<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scientific Data &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/scientific-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 01:05:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Sound Speed, Ship Speed and Beam Width: What Really Determines the Depth of the Challenger Deep</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/sound-speed-ship-speed-and-beam-width-what-really-determines-the-depth-of-the-challenger-deep/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 01:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Marine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic sounding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bathymetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Challenger Deep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Challenger Deep depth estimation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenges in deep-sea measurement precision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data processing in oceanography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep-sea mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep-sea measurement accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of beam width and vessel speed on sonar data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EM124]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of seawater properties on depth readings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mariana Trench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mariana Trench sonar surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modern methods for mapping the ocean floor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multibeam echosounder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multibeam echosounder technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean depth measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R/V Hakuho-maru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific debate over oceanic maximum depths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ship navigation and depth measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound-speed model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underwater sound speed effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XCTD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=204856</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A Japanese team reprocessed identical sonar data from the Challenger Deep through five sound-speed models, showing depth estimates vary by up to 18 meters and proposing 10,927 meters as a preferred maximum depth.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Challenger Deep, at the southern end of the Mariana Trench, is the deepest known place in the ocean, and it has been measured repeatedly since the middle of the twentieth century. Yet even in the era of satellite positioning and modern multibeam sonar, published estimates of its maximum depth still disagree with one another by several meters, and in some cases by more than ten meters. A new study led by researchers at the National Institute of Polar Research, the Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), the University of Tokyo and partner Japanese institutions asks a deceptively simple question: when the seafloor lies nearly 11,000 meters below the surface, what actually controls the number a survey reports as the depth? The answer, the study shows, is not a single instrument reading but a chain of assumptions about seawater, sound, ship handling and data processing.</p>
<p>The team mapped the Challenger Deep using the EM124 multibeam echosounder aboard the Japanese research vessel Hakuho-maru, acquiring dense acoustic coverage of the western, central and eastern basins of the deep. Rather than announcing a new record, the researchers deliberately treated their own dataset as an experiment in measurement. They reprocessed the identical acoustic returns through five different seawater sound-speed models and compared the resulting maximum gridded depths. In the eastern basin, the deepest of the three, the estimates ranged from 10,914 meters to 10,932 meters. That 18-meter spread, produced from one set of echo data, reveals how sensitive a full-ocean-depth measurement is to the way sound is assumed to travel through the water column.</p>
<p>The physical principle behind acoustic bathymetry is straightforward. Depth is obtained by multiplying the speed of sound in seawater by the round-trip travel time of an acoustic pulse and dividing by two. At Challenger Deep depths, sound needs roughly fifteen seconds to travel from the ship to the seafloor and back again. The complication is that sound speed is not a constant: it varies with temperature, salinity and pressure, all of which change dramatically between the surface and a trench bottom under more than a thousand atmospheres of pressure. Because no single profile can capture every variation, the choice of model matters enormously when the answer is quoted to the nearest meter.</p>
<p>The preferred sound-speed model in the study combined two sources of oceanographic data. Upper-ocean observations from expendable probes, XCTD casts acquired by Hakuho-maru during the 2023 survey, extend to about 1,900 meters and capture surface conditions closest in time to the mapping campaign. Below that, the model draws on a full-depth CTD profile collected by the same vessel in 1992, providing sound-speed information through the entire water column. This pairing is notable because it links observations made more than thirty years apart, and it reflects the practical reality that modern surveys rarely have access to a contemporaneous full-depth profile at such extreme depths. Using this model, the team derived maximum gridded depths of 10,926 meters in the western basin, 10,912 meters in the central basin and 10,927 meters in the eastern basin, making 10,927 meters the study&#8217;s preferred estimate of the Challenger Deep&#8217;s maximum depth.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to note that this figure does not render other recent estimates wrong. Full-ocean-depth measurements from the 1984 Japanese survey vessel Takuyo, which yielded a commonly cited value of about 10,920 meters, through modern full-ocean-depth campaigns and the dives of the Five Deeps Expedition, each rest on their own vertical references, observing conditions and processing pipelines. The lesson of the sensitivity tests is that meter-scale comparisons between such numbers must state which sound-speed model, vertical datum and editing procedures were used. A depth of 10,927 meters and a depth of 10,914 meters can both be legitimate descriptions of the same seafloor under different, defensible assumptions about the ocean above it.</p>
<p>Another subtlety concerns what a single acoustic beam actually measures. The EM124&#8217;s beams have a finite width, configured at 2 degrees by 2 degrees on Hakuho-maru. Under a simple flat-seafloor approximation, at a depth of 11,000 meters each beam illuminates a footprint roughly 400 meters across in both the along-track and across-track directions. A quoted depth such as 10,927 meters is therefore not a pinpoint reading of a single point on the seabed. Each return represents an average over a finite patch of seafloor, and the final bathymetric surface is reconstructed from many overlapping soundings. Narrow depressions or sharp topographic relief may be smoothed or missed entirely when the footprint grows to hundreds of meters, which means the deepest point in a V-shaped trench cross-section could plausibly sit lower than any gridded value suggests.</p>
<p>Survey conditions proved to be a second major control on data quality. The main east-west survey lines were run at 4 knots, with additional data collected at 8 and 15 knots. After quality editing, about 87 percent of soundings were retained from the 4-knot east-west lines and 84 percent from the 8-knot lines, compared with 80 percent from the 4-knot north-south lines and 78 percent at 15 knots. At the fastest speed, the greater spacing between successive pings produced visibly sparser coverage of the seafloor, and even at identical speeds the north-south lines showed greater variability where the vessel crossed steep topographic gradients. Ship motion, line orientation and vessel speed, in other words, leave measurable fingerprints on the resulting map.</p>
<p>These findings carry a broader implication: precise mapping of the deep seafloor cannot be separated from careful observation of the ocean above it. The sound-speed structure of the water column, the motion and speed of the survey platform, the geometry of the sonar beams and the choices made during data processing all combine to determine the final number. For a feature as celebrated as the Challenger Deep, where popular accounts often quote depths to single meters, the study provides a sobering reminder that uncertainty at full-ocean depth is intrinsically larger than most headlines imply. It also gives researchers a concrete framework for evaluating any future claim about the deepest point of the world ocean.</p>
<p>In an unusually open move, the team has released the complete underpinnings of their analysis: raw EM124 data, processed soundings, bathymetric grids, the seawater sound-speed models, vessel and sensor configuration details, and the full processing workflow. This openness allows the 2023 observations to be reprocessed whenever better full-depth oceanographic information or more precise vertical references become available. The dataset can also be compared directly with pressure measurements from deep-submergence vehicles and with higher-resolution observations made close to the seafloor, offering independent checks on the acoustic result. The next step, the authors suggest, is to test the 10,927-meter estimate more rigorously by combining such independent observation types.</p>
<p>The approach also points toward future exploration of poorly charted waters. The same methods and open-data philosophy are relevant to mapping polar regions using platforms such as the Japanese Antarctic icebreaker Shirase and the future Arctic research vessel Mirai II, where ice, weather and limited survey time make every sounding count. Published in the journal Scientific Data, the study demonstrates that even a classic measurement, the depth of the ocean&#8217;s deepest point, can be advanced not by a bigger number but by a more transparent account of how the number was made. In deep-sea science, knowing the error bars is as newsworthy as knowing the depth itself.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Sensitivity of full-ocean-depth multibeam bathymetric measurements of the Challenger Deep to sound-speed models and survey conditions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> How accurately can we measure the ocean’s deepest point?</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> How accurately can we measure the ocean’s deepest point?. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1144369" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Challenger Deep, Mariana Trench, bathymetry, multibeam echosounder, sound-speed model, EM124, R/V Hakuho-maru, ocean depth measurement, deep-sea mapping, Scientific Data, acoustic sounding, XCTD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">204856</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New High-Resolution Heat Dataset Maps How City Residents Actually Feel Extreme Heat</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-high-resolution-heat-dataset-maps-how-city-residents-actually-feel-extreme-heat/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell Cooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Athmospheric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acute kidney injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city heat risk analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city resident heat experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city temperature variability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change urban heat mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extreme heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extreme heat health impacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat exposure assessment technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat stress and human health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat vulnerability in urban areas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat-health research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-resolution urban heat dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUMID-Atlanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of architecture on heat exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF NCAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban heat island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban heat island effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban meteorology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban microclimate mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WRF model]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=203100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Scientists at NSF NCAR and partner universities have released HUMID-Atlanta, a high-resolution urban meteorology dataset that captures how residents actually experience heat and is already being used to study heat-related kidney disease.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heat stress quietly kills more people each year than nearly any other weather hazard, and in cities the danger is amplified by a phenomenon that most residents never see: the urban heat island, a manmade pocket of elevated temperatures created when concrete, asphalt and brick absorb sunlight by day and release it slowly by night. Now scientists at the U.S. National Science Foundation National Center for Atmospheric Research, working with colleagues at Emory University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, have unveiled a dataset designed to capture not just how hot a city gets, but how its residents actually experience that heat. The product, called the High-resolution Urban Meteorology for Impacts Dataset for Atlanta Metropolitan Region, or HUMID-Atlanta, is described in the journal Scientific Data and is already being used by health researchers to trace the fingerprints of extreme heat on human disease.</p>
<p>The central insight behind the project is deceptively simple: temperature alone is a poor measure of human heat exposure. Whether an afternoon feels oppressive or merely warm depends on wind, humidity, shade and radiation, all of which are shaped by the fine-grained structure of a city. A pedestrian walking between tall buildings may be shielded from the sun but also deprived of cooling breezes, while someone in a leafy suburb faces a different microclimate entirely. Tzu-Shun Lin, an NSF NCAR scientist and lead author of the new paper, said the dataset is a useful tool for quantifying how human beings experience heat in an urban environment and how factors like wind or humidity influence the impacts. He described HUMID-Atlanta as the first dataset of its kind and noted that the team is already talking with other major cities and exploring a version covering the entire conterminous United States.</p>
<p>To appreciate why the new dataset matters, it helps to understand its lineage. Lin and his colleagues began with an earlier NSF NCAR product, the original HUMID dataset, which was built by combining a relatively simple offline urban model with long-term measurements of temperature and humidity spanning 1980 to 2018. That dataset marked an important research advancement, giving climatologists and epidemiologists a consistent record of urban heat conditions over nearly four decades. But it had a fundamental limitation: it treated the city essentially as a static surface, without simulating how the living, breathing atmosphere interacts with buildings, streets and vegetation. It could not capture, for example, how a canyon of high-rise towers channels wind around corners and alters the rate at which sweat evaporates from human skin.</p>
<p>The breakthrough came from coupling the original HUMID framework with NSF NCAR&#8217;s Weather Research and Forecasting model, a widely used numerical weather prediction system known simply as WRF. By piloting the method on the Atlanta metropolitan area and drawing on the WRF-Urban extension, the team fed detailed urban characteristics, including building height, directly into the atmospheric simulation. This allows HUMID-Atlanta to resolve interactions that simpler datasets miss, such as how wind moves around buildings and influences cooling, a factor that can change how humans are affected by heat. The result is a high-resolution picture of the urban atmosphere that reflects the true physics of heat stress rather than a thermometer reading alone.</p>
<p>The enhanced dataset covers the years 2010 through 2023, a window deliberately chosen to overlap with modern health and administrative records. That overlap is the key to its practical value. Researchers can cross-reference hospitalization records, emergency department visits and other public health data against detailed heat data from the same time period, searching for the specific combinations of weather and urban infrastructure that precede spikes in heat stress. Because heat-related illness often results from an accumulation of factors, including consecutive hot nights, high humidity and limited access to shade or air conditioning, identifying the precise mixture of conditions that drives harm is a problem tailor-made for a dataset of this resolution.</p>
<p>The implications for city planning are substantial. Once researchers can identify when and where dangerous conditions are most likely to occur, governments gain the evidence base needed for targeted interventions, from cooling centers and tree-planting programs to building codes that promote ventilation and reflective surfaces. Lin and his NSF NCAR colleagues are continuing to refine the method and have already extended HUMID-Atlanta through the year 2025, and the dataset is publicly available to any researcher or agency that wants to use it. Plans are underway to apply the approach to other large cities, to the entire United States, and possibly even globally. Lin believes the method could eventually be developed to forecast future meteorological changes, positioning it as a potential backbone for early warning systems that trigger extreme heat action days before the most dangerous conditions arrive.</p>
<p>The most immediate application, however, is in human health. Andrew Newman, an NSF NCAR senior scientist and co-author of the paper, is working with colleagues at Emory University to use the dataset to better understand how heat waves influence human diseases, with a particular focus on acute kidney injury, a condition in which kidney function declines rapidly. The connection between heat and kidney damage is well established in occupational medicine, where agricultural workers exposed to high temperatures have shown elevated rates of renal disease, but earlier studies linking kidney disease to heat exposure failed to capture the crucial differences in how people experience heat depending on whether they live in dense city centers, surrounding suburbs, or rural areas. HUMID-Atlanta is helping researchers narrow in on exactly where the risks are highest and what can be done to mitigate harm.</p>
<p>Newman emphasized that the stakes extend beyond individual suffering. Acute kidney injury is a serious health concern in its own right, he noted, but the economic burden of treating patients who develop it is also substantial, straining hospitals, dialysis capacity and public health budgets. In his view, HUMID-Atlanta and subsequent versions of the dataset have the ability to fill major gaps in heat health research. The work will ultimately support targeted outreach and education activities, guide improvements in clinical case management, and provide inputs for risk assessment and economic evaluation of heat-health impacts. In other words, a meteorological dataset built on atmospheric physics may end up influencing how doctors manage patients and how health departments allocate resources during the hottest weeks of the year.</p>
<p>The research was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, an assignment that reflects the project&#8217;s dual identity as both atmospheric science and public health research. That fusion is arguably what makes HUMID-Atlanta a template for the future. Cities are where most of humanity now lives, and they are warming faster than their surroundings because of the very materials used to build them. As climate change raises baseline temperatures, the difference between a survivable summer and a deadly one may hinge on precise, street-by-street knowledge of how heat behaves. A dataset that can quantify the lived experience of urban heat, from wind-flow shadows between towers to humidity trapped over parking lots, gives scientists, clinicians and city officials a shared language for a hazard that has long been underestimated, and it offers a glimpse of how next-generation climate data could power everything from emergency alerts to neighborhood-scale urban design.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> A high-resolution urban meteorology dataset for studying heat stress and human health in cities</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Hot new dataset focuses on human health</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hot new dataset focuses on human health. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1144476" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> urban heat island, heat stress, HUMID-Atlanta, NSF NCAR, WRF model, Atlanta, acute kidney injury, public health, Scientific Data, extreme heat, urban meteorology, heat-health research</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">203100</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
