<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sagittarius A* &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/sagittarius-a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 00:18:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Dark matter could enlarge and circularize spinning black hole shadows, theoretical study finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/dark-matter-could-enlarge-and-circularize-spinning-black-hole-shadows-theoretical-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 00:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astrophysical implications of dark matter on black hole imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hole event horizon enlargement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hole shadow circularization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hole shadows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hole spin and shadow morphology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark matter distribution around black holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dark matter influence on black hole shadows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of dark matter mass on black hole metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event Horizon Telescope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event Horizon Telescope shadow measurements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawking radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of dark matter shells on black hole horizons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerr spacetime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M87*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newman-Janis algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[null geodesics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primordial black holes and dark matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rotating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rotating black holes in dark matter shells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sagittarius A*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shadow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theoretical modeling of dark matter and black holes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=326403</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A theoretical study predicts that massive dark-matter shells can enlarge and circularize spinning black-hole shadows, while the strongest configurations exceed Event Horizon Telescope constraints for M87* and Sagittarius A*.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A theoretical study of a rotating black hole embedded in a shell of dark matter predicts that sufficiently massive shells can expand the event horizon, enlarge the shadow and make its outline nearly circular, even for rapidly spinning black holes. The study, published in The European Physical Journal C, also finds that the strongest predictions would exceed shadow measurements from the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) for M87* and Sagittarius A*.</p>
<p>The authors construct a model in which a piecewise mass function describes a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a finite, electromagnetically inert dark-matter distribution. The dark matter is treated as an effective addition to the black hole&#8217;s mass, with separate parameters for the mass ratio ΔM/M, the shell&#8217;s inner boundary rs and its thickness Δrs. The authors state that the framework can represent dark matter bound in a galactic halo as well as locally captured objects such as brown dwarfs, stellar-mass black holes, primordial black holes and non-radiating dust.</p>
<p>For the non-rotating case, the analysis identifies a critical shell mass beyond which the metric develops an additional pair of horizons. With rs/M = 2 and Δrs/M = 200, the critical values are r*/M = 152 and ΔM/M = 800/9, or about 88.9. Below that threshold, the original event horizon remains in place, although the photon sphere and shadow radius can change slightly. Above it, the outermost root becomes a new event horizon enclosing the central black hole and part of the dark-matter shell, while the photon-sphere and shadow scales increase substantially.</p>
<p>The authors then generalize the static model to an axisymmetric rotating spacetime using the Newman–Janis Algorithm. The resulting metric returns to the Kerr solution when ΔM = 0 and to the static configuration when the spin parameter is zero. They report that the metric satisfies the Einstein field equations and derive corresponding dark-matter density and pressure profiles. The surface stress-energy at the interfaces of the piecewise mass distribution is found to vanish.</p>
<p>In the rotating model, the critical dark-matter mass depends on spin and shell geometry. For an extremal black hole with a/M = 1 and Δrs/M = 200, the reported threshold is ΔM/M = 88.3 at r*/M = 150.5. Models above this threshold develop an enlarged outer horizon and additional roots in the stationary-limit equation, changing the locations and number of ergosphere layers. The reported changes concern the horizon, ergosphere, critical photon-orbit and shadow scales; the study does not establish a general expansion of every physical scale in the system.</p>
<p>Null geodesics are used to locate the unstable circular photon orbits that define the shadow boundary. In the high-mass regime, the critical photon orbits lie outside the dark-matter shell, where the mass function is constant and the geometry has the Kerr form with a much larger total mass. At a fixed spin, rotation and frame-dragging then have less influence relative to the enlarged shadow scale. The calculated distortion parameter consequently approaches zero, producing a nearly circular shadow even at high spin. This circularization is a model prediction rather than an observed black-hole feature.</p>
<p>The study also estimates the high-frequency absorption cross section from the average shadow radius and uses the surface gravity of the outer horizon to calculate Hawking temperature and thermal energy emission. At fixed dark-matter mass, the model predicts a lower emission rate as spin increases. Dark-matter masses below the critical threshold have a marginal effect, whereas above the threshold the calculated Hawking temperature becomes very small and the emission rate is strongly suppressed.</p>
<p>The authors compare predicted shadow diameters with EHT values of dsh/M = 11 ± 1.5 for M87* and dsh/M = 9.77 ± 0.67 for Sagittarius A*. For M87*, all theoretically allowed dark-matter masses in the plotted compatible region satisfy both the 1σ and 2σ observational intervals. For Sagittarius A*, the full allowed region satisfies the 2σ interval, while a 1σ upper limit emerges and decreases as spin rises. At a/M = 0.9, the reported constraint is ΔM/M ≤ 22.3853.</p>
<p>Because the high-mass branch predicts a shadow diameter beyond the EHT-compatible range, the model disfavors dark-matter configurations large enough to trigger the new outer-horizon branch near the two observed black holes. Within the study&#8217;s assumptions, the dark matter must either be absent from the immediate vicinity or have a localized mass below the relevant critical value. These limits are conditional on the piecewise, electromagnetically inert shell model, its chosen shell geometry and the adopted horizon and shadow calculations, rather than being general constraints on all possible dark-matter distributions.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Theoretical modeling of rotating black holes surrounded by finite dark-matter shells and their observable shadows</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Shadow of rotating black hole surrounded by dark matter</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Feng, H., Cai, Z., Yang, R.-J., &amp; Zhang, J. (2026). Shadow of rotating black hole surrounded by dark matter. <em>The European Physical Journal C, 86</em>(10), Article 1180. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16437-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16437-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16437-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16437-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> black holes, dark matter, black hole shadows, Kerr spacetime, Event Horizon Telescope, null geodesics, Newman–Janis Algorithm, M87*, Sagittarius A*, Hawking radiation, Shadow, rotating</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">326403</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>JWST study finds metal-rich gas around Milky Way’s central black hole</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/jwst-study-finds-metal-rich-gas-around-milky-ways-central-black-hole/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 23:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[around]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astrophysics of gas and dust around black holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black-hole activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[element enrichment near black holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galactic center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galactic center star formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxy evolution and black hole growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrared observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Webb Space Telescope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Webb Space Telescope galaxy observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal enrichment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal-rich gas around supermassive black holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milky Way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milky Way central black hole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sagittarius A*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sagittarius A* gas composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectroscopy of galactic core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star and gas co-evolution in galaxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stellar explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stellar explosions and black hole feeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ways]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=315943</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A peer-reviewed JWST study found that metal-rich gas around Sagittarius A* resembles many nearby stars, while a companion analysis showed that the gas cannot reliably record the black hole’s past outbursts.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gas orbiting Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, is rich in elements heavier than helium and hydrogen, according to a peer-reviewed study led by researchers at McGill University’s Trottier Space Institute. The researchers said the enrichment probably resulted from stars that exploded and released material into the black hole’s surroundings over time. The gas also has a composition similar to that of many stars orbiting Sagittarius A*, suggesting that the gas and stars may have formed together. These findings come from imaging analysis of observations made with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST).</p>
<p>Lead author Nicole Ford, a PhD student in Professor Daryl Haggard’s research group in McGill’s Department of Physics, said the study examined the properties of material available to the black hole, including gas, dust and orbiting stars. “We know there’s a black hole at the centre of our galaxy pulling material into itself, but we see that it’s eating a lot less material than other supermassive black holes, and more slowly,” Ford said. In astronomy, “metals” includes any element heavier than hydrogen and helium, such as carbon, oxygen, iron or gold. The presence of metals influences how quickly gas cools, which in turn affects how readily the gas can be drawn into a black hole.</p>
<p>The team used JWST infrared observations to distinguish the heat signatures of multiple gas clouds orbiting near Sagittarius A* and to measure the metal composition of each cloud. The analysis investigated the ionization structure and metal enrichment of the Galactic Center minispiral. A companion study led by McGill Banting Postdoctoral Fellow Mayura Balakrishnan tested whether the surrounding gas could preserve evidence of previous bursts of energy from the black hole. The companion analysis found that the gas emission is shaped by local conditions, making it difficult to isolate the black hole’s influence. Rather than ruling out past outbursts, the result indicates that the gas cannot provide a reliable history of Sagittarius A*’s activity.</p>
<p>Ford said that understanding how the black hole attracts material will require comparing the observations with simulations of how gas evolves over longer timescales. The new results may help researchers understand how metals are distributed around supermassive black holes in more distant galaxies, as well as the processes that supplied Earth with many elements. Sagittarius A* is closer to Earth, and therefore easier to see, than any other supermassive black hole, providing a nearby setting in which the composition of gas around a galactic center can be studied in detail. However, the findings do not directly explain the black hole’s comparatively slow consumption of material, and the companion study shows that this gas cannot serve as a dependable record of past black-hole bursts. The two papers were published in <em>The Astronomical Journal</em> and <em>The Astrophysical Journal</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> JWST observations of metal enrichment and ionization in gas orbiting the Milky Way’s central black hole</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> The gas around Milky Way&#x27;s central black hole is rich in metals, study finds</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> The gas around Milky Way&#x27;s central black hole is rich in metals, study finds. <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1148340" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a> (Bibliographic details unavailable.)</p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Sagittarius A*, Milky Way, James Webb Space Telescope, galactic center, metal enrichment, infrared observations, stellar explosions, black-hole activity, around, Milky, Way&#x27;s, central</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">315943</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neutrinos Skirting Black Holes Could Reveal the Universe&#8217;s Hidden Dark Matter</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/neutrinos-skirting-black-holes-could-reveal-the-universes-hidden-dark-matter/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 09:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astrophysics of dark matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black holes and dark matter interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmic neutrinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark matter detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark sector exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decoherence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general relativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gravitational lensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M87*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutrino astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutrino black holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutrino flavor oscillations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutrino oscillation mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutrino oscillations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutrino physics research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle astrophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle physics and cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phantom field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phantom field dark matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum effects near black holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sagittarius A*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spacetime curvature]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=267295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new theoretical study shows that dark matter surrounding black holes subtly alters neutrino flavor oscillations, offering a potential new way to probe the dark sector through neutrino astronomy.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neutrinos are the ghost particles of the cosmos: trillions of them pass through your body every second without leaving a trace, and they routinely cross entire galaxies unimpeded. But what happens when these elusive particles skim past a black hole wrapped in dark matter? A new theoretical study published in The European Physical Journal C suggests that the answer could open an entirely new window onto the dark sector of the universe, the mysterious components that make up roughly 95 percent of everything that exists. The research, led by Ikrom Ergashov and colleagues at New Uzbekistan University together with collaborators in Pakistan, Azerbaijan and China, calculates for the first time in detail how a black hole surrounded by dark matter in a phantom field background distorts the delicate quantum dance known as neutrino flavor oscillations.</p>
<p>Neutrino oscillations are one of the most remarkable phenomena in modern particle physics. Neutrinos come in three flavors, electron, muon and tau, but they do not travel as pure flavors. Instead, each flavor is a quantum superposition of three mass states, mixed together by the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata matrix. As a neutrino races through space, these mass states accumulate slightly different quantum phases, and the relative phase difference determines the probability that the particle will be detected as a different flavor than the one it started as. The oscillation phase depends on the neutrino&#8217;s energy, the squared mass differences between the eigenstates, and the distance traveled. In flat spacetime the formula is elegant and well tested by experiments such as Super-Kamiokande, IceCube and Borexino. Curved spacetime, however, changes the game, because the phase must now be computed along the curved geodesic that the particle actually follows.</p>
<p>The team modeled a static, spherically symmetric Schwarzschild black hole immersed in what they call DMPF, dark matter within a phantom field background. This geometry, built from an Einstein-Hilbert action augmented with a scalar field, adds a logarithmic correction to the standard black hole metric, governed by a parameter a that encodes the density of the entire dark sector. The energy density of this dark component falls off as one over the cube of the distance from the hole, a profile consistent with the nearly flat rotation curves observed in spiral galaxies. By varying the dimensionless ratio a/M, where M is the black hole mass, the researchers could dial the strength of the dark matter influence up and down and watch how the neutrino oscillation patterns responded.</p>
<p>The first major result is a striking cancellation. For neutrinos traveling purely radially, straight outward from the black hole, the gravitational contributions to the oscillation phase exactly cancel. The phase difference between mass eigenstates ends up depending only on the radial distance, the mass-squared splitting and the neutrino energy, precisely as it would in flat spacetime. In other words, a neutrino beaming directly away from a black hole carries no memory of the gravitational maelstrom it just escaped, at least not in its oscillation phase. This result follows from expanding the covariant phase integral, built from the canonical momentum along the geodesic, in the ultra-relativistic limit where the neutrino mass is tiny compared with its energy, and it holds even in the presence of the dark matter logarithmic term.</p>
<p>The story changes dramatically for neutrinos whose paths are bent. When a trajectory is deflected by the gravitational field, characterized by a nonzero angular momentum and an impact parameter b, extra phase terms survive. The researchers derived analytical expressions showing that the dark matter parameter enters both as a small correction to the effective mass-splitting coefficient and as an additive logarithmic contribution to the total accumulated phase. When gravitational lensing splits the journey into two segments, from source to the point of closest approach and from there to the detector, the phase acquires further corrections involving the lens mass and the logarithm of the source and detector distances. Gravitational lensing thus does more than bend the neutrino&#8217;s path; it imprints measurable modifications on the interference pattern that determines which flavor arrives at the detector.</p>
<p>To make these abstract calculations concrete, the team computed two-flavor transition probabilities, electron to muon, for realistic astrophysical configurations. They considered three lensing objects: the Sun, Sagittarius A*, the four-million-solar-mass black hole at the center of our galaxy, and M87*, the 6.5-billion-solar-mass giant famously imaged by the Event Horizon Telescope. For Sagittarius A*, Event Horizon Telescope shadow observations constrain the dark sector parameter to values up to roughly 0.15 at two sigma, while for M87* the bound reaches about 0.33. The corresponding neutrino energies span an enormous range: solar neutrinos carry around 10 megaelectronvolts, astrophysical neutrinos detected by IceCube from sources such as the blazar TXS 0506+056 and the Seyfert galaxy NGC 1068 reach 10^8 to 10^10 megaelectronvolts, and hypothetical cosmogenic neutrinos, produced when ultra-high-energy cosmic rays collide with cosmic microwave background photons, could climb to the exaelectronvolt scale near M87*.</p>
<p>The numerical results reveal a rich structure. Plotting the transition probability as a function of the azimuthal angle of the source, the curves shift noticeably as the dark sector parameter is increased from zero, the pure Schwarzschild case, to a/M values of 0.05 and 0.1. The probability is highly sensitive to the dark sector density parameter, and it also depends on whether the neutrino mass hierarchy is normal or inverted. Intriguingly, the team uncovered a degeneracy: different combinations of lens mass and dark matter parameter can produce the same oscillation probability. For a fixed probability, achieving the same flavor transition under an inverted hierarchy requires a slightly larger a/M than under a normal hierarchy, and this difference grows with mass. This degeneracy is both a challenge and an opportunity, since breaking it with independent mass measurements could turn neutrino detectors into dark matter probes.</p>
<p>The study also tackled a subtler question: what happens when neutrinos are treated realistically as Gaussian wave packets rather than infinite plane waves? Wave packets of different mass states gradually separate in space, causing the oscillation pattern to wash out, a process called decoherence. Because gravity dilates proper time, neutrinos in curved spacetime must travel farther before their wave packets lose overlap. The researchers derived the effective damping factor for lensed trajectories and found that the dark matter background exerts only a minimal influence on decoherence. Instead, the absolute neutrino mass is the dominant factor determining the coherence length and the duration over which oscillations persist. Once decoherence sets in, the dark sector parameter has a negligible effect on the transition probability envelope, meaning that any dark matter signature must be extracted from neutrinos that are still coherent when detected.</p>
<p>The implications are tantalizing. In the Solar System, the dark matter density bound at one astronomical unit is so stringent that the parameter a/M is capped at roughly 7.5 times 10 to the minus 12, making dark matter effects on solar neutrino oscillations utterly unobservable with current techniques. But around supermassive black holes like Sagittarius A* and M87*, the allowed dark sector parameters are many orders of magnitude larger, and the extreme gravitational lensing amplifies the phase corrections. Future neutrino astronomy, whether through next-generation IceCube extensions, kilometer-cubic detectors in the Mediterranean, or hypothetical cosmogenic neutrino observatories, could in principle compare observed flavor ratios with the predictions of standard general relativity and detect the fingerprint of the dark halo surrounding these monsters.</p>
<p>Of course, this remains a theoretical edifice, resting on a two-flavor approximation and idealized geometries, and no one has yet observed a neutrino oscillation modified by dark matter. But the work demonstrates that the intersection of quantum interference and strong-field gravity is not merely a curiosity; it is a potential measurement channel. Any departure from the predictions of pure general relativity in neutrino flavor ratios arriving from the vicinity of compact objects would constitute compelling evidence for modified gravity or for the dark environments in which black holes are embedded. As detectors grow more sensitive and theoretical models more refined, the humble neutrino, the particle that barely interacts with anything, may become one of humanity&#8217;s sharpest tools for mapping the invisible universe that surrounds every black hole.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of dark matter in a phantom field background on neutrino flavor oscillations near black holes</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Probing dark matter and phantom field effects on neutrino oscillations around black holes</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ergashov, I., Narzilloev, B., Hussain, I., &amp; Ahmedov, B. (2026). Probing dark matter and phantom field effects on neutrino oscillations around black holes. <em>The European Physical Journal C, 86</em>(9), Article 1032. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16278-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16278-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16278-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16278-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> neutrino oscillations, dark matter, black holes, phantom field, gravitational lensing, general relativity, neutrino astronomy, decoherence, Sagittarius A*, M87*, particle astrophysics, spacetime curvature</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">267295</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dark Matter Halos Leave Only a Whisper on a Black Hole&#8217;s Spacetime</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/dark-matter-halos-leave-only-a-whisper-on-a-black-holes-spacetime/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 01:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anisotropic fluid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hole and dark matter interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hole spacetime perturbations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark matter halo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark matter halos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of galactic dark matter halos on black hole spacetime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Einstein field equations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event Horizon Telescope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event horizon telescope imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general relativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gravitational lensing around dark matter halos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRAVITY Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications of dark matter for black hole observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of dark matter on black hole geometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mathematical analysis of black hole metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S2 star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sagittarius A*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schwarzschild black hole metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schwarzschild metric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shadow radius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spacetime curvature in dark matter environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theoretical models of black holes embedded in dark matter]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=236386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new exact solution of the Einstein field equations shows that a Schwarzschild black hole embedded in a dark matter halo retains a nearly vacuum-like spacetime, with predictions for the S2 star's orbit and the shadow of Sagittarius A* that match current observations.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Event Horizon Telescope unveiled the first image of a black hole in 2019, it confirmed not only that these gravitational monsters exist in the form predicted by general relativity, but also that their immediate surroundings can be probed with extraordinary precision. Since then, a tantalizing question has occupied theoretical physicists: what happens to the spacetime around a black hole when it is embedded in the dark matter halo that supposedly envelops every galaxy? A new study published in The European Physical Journal C tackles this problem with an unusual level of mathematical rigor, and its conclusion is as elegant as it is surprising. The dark matter surrounding a black like Sagittarius A* bends the geometry of spacetime so gently that the resulting metric remains almost indistinguishable from the classic vacuum solution described by Karl Schwarzschild more than a century ago.</p>
<p>The research team, led by M. Castillo Alarcón of the Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute in Mexico City, together with Leonel Bixano, I. A. Sarmiento-Alvarado, Claudio Salas-Pérez and the veteran dark matter theorist Tonatiuh Matos, set out to correct a persistent weakness in the literature. Most existing models of black holes wrapped in dark matter halos begin by assuming a relationship between the two fundamental functions that define a static, spherically symmetric spacetime: the temporal metric function A(r), which governs gravitational redshift and time dilation, and the radial metric function B(r), which governs spatial curvature along the radial direction. In the pure Schwarzschild vacuum solution these functions are exact reciprocals of one another, satisfying A(r)B(r) = 1. Many authors simply carry that reciprocal relation over to halo systems as a convenient ansatz, without checking whether the Einstein field equations actually permit it once matter is present.</p>
<p>Castillo Alarcón and colleagues refused to make that assumption. They started from the most general static, spherically symmetric line element, with A(r) and B(r) treated as fully independent functions, and modeled the dark matter halo as an anisotropic fluid, one whose radial pressure differs from its tangential pressure. This flexibility matters because dark matter need not behave like a perfect fluid; different microscopic candidates, from cold collisionless particles to ultralight scalar fields, can generate different stress-energy configurations. By feeding three widely used halo density profiles directly into the Einstein equations, the Burkert profile favored by observations of dwarf and low-surface-brightness galaxies, the Einasto profile that fits simulated halos so well, and the multistate scalar field dark matter model developed over decades by Matos and collaborators, the team solved for the metric functions, the radial pressure and the tangential pressure simultaneously, without imposing any of them by hand.</p>
<p>The construction works as follows. The radial function B(r) is determined by the total gravitational mass enclosed within a given radius, which combines the black hole mass with the accumulated halo mass. Crucially, the authors assume that dark matter vanishes inside a critical radius r_in, equal to three times the Schwarzschild radius, because any dark matter orbiting closer than the innermost stable circular orbit of a massive particle would be captured by the black hole. Inside that boundary the spacetime is exactly Schwarzschild, in accordance with Birkhoff&#8217;s theorem, though the surrounding halo imprints a uniform gravitational redshift on the inner vacuum region that cannot be removed globally. Outside the boundary, the temporal function A(r) is built from a deformation potential that measures precisely how the halo warps the clock rate relative to the isolated black hole case.</p>
<p>The radial pressure of the halo is reconstructed from the observed circular velocities of stars, using the exact relativistic relation between circular geodesics and the gravitational potential. The tangential pressure then follows from the conservation of the stress-energy tensor, the anisotropic generalization of the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equation that governs hydrostatic equilibrium in relativistic stars. With the full system in hand, the authors verified that all three density profiles satisfy the strong energy condition, meaning the halo source is physically reasonable rather than exotic in a pathological sense. They also demonstrated that the transition between the inner vacuum region and the outer halo at r_in satisfies the Darmois-Israel junction conditions: the induced metric and the extrinsic curvature match perfectly on both sides, so no thin shell of exotic surface matter, no surface pressure and no surface tension appear at the boundary. The halo begins smoothly, not as a membrane.</p>
<p>The headline result emerged from both numerical computation and a semi-analytical proof. Even though no reciprocal relation was ever assumed, the product A(r)B(r) equals one plus corrections of order ten to the minus six throughout the halo. The reason is a small dimensionless parameter that the authors call the halo strength, defined as eight pi times the gravitational constant times the central halo density times the square of the scale radius, divided by the square of the speed of light. For Milky Way parameters this factor is roughly a millionth. The Einstein equations show that the variation of the product A(r)B(r) is controlled entirely by this parameter, with the radial pressure contributing only a second-order correction and the tangential pressure not entering the relation at all. In other words, the reciprocal structure so often assumed in the literature is not an arbitrary guess; it is a derived consequence of the sheer weakness of the halo&#8217;s relativistic pull.</p>
<p>This finding has immediate practical value. Shadow calculations, gravitational lensing studies, quasinormal mode analyses and accretion disk models that adopt A(r) = 1/B(r) for halo systems can now do so with a theoretical license rather than a leap of faith. The authors note that the result is robust even if the sharp inner cutoff of the halo is replaced by a smooth taper, and that the three density profiles, despite their very different origins as phenomenological fits, simulation-motivated shapes and microscopic field theory constructions, produce nearly identical metric functions. From the perspective of light rays skimming the black hole, the team&#8217;s null geodesic calculations show that one essentially cannot tell whether the black hole is embedded in a halo or floating in perfect vacuum; the differences only become visible at distances far from the hole.</p>
<p>To test whether the model survives contact with reality, the researchers confronted it with two of the most precise measurements in modern astrophysics. The first is the pericenter precession of the star S2, which whips around Sagittarius A* every sixteen years on a highly eccentric orbit, passing within about fourteen hundred Schwarzschild radii of the black hole. The GRAVITY Collaboration has measured the relativistic precession of this orbit to remarkable accuracy. Integrating the geodesic equations in the halo spacetime for all three density profiles, the team obtained a precession of 12.1687 arcminutes per orbit, with a fitted scaling factor of 1.11 plus or minus 0.21, comfortably inside the observational range reported by GRAVITY.</p>
<p>The second test is the shadow of Sagittarius A* itself. Using the general formula for the angular radius of a shadow in a static, spherically symmetric spacetime, and adopting the measured distance to the galactic center of 8178 parsecs, the authors computed an angular diameter of 50.1746 microarcseconds for all three halo profiles. The Event Horizon Telescope reports 51.8 plus or minus 2.3 microarcseconds, so the prediction sits squarely within the error bars. Two independent observables, one probing the orbital dynamics of matter far from the hole and the other probing the bending of light near the photon sphere, are simultaneously satisfied. The dark matter halo, at least with the densities inferred for the Milky Way, does not push the spacetime outside what astronomers have already measured.</p>
<p>The study does leave honest caveats. The construction delivers a self-consistent static equilibrium but does not prove dynamical stability under radial perturbations; because the radial pressure depends nonlocally on the enclosed halo mass, a proper stability analysis would require solving the linearized Einstein equations with specified constitutive relations, a task the authors explicitly defer to future work. The treatment of the region inside the innermost stable orbit, where captured dark matter would accumulate, is also acknowledged as a simplification. Nevertheless, the paper&#8217;s central contribution stands: the near-reciprocity of the metric functions in black hole-halo systems is now a proven property rooted in the feeble relativistic strength of galactic dark matter, quantified by a single small parameter. As horizon-scale interferometry sharpens its resolution and stellar orbit monitoring extends to fainter stars closer to the event horizon, the framework offers theorists a rigorous foundation for asking the next question: how small a deviation from Schwarzschild would it take for the Event Horizon Telescope, or its successors, to finally see the dark matter that surrounds the shadow?</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Exact general relativistic modeling of a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a dark matter halo</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Determination of the metric of a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a halo of dark matter</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Alarcón, M. C., Bixano, L., Sarmiento-Alvarado, I. A., Salas-Pérez, C., &amp; Matos, T. (2026). Determination of the metric of a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a halo of dark matter. <em>The European Physical Journal C, 86</em>(9), Article 1100. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16375-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16375-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16375-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16375-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> black holes, dark matter, general relativity, Schwarzschild metric, dark matter halo, Sagittarius A*, Event Horizon Telescope, GRAVITY Collaboration, S2 star, anisotropic fluid, Einstein field equations, shadow radius</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">236386</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the Galactic Centre: Astronomers Map a Black Hole Ecosystem in Space and Time</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/inside-the-galactic-centre-astronomers-map-a-black-hole-ecosystem-in-space-and-time/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 12:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astrophysical insights into galaxy evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hole accretion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hole and gas reservoir interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circumnuclear disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circumnuclear disk structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fermi bubbles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galactic Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galactic Centre black hole ecosystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galactic evolution and gas flows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRAVITY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAU Symposium 405]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrared astrometry of stellar orbits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-scale space-time mapping of black holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear star cluster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear star cluster dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paradox of youth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sagittarius A*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star formation history in galactic nuclei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stellar dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supermassive black hole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supermassive black hole in Milky Way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symposium on galactic nucleus studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Very Large Telescope Interferometer observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-ray light echoes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=194055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Astronomers gathered at IAU Symposium 405 in Brno to present how the Milky Way's central black hole, nuclear star cluster and multiphase gas operate as one evolving ecosystem.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the heart of the Milky Way, some 26,000 light-years from Earth, lies the closest galactic nucleus we can study in detail: a crowded, violent and endlessly instructive region where a supermassive black hole weighing more than four million Suns binds together dense stellar populations, streams of multiphase gas and the relentless churn of galactic evolution. That region, the Galactic Centre, was the focus of the International Astronomical Union&#8217;s Symposium 405, hosted in Brno, Czech Republic, where astronomers from around the world gathered to consolidate a striking shift in perspective. Rather than treating the central black hole, the nuclear star cluster and the surrounding gas reservoirs as separate objects of study, the symposium framed them as a single connected ecosystem, evolving together across spatial scales from the event horizon out to the circumnuclear disk, and across time from the star-forming episodes of tens of millions of years ago to the flare-driven echoes still rippling through the interstellar medium today.</p>
<p>The observational foundation of this ecosystem view rests on decades of precision astrometry. Near-infrared monitoring of the innermost parsec, most notably by the GRAVITY instrument on the European Southern Observatory&#8217;s Very Large Telescope Interferometer, has tracked stars on bound orbits around the compact radio source Sagittarius A star, delivering the most convincing dynamical evidence that this object is indeed a supermassive black hole as described by general relativity. The S-cluster of stars, dominated by the luminous star S2 on its sixteen-year elliptical orbit, has been used to test relativistic effects including gravitational redshift and the Schwarzschild precession, while also pinning down the distance to the Galactic Centre to within a few percent. These measurements transform the central parsec into a precision laboratory where the interplay between stellar dynamics, black hole mass and relativistic gravity can be examined against exact predictions rather than qualitative expectations.</p>
<p>Yet the S-cluster presents one of the field&#8217;s most persistent puzzles: the so-called paradox of youth. The central parsec contains massive, luminous B-type and Wolf-Rayet stars whose lifetimes are measured in millions of years, far too short for them to have migrated from their presumed birth sites in the surrounding disk through standard dynamical friction. At the Brno symposium, participants revisited candidate solutions, including in-situ star formation within the dense accretion disk fragments of the past, tidal disruption of binary stars passing close to the black hole which leaves one captured star in a tight orbit, and exchange interactions in which the black hole swaps into a hard massive binary. Each mechanism leaves a different fingerprint in the distribution of orbital eccentricities and inclinations, and the latest modeling of the S-cluster&#8217;s phase-space structure suggests that no single channel explains every observed orbit, hinting at a layered formation history stretching back many millions of years.</p>
<p>Beyond the S-cluster lies the nuclear star cluster, a dense concentration of roughly ten million solar masses packed within about ten parsecs of the black hole. New analyses presented at the meeting explored how this cluster&#8217;s complex structure, with young stars preferentially rotating in a disk-like configuration at larger radii and older populations dominating closer in, encodes the history of gas inflow episodes triggered by the galactic bar. The nuclear cluster also serves as a gravitational anchor for less massive objects, and speakers examined the fate of stellar-mass black holes, neutron stars and white dwarfs that segregate toward the centre through mass segregation. Their predicted number densities, potentially tens of thousands of stellar remnants within the central parsec, carry consequences for gravitational-wave predictions and for the rates of tidal disruption events, in which stars venturing too close to Sagittarius A star are torn apart and briefly outshine much of the surrounding galaxy.</p>
<p>Gas dynamics formed the second pillar of the symposium. The circumnuclear disk, a ring of dense molecular material at radii of a few parsecs, regulates the flow of gas toward the central engine and episodically feeds, or starves, both accretion onto the black hole and star formation in the central molecular zone. Recent work on the ionized and neutral gas kinematics within the central parsec, including the mini-spiral structures that thread hot plasma through the cavity inside the circumnuclear disk, illustrated how inflow is inefficient and turbulent, with only a small fraction of the supplied material ever reaching the accretion flow. Sagittarius A star today accretes at a rate roughly a billion times below the Eddington limit, producing the faint, radiatively inefficient glow observed by near-infrared polarimetry and by the Event Horizon Telescope, which resolved the ring-like shadow of the black hole&#8217;s photon emission region in 2022.</p>
<p>That quiescent present contrasts dramatically with a far more active past, and the evidence is written in the largest structures of the Galactic Centre region. The Fermi bubbles, two gamma-ray-emitting lobes extending tens of thousands of light-years above and below the Galactic plane, together with the softer X-ray counterpart bubbles detected by the eROSITA instrument, testify to an energetic event several million years ago, plausibly a phase of rapid accretion onto Sagittarius A star or an intense nuclear starburst. Meeting discussions emphasized how the spectral gradients across these bubbles constrain the timing, energy budget and particle acceleration mechanisms of the outburst, with estimates of total injected energy in the range of tens of millions of supernova equivalents, sufficient to reshape the thermal history of the entire Galactic halo.</p>
<p>On smaller scales, X-ray observations of light echoes provide a time-lapse record of more recent activity. Reflections of X-ray photons from past flares, scattered by dense molecular clouds such as the famous MC2 complex near the Sagittarius B region, have been mapped as moving fronts of fluorescing iron, indicating that the central engine brightened substantially within the last few centuries. Modeling of these reverberation signals, combined with polarization measurements that can distinguish forward-scattered from back-scattered radiation, suggests flare luminosities that transiently approached a significant fraction of the Eddington limit, a striking reversal of the present-day faintness. Speakers noted that continuous monitoring of these echoes offers an essentially forensic technique for reconstructing the accretion history of a low-luminosity galactic nucleus, a technique now being extended to nearby external galaxies where analogous echoes betray dormant black holes in action.</p>
<p>The Galactic Centre also functions as the Rosetta stone for galactic nuclei everywhere. Because the Milky Way&#8217;s central black hole is roughly ten thousand times less massive than those powering the most luminous quasars, phenomena observed at different scales and timescales in active galaxies can be scaled and tested locally. Symposium sessions drew explicit connections between the scaling of accretion flows, the physics of relativistic jets, the coupling between black hole feedback and star formation, and the secular evolution of gas driven inward by galactic bars. Comparative studies of nearby low-luminosity nuclei, combined with the Milky Way&#8217;s uniquely resolvable environment, allow astronomers to trace how a galactic nucleus transitions between quiescence and activity, and how feedback from the central engine regulates the fuel supply in a self-limiting loop that shapes the growth of galaxies over cosmic time.</p>
<p>The meeting also spotlighted the computational and observational infrastructure driving the field forward. General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the accretion flow around Sagittarius A star, radiative transfer modeling of its polarization variability, and N-body models of the nuclear star cluster&#8217;s formation now operate at resolutions and statistical sophistication that can be directly confronted with GRAVITY, the Event Horizon Telescope, ALMA, Chandra, XRISM and the upcoming ELT datasets. High-cadence monitoring campaigns of the black hole&#8217;s infrared and submillimeter flares are converging on a picture in which magnetic reconnection and orbiting plasma instabilities generate the observed variability, linking microphysical processes near the horizon to macroscopic structures visible across the electromagnetic spectrum. As these instruments mature over the coming decade, the Galactic Centre ecosystem that the Brno symposium so comprehensively surveyed will be tested not as a collection of separate puzzles, but as a single evolutionary system whose past activity, present faintness and future episodes of renewed feeding can be read directly from the stars, gas and echoes it leaves behind.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The Milky Way Galactic Centre as a laboratory for studying supermassive black holes, stellar dynamics and multiphase gas in galactic nuclei.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Traversing the Galactic Centre in space and time</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zajaček, M., Czerny, B., Mondek, M., Mitra, S., Labaj, M., Ondro, T., Janík, J., &amp; Dušek, J. (2026). Traversing the Galactic Centre in space and time. <em>Nature Astronomy</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-026-02958-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-026-02958-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-026-02958-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41550-026-02958-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Galactic Centre, Sagittarius A*, supermassive black hole, nuclear star cluster, GRAVITY, stellar dynamics, circumnuclear disk, Fermi bubbles, X-ray light echoes, IAU Symposium 405, black hole accretion, paradox of youth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">194055</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
