<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RNA sequencing and imaging techniques &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/rna-sequencing-and-imaging-techniques/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 02:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>AI Model Reads RNA Sequences to Predict Where They Work Inside Cells</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ai-model-reads-rna-sequences-to-predict-where-they-work-inside-cells/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 02:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI-driven biological predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioinformatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMC Bioinformatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circRNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circular RNAs as molecular sponges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational models for RNA subcellular localization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning in transcriptomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disease implications of RNA distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic gating mechanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERNIE-RNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene regulation by RNA localization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lncRNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miRNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-scale convolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-coding RNAs and their cellular roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-trained language models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProtRNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNA function and cellular compartmentalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNA localization prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNA sequencing and imaging techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNA subcellular localization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subcellular RNA transport mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcriptomics data analysis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=233250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in China have developed GEPMC-Loc, a dynamic gated ensemble network that fuses pre-trained language models with multi-scale convolution to predict where RNA molecules localize within cells.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inside every cell, RNA molecules are constantly on the move. Long non-coding RNAs shuttle to the nucleus to help regulate genes, microRNAs settle into the cytoplasm where they silence messenger transcripts, and circular RNAs take up posts in both compartments, acting as molecular sponges and scaffolds. Where an RNA molecule ends up is not a trivial detail of cellular housekeeping; it is often the key to what that molecule actually does. A transcript confined to the nucleus cannot regulate translation, and a cytoplasmic RNA cannot participate in chromatin remodeling. Knowing the subcellular address of an RNA is therefore one of the most informative clues biologists can have when trying to decipher its function, its role in post-transcriptional regulation, and its possible involvement in disease.</p>
<p>Experimental techniques for mapping RNA localization, such as subcellular fractionation followed by sequencing or fluorescence-based imaging, are powerful but expensive, slow, and difficult to scale to the thousands of transcripts being discovered by modern transcriptomics projects. This bottleneck has driven a sustained effort to build computational predictors that can read an RNA sequence and infer its destination. Over the past decade, these predictors have evolved from simple models built on hand-crafted features, such as nucleotide composition and sequence motifs, toward deep learning architectures that learn representations directly from raw sequence data. Yet a stubborn problem has persisted: different ways of representing an RNA sequence capture different kinds of information, and no single representation tells the whole story.</p>
<p>A team of researchers at Jingdezhen Ceramic University in Jiangxi, China, has now tackled this integration problem head-on. In a study published in BMC Bioinformatics, Changping Chen, Zi Liu, Wang-Ren Qiu, Liping Zhao, and Xuan Xiao introduce GEPMC-Loc, a dynamic gated ensemble network that fuses pre-trained language models with attention-enhanced multi-scale convolutional feature learning to predict RNA subcellular localization. The work, which appeared on 14 September 2026 as an open-access article, addresses a question that has become central to computational biology in the era of large pre-trained models: when several powerful encoders each see the same biological sequence differently, how do you decide whose opinion to trust?</p>
<p>The architecture of GEPMC-Loc is built around three parallel feature extraction branches, each offering a distinct perspective on the input RNA sequence. The first branch employs ERNIE-RNA, a pre-trained RNA language model that has absorbed statistical regularities from vast collections of RNA sequences. Because of its training regime, ERNIE-RNA produces what the authors describe as structure-aware semantic features, embeddings that implicitly encode information about how nucleotides relate to one another in the folded architecture of the molecule. The second branch uses ProtRNA, an intriguing transfer-learning strategy that borrows representations from a pre-trained protein language model. Although proteins and RNAs are chemically different, protein language models capture evolutionary and physicochemical patterns that, when transferred to RNA sequences, supply complementary information about the biophysical character of the transcript.</p>
<p>The third branch steps away from language models entirely and returns to classical convolutional neural network machinery, but with a twist. An attention-enhanced multi-scale convolutional module scans the sequence with convolutional filters of different sizes, allowing it to detect local sequence patterns at multiple granularities simultaneously. Short filters can pick up compact motifs such as localization signals a few nucleotides long, while wider filters capture longer-range compositional patterns. The attention enhancement lets the module weigh which of these local patterns matter most for a given sequence. Together, the three branches span a spectrum of feature types: semantic and structural knowledge distilled from large-scale pre-training, transferred physicochemical intuition, and explicitly learned local sequence signatures.</p>
<p>The genuinely novel element of GEPMC-Loc, and the source of its name, is the sample-aware dynamic gating mechanism that sits on top of these branches. Rather than fixing the contribution of each branch in advance or averaging their outputs uniformly, the gating network evaluates each input sequence individually and adaptively adjusts how much weight each branch receives in the final integrated representation. For one RNA, the structure-aware embeddings from ERNIE-RNA might dominate; for another, the convolutional branch&#8217;s local pattern detection might prove more informative. This per-sample flexibility means the model does not have to commit to a single best encoder, a significant advantage given that lncRNAs, miRNAs, and circRNAs differ dramatically in length, structure, and the nature of their localization signals.</p>
<p>Training such a multi-branch system poses its own challenges, and the authors address them with a multi-objective joint learning strategy. Instead of training only the final fused classifier, GEPMC-Loc optimizes branch-specific learning objectives alongside the ultimate prediction task. Each branch is encouraged to become individually competent at the localization problem, while the gating and fusion layers learn to combine their strengths. This joint optimization prevents a common failure mode of ensemble systems, in which one dominant branch effectively silences the others during training, leaving the architecture with the illusion of diversity but none of its benefits. The result is a network in which all three feature extractors remain active contributors throughout learning.</p>
<p>The researchers evaluated GEPMC-Loc on three benchmark datasets covering the three major RNA classes: long non-coding RNAs, microRNAs, and circular RNAs. Performance was assessed with a battery of standard metrics, including overall Accuracy, Macro-Precision, Macro-Recall, and Macro-F1, the macro-averaged variants being particularly important because they ensure that performance on smaller localization classes is not masked by dominant ones. Across these datasets and metrics, GEPMC-Loc achieved competitive results, demonstrating that the dynamic gating approach generalizes across RNA types rather than being tuned to a single transcript family. The breadth of evaluation matters, because a predictor that works only for one class of RNA offers limited utility as transcriptomics pipelines continue to uncover novel transcripts of every conceivable shape and size.</p>
<p>The significance of this work extends beyond the specific benchmarks. It exemplifies a broader trend in bioinformatics in which pre-trained language models, originally developed in the natural language processing world and later adapted to proteins, are now being repurposed and cross-pollinated across molecular domains. The use of ProtRNA to transfer knowledge from a protein language model to RNA sequences is a particularly striking example of this cross-domain borrowing, betting that the statistical structure learned from one alphabet of life can illuminate another. At the same time, the dynamic gating mechanism offers a template for a recurring design question: as the community accumulates an ever-growing zoo of pre-trained encoders, ensemble frameworks that can weigh their contributions on a per-sample basis may become the standard way to harvest their combined power.</p>
<p>For experimental biologists, accurate computational localization predictions could serve as a first-pass filter, prioritizing which transcripts to study in the lab and generating hypotheses about function for RNAs that have never been characterized. For clinicians and drug developers, the stakes are higher still: many non-coding RNAs are emerging as disease biomarkers and therapeutic targets, and knowing where a candidate RNA operates within the cell shapes both its plausibility as a target and the design of molecules aimed at it. The GEPMC-Loc framework, funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and provincial research programs, is available as open-access research, and its authors suggest it provides an effective computational foundation for localization prediction across different RNA types. As the volume of unannotated RNA sequences continues to explode, tools that can read a string of nucleotides and intelligently decide where that molecule belongs in the cell are likely to become indispensable fixtures of the computational biology toolkit.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Computational prediction of RNA subcellular localization using pre-trained language models and dynamic gated ensemble deep learning</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> GEPMC-Loc: a dynamic gated ensemble network fusing pre-trained language models and multi-scale convolution for RNA subcellular localization</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Chen, C., Liu, Z., Qiu, W.-R., Zhao, L., &amp; Xiao, X. (2026). GEPMC-Loc: a dynamic gated ensemble network fusing pre-trained language models and multi-scale convolution for RNA subcellular localization. <em>BMC Bioinformatics</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-026-06646-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-026-06646-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-026-06646-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s12859-026-06646-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> RNA subcellular localization, pre-trained language models, ERNIE-RNA, ProtRNA, dynamic gating mechanism, multi-scale convolution, deep learning, lncRNA, miRNA, circRNA, bioinformatics, BMC Bioinformatics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">233250</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
