly doubled the probability of success compared with the observers&#8217; own baseline performance, and it made the difference between total failure and moderate success relative to uninformed birds. The effect, however, was not uniform across all ages. Only adult observers were significantly more successful and significantly faster at both contacting the box and solving it, both compared with the control group and compared with their own pre-demonstration attempts. This age-specific pattern suggests that adult gulls may be better positioned to translate observed information into effective action, perhaps because of greater motor competence, stronger motivation, or more refined attention to the demonstrator&#8217;s behavior.</p>
<p>Intriguingly, the study found no differences in overall performance between age classes either before or after the demonstration, indicating that immatures were not inherently worse at the task once they had the same social information. Nor did the age of the demonstrator matter: observers learned equally well whether they watched an adult or an immature bird performing the technique. The demonstrator&#8217;s own neophobic response, its hesitancy or boldness around the novel box, also failed to predict whether observers succeeded. These null results are informative in themselves. They suggest that the critical ingredient in social transmission here was the demonstrator&#8217;s technique rather than its social status or emotional demeanor, and that gulls of any age can serve as effective sources of social information within a flock.</p>
<p>One of the most technically interesting aspects of the study was its use of a two-action design, in which different demonstrators could be shown using different lid-opening techniques. This allowed the researchers to ask not merely whether observers learned, but what they learned. The answer was clear: observers predominantly adopted the specific technique used by their demonstrator, and immatures showed greater consistency than adults in copying the exact lid type they had seen opened. This fidelity to the demonstrated method is a hallmark of true social learning rather than mere local enhancement, the simpler process in which an animal is merely attracted to a location or object by another&#8217;s presence. By matching the demonstrator&#8217;s action, the gulls demonstrated that they had extracted procedural information from observation, effectively copying a foraging behavior they had never performed themselves.</p>
<p>The implications of these findings extend well beyond the aviary. Landfills and other urban food subsidies bring large numbers of gulls into close and repeated contact, creating ideal conditions for social transmission of novel foraging innovations. If one inventive individual discovers a new way to access food, whether opening a container, exploiting a new waste stream, or targeting a novel prey, social learning provides a fast track for that innovation to spread through the population. This dynamic helps explain how generalist species like the Kelp Gull can rapidly adjust their behavior to changing environmental conditions, a capacity that is increasingly valuable as urbanization transforms coastal ecosystems across the Southern Hemisphere and beyond. It also raises practical considerations for wildlife management, since behaviors learned socially can be difficult to reverse once established in a local population.</p>
<p>The study also contributes to a broader scientific conversation about cognition in seabirds, a group historically understudied relative to primates, corvids, and parrots. Gulls belong to the charadriiform birds, and accumulating evidence now points to sophisticated cognitive abilities within this lineage, including problem-solving, behavioral flexibility, and social responsiveness. The present experiment adds a controlled, quantitative demonstration that Kelp Gulls possess the capacity for observational learning of an extractive foraging task, placing them firmly within the growing roster of species whose ecological success is underpinned by social cognition. The combination of diverse foraging tactics, cognitive ability, and social transmission appears to be a potent recipe for thriving in human-dominated landscapes.</p>
<p>Methodologically, the work reflects careful attention to animal welfare and experimental design. The gulls were captured with adherence to Argentine legal requirements and guidelines for the use of animals in research, with the experimental protocol approved by the National University of Mar del Plata Animal Ethics Committee. All birds were housed with veterinary assistance during their stay in the aviary and were released at their original habitats once testing was complete. The research was funded by Argentina&#8217;s Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación, and the authors acknowledge the cooperation of workers at the Mar del Plata Landfill, whose daily reality alongside these birds provided the inspiration for the study.</p>
<p>As cities continue to expand and wildlife increasingly shares space with people, understanding the mechanisms of behavioral adaptation becomes ever more urgent. This study of urban Kelp Gulls offers a vivid reminder that the animals flourishing around us are not merely lucky scavengers but capable learners, watching one another, copying successful techniques, and building shared behavioral traditions that ripple through their flocks. In the gull rifling through a landfill, scientists are glimpsing the cognitive machinery that allows some species to turn humanity&#8217;s footprint into opportunity, one observed behavior at a time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Social learning of a novel foraging task in immature and adult urban Kelp Gulls</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Social learning of a foraging task in immature and adult urban Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus)</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Biagiotti Barchiesi, M. C., García, G. O., Castano, M. V., &amp; Biondi, L. M. (2026). Social learning of a foraging task in immature and adult urban Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus). <em>Animal Cognition</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-026-02102-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-026-02102-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-026-02102-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10071-026-02102-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Kelp Gull, social learning, animal cognition, urban wildlife, foraging behavior, seabirds, behavioral flexibility, urbanization, two-action task, social information, extractive foraging, Larus dominicanus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">196759</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remote Caribbean Islands Reveal Centuries of Human Ecological Change and Coral Collapse</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/remote-caribbean-islands-reveal-centuries-of-human-ecological-change-and-coral-collapse/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Porter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropogenic transformation of Caribbean islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiversity Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean coral reef degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation challenges in the Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral collapse in the Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral reefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological change in the Swan Islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of human activity on coral islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guano mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical ecology of remote islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical naturalist surveys of Caribbean islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honduras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human impact on small island ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasive Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[island biodiversity loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[island restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term environmental history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote island ecological reconstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea turtles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seabirds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swan Islands]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=195331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new historical ecology study reconstructs more than five centuries of human-driven environmental change on Honduras' remote Swan Islands, culminating in a rapid coral reef collapse after 2007.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Swan Islands, a tiny pair of raised coral islands administered by Honduras in the western Caribbean Sea, have long been romanticized as one of the region&#8217;s last untouched paradises. A new historical ecology study of these remote outcrops, published in Discover Ecology, dismantles that myth in striking detail. By synthesizing more than a century of naturalists&#8217; accounts, government records, maps, photographs, and 19 biological surveys spanning from 1887 to 2024, researchers Philip V. Mladenov and Scott M. Fitzpatrick have produced the first comprehensive reconstruction of ecological change on the islands from the pre-contact period to the present. Their findings show that despite exceptional remoteness—mainland Honduras lies about 170 kilometers away, Belize roughly 460 kilometers west—the islands were not spared the sweeping anthropogenic transformations that have degraded much of the wider Caribbean.</p>
<p>The geographical setting is central to the story. Great Swan Island, roughly one by three kilometers with a maximum elevation of about 19 meters, and its rugged sister, Little Swan Island, separated by a channel only about 200 meters wide, together cover just 3.6 square kilometers. Today they host a small rotating Honduran naval garrison and no permanent civilian residents. But the archival record reveals layers of human presence stretching back at least to the seventeenth century. Shell middens containing burned top shells and crude pottery, reported by visitors in the 1930s, hint at possible pre-contact Indigenous visits, though the islands&#8217; isolation and lack of permanent freshwater may have kept any occupation minimal. Christopher Columbus&#8217;s crew appears to have been the first European party to encounter the islands in July 1502 during his fourth voyage, and buccaneers including Henry Morgan and Captain Charles Swan—from whom the islands take their English name—used Great Swan Island as a staging base in the mid-to-late 1600s.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that from the pre-contact period through the early seventeenth century, the islands likely remained in a natural or near-natural state. In their pristine condition, the Swan Islands were probably completely cloaked in Caribbean coastal lowland dry forest, so dense that the naturalist Percy Lowe wrote in 1908 that trees came right down to the sea, allowing a visitor to step in five yards from the blinding glare of the beach into the gloom of the woods. Enormous seabird colonies of boobies, frigatebirds, and terns deposited the vast phosphate guano reserves that would later attract industrial exploitation. Green, hawksbill, and loggerhead turtles nested on the beaches in numbers unimaginable today, green iguanas were reportedly tame and abundant, and the reefs supported large predators including goliath groupers, sharks, snappers, and jacks, along with the grazing sea urchin Diadema antillarum and plentiful queen conch.</p>
<p>The pivotal rupture came in the 1850s. In 1857, phosphate-rich guano estimated at more than three million tons, yielding 40 to 80 percent bone phosphate of lime, was reported on the islands, triggering United States claims under the Guano Islands Act of 1856. From 1858, the Atlantic and Pacific Guano Company began clearing native forest on Great Swan Island to excavate the deposits, shipping the guano to Woods Hole, Massachusetts, where it was blended with menhaden waste into fertilizer. At the operation&#8217;s peak in 1887, some 300 men worked the island, supported by a settlement of laborer housing, drying sheds, and a small railroad from the diggings to a western pier. Mining continued under various companies until 1904, leaving pits that persist today as ephemeral ponds. The deforestation almost certainly increased soil erosion and sediment runoff into nearshore waters, initiating a slow chain of marine degradation that would unfold over the following century and a half.</p>
<p>The human and biological toll compounded rapidly. Goats introduced from Grand Cayman grazed down native vegetation, and ships servicing the guano trade and later enterprises delivered rats, mice, and feral cats—predators that devastated seabird colonies, reptiles, and invertebrates. Commercial turtle hunting on an industrial scale was underway by the 1880s; an 1884 Baltimore Sun report described a superintendent freeing more than 300 turtles from holding pens because no vessels had come to buy them. That same article contains what appears to be the first published record of the Swan Island hutia, Geocapromys thoracatus, a small rodent found nowhere else on Earth. After mining ended, leaseholders and the United Fruit Company cleared more forest for a 7,500-tree coconut plantation, fruit crops, and tobacco, while a wireless telegraph station, a US Weather Bureau hurricane station, and later a cattle quarantine station and CIA radio facilities further reshaped the landscape. By 1908, Lowe recorded seabirds nesting only on Little Swan Island, the rookeries of Great Swan having evidently already been extirpated.</p>
<p>The twentieth century catalogued a cascade of extinctions. The endemic whiptail lizard Ameiva fuliginosa, collected in 1887, vanished by 1912, apparently a casualty of cat predation. The islands&#8217; remarkable land snail fauna—23 described species, at least nine endemic—was abundant as late as 1937 but apparently collapsed completely soon afterward, most likely under sustained rat predation. The Swan Island hutia, abundant on Little Swan Island into the early 1950s, went extinct by 1960, a demise researchers attribute to feral cat predation compounded by the catastrophic Category 5 Hurricane Janet in 1955, whose deluge likely drowned animals sheltering in limestone crevices. The endemic Little Swan Island racer snake Cubophis brooksi has not been reliably seen since the late 1990s. Only the green iguanas persisted in force; a 2024 survey estimated 18,000 to 20,000 animals on Great Swan Island, though unlike the tame populations Lowe described, they now flee humans, an apparent behavioral legacy of decades of hunting.</p>
<p>The marine story follows a parallel, delayed trajectory. As late as 2000, the reefs surrounding the islands were still reported as reasonably healthy, with large predatory fish and four shark species present—remarkably late by Caribbean standards, where reef decline generally began decades earlier. Yet the archival synthesis reveals that between 2007 and 2011/13, the reefs underwent a dramatic phase shift. The first quantitative surveys, conducted in 2011 and 2013, found most coral reduced to rubble, with average live coral cover of only about 13 percent in 2011 and 10 percent in 2013, while macroalgae blanketed roughly a third of the reef surface. Predatory fish and sharks had become very rare. Surveys in 2024 showed little recovery, with live coral dominated by weedy, disturbance-tolerant species such as Siderastrea siderea and Porites astreoides, and only three small, bleaching colonies of staghorn coral remaining.</p>
<p>The researchers identify a convergence of stressors that likely pushed the reefs past a tipping point after 2007. These include more than a century and a half of land-use change and sedimentation; the collapse of seabird populations, which historically transported marine-derived nutrients from ocean to island and back into nearshore waters, boosting reef productivity and resilience; the loss of nesting sea turtles, which function as ecosystem engineers grazing seagrass and consuming reef sponges; sustained overfishing of herbivorous and predatory fish; the regional spread of white-band disease; the catastrophic 1983–84 mass mortality of the grazing urchin Diadema antillarum, which removed up to 85 to 90 percent of Caribbean populations; the arrival of invasive lionfish in the early 2000s; and warming-driven coral bleaching. Critically, NOAA hurricane records show that four intense Category 4 and 5 storms—Mitch in 1998, Iris in 2001, Wilma in 2005, and Dean in 2007—struck within a nine-year window, with return intervals of three, four, and less than two years, far too short for reefs already weakened by chronic stress to recover.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s implications extend beyond historical curiosity. The Swan Islands sit within one of the Caribbean&#8217;s largest marine protected areas, declared a national marine park in 1991 and encompassing roughly 5,672 square kilometers of ocean, yet the reserve remains largely unmanaged. The authors argue that historical ecological knowledge is essential both for dispelling the persistent myth that the islands are pristine—as recent tourism and promotional materials still claim—and for setting realistic restoration benchmarks. They advocate a holistic ridge-to-reef strategy, noting that coral restoration efforts are likely to fail unless paired with terrestrial management, invasive species control, and the recovery of seabird and turtle populations that sustain land-sea nutrient connections. Recent development proposals, including a planned maximum-security prison on Great Swan Island that was cancelled in 2023 amid financial and environmental concerns, underscore the stakes. The Swan Islands, the authors conclude, now stand as a powerful model system for understanding how remoteness delays but does not prevent ecological collapse, and for designing restoration strategies grounded in the deep history of what these islands once were.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Long-term anthropogenic ecological change on the Swan Islands in the western Caribbean</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Historical ecology of the Swan Islands (Islas del Cisne) chronicles long-term anthropogenic changes in the Western Caribbean</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Mladenov, P. V., &amp; Fitzpatrick, S. M. (2026). Historical ecology of the Swan Islands (Islas del Cisne) chronicles long-term anthropogenic changes in the Western Caribbean. <em>Discover Ecology, 2</em>(1), Article 23. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00036-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00036-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00036-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44396-026-00036-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Swan Islands, historical ecology, coral reefs, invasive species, guano mining, seabirds, sea turtles, hurricanes, Caribbean, biodiversity loss, island restoration, Honduras</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">195331</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
