<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>saponin &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/saponin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:22:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Mild detergent preserves bacteria for rapid sepsis susceptibility testing</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/mild-detergent-preserves-bacteria-for-rapid-sepsis-susceptibility-testing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristina Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antimicrobial Resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antimicrobial susceptibility testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteria preservation in blood samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial preservation methods for quick susceptibility testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial viability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood cell lysis effects on bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood culture to rapid testing transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloodstream infection diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloodstream infection diagnostic delays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloodstream infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effect of lysis buffers on bacterial viability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escherichia coli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of detergent-based bacterial sample prep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impedance cytometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving rapid diagnostics for sepsis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live bacteria for fast antibiotic susceptibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MALDI-TOF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBT Sepsityper kit limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microfluidics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapid sepsis susceptibility testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saponin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sepsis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sepsityper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staphylococcus aureus]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=221986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers at the University of Southampton show that a mild saponin-based lysis protocol preserves the viability of Gram-positive bacteria extracted from positive blood cultures, while the widely used Sepsityper kit delays their growth by several hours.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloodstream infections are among the most dangerous conditions clinicians face, capable of spiralling into sepsis within hours and killing a significant fraction of the patients they touch. The standard diagnostic pathway, in which blood is cultured, Gram-stained, subcultured onto agar plates, identified by mass spectrometry and then subjected to overnight susceptibility testing, can take more than 48 hours to deliver actionable answers. That delay is not benign: mortality from bloodstream infections increases by roughly eight percent for every hour that effective antibiotic therapy is postponed. A team at the University of Southampton has now examined a critical but often overlooked link in the chain of rapid diagnostics: whether the chemical tricks used to strip blood cells away from bacteria leave the pathogens alive and healthy enough for fast susceptibility testing.</p>
<p>The problem arises because the most widely used rapid sample preparation method, the commercially available MBT Sepsityper kit, was designed for a task that does not require living bacteria. The kit uses a proprietary lysis buffer, thought to contain ionic detergents such as sodium dodecyl sulphate, to rupture red blood cells, followed by high-speed centrifugation at around 16,000 times gravity to pellet the bacteria and discard cellular debris. The resulting organisms are fed into matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry, which identifies pathogens from their protein and lipid fingerprints. For that purpose, viability is irrelevant. But the new generation of rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility tests, which promise results within two to three hours, depends entirely on bacteria that are actively dividing the moment they emerge from the extraction process.</p>
<p>This distinction matters most for Gram-positive pathogens. Organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus, which together with other Gram-positive bacteria account for more than half of bloodstream infections, possess a thick cell wall and membrane architecture that renders them far more vulnerable to detergent damage than their Gram-negative counterparts such as Escherichia coli. Previous studies have already hinted at the problem, reporting lower identification scores for Gram-positive organisms processed with Sepsityper. The Southampton group, led by Hywel Morgan and Daniel Spencer, set out to quantify exactly how much harm five different blood lysis protocols inflict on bacterial viability during the earliest stages of growth, the window that rapid susceptibility assays cannot afford to lose.</p>
<p>The researchers spiked healthy human blood with laboratory strains of E. coli and S. aureus, incubated the mixtures in standard aerobic blood culture bottles until they flagged positive, and then processed each bottle with one of five extraction chemistries: the Sepsityper kit, saponin alone, an ammonium chloride and potassium bicarbonate buffer, deionised water lysis by hypoosmotic shock, and a combination of saponin with the non-ionic detergent Triton X-100 supplemented with reducing agents to suppress reactive oxygen species. Each protocol lyses red blood cells by a different mechanism, from detergent-mediated membrane permeabilisation to osmotic swelling, and each carries its own trade-off between how completely the blood cells are destroyed and how gently the bacteria are treated.</p>
<p>To judge the outcome, the team turned to microfluidic impedance cytometry, a label-free technique that measures the electrical properties of thousands of individual cells as they stream through a microchannel lined with microelectrodes. An alternating voltage is applied at two frequencies, 5 MHz and 40 MHz. At the lower frequency the signal reflects cell volume, while at the higher frequency it is sensitive to the cell membrane and wall. Because the channel is only about 20 by 40 micrometres, bacteria can be counted and characterised one by one, even in the presence of residual red cell ghosts and debris, provided their electrical signatures do not overlap. The technique has already been shown to detect antibiotic-induced changes in bacterial impedance within two hours, forming the basis of a rapid susceptibility method known as iFAST.</p>
<p>The impedance data revealed striking differences between the extraction protocols. For E. coli, which reaches very high concentrations in blood culture bottles, all five methods yielded counts in agreement with conventional colony counting, and the bacteria resumed normal growth after only a brief 30-minute lag. For S. aureus, which grows more slowly and is present at roughly tenfold lower concentrations at the time the bottle flags positive, the picture changed dramatically. Samples treated with Sepsityper produced far fewer detectable organisms immediately after extraction, and the population did not begin to grow until two and a half hours had passed. Untreated and saponin-treated samples, by contrast, showed only a one-hour delay before entering exponential growth, with doubling times of around 65 to 67 minutes that were statistically indistinguishable from each other.</p>
<p>Independent confirmation came from optical flow cytometry using live/dead fluorescent staining. The team labelled bacteria with SYTO 9, a green dye that enters all cells, and propidium iodide, a red dye that penetrates only cells with damaged membranes. Immediately after Sepsityper extraction, most S. aureus cells showed strong propidium iodide signal, indicating compromised membranes, while saponin-treated cells looked essentially identical to untreated controls and recovered as quickly. The likely culprit is the ionic detergent in the Sepsityper buffer, which can permeabilise bacterial membranes and may also provoke oxidative stress. Colony imaging after overnight incubation reinforced the finding: S. aureus colonies isolated with Sepsityper were significantly smaller than those from untreated samples, whereas saponin-treated colonies showed no significant difference.</p>
<p>Extraction efficiency told a similar story. Measured against colony counts from untreated cultures, viable E. coli recovery ranged from 37 to 54 percent across the protocols, while S. aureus recovery ranged from just 5 to 35 percent. Saponin delivered the highest impedance-based efficiency for S. aureus at 35 percent and produced the cleanest samples, with debris particles small enough to be separated from the bacteria electrically. The ammonium chloride protocol generated so much debris overlapping with the S. aureus population that accurate counting became impossible, and deionised water lysis performed worst of all, possibly because S. aureus cells adhered to red blood cells and sedimented away with them during centrifugation. For E. coli, the data even suggested that lysis and centrifugation may be unnecessary, since fast-growing Gram-negative organisms can be discriminated from blood cells directly.</p>
<p>Beyond viability, the study highlights a subtler advantage of impedance cytometry for the diagnostic workflow itself. Preparing the inoculum for a phenotypic susceptibility test normally relies on turbidity matching against a McFarland standard, but blood cells and debris inflate turbidity and skew the measurement. Because impedance cytometry counts each bacterium as a discrete electrical event and can distinguish bacteria from red cells, ghosts and platelets by their size and high-frequency phase, it offers a direct route to accurate inoculum preparation at the concentration recommended by EUCAST guidelines. The technique can even discriminate E. coli from S. aureus by their electrical phase, an analogue of conventional Gram staining performed without any reagents or stains.</p>
<p>The implications reach well beyond the laboratory bench. Any rapid susceptibility platform that promises answers within three hours of a blood bottle flagging positive will be defeated if its sample preparation quietly kills or stuns a large fraction of the pathogens, and the organisms most likely to be harmed are precisely the Gram-positive bacteria that dominate bloodstream infections. The Southampton results point to saponin, a mild natural detergent, as the chemistry of choice for preserving viable organisms, and the team now plans to integrate on-chip lysis, automated washing and size-based separation into a streamlined microfluidic sample preparation system. Clinical samples, polymicrobial cultures and a broader panel of Gram-positive pathogens remain the next hurdles, but the study makes clear that the road to same-hour antibiotic decisions runs through gentler chemistry.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Rapid isolation of viable bacteria from positive blood cultures using microfluidic impedance cytometry to compare blood lysis protocols for antimicrobial susceptibility testing</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Isolating viable bacteria from positive blood cultures: impedance cytometry analysis</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Isolating viable bacteria from positive blood cultures: impedance cytometry analysis. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-026-00847-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-026-00847-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-026-00847-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10544-026-00847-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> bloodstream infections, sepsis, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, impedance cytometry, microfluidics, Sepsityper, saponin, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, bacterial viability, MALDI-TOF, antimicrobial resistance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">221986</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soap Bark Extract and Detergent Molecule Team Up to Shield Steel from Acid</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/soap-bark-extract-and-detergent-molecule-team-up-to-shield-steel-from-acid/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 22:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid-resistant steel treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biosurfactants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biosurfactants in corrosion prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corrosion inhibition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corrosion inhibitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corrosion mitigation in industrial pipelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly chemical inhibitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemical polarization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly corrosion inhibitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green chemistry in corrosion control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impedance spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Langmuir adsorption isotherm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mild steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural plant-based surfactants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical adsorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-derived surfactants for steel protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saponin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium dodecyl sulfate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as corrosion inhibitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel corrosion protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfuric acid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfuric acid corrosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surfactants]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=216713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in Nepal have shown that combining plant-derived saponin with the synthetic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate suppresses mild steel corrosion in sulfuric acid with efficiencies reaching 96.70 percent through synergistic physical adsorption.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrosion is one of the quietest and most expensive problems in modern industry. Every year, pipelines, storage tanks, machinery, and structural steel components lose metal to aggressive chemical environments, and the global bill runs into hundreds of billions of dollars. Acidic solutions, particularly sulfuric acid used in pickling, descaling, and oil-well acidizing, attack mild steel relentlessly, dissolving iron atoms from the surface and converting them into soluble corrosion products. For decades, engineers have fought back with chemical inhibitors, molecules that adsorb onto metal surfaces and slow the electrochemical reactions of corrosion. But many of the most effective inhibitors are toxic, expensive, or environmentally persistent, which is precisely why a new study from researchers in Nepal has attracted attention: it shows that a natural, plant-derived surfactant can be paired with a common detergent molecule to protect steel with remarkable efficiency.</p>
<p>The research, published in Discover Green Chemistry by Yog Prakash Yadav, Madhab Gautam, Anju Kumari Das, Sanjay Singh, Chandradip Kumar Yadav, and Ajaya Bhattarai of Tribhuvan University, examines the combined anticorrosive power of saponin and sodium dodecyl sulfate, or SDS, on mild steel immersed in 0.5 molar sulfuric acid. Saponin is a naturally occurring biosurfactant best known as the source of the foamy lather in soap bark, Quillaja saponaria, and soapnut trees. Its molecules carry multiple polar functional groups, including hydroxyl and carbonyl moieties, alongside nonpolar hydrocarbon regions, giving them the amphiphilic character that defines all surfactants. SDS, by contrast, is a synthetic anionic surfactant familiar to anyone who has read the ingredient list of a shampoo bottle. The team reasoned that if the two molecules could cooperate at the steel–acid interface, the resulting protective film might outperform either compound acting alone.</p>
<p>The experimental design was thorough, combining classical gravimetric testing with modern electrochemical and spectroscopic techniques. Mild steel specimens, cut to 3 by 3 centimeter squares containing less than 0.3 percent carbon, were polished with silicon carbide papers of progressively finer grit, from 180 up to 2000, then cleaned in distilled water and sonicated in ethanol for twenty minutes. Pre-weighed samples were immersed in sulfuric acid solutions of varying concentrations, from 0.0125 to 0.5 molar, at temperatures spanning 298.5 to 328 kelvin, for exposure periods ranging from 3 to 96 hours. Some baths contained saponin alone, others contained saponin with SDS, and control baths contained only acid. After immersion, the specimens were reweighed on a precision semi-micro balance, and the weight loss was converted into corrosion rates expressed in millimeters per year.</p>
<p>The gravimetric results told a clear story. Saponin on its own achieved an inhibition efficiency of 64.30 percent at a concentration of 2.92 grams per liter, meaning nearly two-thirds of the corrosion that would have occurred in plain acid was suppressed. When SDS was added to the saponin solution, the efficiency climbed by 13.35 percentage points to 77.66 percent, and the corrosion rate fell to a minimum of 0.37 mils per year in the mixed system. The researchers attributed this improvement to a synergistic effect: the two surfactants interact in solution to form mixed micelles with improved stability, a conclusion supported by conductivity measurements showing that the critical micelle concentration of saponin drops from 0.734 grams per liter to 0.679 grams per liter when SDS is present. A lower critical micelle concentration means the molecules begin assembling into surface-active aggregates at lower doses, which translates into better surface coverage on the metal.</p>
<p>Electrochemical measurements provided even more striking evidence. In potentiodynamic polarization experiments, using mild steel as the working electrode, a saturated calomel electrode as the reference, and graphite as the counter electrode, the team measured corrosion current densities after stabilizing each system at open circuit potential for thirty minutes. Bare steel in sulfuric acid exhibited a corrosion current density of 2.62 times ten to the minus two milliamperes per square centimeter, a signature of severe attack. SDS alone halved the damage, achieving roughly 50 percent inhibition, while saponin alone reduced the current to 8.64 times ten to the minus three milliamperes per square centimeter, corresponding to 67 percent efficiency. But the mixed saponin–SDS system was in a different league entirely: the corrosion current density plummeted to 8.55 times ten to the minus four milliamperes per square centimeter, yielding an inhibition efficiency of 96.70 percent. Crucially, both the anodic reaction, in which iron dissolves into solution, and the cathodic reaction, in which hydrogen gas evolves, were suppressed, identifying the mixture as a mixed-type inhibitor that does not fundamentally alter the corrosion mechanism.</p>
<p>Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy reinforced the picture. Nyquist plots recorded from 100 kilohertz down to 1 hertz showed a very small semicircle for steel in plain acid, indicating low charge transfer resistance and rapid metal dissolution. With inhibitors present, the semicircles grew dramatically, and the largest capacitive loop, the highest charge transfer resistance, and the lowest double-layer capacitance appeared in the saponin–SDS system. Fitting the spectra to a Randles circuit with chi-square values below ten to the minus two confirmed that the mixed formulation delivers inhibition efficiencies of 70 percent or above at the interface. A higher charge transfer resistance means electrons face a greater barrier moving between the metal and the electrolyte, which is exactly what a dense, well-ordered protective film should produce.</p>
<p>Thermodynamic analysis revealed the nature of the protective layer. The experimental data fit the Langmuir adsorption isotherm closely, with correlation coefficients between 0.94 and 0.98 across all temperatures, indicating that the inhibitor molecules arrange themselves as a single monolayer on the steel surface. The standard Gibbs free energy of adsorption remained below minus 20 kilojoules per mole at every temperature tested, a threshold that points to physical adsorption driven by electrostatic attraction and van der Waals forces rather than the formation of new covalent bonds. Notably, both the enthalpy and entropy of adsorption were positive, meaning the process is endothermic and accompanied by increasing disorder, likely as water molecules are displaced from the metal surface. Consistent with this physical mechanism, inhibition efficiency declined as temperature rose, dropping from 93.46 to 80.57 percent for saponin and from 95.55 to 88.33 percent for the saponin–SDS mixture between 298.5 and 328 kelvin, because thermal agitation loosens the grip of adsorbed molecules.</p>
<p>Microscopic and spectroscopic examinations made the protection visible. Optical microscopy revealed extensive pitting and roughening on steel immersed in plain acid, while saponin-treated surfaces were noticeably smoother and the saponin–SDS surfaces were the most intact of all, retaining much of the original polished finish. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy confirmed these observations at higher magnification, showing that the mixed inhibitor preserved the polished surface even in a highly corrosive environment. Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis added elemental proof: carbon and oxygen signals increased on saponin-treated steel, and sulfur appeared when SDS was included, confirming that a carbon-, oxygen-, and sulfur-rich organic film had deposited over the iron. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy identified the functional groups involved, including broad hydroxyl stretches near 3400 wavenumbers, carbonyl stretches near 1700, and the characteristic sulfate vibrations of SDS between 1200 and 1300 wavenumbers, with the spectra indicating physical interactions and cooperative adsorption rather than the formation of a new chemical compound.</p>
<p>What makes this work resonate beyond the laboratory is its environmental framing. More than 60 percent of synthetic surfactants used industrially ultimately reach aquatic ecosystems, where petroleum-derived compounds can persist, accumulate in organisms, and harm aquatic life. By anchoring a biodegradable, plant-derived molecule at the heart of the formulation and using the synthetic component only as a synergistic partner, the Nepali team has sketched a template for greener corrosion control: formulations that are effective at low doses, inexpensive, and far less damaging when released. The authors note that efficiency does decline over prolonged immersion as the protective film partially desorbs, and that thermal stability remains a limitation, so engineering challenges remain before industrial deployment. Still, the demonstration that a soap bark extract and a detergent molecule can jointly block more than 96 percent of electrochemical corrosion in sulfuric acid is a vivid reminder that some of the most advanced materials science solutions may be growing quietly in trees, waiting to be tested against humanity&#8217;s oldest chemical enemies.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Synergistic corrosion inhibition of mild steel in sulfuric acid using saponin and sodium dodecyl sulfate</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Anticorrosive efficacy of saponin and sodium dodecyl sulfate on mild steel specimens immersed in acidic medium</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Yadav, Y. P., Gautam, M., Das, A. K., Singh, S., Yadav, C. K., &amp; Bhattarai, A. (2026). Anticorrosive efficacy of saponin and sodium dodecyl sulfate on mild steel specimens immersed in acidic medium. <em>Discover Green Chemistry, 1</em>(1), Article 10. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44509-026-00008-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44509-026-00008-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44509-026-00008-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44509-026-00008-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> corrosion inhibition, mild steel, saponin, sodium dodecyl sulfate, sulfuric acid, surfactants, electrochemical polarization, impedance spectroscopy, Langmuir adsorption isotherm, green chemistry, biosurfactants, physical adsorption</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">216713</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
