<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>salinity &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/salinity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 12:38:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Wheat Faces Rising Heat, Salt and Drought: Scientists Map the Genes That Could Save It</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/wheat-faces-rising-heat-salt-and-drought-scientists-map-the-genes-that-could-save-it/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 12:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abiotic stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidant defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change impact on wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop yield improvement strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought tolerance in wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic mapping of wheat genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genomic selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global wheat production challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GWAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat stress effects on crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of rising temperatures on cereal crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular breeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular mechanisms of wheat stress response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QTL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salt tolerance in wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable wheat cultivation in changing climates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat breeding for climate adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wheat stress resilience]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=194247</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A comprehensive review argues that combining physiological insights with molecular breeding tools such as GWAS, genomic selection and CRISPR editing is essential to develop climate-resilient wheat cultivars.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wheat feeds more of humanity than almost any other crop, and the pressure on it has never been greater. Meeting projected global demand by 2050 will require annual productivity gains of roughly 1.7 percent, with total production expected to rise from about 642 million tonnes to 840 million tonnes as demand approaches one billion tonnes. A global population heading toward 9.7 billion by mid-century and cereal output needing to climb nearly 40 percent frame the scale of the challenge. Yet the fields that produce this grain are under simultaneous siege from heat, salinity, drought, cold, ultraviolet radiation, heavy metals, nutrient deficiencies and even nanoplastic contamination. A new open-access review published in Discover Plants pulls these threads together, arguing that the field has fragmented its understanding of wheat stress biology and that only an integrated view of physiology, molecular mechanisms and breeding can deliver cultivars resilient enough for a warming century.</p>
<p>The numbers underlying the urgency are stark. Each 1 °C rise in seasonal temperature is associated with an average wheat yield decline of approximately 6 percent, according to a global meta-analysis cited in the review. Severe water scarcity could affect up to 60 percent of wheat-growing areas by the end of the century, and roughly 7 percent of the Earth&#8217;s land surface is already salt-affected, with some projections suggesting that as much as half of arable land could be compromised by 2050. Soil salinisation alone can cut whole-season grain yield by 20 to 43 percent, averaging around 40 percent depending on severity. Heat stress operates with equal brutality: exposure to 32/22 °C for fourteen days reduced wheat photosynthesis by 17 percent at anthesis and 25 percent during grain filling, while thylakoid membrane damage increased by 61 and 68 percent respectively. When temperatures reach 38/22 °C, the plant mounts a molecular counterattack, inducing a forty-fold increase in Rca1β transcripts within four hours, a response that helps preserve carbon fixation under elevated temperatures.</p>
<p>Salinity remains the most extensively studied stress in wheat, and the review uses it as a representative framework for understanding tolerance mechanisms. Salt injury unfolds in two phases. An early osmotic phase, beginning within minutes to 24 hours of exposure, triggers sodium sensing, stomatal closure and suppressed leaf expansion, largely independent of ion accumulation. A later ionic phase, developing over days to weeks, results from the progressive accumulation of toxic sodium and chloride ions, which disrupt metabolism, accelerate leaf senescence and ultimately reduce yield. Chlorophyll fluorescence studies have revealed how deep this damage goes: high salt stress reduced photosystem II electron transfer rates by approximately 75 percent at the donor side and 25 percent at the acceptor side, with donor-side damage only partially recoverable. Wheat counters these assaults by accumulating osmoprotectants such as proline, soluble sugars and glycine betaine, and by activating antioxidant systems that neutralise the reactive oxygen species, including singlet oxygen, superoxide radicals, hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals, that would otherwise damage proteins, DNA and membrane lipids.</p>
<p>Drought, the single biggest factor reducing crop productivity across climate zones, strikes wheat hardest during reproduction. Brief water deficits during pollen mother cell meiosis and anthesis cause pollen sterility that halts microsporogenesis, cutting grain set by 40 to 50 percent. Water limitation at tillering, flowering or grain filling reduces spike length, spikelets per spike, grains per spike, thousand-grain weight and total grain production. Ultraviolet radiation adds another layer of pressure: while UV-C is largely screened by the atmosphere and confined to laboratory studies, UV-A and UV-B reach crops directly, generating oxidative stress and DNA damage, though wheat can respond by accumulating protective flavonoids. Heavy metals compound the problem, with cadmium exposure reducing shoot height by 59 percent, nitrogen concentration by 42 percent and phosphorus by 26 percent. Even nanoplastics, an emerging contaminant driven by plastic mulch and wastewater irrigation, have been shown to alter carbon metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, MAPK signaling and hormone pathways at concentrations as low as 10 mg per litre, apparently through metabolic and transcriptional reprogramming rather than classical antioxidant enzyme activation.</p>
<p>The central insight of the review is that these physiological responses and molecular controls are not separate stories but one interconnected network. Stress initially triggers reactive oxygen species that, at controlled levels, act as signaling molecules activating stress-responsive pathways. ROS signaling intertwines with abscisic acid-mediated pathways that close stomata to conserve water, though prolonged closure restricts carbon dioxide diffusion and ultimately limits photosynthesis and yield. Downstream, ABA perception through PYR/PYL receptors activates SnRK2 kinases while inhibiting PP2C phosphatases, and the wheat kinase TaSnRK2.3 showed remarkable inducibility, increasing 27-fold under drought-mimicking PEG treatment, 28-fold under salinity and 48-fold under cold within 48 hours, while regulating key downstream genes such as DREB2A, ABI5 and RD29A. Ion transporters including TaHKT1;5 and TaNHX1 maintain sodium-potassium homeostasis, while antioxidant enzymes SOD, CAT, APX and POD mop up damaging radicals. Multi-omics work has shown that 2,374 genes are shared across drought, heat, salinity and cold responses, and that combined stresses trigger responses that cannot be predicted from single-stress studies alone.</p>
<p>Transcription factors have emerged as the master switches of this network and as prime breeding targets. TaNAC47, rapidly induced by salinity, drought, cold and ABA, conferred 81 to 100 percent survival under freezing stress in transgenic plants compared to 41 percent in wild types, alongside increased proline and soluble sugar accumulation. TaNAC29 improves salt tolerance by boosting antioxidant enzyme activity, while TaWRKY1-2D enhances drought resistance through interaction with the dehydrin protein TaDHN3, and heterologous expression of AtWRKY30 in wheat improved heat and drought tolerance via elevated antioxidant capacity. Perhaps most intriguingly, the AP2/ERF factor TaEREBP1-L acts as a master regulator during combined drought-heat stress, directly activating the ABA biosynthesis gene AAO3 and the jasmonic acid biosynthesis gene AOC2, and combined stress induced thousands of upregulated genes at different developmental stages, revealing transcriptional reprogramming qualitatively different from any single stress response.</p>
<p>Molecular markers have translated this mechanistic knowledge into practical breeding tools at remarkable speed. A comprehensive meta-QTL study integrating 32 genome-wide association studies and QTL mapping investigations identified 134 meta-QTLs associated with drought, heat, salinity, waterlogging, pre-harvest sprouting and aluminium tolerance, 57 percent of which were validated through independent datasets, with 43 percent having confidence intervals under one centimorgan. High-density genotyping of 277 wheat accessions with nearly 400,000 SNPs identified 295 loci linked to agronomic performance under drought and heat, while salinity-focused GWAS using a 90K SNP chip pinpointed stable loci on chromosomes 1BS, 2AL, 2BS and 3AL, encompassing candidate genes such as TaHKT1;5, Nax1, TaWRKY19 and TaMYB30-B. Drought tolerance has been tied to TaDREB, TaERF3 and TaZFP34, heat tolerance to TaHSFA6e and TaHSP101B, and aluminium tolerance to TaALMT1. Crucially, three SNPs have been converted into validated KASP markers for marker-assisted selection, and marker-assisted backcrossing has already been applied to elite cultivars including HD2733 and GW322, targeting canopy temperature, chlorophyll content and grain yield under stress.</p>
<p>Beyond the genome, climate-smart soil and microbial interventions are proving surprisingly powerful. Combined biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi application under salinity increased plant height by 14.1 percent, shoot fresh biomass by 75.7 percent, and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake by 19.5, 35.9 and 33.9 percent respectively, while photosynthetic pigments improved by up to 54.8 percent. Under cadmium contamination, farmyard manure biochar paired with Pseudomonas frederiksbergensis cut root cadmium by 39.4 percent and shoot cadmium by 55.3 percent. Gold nanoparticle seed priming improved freezing tolerance in winter wheat by enhancing chlorophyll content, grana development and membrane unsaturated fatty acid content, with the nanoparticles detected only in seeds yet triggering lasting physiological changes. Nanoparticle-based interventions against cadmium toxicity have similarly reduced malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide levels while increasing phenolics, proline and antioxidant enzyme activity, though the review cautions that most such evidence comes from greenhouse pot experiments requiring multi-location field validation.</p>
<p>Formidable obstacles still stand between laboratory discovery and farmers&#8217; fields. The hexaploid wheat genome, roughly 85 percent repetitive sequence, presents most genes as three homoeologous copies, so multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the TaSal1 family achieved mutations in only 34.2 percent of transgenic plants and complete knockout of all five functional copies in just 4.2 percent of lines. Few candidate genes, among them TaDREB2, TaNHX1 and the CBF family, have been validated under multi-location field conditions, and genotype-by-environment interactions plus the polygenic nature of stress tolerance continue to complicate breeding. The path forward, the authors argue, lies in integrating CRISPR-based editing, base and prime editing platforms, multi-omics analytics, artificial intelligence-driven genomic prediction, speed breeding and high-throughput drone phenotyping within coordinated international frameworks. With germplasm banks at CIMMYT holding over 102,000 wheat accessions and its breeding programs already achieving genetic gains of roughly 18 kilograms per hectare per year under drought, the raw materials and the roadmap for a climate-resilient wheat future now exist. What remains is the disciplined integration of physiology, molecular biology and breeding at global scale.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Integrated physiological and molecular strategies for improving abiotic stress tolerance in wheat</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Integrative approaches to enhancing abiotic stress tolerance in wheat crop through physiological and molecular strategies</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Bhodiwal, S., Barupal, T., Meena, M., Swapnil, P., Sahoo, A., &amp; Kumar, S. (2026). Integrative approaches to enhancing abiotic stress tolerance in wheat crop through physiological and molecular strategies. <em>Discover Plants, 3</em>(1), Article 398. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00876-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00876-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00876-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44372-026-00876-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> wheat, abiotic stress, salinity, drought, heat stress, CRISPR, genomic selection, GWAS, QTL, antioxidant defense, molecular breeding, food security</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">194247</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
